Redwood Trust, Inc.
Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RWT-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Mortgage Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RWT-PA | $25.24 | +0.66% | 3.2B | N/A | N/A | +13.35% |
| RCB | $25.34 | -0.04% | 61.3B | 15.98 | $1.59 | +6.12% |
| NLY-PI | $25.71 | +0.12% | 17.3B | 14.54 | $1.77 | +12.48% |
| NLY | $22.44 | -0.75% | 16.4B | 7.24 | $3.10 | +12.48% |
| RITM-PA | $25.29 | +0.16% | 13.8B | 17.32 | $1.46 | +10.33% |
| RITM-PB | $25.25 | +0.04% | 13.8B | N/A | N/A | +10.33% |
| NLY-PG | $25.37 | +0.04% | 13.8B | 14.35 | $1.77 | +12.48% |
| RITM-PD | $24.90 | +0.08% | 13.6B | N/A | N/A | +10.33% |
| NLY-PF | $26.03 | -0.12% | 13.6B | 14.74 | $1.77 | +12.48% |
| RITM-PC | $24.57 | -0.08% | 13.4B | N/A | N/A | +10.33% |
Stock Comparison
RWT-PA vs RCB Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RCB has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while RCB trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCB's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RCB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to RCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check RCB's competition here
RWT-PA vs NLY-PI Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NLY-PI has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while NLY-PI trades at $25.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NLY-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to NLY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check NLY-PI's competition here
RWT-PA vs NLY Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NLY has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while NLY trades at $22.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLY's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to NLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check NLY's competition here
RWT-PA vs RITM-PA Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RITM-PA has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while RITM-PA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITM-PA's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RITM-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check RITM-PA's competition here
RWT-PA vs RITM-PB Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RITM-PB has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while RITM-PB trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITM-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RITM-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check RITM-PB's competition here
RWT-PA vs NLY-PG Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NLY-PG has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while NLY-PG trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLY-PG's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NLY-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to NLY-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check NLY-PG's competition here
RWT-PA vs RITM-PD Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RITM-PD has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while RITM-PD trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITM-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RITM-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check RITM-PD's competition here
RWT-PA vs NLY-PF Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NLY-PF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while NLY-PF trades at $26.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NLY-PF's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NLY-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to NLY-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check NLY-PF's competition here
RWT-PA vs RITM-PC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RITM-PC has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while RITM-PC trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITM-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RITM-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to RITM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check RITM-PC's competition here
RWT-PA vs AGNC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AGNC has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while AGNC trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGNC's P/E ratio is 8.44. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AGNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to AGNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check AGNC's competition here
RWT-PA vs AGNCO Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AGNCO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while AGNCO trades at $25.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGNCO's P/E ratio is -13.74. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AGNCO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check AGNCO's competition here
RWT-PA vs AGNCP Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AGNCP has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while AGNCP trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGNCP's P/E ratio is -13.43. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AGNCP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check AGNCP's competition here
RWT-PA vs AGNCL Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AGNCL has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while AGNCL trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGNCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AGNCL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check AGNCL's competition here
RWT-PA vs AGNCM Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AGNCM has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while AGNCM trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGNCM's P/E ratio is -13.42. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AGNCM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check AGNCM's competition here
RWT-PA vs AGNCN Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AGNCN has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while AGNCN trades at $25.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGNCN's P/E ratio is -13.85. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AGNCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to AGNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check AGNCN's competition here
RWT-PA vs STWD Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, STWD has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while STWD trades at $17.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STWD's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to STWD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to STWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check STWD's competition here
RWT-PA vs RITM Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RITM has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while RITM trades at $9.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RITM's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RITM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to RITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check RITM's competition here
RWT-PA vs NRZ Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NRZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while NRZ trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NRZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NRZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to NRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check NRZ's competition here
RWT-PA vs ABR-PF Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ABR-PF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while ABR-PF trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABR-PF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ABR-PF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to ABR-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check ABR-PF's competition here
RWT-PA vs EFC-PE Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EFC-PE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while EFC-PE trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFC-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EFC-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to EFC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check EFC-PE's competition here
RWT-PA vs RCD Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RCD has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while RCD trades at $22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCD's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RCD's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to RCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check RCD's competition here
RWT-PA vs ABR-PD Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ABR-PD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while ABR-PD trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABR-PD's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ABR-PD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to ABR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check ABR-PD's competition here
RWT-PA vs ABR-PE Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ABR-PE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while ABR-PE trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABR-PE's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ABR-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to ABR-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check ABR-PE's competition here
RWT-PA vs RWTN Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RWTN has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while RWTN trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RWTN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to RWTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check RWTN's competition here
RWT-PA vs BXMT Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BXMT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while BXMT trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BXMT's P/E ratio is 30.58. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BXMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to BXMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check BXMT's competition here
RWT-PA vs EFC-PC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EFC-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while EFC-PC trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check EFC-PC's competition here
RWT-PA vs TWO-PC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TWO-PC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while TWO-PC trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWO-PC's P/E ratio is 6.80. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TWO-PC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to TWO-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check TWO-PC's competition here
RWT-PA vs TWO-PB Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TWO-PB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while TWO-PB trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWO-PB's P/E ratio is 44.95. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TWO-PB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to TWO-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check TWO-PB's competition here
RWT-PA vs MFAN Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MFAN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while MFAN trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to MFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check MFAN's competition here
RWT-PA vs TWO-PA Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TWO-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while TWO-PA trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWO-PA's P/E ratio is 44.65. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TWO-PA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to TWO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check TWO-PA's competition here
RWT-PA vs MFAO Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MFAO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while MFAO trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to MFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check MFAO's competition here
RWT-PA vs EFC-PB Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EFC-PB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while EFC-PB trades at $24.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFC-PB's P/E ratio is 16.61. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EFC-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check EFC-PB's competition here
RWT-PA vs EFC-PD Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EFC-PD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while EFC-PD trades at $23.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFC-PD's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EFC-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to EFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check EFC-PD's competition here
RWT-PA vs MFA-PC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MFA-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while MFA-PC trades at $23.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFA-PC's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MFA-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to MFA-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check MFA-PC's competition here
RWT-PA vs NYMTH Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NYMTH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while NYMTH trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYMTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NYMTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check NYMTH's competition here
RWT-PA vs NYMTM Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NYMTM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while NYMTM trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYMTM's P/E ratio is 531.49. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NYMTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check NYMTM's competition here
RWT-PA vs ARR Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ARR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while ARR trades at $17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARR's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ARR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to ARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check ARR's competition here
RWT-PA vs RC-PC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RC-PC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while RC-PC trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RC-PC's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RC-PC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to RC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check RC-PC's competition here
RWT-PA vs RC-PE Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RC-PE has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while RC-PE trades at $13.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RC-PE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to RC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check RC-PE's competition here
RWT-PA vs MFA-PB Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MFA-PB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while MFA-PB trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFA-PB's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MFA-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to MFA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check MFA-PB's competition here
RWT-PA vs DX Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while DX trades at $13.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DX's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to DX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check DX's competition here
RWT-PA vs IVR-PC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IVR-PC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while IVR-PC trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVR-PC's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IVR-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to IVR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check IVR-PC's competition here
RWT-PA vs FBRT-PE Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FBRT-PE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while FBRT-PE trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBRT-PE's P/E ratio is -11.56. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FBRT-PE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to FBRT-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check FBRT-PE's competition here
RWT-PA vs DX-PC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, DX-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while DX-PC trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DX-PC's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DX-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to DX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check DX-PC's competition here
RWT-PA vs PMT-PC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PMT-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while PMT-PC trades at $18.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMT-PC's P/E ratio is -25.21. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PMT-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to PMT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check PMT-PC's competition here
RWT-PA vs TRTX-PC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TRTX-PC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while TRTX-PC trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRTX-PC's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TRTX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to TRTX-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check TRTX-PC's competition here
RWT-PA vs ARI Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ARI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while ARI trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARI's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ARI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to ARI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check ARI's competition here
RWT-PA vs ARR-PC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ARR-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while ARR-PC trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARR-PC's P/E ratio is -13.61. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ARR-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to ARR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check ARR-PC's competition here
RWT-PA vs EFC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EFC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while EFC trades at $13.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFC's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to EFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check EFC's competition here
RWT-PA vs TWO Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TWO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while TWO trades at $12.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TWO's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TWO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to TWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check TWO's competition here
RWT-PA vs NYMTO Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NYMTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while NYMTO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYMTO's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NYMTO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check NYMTO's competition here
RWT-PA vs LADR Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while LADR trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check LADR's competition here
RWT-PA vs ABR Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ABR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while ABR trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABR's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ABR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to ABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check ABR's competition here
RWT-PA vs KREF-PA Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KREF-PA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while KREF-PA trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KREF-PA's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KREF-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to KREF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check KREF-PA's competition here
RWT-PA vs SCCC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SCCC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while SCCC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SCCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to SCCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check SCCC's competition here
RWT-PA vs SCCG Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SCCG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while SCCG trades at $23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SCCG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to SCCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check SCCG's competition here
RWT-PA vs CIM-PC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CIM-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while CIM-PC trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.84. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIM-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to CIM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check CIM-PC's competition here
RWT-PA vs CIM Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CIM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while CIM trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIM's P/E ratio is -16.22. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to CIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check CIM's competition here
RWT-PA vs CIM-PD Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CIM-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while CIM-PD trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIM-PD's P/E ratio is 33.49. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIM-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to CIM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check CIM-PD's competition here
RWT-PA vs CIM-PB Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CIM-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while CIM-PB trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIM-PB's P/E ratio is 33.63. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIM-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to CIM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check CIM-PB's competition here
RWT-PA vs CIM-PA Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CIM-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while CIM-PA trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIM-PA's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIM-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to CIM-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check CIM-PA's competition here
RWT-PA vs ORC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ORC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while ORC trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ORC's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ORC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to ORC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check ORC's competition here
RWT-PA vs LFT-PA Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, LFT-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while LFT-PA trades at $19.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFT-PA's P/E ratio is 86.07. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LFT-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to LFT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check LFT-PA's competition here
RWT-PA vs PMT-PA Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PMT-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while PMT-PA trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMT-PA's P/E ratio is -31.78. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PMT-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to PMT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check PMT-PA's competition here
RWT-PA vs PMT-PB Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PMT-PB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while PMT-PB trades at $23.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMT-PB's P/E ratio is -31.56. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PMT-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to PMT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check PMT-PB's competition here
RWT-PA vs MFA Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MFA has a market cap of 982.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while MFA trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFA's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MFA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to MFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check MFA's competition here
RWT-PA vs GPMT-PA Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, GPMT-PA has a market cap of 951.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while GPMT-PA trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPMT-PA's P/E ratio is 29.99. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GPMT-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to GPMT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check GPMT-PA's competition here
RWT-PA vs PMT Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, PMT has a market cap of 938.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while PMT trades at $10.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMT's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to PMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check PMT's competition here
RWT-PA vs SACH-PA Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, SACH-PA has a market cap of 849.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while SACH-PA trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SACH-PA's P/E ratio is 42.00. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SACH-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to SACH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check SACH-PA's competition here
RWT-PA vs MITN Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MITN has a market cap of 807.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while MITN trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MITN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to MITN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check MITN's competition here
RWT-PA vs MITP Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MITP has a market cap of 800.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while MITP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MITP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to MITP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check MITP's competition here
RWT-PA vs ADAM Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ADAM has a market cap of 778.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while ADAM trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADAM's P/E ratio is 7.40. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ADAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to ADAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check ADAM's competition here
RWT-PA vs MITT-PC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MITT-PC has a market cap of 775.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while MITT-PC trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITT-PC's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MITT-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to MITT-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check MITT-PC's competition here
RWT-PA vs CHMI-PA Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CHMI-PA has a market cap of 775.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while CHMI-PA trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHMI-PA's P/E ratio is 38.31. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CHMI-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to CHMI-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check CHMI-PA's competition here
RWT-PA vs FBRT Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, FBRT has a market cap of 676.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while FBRT trades at $8.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FBRT's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FBRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to FBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check FBRT's competition here
RWT-PA vs RWT Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RWT has a market cap of 666.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while RWT trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RWT's P/E ratio is -6.65. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RWT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to RWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check RWT's competition here
RWT-PA vs EFC-PA Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, EFC-PA has a market cap of 658.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while EFC-PA trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EFC-PA's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to EFC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check EFC-PA's competition here
RWT-PA vs TRTX Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, TRTX has a market cap of 648.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while TRTX trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRTX's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TRTX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to TRTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check TRTX's competition here
RWT-PA vs NYMT Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NYMT has a market cap of 642.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while NYMT trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYMT's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NYMT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to NYMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check NYMT's competition here
RWT-PA vs BRMK Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, BRMK has a market cap of 635M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while BRMK trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BRMK's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BRMK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to BRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check BRMK's competition here
RWT-PA vs NYMTZ Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NYMTZ has a market cap of 633.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while NYMTZ trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYMTZ's P/E ratio is 396.39. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NYMTZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check NYMTZ's competition here
RWT-PA vs AIC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AIC has a market cap of 631.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while AIC trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIC's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AIC's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to AIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check AIC's competition here
RWT-PA vs NYMTN Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NYMTN has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while NYMTN trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYMTN's P/E ratio is 460.96. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NYMTN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to NYMTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check NYMTN's competition here
RWT-PA vs NYMTL Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NYMTL has a market cap of 611.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while NYMTL trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYMTL's P/E ratio is 464.26. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NYMTL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to NYMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check NYMTL's competition here
RWT-PA vs IVR Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, IVR has a market cap of 586.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while IVR trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVR's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IVR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to IVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check IVR's competition here
RWT-PA vs NREF-PA Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NREF-PA has a market cap of 432.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while NREF-PA trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NREF-PA's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NREF-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to NREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check NREF-PA's competition here
RWT-PA vs KREF Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, KREF has a market cap of 418M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while KREF trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KREF's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KREF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to KREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check KREF's competition here
RWT-PA vs CMTG Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, CMTG has a market cap of 323.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while CMTG trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CMTG's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CMTG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to CMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check CMTG's competition here
RWT-PA vs RC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, RC has a market cap of 293.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while RC trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RC's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to RC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check RC's competition here
RWT-PA vs NREF Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, NREF has a market cap of 291.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while NREF trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NREF's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NREF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to NREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check NREF's competition here
RWT-PA vs ACRE Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ACRE has a market cap of 270.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while ACRE trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACRE's P/E ratio is -13.54. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ACRE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to ACRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check ACRE's competition here
RWT-PA vs MITT Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MITT has a market cap of 246.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while MITT trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITT's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MITT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to MITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check MITT's competition here
RWT-PA vs REFI Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, REFI has a market cap of 245.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while REFI trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REFI's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to REFI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to REFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check REFI's competition here
RWT-PA vs MITT-PA Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MITT-PA has a market cap of 244.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while MITT-PA trades at $22.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITT-PA's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MITT-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to MITT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check MITT-PA's competition here
RWT-PA vs MITT-PB Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, MITT-PB has a market cap of 239.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while MITT-PB trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MITT-PB's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MITT-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to MITT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check MITT-PB's competition here
RWT-PA vs AOMR Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, AOMR has a market cap of 212.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while AOMR trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOMR's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AOMR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to AOMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check AOMR's competition here
RWT-PA vs ICR-PA Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ICR-PA has a market cap of 183.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while ICR-PA trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICR-PA's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ICR-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to ICR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check ICR-PA's competition here
RWT-PA vs ACR-PC Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ACR-PC has a market cap of 174.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while ACR-PC trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACR-PC's P/E ratio is 49.59. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ACR-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is more volatile compared to ACR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check ACR-PC's competition here
RWT-PA vs ACR Comparison May 2026
RWT-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT-PA stands at 3.2B. In comparison, ACR has a market cap of 158.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT-PA is priced at $25.24, while ACR trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT-PA currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACR's P/E ratio is 32.49. In terms of profitability, RWT-PA's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ACR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT-PA is less volatile compared to ACR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT-PA.Check ACR's competition here