Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TWO-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Mortgage Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TWO-PA | $24.63 | -0.24% | 2.6B | 44.70 | $0.55 | +11.41% |
| RCB | $25.34 | -0.04% | 61.3B | 15.98 | $1.59 | +6.12% |
| NLY-PI | $25.19 | -0.36% | 17B | 14.28 | $1.77 | +13.24% |
| NLY | $21.17 | -0.61% | 15.5B | 6.83 | $3.10 | +13.24% |
| RITM-PA | $25.32 | +0.06% | 13.8B | 17.36 | $1.46 | +11.05% |
| RITM-PB | $25.15 | -0.12% | 13.7B | N/A | N/A | +11.05% |
| RITM-PD | $24.90 | -0.02% | 13.6B | N/A | N/A | +11.05% |
| NLY-PG | $24.97 | +0.24% | 13.6B | 14.12 | $1.77 | +13.24% |
| RITM-PC | $24.50 | -0.16% | 13.4B | N/A | N/A | +11.05% |
| NLY-PF | $25.50 | -0.08% | 13.3B | 14.42 | $1.77 | +13.24% |
Stock Comparison
TWO-PA vs RCB Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RCB has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while RCB trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas RCB's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RCB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to RCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check RCB's competition here
TWO-PA vs NLY-PI Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NLY-PI has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while NLY-PI trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas NLY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NLY-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to NLY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check NLY-PI's competition here
TWO-PA vs NLY Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NLY has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while NLY trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas NLY's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to NLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check NLY's competition here
TWO-PA vs RITM-PA Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RITM-PA has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while RITM-PA trades at $25.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas RITM-PA's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RITM-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check RITM-PA's competition here
TWO-PA vs RITM-PB Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RITM-PB has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while RITM-PB trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas RITM-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RITM-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check RITM-PB's competition here
TWO-PA vs RITM-PD Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RITM-PD has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while RITM-PD trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas RITM-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RITM-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check RITM-PD's competition here
TWO-PA vs NLY-PG Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NLY-PG has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while NLY-PG trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas NLY-PG's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NLY-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to NLY-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check NLY-PG's competition here
TWO-PA vs RITM-PC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RITM-PC has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while RITM-PC trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas RITM-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RITM-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check RITM-PC's competition here
TWO-PA vs NLY-PF Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NLY-PF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while NLY-PF trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas NLY-PF's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NLY-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to NLY-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check NLY-PF's competition here
TWO-PA vs AGNC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGNC has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while AGNC trades at $10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas AGNC's P/E ratio is 7.94. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AGNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to AGNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check AGNC's competition here
TWO-PA vs AGNCO Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGNCO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while AGNCO trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas AGNCO's P/E ratio is -13.71. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AGNCO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check AGNCO's competition here
TWO-PA vs AGNCP Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGNCP has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while AGNCP trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas AGNCP's P/E ratio is -13.49. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AGNCP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check AGNCP's competition here
TWO-PA vs AGNCL Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGNCL has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while AGNCL trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas AGNCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AGNCL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to AGNCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check AGNCL's competition here
TWO-PA vs AGNCM Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGNCM has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while AGNCM trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas AGNCM's P/E ratio is -13.49. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AGNCM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check AGNCM's competition here
TWO-PA vs AGNCN Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AGNCN has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while AGNCN trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas AGNCN's P/E ratio is -13.84. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AGNCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to AGNCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check AGNCN's competition here
TWO-PA vs STWD Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, STWD has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while STWD trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas STWD's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to STWD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to STWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check STWD's competition here
TWO-PA vs NRZ Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NRZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while NRZ trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas NRZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NRZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to NRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check NRZ's competition here
TWO-PA vs RITM Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RITM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while RITM trades at $9.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas RITM's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RITM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to RITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check RITM's competition here
TWO-PA vs EFC-PE Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EFC-PE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while EFC-PE trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas EFC-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to EFC-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to EFC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check EFC-PE's competition here
TWO-PA vs ABR-PF Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ABR-PF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while ABR-PF trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas ABR-PF's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABR-PF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to ABR-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check ABR-PF's competition here
TWO-PA vs RCD Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RCD has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while RCD trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas RCD's P/E ratio is 3.06. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RCD's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to RCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check RCD's competition here
TWO-PA vs ABR-PD Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ABR-PD has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while ABR-PD trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas ABR-PD's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABR-PD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to ABR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check ABR-PD's competition here
TWO-PA vs ABR-PE Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ABR-PE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while ABR-PE trades at $16.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas ABR-PE's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABR-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to ABR-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check ABR-PE's competition here
TWO-PA vs RWTN Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RWTN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while RWTN trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas RWTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RWTN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to RWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check RWTN's competition here
TWO-PA vs RWTQ Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RWTQ has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while RWTQ trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas RWTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RWTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to RWTQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check RWTQ's competition here
TWO-PA vs BXMT Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BXMT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while BXMT trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas BXMT's P/E ratio is 30.06. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BXMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to BXMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check BXMT's competition here
TWO-PA vs RWT-PA Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RWT-PA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while RWT-PA trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas RWT-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RWT-PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to RWT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check RWT-PA's competition here
TWO-PA vs EFC-PC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EFC-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while EFC-PC trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas EFC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to EFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to EFC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check EFC-PC's competition here
TWO-PA vs TWO-PC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TWO-PC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while TWO-PC trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas TWO-PC's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TWO-PC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to TWO-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check TWO-PC's competition here
TWO-PA vs MFAN Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MFAN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while MFAN trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas MFAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to MFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check MFAN's competition here
TWO-PA vs TWO-PB Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TWO-PB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while TWO-PB trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas TWO-PB's P/E ratio is 44.54. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TWO-PB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to TWO-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check TWO-PB's competition here
TWO-PA vs MFAO Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MFAO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while MFAO trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas MFAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to MFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check MFAO's competition here
TWO-PA vs EFC-PB Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EFC-PB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while EFC-PB trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas EFC-PB's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to EFC-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check EFC-PB's competition here
TWO-PA vs EFC-PD Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EFC-PD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while EFC-PD trades at $23.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas EFC-PD's P/E ratio is 19.20. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to EFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to EFC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check EFC-PD's competition here
TWO-PA vs MFA-PC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MFA-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while MFA-PC trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas MFA-PC's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MFA-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to MFA-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check MFA-PC's competition here
TWO-PA vs ADAMH Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ADAMH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while ADAMH trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas ADAMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ADAMH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to ADAMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check ADAMH's competition here
TWO-PA vs NYMTH Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NYMTH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while NYMTH trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas NYMTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NYMTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to NYMTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check NYMTH's competition here
TWO-PA vs ADAMI Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ADAMI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while ADAMI trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas ADAMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ADAMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to ADAMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check ADAMI's competition here
TWO-PA vs ADAMM Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ADAMM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while ADAMM trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas ADAMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ADAMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to ADAMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check ADAMM's competition here
TWO-PA vs NYMTM Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NYMTM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while NYMTM trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas NYMTM's P/E ratio is 531.49. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NYMTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to NYMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check NYMTM's competition here
TWO-PA vs PMTU Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while PMTU trades at $25.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check PMTU's competition here
TWO-PA vs ADAMN Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ADAMN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while ADAMN trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas ADAMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ADAMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to ADAMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check ADAMN's competition here
TWO-PA vs RC-PC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RC-PC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while RC-PC trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas RC-PC's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RC-PC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to RC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check RC-PC's competition here
TWO-PA vs ARR Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ARR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while ARR trades at $17.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas ARR's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ARR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to ARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check ARR's competition here
TWO-PA vs CIMN Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CIMN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while CIMN trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas CIMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CIMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to CIMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check CIMN's competition here
TWO-PA vs MFA-PB Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MFA-PB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while MFA-PB trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas MFA-PB's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MFA-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to MFA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check MFA-PB's competition here
TWO-PA vs RC-PE Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RC-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while RC-PE trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas RC-PE's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RC-PE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to RC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check RC-PE's competition here
TWO-PA vs CIMP Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CIMP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while CIMP trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas CIMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CIMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to CIMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check CIMP's competition here
TWO-PA vs DX Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, DX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while DX trades at $12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas DX's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to DX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check DX's competition here
TWO-PA vs IVR-PC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, IVR-PC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while IVR-PC trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas IVR-PC's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IVR-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to IVR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check IVR-PC's competition here
TWO-PA vs DX-PC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, DX-PC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while DX-PC trades at $26.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas DX-PC's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to DX-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to DX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check DX-PC's competition here
TWO-PA vs FBRT-PE Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FBRT-PE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while FBRT-PE trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas FBRT-PE's P/E ratio is -11.42. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FBRT-PE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to FBRT-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check FBRT-PE's competition here
TWO-PA vs PMT-PC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PMT-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while PMT-PC trades at $17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas PMT-PC's P/E ratio is -24.54. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PMT-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to PMT-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check PMT-PC's competition here
TWO-PA vs TRTX-PC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TRTX-PC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while TRTX-PC trades at $18.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas TRTX-PC's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TRTX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to TRTX-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check TRTX-PC's competition here
TWO-PA vs ARI Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ARI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while ARI trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas ARI's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ARI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to ARI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check ARI's competition here
TWO-PA vs ARR-PC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ARR-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while ARR-PC trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas ARR-PC's P/E ratio is -13.46. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ARR-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to ARR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check ARR-PC's competition here
TWO-PA vs EFC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EFC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while EFC trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas EFC's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to EFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to EFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check EFC's competition here
TWO-PA vs NYMTO Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NYMTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while NYMTO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas NYMTO's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NYMTO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check NYMTO's competition here
TWO-PA vs TWO Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TWO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while TWO trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas TWO's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TWO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to TWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check TWO's competition here
TWO-PA vs SCCG Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SCCG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while SCCG trades at $24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas SCCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SCCG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to SCCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check SCCG's competition here
TWO-PA vs SCCC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SCCC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while SCCC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas SCCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SCCC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to SCCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check SCCC's competition here
TWO-PA vs KREF-PA Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KREF-PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while KREF-PA trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas KREF-PA's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KREF-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to KREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check KREF-PA's competition here
TWO-PA vs CIM-PC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CIM-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while CIM-PC trades at $22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas CIM-PC's P/E ratio is 30.98. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CIM-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to CIM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check CIM-PC's competition here
TWO-PA vs CIM Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CIM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while CIM trades at $13.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas CIM's P/E ratio is -15.83. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CIM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to CIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check CIM's competition here
TWO-PA vs CIM-PD Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CIM-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while CIM-PD trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas CIM-PD's P/E ratio is 32.99. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CIM-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to CIM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check CIM-PD's competition here
TWO-PA vs CIM-PB Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CIM-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while CIM-PB trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas CIM-PB's P/E ratio is 33.07. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CIM-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to CIM-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check CIM-PB's competition here
TWO-PA vs CIM-PA Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CIM-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while CIM-PA trades at $21.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas CIM-PA's P/E ratio is 29.48. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CIM-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to CIM-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check CIM-PA's competition here
TWO-PA vs ABR Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ABR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while ABR trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas ABR's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ABR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to ABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check ABR's competition here
TWO-PA vs ORC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ORC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while ORC trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas ORC's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ORC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to ORC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check ORC's competition here
TWO-PA vs PMT-PA Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PMT-PA has a market cap of 997.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while PMT-PA trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas PMT-PA's P/E ratio is -30.88. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PMT-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to PMT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check PMT-PA's competition here
TWO-PA vs PMT-PB Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PMT-PB has a market cap of 992.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while PMT-PB trades at $22.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas PMT-PB's P/E ratio is -30.89. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PMT-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to PMT-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check PMT-PB's competition here
TWO-PA vs LFT-PA Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, LFT-PA has a market cap of 987.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while LFT-PA trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas LFT-PA's P/E ratio is 82.40. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to LFT-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to LFT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check LFT-PA's competition here
TWO-PA vs SACH-PA Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, SACH-PA has a market cap of 970.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while SACH-PA trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas SACH-PA's P/E ratio is 47.99. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to SACH-PA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to SACH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check SACH-PA's competition here
TWO-PA vs MFA Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MFA has a market cap of 934.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while MFA trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas MFA's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MFA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to MFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check MFA's competition here
TWO-PA vs GPMT-PA Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, GPMT-PA has a market cap of 925M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while GPMT-PA trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas GPMT-PA's P/E ratio is 29.16. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to GPMT-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to GPMT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check GPMT-PA's competition here
TWO-PA vs PMT Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, PMT has a market cap of 873.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while PMT trades at $10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas PMT's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to PMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to PMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check PMT's competition here
TWO-PA vs CHMI-PA Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CHMI-PA has a market cap of 821.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while CHMI-PA trades at $22.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas CHMI-PA's P/E ratio is 40.58. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CHMI-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to CHMI-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check CHMI-PA's competition here
TWO-PA vs MITN Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MITN has a market cap of 800.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while MITN trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas MITN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MITN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to MITN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check MITN's competition here
TWO-PA vs MITP Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MITP has a market cap of 799.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while MITP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas MITP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MITP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to MITP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check MITP's competition here
TWO-PA vs ADAM Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ADAM has a market cap of 789.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while ADAM trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas ADAM's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ADAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to ADAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check ADAM's competition here
TWO-PA vs MITT-PC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MITT-PC has a market cap of 759.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while MITT-PC trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas MITT-PC's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MITT-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to MITT-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check MITT-PC's competition here
TWO-PA vs EFC-PA Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, EFC-PA has a market cap of 658.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while EFC-PA trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas EFC-PA's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to EFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to EFC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check EFC-PA's competition here
TWO-PA vs RWT Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RWT has a market cap of 652.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while RWT trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas RWT's P/E ratio is -6.51. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RWT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to RWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check RWT's competition here
TWO-PA vs TRTX Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, TRTX has a market cap of 647.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while TRTX trades at $8.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas TRTX's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to TRTX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to TRTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check TRTX's competition here
TWO-PA vs NYMT Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NYMT has a market cap of 642.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while NYMT trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas NYMT's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NYMT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to NYMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check NYMT's competition here
TWO-PA vs FBRT Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, FBRT has a market cap of 637.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while FBRT trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas FBRT's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to FBRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to FBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check FBRT's competition here
TWO-PA vs BRMK Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, BRMK has a market cap of 635M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while BRMK trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas BRMK's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to BRMK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to BRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check BRMK's competition here
TWO-PA vs NYMTZ Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NYMTZ has a market cap of 633.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while NYMTZ trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas NYMTZ's P/E ratio is 396.39. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NYMTZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check NYMTZ's competition here
TWO-PA vs AIC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, AIC has a market cap of 631.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while AIC trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas AIC's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to AIC's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to AIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check AIC's competition here
TWO-PA vs NYMTN Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NYMTN has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while NYMTN trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas NYMTN's P/E ratio is 460.96. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NYMTN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to NYMTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check NYMTN's competition here
TWO-PA vs NYMTL Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NYMTL has a market cap of 611.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while NYMTL trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas NYMTL's P/E ratio is 464.26. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NYMTL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check NYMTL's competition here
TWO-PA vs IVR Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, IVR has a market cap of 558.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while IVR trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas IVR's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to IVR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to IVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check IVR's competition here
TWO-PA vs NREF-PA Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NREF-PA has a market cap of 453.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while NREF-PA trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas NREF-PA's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NREF-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to NREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check NREF-PA's competition here
TWO-PA vs KREF Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, KREF has a market cap of 436.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while KREF trades at $6.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas KREF's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to KREF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to KREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check KREF's competition here
TWO-PA vs CMTG Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, CMTG has a market cap of 329.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while CMTG trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas CMTG's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to CMTG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to CMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check CMTG's competition here
TWO-PA vs NREF Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, NREF has a market cap of 292.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while NREF trades at $15.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas NREF's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to NREF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to NREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check NREF's competition here
TWO-PA vs ACRE Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, ACRE has a market cap of 272.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while ACRE trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas ACRE's P/E ratio is -13.63. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to ACRE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to ACRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check ACRE's competition here
TWO-PA vs RC Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, RC has a market cap of 257.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while RC trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas RC's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to RC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to RC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check RC's competition here
TWO-PA vs MITT Comparison June 2026
TWO-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TWO-PA stands at 2.6B. In comparison, MITT has a market cap of 240.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TWO-PA is priced at $24.63, while MITT trades at $7.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TWO-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 44.70, whereas MITT's P/E ratio is 18.01. In terms of profitability, TWO-PA's ROE is -0.19%, compared to MITT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TWO-PA is less volatile compared to MITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TWO-PA.Check MITT's competition here