Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EFC-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Mortgage Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFC-PA | $12.22 | -0.61% | 658.6M | 8.19 | $1.49 | +11.43% |
| RCB | $25.34 | -0.04% | 61.3B | 15.98 | $1.59 | +6.12% |
| NLY | $22.31 | +0.18% | 16.4B | 8.82 | $2.53 | +12.52% |
| NLY-PI | $25.38 | -0.41% | 16.3B | 8.66 | $2.93 | +12.52% |
| NLY-PG | $24.75 | -0.16% | 13.4B | 8.43 | $2.93 | +12.52% |
| NLY-PF | $25.40 | -0.35% | 13.2B | 8.66 | $2.93 | +12.52% |
| AGNC | $10.49 | +0.48% | 12B | 6.99 | $1.50 | +13.71% |
| AGNCP | $25.16 | -0.16% | 9.8B | 18.03 | $1.40 | +13.71% |
| AGNCO | $25.46 | -0.04% | 9.8B | 18.21 | $1.40 | +13.71% |
| AGNCL | $24.92 | +0.44% | 9.7B | 17.86 | $1.40 | +13.71% |
Stock Comparison
EFC-PA vs RCB Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, RCB has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while RCB trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas RCB's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RCB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to RCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check RCB's competition here
EFC-PA vs NLY Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, NLY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while NLY trades at $22.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas NLY's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to NLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check NLY's competition here
EFC-PA vs NLY-PI Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, NLY-PI has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while NLY-PI trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas NLY-PI's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NLY-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to NLY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check NLY-PI's competition here
EFC-PA vs NLY-PG Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, NLY-PG has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while NLY-PG trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas NLY-PG's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NLY-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to NLY-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check NLY-PG's competition here
EFC-PA vs NLY-PF Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, NLY-PF has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while NLY-PF trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas NLY-PF's P/E ratio is 8.66. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NLY-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to NLY-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check NLY-PF's competition here
EFC-PA vs AGNC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, AGNC has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while AGNC trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AGNC's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to AGNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check AGNC's competition here
EFC-PA vs AGNCP Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, AGNCP has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while AGNCP trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AGNCP's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGNCP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check AGNCP's competition here
EFC-PA vs AGNCO Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, AGNCO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while AGNCO trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AGNCO's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGNCO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check AGNCO's competition here
EFC-PA vs AGNCL Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, AGNCL has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while AGNCL trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AGNCL's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGNCL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check AGNCL's competition here
EFC-PA vs AGNCM Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, AGNCM has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while AGNCM trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AGNCM's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGNCM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check AGNCM's competition here
EFC-PA vs AGNCN Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, AGNCN has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while AGNCN trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AGNCN's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGNCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check AGNCN's competition here
EFC-PA vs STWD Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, STWD has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while STWD trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas STWD's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STWD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to STWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check STWD's competition here
EFC-PA vs RITM-PA Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, RITM-PA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while RITM-PA trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas RITM-PA's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RITM-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check RITM-PA's competition here
EFC-PA vs RITM-PB Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, RITM-PB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while RITM-PB trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas RITM-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RITM-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check RITM-PB's competition here
EFC-PA vs RITM Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, RITM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while RITM trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas RITM's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RITM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to RITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check RITM's competition here
EFC-PA vs NRZ Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, NRZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while NRZ trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas NRZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NRZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to NRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check NRZ's competition here
EFC-PA vs RITM-PC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, RITM-PC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while RITM-PC trades at $24.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas RITM-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RITM-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check RITM-PC's competition here
EFC-PA vs RITM-PD Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, RITM-PD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while RITM-PD trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas RITM-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RITM-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check RITM-PD's competition here
EFC-PA vs EFC-PE Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, EFC-PE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while EFC-PE trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas EFC-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EFC-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check EFC-PE's competition here
EFC-PA vs RCD Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, RCD has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while RCD trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas RCD's P/E ratio is -29.17. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RCD's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to RCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check RCD's competition here
EFC-PA vs RWTN Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, RWTN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while RWTN trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas RWTN's P/E ratio is 100.89. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RWTN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to RWTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check RWTN's competition here
EFC-PA vs RWTQ Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, RWTQ has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while RWTQ trades at $24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas RWTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RWTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to RWTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check RWTQ's competition here
EFC-PA vs BXMT Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, BXMT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while BXMT trades at $17.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas BXMT's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BXMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to BXMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check BXMT's competition here
EFC-PA vs EFC-PB Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, EFC-PB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while EFC-PB trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas EFC-PB's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EFC-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check EFC-PB's competition here
EFC-PA vs NYMTH Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, NYMTH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while NYMTH trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas NYMTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYMTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check NYMTH's competition here
EFC-PA vs NYMTM Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, NYMTM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while NYMTM trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas NYMTM's P/E ratio is 531.49. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYMTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check NYMTM's competition here
EFC-PA vs ARR Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, ARR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while ARR trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ARR's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to ARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check ARR's competition here
EFC-PA vs DX Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, DX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while DX trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas DX's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to DX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check DX's competition here
EFC-PA vs DX-PC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, DX-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while DX-PC trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas DX-PC's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DX-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to DX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check DX-PC's competition here
EFC-PA vs FBRT-PE Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, FBRT-PE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while FBRT-PE trades at $19.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas FBRT-PE's P/E ratio is 28.55. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBRT-PE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to FBRT-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check FBRT-PE's competition here
EFC-PA vs ARI Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, ARI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while ARI trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ARI's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ARI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check ARI's competition here
EFC-PA vs ARR-PC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, ARR-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while ARR-PC trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ARR-PC's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARR-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to ARR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check ARR-PC's competition here
EFC-PA vs EFC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, EFC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while EFC trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas EFC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to EFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check EFC's competition here
EFC-PA vs EFC-PD Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, EFC-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while EFC-PD trades at $22.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas EFC-PD's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check EFC-PD's competition here
EFC-PA vs EFC-PC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, EFC-PC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while EFC-PC trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas EFC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check EFC-PC's competition here
EFC-PA vs NYMTO Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, NYMTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while NYMTO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas NYMTO's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYMTO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check NYMTO's competition here
EFC-PA vs TWO Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, TWO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while TWO trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas TWO's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TWO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to TWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check TWO's competition here
EFC-PA vs TWO-PB Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, TWO-PB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while TWO-PB trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas TWO-PB's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TWO-PB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to TWO-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check TWO-PB's competition here
EFC-PA vs TWO-PA Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, TWO-PA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while TWO-PA trades at $24.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas TWO-PA's P/E ratio is -7.91. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TWO-PA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to TWO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check TWO-PA's competition here
EFC-PA vs TWO-PC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, TWO-PC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while TWO-PC trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas TWO-PC's P/E ratio is -7.99. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TWO-PC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to TWO-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check TWO-PC's competition here
EFC-PA vs SCCG Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, SCCG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while SCCG trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas SCCG's P/E ratio is -141.23. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCCG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to SCCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check SCCG's competition here
EFC-PA vs SCCC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, SCCC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while SCCC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas SCCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCCC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to SCCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check SCCC's competition here
EFC-PA vs CIM Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, CIM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while CIM trades at $13.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas CIM's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to CIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check CIM's competition here
EFC-PA vs CIMN Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, CIMN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while CIMN trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas CIMN's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to CIMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check CIMN's competition here
EFC-PA vs CIMP Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, CIMP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while CIMP trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas CIMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to CIMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check CIMP's competition here
EFC-PA vs CIM-PC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, CIM-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while CIM-PC trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas CIM-PC's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIM-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to CIM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check CIM-PC's competition here
EFC-PA vs CIM-PA Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, CIM-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while CIM-PA trades at $21.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas CIM-PA's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIM-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to CIM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check CIM-PA's competition here
EFC-PA vs CIM-PD Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, CIM-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while CIM-PD trades at $23.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas CIM-PD's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIM-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to CIM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check CIM-PD's competition here
EFC-PA vs CIM-PB Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, CIM-PB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while CIM-PB trades at $23.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas CIM-PB's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIM-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to CIM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check CIM-PB's competition here
EFC-PA vs ORC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, ORC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while ORC trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ORC's P/E ratio is 7.17. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ORC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to ORC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check ORC's competition here
EFC-PA vs PMT-PB Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, PMT-PB has a market cap of 995.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while PMT-PB trades at $22.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas PMT-PB's P/E ratio is -30.98. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PMT-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to PMT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check PMT-PB's competition here
EFC-PA vs PMT-PA Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, PMT-PA has a market cap of 995.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while PMT-PA trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas PMT-PA's P/E ratio is -30.81. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PMT-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to PMT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check PMT-PA's competition here
EFC-PA vs LFT-PA Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, LFT-PA has a market cap of 995M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while LFT-PA trades at $19.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas LFT-PA's P/E ratio is -428.54. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LFT-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to LFT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check LFT-PA's competition here
EFC-PA vs ABR-PE Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, ABR-PE has a market cap of 992.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while ABR-PE trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ABR-PE's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABR-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to ABR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check ABR-PE's competition here
EFC-PA vs MFA-PB Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, MFA-PB has a market cap of 985.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while MFA-PB trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas MFA-PB's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFA-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to MFA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check MFA-PB's competition here
EFC-PA vs MFAO Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, MFAO has a market cap of 984.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while MFAO trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas MFAO's P/E ratio is 18.86. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to MFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check MFAO's competition here
EFC-PA vs MFA-PC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, MFA-PC has a market cap of 980.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while MFA-PC trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas MFA-PC's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFA-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to MFA-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check MFA-PC's competition here
EFC-PA vs MFA Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, MFA has a market cap of 980.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while MFA trades at $9.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas MFA's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to MFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check MFA's competition here
EFC-PA vs ABR-PD Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, ABR-PD has a market cap of 980.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while ABR-PD trades at $16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ABR-PD's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABR-PD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ABR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check ABR-PD's competition here
EFC-PA vs ABR Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, ABR has a market cap of 980.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while ABR trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ABR's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check ABR's competition here
EFC-PA vs ABR-PF Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, ABR-PF has a market cap of 967.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while ABR-PF trades at $22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ABR-PF's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABR-PF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ABR-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check ABR-PF's competition here
EFC-PA vs MFAN Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, MFAN has a market cap of 962.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while MFAN trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas MFAN's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to MFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check MFAN's competition here
EFC-PA vs PMT Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, PMT has a market cap of 913.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while PMT trades at $10.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas PMT's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to PMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check PMT's competition here
EFC-PA vs PMTU Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 865.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while PMTU trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check PMTU's competition here
EFC-PA vs PMT-PC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, PMT-PC has a market cap of 864.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while PMT-PC trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas PMT-PC's P/E ratio is -24.43. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PMT-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to PMT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check PMT-PC's competition here
EFC-PA vs ADAM Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, ADAM has a market cap of 837.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while ADAM trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ADAM's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ADAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check ADAM's competition here
EFC-PA vs ADAMI Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, ADAMI has a market cap of 819.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while ADAMI trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ADAMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADAMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to ADAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check ADAMI's competition here
EFC-PA vs ADAMH Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, ADAMH has a market cap of 816.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while ADAMH trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ADAMH's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADAMH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to ADAMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check ADAMH's competition here
EFC-PA vs ADAMN Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, ADAMN has a market cap of 815M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while ADAMN trades at $23.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ADAMN's P/E ratio is 20.47. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADAMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to ADAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check ADAMN's competition here
EFC-PA vs ADAMM Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, ADAMM has a market cap of 811.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while ADAMM trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ADAMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADAMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to ADAMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check ADAMM's competition here
EFC-PA vs MITN Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, MITN has a market cap of 808.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while MITN trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas MITN's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MITN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to MITN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check MITN's competition here
EFC-PA vs MITP Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, MITP has a market cap of 807.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while MITP trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas MITP's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MITP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to MITP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check MITP's competition here
EFC-PA vs MITT-PC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, MITT-PC has a market cap of 764.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while MITT-PC trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas MITT-PC's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MITT-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to MITT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check MITT-PC's competition here
EFC-PA vs TRTX Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, TRTX has a market cap of 662.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while TRTX trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas TRTX's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRTX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to TRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check TRTX's competition here
EFC-PA vs TRTX-PC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, TRTX-PC has a market cap of 660.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while TRTX-PC trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas TRTX-PC's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRTX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to TRTX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check TRTX-PC's competition here
EFC-PA vs NYMT Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, NYMT has a market cap of 642.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while NYMT trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas NYMT's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYMT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to NYMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check NYMT's competition here
EFC-PA vs FBRT Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, FBRT has a market cap of 641.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while FBRT trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas FBRT's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to FBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check FBRT's competition here
EFC-PA vs BRMK Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, BRMK has a market cap of 635M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while BRMK trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas BRMK's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRMK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to BRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check BRMK's competition here
EFC-PA vs NYMTZ Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, NYMTZ has a market cap of 633.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while NYMTZ trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas NYMTZ's P/E ratio is 396.39. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYMTZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check NYMTZ's competition here
EFC-PA vs AIC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, AIC has a market cap of 631.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while AIC trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas AIC's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIC's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to AIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check AIC's competition here
EFC-PA vs NYMTN Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, NYMTN has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while NYMTN trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas NYMTN's P/E ratio is 460.96. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYMTN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA and NYMTN have similar daily volatility (1.71).Check NYMTN's competition here
EFC-PA vs NYMTL Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, NYMTL has a market cap of 611.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while NYMTL trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas NYMTL's P/E ratio is 464.26. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NYMTL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check NYMTL's competition here
EFC-PA vs RWT-PA Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, RWT-PA has a market cap of 606.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while RWT-PA trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas RWT-PA's P/E ratio is -62.56. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RWT-PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to RWT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check RWT-PA's competition here
EFC-PA vs RWT Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, RWT has a market cap of 602.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while RWT trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas RWT's P/E ratio is 4.86. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RWT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to RWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check RWT's competition here
EFC-PA vs IVR-PC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, IVR-PC has a market cap of 559.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while IVR-PC trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas IVR-PC's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IVR-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to IVR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check IVR-PC's competition here
EFC-PA vs IVR Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, IVR has a market cap of 559.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while IVR trades at $7.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas IVR's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IVR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to IVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check IVR's competition here
EFC-PA vs KREF Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, KREF has a market cap of 455.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while KREF trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas KREF's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KREF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to KREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check KREF's competition here
EFC-PA vs KREF-PA Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, KREF-PA has a market cap of 452.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while KREF-PA trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas KREF-PA's P/E ratio is -229.76. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KREF-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to KREF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check KREF-PA's competition here
EFC-PA vs CMTG Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, CMTG has a market cap of 341.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while CMTG trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas CMTG's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMTG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to CMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check CMTG's competition here
EFC-PA vs RC-PE Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, RC-PE has a market cap of 289.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while RC-PE trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas RC-PE's P/E ratio is -6.48. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RC-PE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to RC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check RC-PE's competition here
EFC-PA vs NREF-PA Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, NREF-PA has a market cap of 286.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while NREF-PA trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas NREF-PA's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NREF-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to NREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check NREF-PA's competition here
EFC-PA vs RC-PC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, RC-PC has a market cap of 285.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while RC-PC trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas RC-PC's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RC-PC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to RC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check RC-PC's competition here
EFC-PA vs NREF Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, NREF has a market cap of 285M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while NREF trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas NREF's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NREF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA and NREF have similar daily volatility (1.71).Check NREF's competition here
EFC-PA vs RC Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, RC has a market cap of 283.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while RC trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas RC's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to RC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check RC's competition here
EFC-PA vs MITT Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, MITT has a market cap of 257.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while MITT trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas MITT's P/E ratio is 8.79. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MITT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to MITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check MITT's competition here
EFC-PA vs ACRE Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, ACRE has a market cap of 248.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while ACRE trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas ACRE's P/E ratio is -22.40. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACRE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to ACRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check ACRE's competition here
EFC-PA vs MITT-PA Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, MITT-PA has a market cap of 232.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while MITT-PA trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas MITT-PA's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MITT-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to MITT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check MITT-PA's competition here
EFC-PA vs REFI Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, REFI has a market cap of 232.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while REFI trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas REFI's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REFI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is less volatile compared to REFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check REFI's competition here
EFC-PA vs MITT-PB Comparison June 2026
EFC-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PA stands at 658.6M. In comparison, MITT-PB has a market cap of 225.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PA is priced at $12.22, while MITT-PB trades at $21.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 8.19, whereas MITT-PB's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, EFC-PA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MITT-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PA is more volatile compared to MITT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PA.Check MITT-PB's competition here