Urstadt Biddle Properties Inc.
Urstadt Biddle Properties Inc. UBA Peers
See (UBA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBA | $21.14 | -1.81% | 832.17M | 34.66 | $0.61 | N/A |
| SPG | $165.08 | +1.26% | 53.88B | 26.29 | $6.28 | +4.99% |
| SPG-PJ | $58.35 | +0.32% | 51.60B | 8.61 | $6.78 | +4.99% |
| O | $56.25 | +1.53% | 50.80B | 51.14 | $1.10 | +5.65% |
| KIM-PN | $58.20 | -1.26% | 39.24B | N/A | N/A | +6.23% |
| KIM | $21.69 | +1.40% | 14.67B | 28.54 | $0.76 | +4.53% |
| KIM-PM | $20.41 | +0.05% | 14.54B | 12.40 | $1.65 | +4.53% |
| KIM-PL | $19.94 | -0.05% | 14.30B | 12.11 | $1.65 | +4.53% |
| REG | $73.82 | +1.69% | 13.40B | 34.99 | $2.11 | +3.73% |
| FRT | $98.00 | +1.33% | 8.45B | 28.16 | $3.48 | +4.49% |
Stock Comparison
UBA vs SPG Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 53.88B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SPG trades at $165.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPG's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs SPG-PJ Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 51.60B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SPG-PJ trades at $58.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs O Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, O has a market cap of 50.80B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while O trades at $56.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas O's P/E ratio is 51.14. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs KIM-PN Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 39.24B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KIM-PN trades at $58.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs KIM Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 14.67B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KIM trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 28.54. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs KIM-PM Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 14.54B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KIM-PM trades at $20.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs KIM-PL Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 14.30B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KIM-PL trades at $19.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs REG Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 13.40B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while REG trades at $73.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 34.99. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs FRT Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 8.45B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while FRT trades at $98.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs ADC Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 8.24B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ADC trades at $74.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 42.32. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs FRT-PC Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 8.22B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while FRT-PC trades at $20.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs BRX Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 8.14B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BRX trades at $26.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs NNN Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 7.90B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while NNN trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs KRG Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5.09B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KRG trades at $23.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 331.07. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs PECO Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PECO trades at $36.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 62.55. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs REGCP Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.30B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while REGCP trades at $23.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs REGCO Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4.14B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while REGCO trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs MAC Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while MAC trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is -32.71. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs SKT Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 3.62B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SKT trades at $31.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 36.30. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs FCPT Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while FCPT trades at $27.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs AKR Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while AKR trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 119.32. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs CURB Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 2.50B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CURB trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 197.75. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs ROIC Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs IVT Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while IVT trades at $28.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 118.38. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs ADC-PA Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ADC-PA trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs GTY Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while GTY trades at $29.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs NTST Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while NTST trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is -106.13. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs ALX Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ALX trades at $220.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs RPT-PD Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs BFS Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 835.20M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BFS trades at $34.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs UBP Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.17M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs UBP-PK Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.66M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs BFS-PD Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 803.68M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BFS-PD trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.68. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs CBL Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 794.43M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CBL trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs SITC Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 699.42M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SITC trades at $13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs UBP-PH Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.36M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs WSR Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 647.90M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WSR trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs BFS-PE Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 500.54M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BFS-PE trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs SITC-PA Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 372.97M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs PINE Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 217.57M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PINE trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is 190.63. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs CDR-PB Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 217.12M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CDR-PB trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs CDR-PC Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 200.29M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CDR-PC trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs SRG-PA Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 165.21M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SRG-PA trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -12.69. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs SRG Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 163.62M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SRG trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs WHLR Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 4.38M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WHLR trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs WHLRD Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 3.96M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WHLRD trades at $33.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -18.19. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs WHLRP Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 3.89M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WHLRP trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.
UBA vs WHLRL Comparison
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.17M. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 1.03M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WHLRL trades at $183.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -98.16. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.