Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FBRT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Mortgage Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBRT | $8.67 | +0.35% | 667.7M | 17.01 | $0.51 | +14.61% |
| RCB | $25.34 | -0.04% | 61.3B | 15.98 | $1.59 | +6.12% |
| NLY-PI | $25.68 | -0.04% | 17.3B | 14.54 | $1.77 | +12.82% |
| NLY | $21.85 | +1.16% | 16B | 7.05 | $3.10 | +12.82% |
| RITM-PA | $25.25 | -0.39% | 13.8B | 17.32 | $1.46 | +10.72% |
| RITM-PB | $25.16 | -0.13% | 13.8B | N/A | N/A | +10.72% |
| NLY-PG | $25.21 | -0.40% | 13.7B | 14.28 | $1.77 | +12.82% |
| RITM-PD | $24.91 | -0.04% | 13.6B | N/A | N/A | +10.72% |
| NLY-PF | $26.03 | -0.27% | 13.6B | 14.72 | $1.77 | +12.82% |
| RITM-PC | $24.57 | -0.04% | 13.4B | N/A | N/A | +10.72% |
Stock Comparison
FBRT vs RCB Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, RCB has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while RCB trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas RCB's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RCB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to RCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check RCB's competition here
FBRT vs NLY-PI Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, NLY-PI has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while NLY-PI trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas NLY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NLY-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to NLY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check NLY-PI's competition here
FBRT vs NLY Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, NLY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while NLY trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas NLY's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to NLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check NLY's competition here
FBRT vs RITM-PA Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, RITM-PA has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while RITM-PA trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas RITM-PA's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RITM-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to RITM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check RITM-PA's competition here
FBRT vs RITM-PB Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, RITM-PB has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while RITM-PB trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas RITM-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RITM-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to RITM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check RITM-PB's competition here
FBRT vs NLY-PG Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, NLY-PG has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while NLY-PG trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas NLY-PG's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NLY-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to NLY-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check NLY-PG's competition here
FBRT vs RITM-PD Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, RITM-PD has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while RITM-PD trades at $24.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas RITM-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RITM-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to RITM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check RITM-PD's competition here
FBRT vs NLY-PF Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, NLY-PF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while NLY-PF trades at $26.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas NLY-PF's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NLY-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to NLY-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check NLY-PF's competition here
FBRT vs RITM-PC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, RITM-PC has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while RITM-PC trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas RITM-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RITM-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to RITM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check RITM-PC's competition here
FBRT vs AGNC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, AGNC has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while AGNC trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas AGNC's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to AGNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check AGNC's competition here
FBRT vs AGNCO Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, AGNCO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while AGNCO trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas AGNCO's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGNCO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to AGNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check AGNCO's competition here
FBRT vs AGNCP Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, AGNCP has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while AGNCP trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas AGNCP's P/E ratio is -13.51. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGNCP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to AGNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check AGNCP's competition here
FBRT vs AGNCL Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, AGNCL has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while AGNCL trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas AGNCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGNCL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to AGNCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check AGNCL's competition here
FBRT vs AGNCM Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, AGNCM has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while AGNCM trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas AGNCM's P/E ratio is -13.41. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGNCM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to AGNCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check AGNCM's competition here
FBRT vs AGNCN Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, AGNCN has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while AGNCN trades at $25.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas AGNCN's P/E ratio is -13.87. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGNCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to AGNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check AGNCN's competition here
FBRT vs STWD Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, STWD has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while STWD trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas STWD's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STWD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to STWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check STWD's competition here
FBRT vs RITM Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, RITM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while RITM trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas RITM's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RITM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to RITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check RITM's competition here
FBRT vs NRZ Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, NRZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while NRZ trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas NRZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NRZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to NRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check NRZ's competition here
FBRT vs EFC-PE Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, EFC-PE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while EFC-PE trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas EFC-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EFC-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to EFC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check EFC-PE's competition here
FBRT vs ABR-PF Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, ABR-PF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while ABR-PF trades at $22.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas ABR-PF's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABR-PF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to ABR-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check ABR-PF's competition here
FBRT vs RCD Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, RCD has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while RCD trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas RCD's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RCD's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to RCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check RCD's competition here
FBRT vs ABR-PD Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, ABR-PD has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while ABR-PD trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas ABR-PD's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABR-PD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT and ABR-PD have similar daily volatility (1.39).Check ABR-PD's competition here
FBRT vs ABR-PE Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, ABR-PE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while ABR-PE trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas ABR-PE's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABR-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to ABR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check ABR-PE's competition here
FBRT vs RWTN Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, RWTN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while RWTN trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas RWTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RWTN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to RWTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check RWTN's competition here
FBRT vs RWTQ Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, RWTQ has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while RWTQ trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas RWTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RWTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to RWTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check RWTQ's competition here
FBRT vs RWT-PA Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, RWT-PA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while RWT-PA trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas RWT-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RWT-PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to RWT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check RWT-PA's competition here
FBRT vs BXMT Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, BXMT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while BXMT trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas BXMT's P/E ratio is 30.47. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BXMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to BXMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check BXMT's competition here
FBRT vs EFC-PC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, EFC-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while EFC-PC trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas EFC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to EFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check EFC-PC's competition here
FBRT vs TWO-PC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, TWO-PC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while TWO-PC trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas TWO-PC's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWO-PC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to TWO-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check TWO-PC's competition here
FBRT vs TWO-PA Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, TWO-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while TWO-PA trades at $24.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas TWO-PA's P/E ratio is 44.86. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWO-PA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to TWO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check TWO-PA's competition here
FBRT vs TWO-PB Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, TWO-PB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while TWO-PB trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas TWO-PB's P/E ratio is 44.68. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWO-PB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to TWO-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check TWO-PB's competition here
FBRT vs MFAN Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, MFAN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while MFAN trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas MFAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to MFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check MFAN's competition here
FBRT vs MFAO Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, MFAO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while MFAO trades at $25.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas MFAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to MFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check MFAO's competition here
FBRT vs EFC-PB Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, EFC-PB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while EFC-PB trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas EFC-PB's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EFC-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to EFC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check EFC-PB's competition here
FBRT vs EFC-PD Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, EFC-PD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while EFC-PD trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas EFC-PD's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to EFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check EFC-PD's competition here
FBRT vs MFA-PC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, MFA-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while MFA-PC trades at $23.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas MFA-PC's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MFA-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to MFA-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check MFA-PC's competition here
FBRT vs ADAMH Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, ADAMH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while ADAMH trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas ADAMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADAMH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to ADAMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check ADAMH's competition here
FBRT vs NYMTH Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, NYMTH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while NYMTH trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas NYMTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NYMTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to NYMTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check NYMTH's competition here
FBRT vs ADAMI Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, ADAMI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while ADAMI trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas ADAMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADAMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to ADAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check ADAMI's competition here
FBRT vs ADAMM Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, ADAMM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while ADAMM trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas ADAMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADAMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to ADAMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check ADAMM's competition here
FBRT vs NYMTM Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, NYMTM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while NYMTM trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas NYMTM's P/E ratio is 531.49. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NYMTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to NYMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check NYMTM's competition here
FBRT vs PMTU Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while PMTU trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check PMTU's competition here
FBRT vs ARR Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, ARR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while ARR trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas ARR's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to ARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check ARR's competition here
FBRT vs RC-PC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, RC-PC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while RC-PC trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas RC-PC's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RC-PC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to RC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check RC-PC's competition here
FBRT vs CIMN Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, CIMN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while CIMN trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas CIMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to CIMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check CIMN's competition here
FBRT vs ADAMN Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, ADAMN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while ADAMN trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas ADAMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADAMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to ADAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check ADAMN's competition here
FBRT vs RC-PE Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, RC-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while RC-PE trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas RC-PE's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RC-PE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to RC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check RC-PE's competition here
FBRT vs MFA-PB Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, MFA-PB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while MFA-PB trades at $20.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas MFA-PB's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MFA-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to MFA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check MFA-PB's competition here
FBRT vs CIMP Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, CIMP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while CIMP trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas CIMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to CIMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check CIMP's competition here
FBRT vs DX Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, DX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while DX trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas DX's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to DX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check DX's competition here
FBRT vs IVR-PC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, IVR-PC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while IVR-PC trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas IVR-PC's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IVR-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to IVR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check IVR-PC's competition here
FBRT vs DX-PC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, DX-PC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while DX-PC trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas DX-PC's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DX-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to DX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check DX-PC's competition here
FBRT vs FBRT-PE Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, FBRT-PE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while FBRT-PE trades at $19.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas FBRT-PE's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FBRT-PE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to FBRT-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check FBRT-PE's competition here
FBRT vs PMT-PC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, PMT-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while PMT-PC trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas PMT-PC's P/E ratio is -25.44. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PMT-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to PMT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check PMT-PC's competition here
FBRT vs TRTX-PC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, TRTX-PC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while TRTX-PC trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas TRTX-PC's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRTX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to TRTX-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check TRTX-PC's competition here
FBRT vs ARI Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, ARI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while ARI trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas ARI's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to ARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check ARI's competition here
FBRT vs ARR-PC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, ARR-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while ARR-PC trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas ARR-PC's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ARR-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to ARR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check ARR-PC's competition here
FBRT vs EFC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, EFC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while EFC trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas EFC's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to EFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check EFC's competition here
FBRT vs NYMTO Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, NYMTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while NYMTO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas NYMTO's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NYMTO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to NYMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check NYMTO's competition here
FBRT vs TWO Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, TWO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while TWO trades at $12.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas TWO's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TWO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to TWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check TWO's competition here
FBRT vs SCCG Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, SCCG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while SCCG trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas SCCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCCG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to SCCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check SCCG's competition here
FBRT vs SCCC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, SCCC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while SCCC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas SCCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCCC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to SCCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check SCCC's competition here
FBRT vs KREF-PA Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, KREF-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while KREF-PA trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas KREF-PA's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KREF-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to KREF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check KREF-PA's competition here
FBRT vs CIM Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, CIM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while CIM trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas CIM's P/E ratio is -16.41. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to CIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check CIM's competition here
FBRT vs CIM-PC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, CIM-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while CIM-PC trades at $23.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas CIM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.83. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIM-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to CIM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check CIM-PC's competition here
FBRT vs CIM-PD Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, CIM-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while CIM-PD trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas CIM-PD's P/E ratio is 33.40. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIM-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to CIM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check CIM-PD's competition here
FBRT vs ABR Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, ABR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while ABR trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas ABR's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to ABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check ABR's competition here
FBRT vs CIM-PA Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, CIM-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while CIM-PA trades at $22.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas CIM-PA's P/E ratio is 30.11. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIM-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to CIM-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check CIM-PA's competition here
FBRT vs CIM-PB Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, CIM-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while CIM-PB trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas CIM-PB's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CIM-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to CIM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check CIM-PB's competition here
FBRT vs ORC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, ORC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while ORC trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas ORC's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ORC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to ORC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check ORC's competition here
FBRT vs PMT-PA Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, PMT-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while PMT-PA trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas PMT-PA's P/E ratio is -31.42. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PMT-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to PMT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check PMT-PA's competition here
FBRT vs PMT-PB Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, PMT-PB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while PMT-PB trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas PMT-PB's P/E ratio is -31.40. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PMT-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to PMT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check PMT-PB's competition here
FBRT vs LFT-PA Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, LFT-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while LFT-PA trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas LFT-PA's P/E ratio is 84.15. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LFT-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to LFT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check LFT-PA's competition here
FBRT vs MFA Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, MFA has a market cap of 980.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while MFA trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas MFA's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MFA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to MFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check MFA's competition here
FBRT vs SACH-PA Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, SACH-PA has a market cap of 973.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while SACH-PA trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas SACH-PA's P/E ratio is 48.14. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SACH-PA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to SACH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check SACH-PA's competition here
FBRT vs GPMT-PA Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, GPMT-PA has a market cap of 927.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while GPMT-PA trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas GPMT-PA's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GPMT-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to GPMT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check GPMT-PA's competition here
FBRT vs PMT Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, PMT has a market cap of 912.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while PMT trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas PMT's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to PMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check PMT's competition here
FBRT vs ADAM Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, ADAM has a market cap of 826.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while ADAM trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas ADAM's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to ADAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check ADAM's competition here
FBRT vs MITN Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, MITN has a market cap of 802.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while MITN trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas MITN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MITN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to MITN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check MITN's competition here
FBRT vs MITP Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, MITP has a market cap of 799.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while MITP trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas MITP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MITP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to MITP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check MITP's competition here
FBRT vs CHMI-PA Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, CHMI-PA has a market cap of 769M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while CHMI-PA trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas CHMI-PA's P/E ratio is 37.99. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CHMI-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to CHMI-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check CHMI-PA's competition here
FBRT vs MITT-PC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, MITT-PC has a market cap of 760.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while MITT-PC trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas MITT-PC's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MITT-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to MITT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check MITT-PC's competition here
FBRT vs RWT Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, RWT has a market cap of 677.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while RWT trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas RWT's P/E ratio is -6.76. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RWT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to RWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check RWT's competition here
FBRT vs EFC-PA Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, EFC-PA has a market cap of 658.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while EFC-PA trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas EFC-PA's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to EFC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check EFC-PA's competition here
FBRT vs TRTX Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, TRTX has a market cap of 650.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while TRTX trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas TRTX's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TRTX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to TRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check TRTX's competition here
FBRT vs NYMT Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, NYMT has a market cap of 642.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while NYMT trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas NYMT's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NYMT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to NYMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check NYMT's competition here
FBRT vs BRMK Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, BRMK has a market cap of 635M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while BRMK trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas BRMK's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRMK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to BRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check BRMK's competition here
FBRT vs NYMTZ Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, NYMTZ has a market cap of 633.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while NYMTZ trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas NYMTZ's P/E ratio is 396.39. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NYMTZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to NYMTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check NYMTZ's competition here
FBRT vs AIC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, AIC has a market cap of 631.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while AIC trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas AIC's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AIC's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to AIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check AIC's competition here
FBRT vs NYMTN Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, NYMTN has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while NYMTN trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas NYMTN's P/E ratio is 460.96. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NYMTN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to NYMTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check NYMTN's competition here
FBRT vs NYMTL Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, NYMTL has a market cap of 611.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while NYMTL trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas NYMTL's P/E ratio is 464.26. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NYMTL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to NYMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check NYMTL's competition here
FBRT vs IVR Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, IVR has a market cap of 563.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while IVR trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas IVR's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IVR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to IVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check IVR's competition here
FBRT vs NREF-PA Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, NREF-PA has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while NREF-PA trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas NREF-PA's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NREF-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to NREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check NREF-PA's competition here
FBRT vs KREF Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, KREF has a market cap of 428.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while KREF trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas KREF's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KREF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to KREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check KREF's competition here
FBRT vs CMTG Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, CMTG has a market cap of 342.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while CMTG trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas CMTG's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMTG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to CMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check CMTG's competition here
FBRT vs NREF Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, NREF has a market cap of 295.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while NREF trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas NREF's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NREF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to NREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check NREF's competition here
FBRT vs RC Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, RC has a market cap of 292.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while RC trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas RC's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to RC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check RC's competition here
FBRT vs ACRE Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, ACRE has a market cap of 274.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while ACRE trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas ACRE's P/E ratio is -13.74. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ACRE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is more volatile compared to ACRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check ACRE's competition here
FBRT vs MITT Comparison June 2026
FBRT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBRT stands at 667.7M. In comparison, MITT has a market cap of 245.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBRT is priced at $8.67, while MITT trades at $7.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBRT currently has a P/E ratio of 17.01, whereas MITT's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, FBRT's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MITT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBRT is less volatile compared to MITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBRT.Check MITT's competition here