Kimco Realty Corporation
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for KIM
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for KIM
Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KIM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIM | $24.19 | +1.85% | 16.3B | 29.14 | $0.83 | +4.21% |
| SPG | $206.23 | +2.42% | 67B | 14.55 | $14.17 | +4.19% |
| O | $65.09 | +0.70% | 60.7B | 55.61 | $1.17 | +4.96% |
| SPG-PJ | $54.22 | +0.06% | 55.8B | 7.97 | $6.78 | +4.19% |
| KIM-PN | $60.55 | +0.67% | 40.6B | N/A | N/A | +4.21% |
| REG | $80.93 | +1.61% | 14.8B | 28.70 | $2.82 | +3.61% |
| KIM-PM | $20.14 | -0.05% | 13.6B | 12.23 | $1.65 | +4.21% |
| KIM-PL | $19.67 | +0.36% | 13.3B | 12.00 | $1.65 | +4.21% |
| FRT | $112.53 | +2.26% | 9.7B | 24.04 | $4.68 | +4.00% |
| ADC | $79.46 | +0.67% | 9.5B | 44.89 | $1.77 | +3.92% |
Stock Comparison
KIM vs SPG Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while SPG trades at $206.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPG's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check SPG's competition here
KIM vs O Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, O has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while O trades at $65.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas O's P/E ratio is 55.61. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check O's competition here
KIM vs SPG-PJ Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while SPG-PJ trades at $54.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check SPG-PJ's competition here
KIM vs KIM-PN Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 40.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while KIM-PN trades at $60.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check KIM-PN's competition here
KIM vs REG Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while REG trades at $80.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 28.70. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check REG's competition here
KIM vs KIM-PM Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while KIM-PM trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check KIM-PM's competition here
KIM vs KIM-PL Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while KIM-PL trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check KIM-PL's competition here
KIM vs FRT Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while FRT trades at $112.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check FRT's competition here
KIM vs ADC Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while ADC trades at $79.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 44.89. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check ADC's competition here
KIM vs BRX Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while BRX trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check BRX's competition here
KIM vs NNN Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while NNN trades at $45.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check NNN's competition here
KIM vs FRT-PC Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while FRT-PC trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check FRT-PC's competition here
KIM vs MAC Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while MAC trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is -28.59. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check MAC's competition here
KIM vs KRG Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while KRG trades at $26.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check KRG's competition here
KIM vs PECO Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while PECO trades at $39.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 44.99. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check PECO's competition here
KIM vs REGCP Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while REGCP trades at $23.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check REGCP's competition here
KIM vs SKT Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while SKT trades at $37.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 37.40. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check SKT's competition here
KIM vs REGCO Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while REGCO trades at $22.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check REGCO's competition here
KIM vs CURB Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while CURB trades at $28.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 76.32. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check CURB's competition here
KIM vs AKR Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while AKR trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 217.30. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check AKR's competition here
KIM vs FCPT Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while FCPT trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check FCPT's competition here
KIM vs IVT Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while IVT trades at $32.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check IVT's competition here
KIM vs ROIC Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check ROIC's competition here
KIM vs GTY Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while GTY trades at $34.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 25.64. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check GTY's competition here
KIM vs ADC-PA Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while ADC-PA trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check ADC-PA's competition here
KIM vs NTST Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while NTST trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is 261.06. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check NTST's competition here
KIM vs ALEX Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while ALEX trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check ALEX's competition here
KIM vs CBL Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while CBL trades at $43.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check CBL's competition here
KIM vs ALX Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while ALX trades at $252.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 46.06. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check ALX's competition here
KIM vs RPT-PD Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check RPT-PD's competition here
KIM vs WSR Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 973.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while WSR trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check WSR's competition here
KIM vs BFS Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while BFS trades at $34.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 31.59. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check BFS's competition here
KIM vs UBP Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check UBP's competition here
KIM vs UBA Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check UBA's competition here
KIM vs UBP-PK Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check UBP-PK's competition here
KIM vs BFS-PD Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 758.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while BFS-PD trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check BFS-PD's competition here
KIM vs UBP-PH Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check UBP-PH's competition here
KIM vs BFS-PE Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 552.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while BFS-PE trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check BFS-PE's competition here
KIM vs SITC-PA Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check SITC-PA's competition here
KIM vs RVI Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 317.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while RVI trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -29.99. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RVI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check RVI's competition here
KIM vs PINE Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 299.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while PINE trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is -90.18. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PINE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check PINE's competition here
KIM vs SITC Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 292.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while SITC trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.66. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check SITC's competition here
KIM vs CDR-PB Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 277M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while CDR-PB trades at $20.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check CDR-PB's competition here
KIM vs CDR-PC Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 274.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while CDR-PC trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check CDR-PC's competition here
KIM vs SRG-PA Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 156.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while SRG-PA trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -12.21. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check SRG-PA's competition here
KIM vs SRG Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 150.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while SRG trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check SRG's competition here
KIM vs WHLRL Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 75.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while WHLRL trades at $80.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -42.83. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check WHLRL's competition here
KIM vs WHLRP Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while WHLRP trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check WHLRP's competition here
KIM vs WHLRD Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while WHLRD trades at $36.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -19.59. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check WHLRD's competition here
KIM vs WHLR Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 137.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while WHLR trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check WHLR's competition here
KIM vs WRI Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check WRI's competition here
KIM vs PEI-PB Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check PEI-PB's competition here
KIM vs PEI Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check PEI's competition here
KIM vs PEI-PC Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check PEI-PC's competition here
KIM vs EQY Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, EQY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while EQY trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas EQY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EQY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to EQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check EQY's competition here
KIM vs CDR Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check CDR's competition here
KIM vs PEI-PD Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check PEI-PD's competition here
KIM vs WPG Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check WPG's competition here
KIM vs NNN-PF Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check NNN-PF's competition here
KIM vs BPYU Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check BPYU's competition here
KIM vs BPYUP Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check BPYUP's competition here
KIM vs HMG Comparison April 2026
KIM plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KIM stands at 16.3B. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KIM is priced at $24.19, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KIM currently has a P/E ratio of 29.14, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, KIM's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KIM is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KIM.Check HMG's competition here