Kimco Realty Corporation
Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KIM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIM | $23.28 | -0.83% | 15.9B | 27.07 | $0.87 | +4.33% |
| SPG | $203.30 | +1.14% | 66.8B | 14.31 | $14.37 | +4.25% |
| O | $62.12 | -0.38% | 58.3B | 51.25 | $1.22 | +5.17% |
| SPG-PJ | $54.20 | -0.13% | 56B | 8.00 | $6.78 | +4.25% |
| KIM-PN | $60.70 | +0.00% | 40.9B | N/A | N/A | +4.33% |
| REG | $77.12 | -0.77% | 14.2B | 26.67 | $2.91 | +3.77% |
| KIM-PM | $20.36 | -0.59% | 13.8B | 12.39 | $1.65 | +4.33% |
| KIM-PL | $19.69 | -0.56% | 13.3B | 12.00 | $1.65 | +4.33% |
| FRT | $114.77 | -0.56% | 10B | 20.03 | $5.77 | +3.90% |
| ADC | $75.87 | -0.68% | 9.2B | 41.37 | $1.85 | +4.08% |
Stock Comparison
KIM vs SPG Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while SPG trades at $203.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPG's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check SPG's competition here
KIM vs O Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, O has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while O trades at $62.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas O's P/E ratio is 51.25. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check O's competition here
KIM vs SPG-PJ Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while SPG-PJ trades at $54.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check SPG-PJ's competition here
KIM vs KIM-PN Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while KIM-PN trades at $60.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check KIM-PN's competition here
KIM vs REG Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while REG trades at $77.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check REG's competition here
KIM vs KIM-PM Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while KIM-PM trades at $20.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check KIM-PM's competition here
KIM vs KIM-PL Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while KIM-PL trades at $19.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check KIM-PL's competition here
KIM vs FRT Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while FRT trades at $114.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check FRT's competition here
KIM vs ADC Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while ADC trades at $75.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 41.37. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check ADC's competition here
KIM vs BRX Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while BRX trades at $29.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check BRX's competition here
KIM vs NNN Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while NNN trades at $44.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check NNN's competition here
KIM vs FRT-PC Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while FRT-PC trades at $19.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check FRT-PC's competition here
KIM vs MAC Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while MAC trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is -30.89. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check MAC's competition here
KIM vs KRG Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while KRG trades at $26.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 20.27. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check KRG's competition here
KIM vs PECO Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while PECO trades at $39.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 43.10. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check PECO's competition here
KIM vs REGCP Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while REGCP trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check REGCP's competition here
KIM vs SKT Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while SKT trades at $35.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 34.01. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check SKT's competition here
KIM vs REGCO Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while REGCO trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check REGCO's competition here
KIM vs CURB Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while CURB trades at $27.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 92.33. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check CURB's competition here
KIM vs AKR Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while AKR trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 69.65. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check AKR's competition here
KIM vs FCPT Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while FCPT trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check FCPT's competition here
KIM vs IVT Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while IVT trades at $30.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 22.31. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check IVT's competition here
KIM vs ROIC Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check ROIC's competition here
KIM vs GTY Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while GTY trades at $33.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check GTY's competition here
KIM vs ADC-PA Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while ADC-PA trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check ADC-PA's competition here
KIM vs NTST Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while NTST trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is 172.75. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check NTST's competition here
KIM vs ALEX Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while ALEX trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check ALEX's competition here
KIM vs CBL Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while CBL trades at $45.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check CBL's competition here
KIM vs ALX Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while ALX trades at $231.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 58.28. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check ALX's competition here
KIM vs RPT-PD Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check RPT-PD's competition here
KIM vs WSR Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 975.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while WSR trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 19.77. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check WSR's competition here
KIM vs BFS Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 844.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while BFS trades at $34.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 32.48. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check BFS's competition here
KIM vs UBP Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check UBP's competition here
KIM vs UBA Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check UBA's competition here
KIM vs UBP-PK Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check UBP-PK's competition here
KIM vs BFS-PD Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 759M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while BFS-PD trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check BFS-PD's competition here
KIM vs RVI Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 674.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while RVI trades at $68.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -63.68. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RVI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check RVI's competition here
KIM vs UBP-PH Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check UBP-PH's competition here
KIM vs BFS-PE Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 558M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while BFS-PE trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check BFS-PE's competition here
KIM vs SITC-PA Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check SITC-PA's competition here
KIM vs PINE Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 315.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while PINE trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is -238.62. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check PINE's competition here
KIM vs SITC Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 291.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while SITC trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.67. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check SITC's competition here
KIM vs CDR-PB Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 273.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while CDR-PB trades at $19.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check CDR-PB's competition here
KIM vs CDR-PC Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 271.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while CDR-PC trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -4.51. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check CDR-PC's competition here
KIM vs SRG-PA Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 147.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while SRG-PA trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -11.51. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check SRG-PA's competition here
KIM vs SRG Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 147M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while SRG trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check SRG's competition here
KIM vs WHLRL Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 83.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while WHLRL trades at $83.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -42.83. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check WHLRL's competition here
KIM vs WHLRP Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while WHLRP trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check WHLRP's competition here
KIM vs WHLRD Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while WHLRD trades at $35.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -19.06. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check WHLRD's competition here
KIM vs WHLR Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 76.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while WHLR trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check WHLR's competition here
KIM vs NNN-PF Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check NNN-PF's competition here
KIM vs HMG Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check HMG's competition here
KIM vs CDR Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check CDR's competition here
KIM vs WPG Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check WPG's competition here
KIM vs WRI Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check WRI's competition here
KIM vs PEI-PC Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check PEI-PC's competition here
KIM vs PEI Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PEI's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check PEI's competition here
KIM vs EQY Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, EQY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while EQY trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas EQY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EQY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to EQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check EQY's competition here
KIM vs PEI-PD Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check PEI-PD's competition here
KIM vs BPYU Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check BPYU's competition here
KIM vs PEI-PB Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check PEI-PB's competition here
KIM vs BPYUP Comparison May 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 15.9B. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $23.28, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 27.07, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check BPYUP's competition here