Ellington Financial Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for EFC-PB
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for EFC-PB
Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC-PB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EFC-PB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Mortgage Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFC-PB | $24.53 | +0.66% | 2.5B | 16.44 | $1.49 | +12.47% |
| RCB | $25.31 | +0.04% | 61.2B | 15.96 | $1.59 | +6.12% |
| NLY-PI | $25.20 | +0.12% | 16.1B | 14.25 | $1.77 | +12.68% |
| NLY | $22.14 | +0.18% | 15.9B | 7.58 | $2.92 | +12.68% |
| RITM-PA | $25.50 | +0.00% | 13.7B | 17.47 | $1.46 | +10.12% |
| NLY-PG | $24.81 | -0.44% | 13.5B | 14.04 | $1.77 | +12.68% |
| RITM-PB | $24.98 | -0.08% | 13.4B | N/A | N/A | +10.12% |
| RITM-PD | $24.84 | +0.00% | 13.4B | N/A | N/A | +10.12% |
| NLY-PF | $25.60 | +0.00% | 13.4B | 14.48 | $1.77 | +12.68% |
| RITM-PC | $24.39 | -0.12% | 13.1B | N/A | N/A | +10.12% |
Stock Comparison
EFC-PB vs RCB Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RCB has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while RCB trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas RCB's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RCB's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to RCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check RCB's competition here
EFC-PB vs NLY-PI Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NLY-PI has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while NLY-PI trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas NLY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NLY-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to NLY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check NLY-PI's competition here
EFC-PB vs NLY Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NLY has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while NLY trades at $22.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas NLY's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to NLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check NLY's competition here
EFC-PB vs RITM-PA Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RITM-PA has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while RITM-PA trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas RITM-PA's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RITM-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to RITM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check RITM-PA's competition here
EFC-PB vs NLY-PG Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NLY-PG has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while NLY-PG trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas NLY-PG's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NLY-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to NLY-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check NLY-PG's competition here
EFC-PB vs RITM-PB Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RITM-PB has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while RITM-PB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas RITM-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RITM-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to RITM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check RITM-PB's competition here
EFC-PB vs RITM-PD Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RITM-PD has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while RITM-PD trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas RITM-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RITM-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to RITM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check RITM-PD's competition here
EFC-PB vs NLY-PF Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NLY-PF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while NLY-PF trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas NLY-PF's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NLY-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to NLY-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check NLY-PF's competition here
EFC-PB vs RITM-PC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RITM-PC has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while RITM-PC trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas RITM-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RITM-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to RITM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check RITM-PC's competition here
EFC-PB vs AGNC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AGNC has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while AGNC trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas AGNC's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to AGNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check AGNC's competition here
EFC-PB vs AGNCO Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AGNCO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while AGNCO trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas AGNCO's P/E ratio is -13.44. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNCO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to AGNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check AGNCO's competition here
EFC-PB vs AGNCP Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AGNCP has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while AGNCP trades at $24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas AGNCP's P/E ratio is -13.09. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNCP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to AGNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check AGNCP's competition here
EFC-PB vs AGNCL Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AGNCL has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while AGNCL trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas AGNCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNCL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to AGNCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check AGNCL's competition here
EFC-PB vs AGNCN Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AGNCN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while AGNCN trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas AGNCN's P/E ratio is -13.58. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to AGNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check AGNCN's competition here
EFC-PB vs AGNCM Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AGNCM has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while AGNCM trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas AGNCM's P/E ratio is -13.02. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGNCM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to AGNCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check AGNCM's competition here
EFC-PB vs STWD Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, STWD has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while STWD trades at $17.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas STWD's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STWD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to STWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check STWD's competition here
EFC-PB vs RITM Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RITM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while RITM trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas RITM's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RITM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to RITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check RITM's competition here
EFC-PB vs NRZ Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NRZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while NRZ trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas NRZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NRZ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to NRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check NRZ's competition here
EFC-PB vs EFC-PE Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EFC-PE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while EFC-PE trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas EFC-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFC-PE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to EFC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check EFC-PE's competition here
EFC-PB vs ABR-PF Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ABR-PF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while ABR-PF trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas ABR-PF's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABR-PF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to ABR-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check ABR-PF's competition here
EFC-PB vs ABR-PE Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ABR-PE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while ABR-PE trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas ABR-PE's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABR-PE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to ABR-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check ABR-PE's competition here
EFC-PB vs ABR-PD Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ABR-PD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while ABR-PD trades at $17.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas ABR-PD's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABR-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to ABR-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check ABR-PD's competition here
EFC-PB vs BXMT Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BXMT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while BXMT trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas BXMT's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BXMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to BXMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check BXMT's competition here
EFC-PB vs RCD Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RCD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while RCD trades at $20.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas RCD's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RCD's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to RCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check RCD's competition here
EFC-PB vs RWTN Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RWTN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while RWTN trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas RWTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RWTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to RWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check RWTN's competition here
EFC-PB vs RWT-PA Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RWT-PA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while RWT-PA trades at $24.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas RWT-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RWT-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to RWT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check RWT-PA's competition here
EFC-PB vs MFAO Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MFAO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while MFAO trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas MFAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFAO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to MFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check MFAO's competition here
EFC-PB vs MFAN Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MFAN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while MFAN trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas MFAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to MFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check MFAN's competition here
EFC-PB vs TWO-PC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TWO-PC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while TWO-PC trades at $24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas TWO-PC's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWO-PC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to TWO-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check TWO-PC's competition here
EFC-PB vs TWO-PB Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TWO-PB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while TWO-PB trades at $24.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas TWO-PB's P/E ratio is 44.79. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWO-PB's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to TWO-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check TWO-PB's competition here
EFC-PB vs TWO-PA Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TWO-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while TWO-PA trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas TWO-PA's P/E ratio is 44.75. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWO-PA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to TWO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check TWO-PA's competition here
EFC-PB vs EFC-PC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EFC-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while EFC-PC trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas EFC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFC-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to EFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check EFC-PC's competition here
EFC-PB vs EFC-PD Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EFC-PD has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while EFC-PD trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas EFC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFC-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to EFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check EFC-PD's competition here
EFC-PB vs MFA-PC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MFA-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while MFA-PC trades at $23.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas MFA-PC's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFA-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to MFA-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check MFA-PC's competition here
EFC-PB vs NYMTH Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NYMTH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while NYMTH trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas NYMTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to NYMTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check NYMTH's competition here
EFC-PB vs NYMTM Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NYMTM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while NYMTM trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas NYMTM's P/E ratio is 531.49. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to NYMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check NYMTM's competition here
EFC-PB vs ARR Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ARR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while ARR trades at $17.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas ARR's P/E ratio is 5.35. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to ARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check ARR's competition here
EFC-PB vs MFA-PB Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MFA-PB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while MFA-PB trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas MFA-PB's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFA-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to MFA-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check MFA-PB's competition here
EFC-PB vs DX Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while DX trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas DX's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to DX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check DX's competition here
EFC-PB vs RC-PE Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RC-PE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while RC-PE trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas RC-PE's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RC-PE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to RC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check RC-PE's competition here
EFC-PB vs RC-PC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RC-PC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while RC-PC trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas RC-PC's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RC-PC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to RC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check RC-PC's competition here
EFC-PB vs DX-PC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, DX-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while DX-PC trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas DX-PC's P/E ratio is 9.58. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DX-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to DX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check DX-PC's competition here
EFC-PB vs FBRT-PE Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FBRT-PE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while FBRT-PE trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas FBRT-PE's P/E ratio is -11.32. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FBRT-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to FBRT-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check FBRT-PE's competition here
EFC-PB vs IVR-PC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IVR-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while IVR-PC trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas IVR-PC's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IVR-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to IVR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check IVR-PC's competition here
EFC-PB vs PMT-PC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PMT-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while PMT-PC trades at $18.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas PMT-PC's P/E ratio is -25.10. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMT-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to PMT-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check PMT-PC's competition here
EFC-PB vs ARI Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ARI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while ARI trades at $10.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas ARI's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to ARI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check ARI's competition here
EFC-PB vs ABR Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ABR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while ABR trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas ABR's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to ABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check ABR's competition here
EFC-PB vs TRTX-PC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TRTX-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while TRTX-PC trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas TRTX-PC's P/E ratio is 22.11. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRTX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to TRTX-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check TRTX-PC's competition here
EFC-PB vs ARR-PC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ARR-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while ARR-PC trades at $20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas ARR-PC's P/E ratio is -13.59. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARR-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to ARR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check ARR-PC's competition here
EFC-PB vs NYMTO Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NYMTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while NYMTO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas NYMTO's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to NYMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check NYMTO's competition here
EFC-PB vs LADR Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while LADR trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check LADR's competition here
EFC-PB vs EFC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EFC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while EFC trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas EFC's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to EFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check EFC's competition here
EFC-PB vs SCCC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SCCC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while SCCC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas SCCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to SCCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check SCCC's competition here
EFC-PB vs TWO Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TWO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while TWO trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas TWO's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TWO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to TWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check TWO's competition here
EFC-PB vs SCCG Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SCCG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while SCCG trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas SCCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCCG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to SCCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check SCCG's competition here
EFC-PB vs KREF-PA Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KREF-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while KREF-PA trades at $17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas KREF-PA's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KREF-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to KREF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check KREF-PA's competition here
EFC-PB vs CIM Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CIM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while CIM trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas CIM's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to CIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check CIM's competition here
EFC-PB vs CIM-PA Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CIM-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while CIM-PA trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas CIM-PA's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIM-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to CIM-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check CIM-PA's competition here
EFC-PB vs ORC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ORC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while ORC trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas ORC's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ORC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to ORC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check ORC's competition here
EFC-PB vs CIM-PD Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CIM-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while CIM-PD trades at $23.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas CIM-PD's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIM-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to CIM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check CIM-PD's competition here
EFC-PB vs CIM-PC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CIM-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while CIM-PC trades at $21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas CIM-PC's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIM-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to CIM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check CIM-PC's competition here
EFC-PB vs PMT-PA Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PMT-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while PMT-PA trades at $23.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas PMT-PA's P/E ratio is -32.71. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMT-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to PMT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check PMT-PA's competition here
EFC-PB vs CIM-PB Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CIM-PB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while CIM-PB trades at $23.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas CIM-PB's P/E ratio is 31.94. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CIM-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to CIM-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check CIM-PB's competition here
EFC-PB vs LFT-PA Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, LFT-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while LFT-PA trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas LFT-PA's P/E ratio is 86.68. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LFT-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to LFT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check LFT-PA's competition here
EFC-PB vs PMT-PB Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PMT-PB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while PMT-PB trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas PMT-PB's P/E ratio is -32.27. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMT-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to PMT-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check PMT-PB's competition here
EFC-PB vs PMT Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, PMT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while PMT trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas PMT's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PMT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to PMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check PMT's competition here
EFC-PB vs MFA Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MFA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while MFA trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas MFA's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MFA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to MFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check MFA's competition here
EFC-PB vs GPMT-PA Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, GPMT-PA has a market cap of 869.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while GPMT-PA trades at $18.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas GPMT-PA's P/E ratio is 27.42. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPMT-PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to GPMT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check GPMT-PA's competition here
EFC-PB vs SACH-PA Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, SACH-PA has a market cap of 836.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while SACH-PA trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas SACH-PA's P/E ratio is 41.36. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SACH-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to SACH-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check SACH-PA's competition here
EFC-PB vs MITP Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MITP has a market cap of 809.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while MITP trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas MITP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to MITP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check MITP's competition here
EFC-PB vs MITN Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MITN has a market cap of 807.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while MITN trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas MITN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to MITN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check MITN's competition here
EFC-PB vs CHMI-PA Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CHMI-PA has a market cap of 763.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while CHMI-PA trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas CHMI-PA's P/E ratio is 37.71. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CHMI-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to CHMI-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check CHMI-PA's competition here
EFC-PB vs MITT-PC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MITT-PC has a market cap of 762M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while MITT-PC trades at $24.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas MITT-PC's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITT-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to MITT-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check MITT-PC's competition here
EFC-PB vs RWT Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RWT has a market cap of 741.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while RWT trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas RWT's P/E ratio is -9.42. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RWT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to RWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check RWT's competition here
EFC-PB vs FBRT Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, FBRT has a market cap of 707.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while FBRT trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas FBRT's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FBRT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to FBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check FBRT's competition here
EFC-PB vs ADAM Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ADAM has a market cap of 686.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while ADAM trades at $7.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas ADAM's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ADAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to ADAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check ADAM's competition here
EFC-PB vs EFC-PA Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, EFC-PA has a market cap of 658.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while EFC-PA trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas EFC-PA's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EFC-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to EFC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check EFC-PA's competition here
EFC-PB vs NYMT Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NYMT has a market cap of 642.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while NYMT trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas NYMT's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to NYMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check NYMT's competition here
EFC-PB vs BRMK Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, BRMK has a market cap of 635M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while BRMK trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas BRMK's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BRMK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to BRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check BRMK's competition here
EFC-PB vs NYMTZ Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NYMTZ has a market cap of 633.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while NYMTZ trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas NYMTZ's P/E ratio is 396.39. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTZ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to NYMTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check NYMTZ's competition here
EFC-PB vs TRTX Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, TRTX has a market cap of 631.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while TRTX trades at $8.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas TRTX's P/E ratio is 13.67. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRTX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to TRTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check TRTX's competition here
EFC-PB vs AIC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AIC has a market cap of 631.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while AIC trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas AIC's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIC's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to AIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check AIC's competition here
EFC-PB vs NYMTN Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NYMTN has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while NYMTN trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas NYMTN's P/E ratio is 460.96. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to NYMTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check NYMTN's competition here
EFC-PB vs NYMTL Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NYMTL has a market cap of 611.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while NYMTL trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas NYMTL's P/E ratio is 464.26. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NYMTL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to NYMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check NYMTL's competition here
EFC-PB vs IVR Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, IVR has a market cap of 563.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while IVR trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas IVR's P/E ratio is 6.38. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IVR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to IVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check IVR's competition here
EFC-PB vs KREF Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, KREF has a market cap of 408.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while KREF trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas KREF's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KREF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to KREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check KREF's competition here
EFC-PB vs NREF-PA Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NREF-PA has a market cap of 406.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while NREF-PA trades at $23.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas NREF-PA's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NREF-PA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to NREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check NREF-PA's competition here
EFC-PB vs CMTG Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, CMTG has a market cap of 355.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while CMTG trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas CMTG's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMTG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to CMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check CMTG's competition here
EFC-PB vs ACRE Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ACRE has a market cap of 277.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while ACRE trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas ACRE's P/E ratio is -250.75. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACRE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to ACRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check ACRE's competition here
EFC-PB vs RC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, RC has a market cap of 259.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while RC trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas RC's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to RC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check RC's competition here
EFC-PB vs MITT Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MITT has a market cap of 245.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while MITT trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas MITT's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to MITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check MITT's competition here
EFC-PB vs NREF Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, NREF has a market cap of 243.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while NREF trades at $13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas NREF's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NREF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to NREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check NREF's competition here
EFC-PB vs REFI Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, REFI has a market cap of 242.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while REFI trades at $11.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas REFI's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to REFI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to REFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check REFI's competition here
EFC-PB vs MITT-PA Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MITT-PA has a market cap of 229.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while MITT-PA trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas MITT-PA's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITT-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to MITT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check MITT-PA's competition here
EFC-PB vs MITT-PB Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, MITT-PB has a market cap of 228.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while MITT-PB trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas MITT-PB's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MITT-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to MITT-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check MITT-PB's competition here
EFC-PB vs AOMR Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, AOMR has a market cap of 214M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while AOMR trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas AOMR's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AOMR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to AOMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check AOMR's competition here
EFC-PB vs ICR-PA Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ICR-PA has a market cap of 180.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while ICR-PA trades at $21.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas ICR-PA's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ICR-PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is less volatile compared to ICR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check ICR-PA's competition here
EFC-PB vs ACR-PC Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ACR-PC has a market cap of 168.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while ACR-PC trades at $24.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas ACR-PC's P/E ratio is 48.97. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACR-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to ACR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check ACR-PC's competition here
EFC-PB vs ACR-PD Comparison April 2026
EFC-PB plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EFC-PB stands at 2.5B. In comparison, ACR-PD has a market cap of 144.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EFC-PB is priced at $24.53, while ACR-PD trades at $21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EFC-PB currently has a P/E ratio of 16.44, whereas ACR-PD's P/E ratio is 41.99. In terms of profitability, EFC-PB's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ACR-PD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EFC-PB is more volatile compared to ACR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EFC-PB.Check ACR-PD's competition here