United States Antimony Corporation
United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UAMY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UAMY | $3.34 | -0.15% | 397.8M | -334.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| RIO | $62.19 | -1.45% | 102.6B | 8.80 | $7.07 | +6.38% |
| BHP | $52.27 | -1.66% | 66.3B | 11.67 | $4.48 | +4.64% |
| VALE | $9.85 | -1.55% | 42B | 7.13 | $1.38 | +8.33% |
| TECK | $33.74 | +2.24% | 16.5B | 102.24 | $0.33 | +2.19% |
| MP | $64.12 | +3.29% | 11.4B | -101.78 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| TMC | $7.45 | -4.36% | 3B | -32.39 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| MTRN | $93.93 | -0.92% | 2B | 195.69 | $0.48 | +0.57% |
| SKE | $14.76 | -4.53% | 1.7B | -12.62 | -$1.17 | N/A |
| STR | $18.46 | +0.49% | 1.4B | 35.50 | $0.52 | +7.27% |
Stock Comparison
UAMY vs RIO Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while RIO trades at $62.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check RIO's competition here
UAMY vs BHP Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while BHP trades at $52.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check BHP's competition here
UAMY vs VALE Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while VALE trades at $9.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check VALE's competition here
UAMY vs TECK Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while TECK trades at $33.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 102.24. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check TECK's competition here
UAMY vs MP Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while MP trades at $64.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -101.78. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check MP's competition here
UAMY vs TMC Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while TMC trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -32.39. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMC's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check TMC's competition here
UAMY vs MTRN Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while MTRN trades at $93.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 195.69. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check MTRN's competition here
UAMY vs SKE Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while SKE trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -12.62. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check SKE's competition here
UAMY vs STR Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while STR trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check STR's competition here
UAMY vs IPX Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while IPX trades at $40.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -15.72. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check IPX's competition here
UAMY vs USAR Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while USAR trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to USAR's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check USAR's competition here
UAMY vs VZLA Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while VZLA trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -158.25. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check VZLA's competition here
UAMY vs GSM Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 851M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while GSM trades at $4.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check GSM's competition here
UAMY vs CMP Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 850.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while CMP trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -5.74. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check CMP's competition here
UAMY vs TMCWW Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 784.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while TMCWW trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check TMCWW's competition here
UAMY vs SGML Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 728.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while SGML trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -19.85. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check SGML's competition here
UAMY vs NEXA Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 662.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while NEXA trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check NEXA's competition here
UAMY vs USAS Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 622.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while USAS trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check USAS's competition here
UAMY vs LAC Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 619.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while LAC trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -12.86. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check LAC's competition here
UAMY vs SLI Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 517.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while SLI trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check SLI's competition here
UAMY vs LAR Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while LAR trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -42.07. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check LAR's competition here
UAMY vs NAK Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 452M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while NAK trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check NAK's competition here
UAMY vs LAAC Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check LAAC's competition here
UAMY vs PLM Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check PLM's competition here
UAMY vs GRFX Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check GRFX's competition here
UAMY vs CRML Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 400.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while CRML trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check CRML's competition here
UAMY vs CRMLW Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 383.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while CRMLW trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check CRMLW's competition here
UAMY vs LZM Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 370.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while LZM trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check LZM's competition here
UAMY vs USARW Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 332.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while USARW trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to USARW's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check USARW's competition here
UAMY vs EMX Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 327.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while EMX trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -101.17. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check EMX's competition here
UAMY vs TMQ Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 304.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while TMQ trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -30.92. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check TMQ's competition here
UAMY vs NMG Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 299.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while NMG trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check NMG's competition here
UAMY vs ABAT Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 268.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while ABAT trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -3.19. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check ABAT's competition here
UAMY vs WRN Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 263M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while WRN trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -65.75. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check WRN's competition here
UAMY vs NB Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 217.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while NB trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -15.79. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check NB's competition here
UAMY vs IONR Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 179.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while IONR trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -13.86. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check IONR's competition here
UAMY vs PLL Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 170.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while PLL trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check PLL's competition here
UAMY vs USGO Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 103.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while USGO trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check USGO's competition here
UAMY vs LGO Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while LGO trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -2.04. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check LGO's competition here
UAMY vs FURY Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while FURY trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check FURY's competition here
UAMY vs AMLI Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while AMLI trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check AMLI's competition here
UAMY vs GRO Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while GRO trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check GRO's competition here
UAMY vs WWR Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 64.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while WWR trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check WWR's competition here
UAMY vs XPL Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 61M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while XPL trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -10.54. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check XPL's competition here
UAMY vs LITM Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 43.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while LITM trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check LITM's competition here
UAMY vs ELBM Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while ELBM trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check ELBM's competition here
UAMY vs GTI Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while GTI trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check GTI's competition here
UAMY vs BYU Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check BYU's competition here
UAMY vs STR-WT Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 239.2K. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check STR-WT's competition here
UAMY vs GLG Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check GLG's competition here
UAMY vs KMCM Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. UAMY has daily volatility of 7.56 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.Check KMCM's competition here
UAMY vs EXN Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check EXN's competition here
UAMY vs BBL Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check BBL's competition here
UAMY vs VEDL Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check VEDL's competition here
UAMY vs SMTS Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is less volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check SMTS's competition here
UAMY vs IFFT Comparison July 2025
UAMY plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UAMY stands at 397.8M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UAMY is priced at $3.34, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UAMY currently has a P/E ratio of -334.00, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, UAMY's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IFFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UAMY is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UAMY.Check IFFT's competition here