Urstadt Biddle Properties Inc.
Urstadt Biddle Properties Inc. UBA Peers
See (UBA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBA | $21.14 | -1.81% | 832.2M | 34.66 | $0.61 | N/A |
| O | $57.42 | -0.39% | 51.9B | 52.20 | $1.10 | +5.55% |
| SPG-PJ | $58.35 | +1.83% | 51.6B | 8.61 | $6.78 | +5.30% |
| SPG | $157.84 | +0.60% | 51.5B | 25.13 | $6.28 | +5.30% |
| KIM-PN | $60.00 | N/A | 40.5B | N/A | N/A | +6.04% |
| KIM-PM | $19.82 | -0.25% | 14.2B | 12.04 | $1.65 | +4.74% |
| KIM | $20.94 | +0.53% | 14.2B | 27.55 | $0.76 | +4.74% |
| KIM-PL | $19.50 | -0.05% | 14.1B | 11.85 | $1.65 | +4.74% |
| REG | $70.40 | +0.21% | 12.8B | 33.36 | $2.11 | +3.97% |
| FRT-PC | $20.05 | -0.05% | 8.3B | 6.10 | $3.29 | +4.60% |
Stock Comparison
UBA vs O Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, O has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while O trades at $57.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas O's P/E ratio is 52.20. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs SPG-PJ Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SPG-PJ trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs SPG Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SPG trades at $157.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPG's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs KIM-PN Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KIM-PN trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs KIM-PM Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KIM-PM trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs KIM Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KIM trades at $20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs KIM-PL Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KIM-PL trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs REG Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while REG trades at $70.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 33.36. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs FRT-PC Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while FRT-PC trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs FRT Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while FRT trades at $95.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs ADC Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ADC trades at $73.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 41.66. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs NNN Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while NNN trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs BRX Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BRX trades at $25.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs KRG Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KRG trades at $22.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 319.14. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs PECO Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PECO trades at $35.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 61.67. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs REGCP Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while REGCP trades at $23.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs REGCO Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while REGCO trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs MAC Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while MAC trades at $16.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs SKT Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SKT trades at $30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 35.32. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs FCPT Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while FCPT trades at $27.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 25.52. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs AKR Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while AKR trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 113.35. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs CURB Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CURB trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 188.04. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs ROIC Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs IVT Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while IVT trades at $27.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 115.92. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs ADC-PA Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ADC-PA trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs GTY Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while GTY trades at $28.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs NTST Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while NTST trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is -108.60. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs ALX Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ALX trades at $226.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 29.30. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs RPT-PD Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs BFS Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 836.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BFS trades at $34.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 23.50. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs BFS-PD Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 833.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BFS-PD trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs UBP Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs UBP-PK Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs CBL Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 763.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CBL trades at $24.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs UBP-PH Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs WSR Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 622.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WSR trades at $12.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs SITC Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 602.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SITC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.10. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs BFS-PE Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 513.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BFS-PE trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs SITC-PA Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs CDR-PB Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 214.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CDR-PB trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs PINE Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 212.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PINE trades at $14.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is 186.13. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs CDR-PC Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 202.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CDR-PC trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs SRG-PA Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 167.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SRG-PA trades at $22.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -12.45. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs SRG Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 164.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SRG trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs WHLRL Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WHLRL trades at $183.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -98.16. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs WHLRD Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WHLRD trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -17.67. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs WHLRP Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WHLRP trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs WHLR Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WHLR trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs CDR Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs NNN-PF Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs RVI Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while RVI trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs HMG Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs WPG Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs PEI-PB Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs BPYUP Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs PEI Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs BPYU Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs WRI Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs PEI-PC Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs PEI-PD Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.