Redwood Trust, Inc. (RWT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RWT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Mortgage Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RWT | $5.12 | -1.73% | 641.7M | 5.57 | $0.92 | +14.15% |
| RCB | $25.34 | -0.04% | 61.3B | -32.84 | -$0.77 | +6.12% |
| NLY-PI | $25.73 | +0.12% | 17.2B | 8.77 | $2.93 | +12.42% |
| NLY | $23.01 | -1.75% | 16.9B | 7.77 | $2.96 | +12.42% |
| NLY-PG | $25.16 | +0.12% | 13.6B | 8.56 | $2.93 | +12.42% |
| NLY-PF | $25.83 | +0.23% | 13.5B | 8.81 | $2.93 | +12.42% |
| AGNC | $11.22 | -1.84% | 12.9B | 7.48 | $1.50 | +12.90% |
| AGNCO | $25.41 | +0.20% | 9.8B | 18.21 | $1.40 | +12.90% |
| AGNCP | $25.03 | -0.16% | 9.8B | 17.94 | $1.40 | +12.90% |
| AGNCL | $24.82 | -0.04% | 9.7B | 17.79 | $1.40 | +12.90% |
Stock Comparison
RWT vs RCB Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, RCB has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while RCB trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas RCB's P/E ratio is -32.84. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RCB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to RCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check RCB's competition here
RWT vs NLY-PI Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, NLY-PI has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while NLY-PI trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas NLY-PI's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NLY-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to NLY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check NLY-PI's competition here
RWT vs NLY Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, NLY has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while NLY trades at $23.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas NLY's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to NLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check NLY's competition here
RWT vs NLY-PG Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, NLY-PG has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while NLY-PG trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas NLY-PG's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NLY-PG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to NLY-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check NLY-PG's competition here
RWT vs NLY-PF Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, NLY-PF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while NLY-PF trades at $25.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas NLY-PF's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NLY-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to NLY-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check NLY-PF's competition here
RWT vs AGNC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, AGNC has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while AGNC trades at $11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas AGNC's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AGNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to AGNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check AGNC's competition here
RWT vs AGNCO Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, AGNCO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while AGNCO trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas AGNCO's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AGNCO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to AGNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check AGNCO's competition here
RWT vs AGNCP Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, AGNCP has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while AGNCP trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas AGNCP's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AGNCP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to AGNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check AGNCP's competition here
RWT vs AGNCL Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, AGNCL has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while AGNCL trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas AGNCL's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AGNCL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to AGNCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check AGNCL's competition here
RWT vs AGNCM Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, AGNCM has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while AGNCM trades at $24.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas AGNCM's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AGNCM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to AGNCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check AGNCM's competition here
RWT vs AGNCN Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, AGNCN has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while AGNCN trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas AGNCN's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AGNCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to AGNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check AGNCN's competition here
RWT vs STWD Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, STWD has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while STWD trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas STWD's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to STWD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to STWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check STWD's competition here
RWT vs RITM-PC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, RITM-PC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while RITM-PC trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas RITM-PC's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RITM-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to RITM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check RITM-PC's competition here
RWT vs RITM-PA Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, RITM-PA has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while RITM-PA trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas RITM-PA's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RITM-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to RITM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check RITM-PA's competition here
RWT vs NRZ Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, NRZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while NRZ trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas NRZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NRZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to NRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check NRZ's competition here
RWT vs EFC-PE Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, EFC-PE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while EFC-PE trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas EFC-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EFC-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to EFC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check EFC-PE's competition here
RWT vs RWTQ Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, RWTQ has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while RWTQ trades at $24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas RWTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RWTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to RWTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check RWTQ's competition here
RWT vs RWTN Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, RWTN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while RWTN trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas RWTN's P/E ratio is 101.09. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RWTN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to RWTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check RWTN's competition here
RWT vs BXMT Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, BXMT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while BXMT trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas BXMT's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BXMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to BXMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check BXMT's competition here
RWT vs EFC-PB Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, EFC-PB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while EFC-PB trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas EFC-PB's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EFC-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to EFC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check EFC-PB's competition here
RWT vs NYMTH Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, NYMTH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while NYMTH trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas NYMTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NYMTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to NYMTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check NYMTH's competition here
RWT vs NYMTM Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, NYMTM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while NYMTM trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas NYMTM's P/E ratio is 531.49. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NYMTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to NYMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check NYMTM's competition here
RWT vs ARR Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, ARR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while ARR trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ARR's P/E ratio is 5.61. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ARR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is less volatile compared to ARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check ARR's competition here
RWT vs DX Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, DX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while DX trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas DX's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to DX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check DX's competition here
RWT vs DX-PC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, DX-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while DX-PC trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas DX-PC's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to DX-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to DX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check DX-PC's competition here
RWT vs FBRT-PE Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, FBRT-PE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while FBRT-PE trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas FBRT-PE's P/E ratio is 28.29. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FBRT-PE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to FBRT-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check FBRT-PE's competition here
RWT vs EFC-PD Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, EFC-PD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while EFC-PD trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas EFC-PD's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to EFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check EFC-PD's competition here
RWT vs EFC-PC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, EFC-PC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while EFC-PC trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas EFC-PC's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to EFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check EFC-PC's competition here
RWT vs EFC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, EFC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while EFC trades at $13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas EFC's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to EFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check EFC's competition here
RWT vs ARR-PC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, ARR-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while ARR-PC trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ARR-PC's P/E ratio is 10.01. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ARR-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to ARR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check ARR-PC's competition here
RWT vs NYMTO Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, NYMTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while NYMTO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas NYMTO's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NYMTO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to NYMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check NYMTO's competition here
RWT vs TWO-PB Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, TWO-PB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while TWO-PB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas TWO-PB's P/E ratio is -8.01. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TWO-PB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to TWO-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check TWO-PB's competition here
RWT vs TWO-PC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, TWO-PC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while TWO-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas TWO-PC's P/E ratio is -8.02. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TWO-PC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to TWO-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check TWO-PC's competition here
RWT vs TWO-PA Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, TWO-PA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while TWO-PA trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas TWO-PA's P/E ratio is -8.01. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TWO-PA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to TWO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check TWO-PA's competition here
RWT vs TWO Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, TWO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while TWO trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas TWO's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TWO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to TWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check TWO's competition here
RWT vs SCCC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, SCCC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while SCCC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas SCCC's P/E ratio is 155.80. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SCCC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to SCCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check SCCC's competition here
RWT vs SCCG Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, SCCG has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while SCCG trades at $24.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas SCCG's P/E ratio is -138.23. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SCCG's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to SCCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check SCCG's competition here
RWT vs CIM-PC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, CIM-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while CIM-PC trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas CIM-PC's P/E ratio is 15.45. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIM-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to CIM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check CIM-PC's competition here
RWT vs CIMN Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, CIMN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while CIMN trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas CIMN's P/E ratio is 23.72. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to CIMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check CIMN's competition here
RWT vs CIMP Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, CIMP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while CIMP trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas CIMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to CIMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check CIMP's competition here
RWT vs CIM-PD Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, CIM-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while CIM-PD trades at $24.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas CIM-PD's P/E ratio is 16.07. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIM-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to CIM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check CIM-PD's competition here
RWT vs CIM-PA Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, CIM-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while CIM-PA trades at $21.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas CIM-PA's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIM-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to CIM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check CIM-PA's competition here
RWT vs CIM-PB Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, CIM-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while CIM-PB trades at $24.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas CIM-PB's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIM-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to CIM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check CIM-PB's competition here
RWT vs CIM Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, CIM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while CIM trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas CIM's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to CIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check CIM's competition here
RWT vs ORC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, ORC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while ORC trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ORC's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ORC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to ORC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check ORC's competition here
RWT vs PMT-PB Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, PMT-PB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while PMT-PB trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas PMT-PB's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PMT-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to PMT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check PMT-PB's competition here
RWT vs PMT-PA Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, PMT-PA has a market cap of 998.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while PMT-PA trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas PMT-PA's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PMT-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to PMT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check PMT-PA's competition here
RWT vs ABR Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, ABR has a market cap of 996.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while ABR trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ABR's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ABR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is less volatile compared to ABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check ABR's competition here
RWT vs MFAN Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, MFAN has a market cap of 983.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while MFAN trades at $25.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas MFAN's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to MFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check MFAN's competition here
RWT vs MFAO Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, MFAO has a market cap of 983.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while MFAO trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas MFAO's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to MFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check MFAO's competition here
RWT vs ABR-PF Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, ABR-PF has a market cap of 967.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while ABR-PF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ABR-PF's P/E ratio is 37.24. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ABR-PF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to ABR-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check ABR-PF's competition here
RWT vs MFA Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, MFA has a market cap of 963.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while MFA trades at $9.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas MFA's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MFA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to MFA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check MFA's competition here
RWT vs MFA-PB Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, MFA-PB has a market cap of 963.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while MFA-PB trades at $20.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas MFA-PB's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MFA-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to MFA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check MFA-PB's competition here
RWT vs ABR-PE Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, ABR-PE has a market cap of 963M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while ABR-PE trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ABR-PE's P/E ratio is 26.29. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ABR-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to ABR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check ABR-PE's competition here
RWT vs MFA-PC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, MFA-PC has a market cap of 962.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while MFA-PC trades at $23.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas MFA-PC's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MFA-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to MFA-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check MFA-PC's competition here
RWT vs ABR-PD Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, ABR-PD has a market cap of 962.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while ABR-PD trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ABR-PD's P/E ratio is 26.37. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ABR-PD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to ABR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check ABR-PD's competition here
RWT vs LFT-PA Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, LFT-PA has a market cap of 950.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while LFT-PA trades at $18.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas LFT-PA's P/E ratio is -409.38. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LFT-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to LFT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check LFT-PA's competition here
RWT vs ARI Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, ARI has a market cap of 915.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while ARI trades at $6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ARI's P/E ratio is 6.72. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ARI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to ARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check ARI's competition here
RWT vs PMT Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, PMT has a market cap of 864.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while PMT trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas PMT's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is less volatile compared to PMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check PMT's competition here
RWT vs PMTU Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 863.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while PMTU trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check PMTU's competition here
RWT vs PMT-PC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, PMT-PC has a market cap of 852M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while PMT-PC trades at $17.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas PMT-PC's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to PMT-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to PMT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check PMT-PC's competition here
RWT vs ADAMH Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, ADAMH has a market cap of 829.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while ADAMH trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ADAMH's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ADAMH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to ADAMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check ADAMH's competition here
RWT vs ADAMN Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, ADAMN has a market cap of 822.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while ADAMN trades at $24.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ADAMN's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ADAMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to ADAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check ADAMN's competition here
RWT vs MITN Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, MITN has a market cap of 813.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while MITN trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas MITN's P/E ratio is 27.82. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MITN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to MITN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check MITN's competition here
RWT vs ADAM Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, ADAM has a market cap of 807M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while ADAM trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ADAM's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ADAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is less volatile compared to ADAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check ADAM's competition here
RWT vs MITT-PC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, MITT-PC has a market cap of 770.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while MITT-PC trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas MITT-PC's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MITT-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to MITT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check MITT-PC's competition here
RWT vs ADAMO Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, ADAMO has a market cap of 722.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while ADAMO trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ADAMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ADAMO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to ADAMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check ADAMO's competition here
RWT vs TRTX Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, TRTX has a market cap of 676.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while TRTX trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas TRTX's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TRTX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to TRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check TRTX's competition here
RWT vs TRTX-PC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, TRTX-PC has a market cap of 674.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while TRTX-PC trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas TRTX-PC's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TRTX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to TRTX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check TRTX-PC's competition here
RWT vs EFC-PA Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, EFC-PA has a market cap of 658.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while EFC-PA trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas EFC-PA's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to EFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check EFC-PA's competition here
RWT vs NYMT Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, NYMT has a market cap of 642.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while NYMT trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas NYMT's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NYMT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to NYMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check NYMT's competition here
RWT vs RWT-PA Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, RWT-PA has a market cap of 641.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while RWT-PA trades at $24.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas RWT-PA's P/E ratio is -62.52. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RWT-PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to RWT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check RWT-PA's competition here
RWT vs BRMK Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, BRMK has a market cap of 635M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while BRMK trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas BRMK's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BRMK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to BRMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check BRMK's competition here
RWT vs NYMTZ Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, NYMTZ has a market cap of 633.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while NYMTZ trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas NYMTZ's P/E ratio is 396.39. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NYMTZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to NYMTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check NYMTZ's competition here
RWT vs AIC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, AIC has a market cap of 631.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while AIC trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas AIC's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AIC's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to AIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check AIC's competition here
RWT vs FBRT Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, FBRT has a market cap of 627.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while FBRT trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas FBRT's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FBRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to FBRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check FBRT's competition here
RWT vs AOMN Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, AOMN has a market cap of 622.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while AOMN trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas AOMN's P/E ratio is 26.60. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AOMN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to AOMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check AOMN's competition here
RWT vs NYMTN Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, NYMTN has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while NYMTN trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas NYMTN's P/E ratio is 460.96. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NYMTN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to NYMTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check NYMTN's competition here
RWT vs NYMTL Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, NYMTL has a market cap of 611.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while NYMTL trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas NYMTL's P/E ratio is 464.26. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NYMTL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to NYMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check NYMTL's competition here
RWT vs IVR Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, IVR has a market cap of 586.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while IVR trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas IVR's P/E ratio is 3.61. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IVR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to IVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check IVR's competition here
RWT vs IVR-PC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, IVR-PC has a market cap of 570.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while IVR-PC trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas IVR-PC's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IVR-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to IVR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check IVR-PC's competition here
RWT vs KREF Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, KREF has a market cap of 468.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while KREF trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas KREF's P/E ratio is -18.21. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KREF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is less volatile compared to KREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check KREF's competition here
RWT vs KREF-PA Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, KREF-PA has a market cap of 448.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while KREF-PA trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas KREF-PA's P/E ratio is -227.47. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KREF-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to KREF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check KREF-PA's competition here
RWT vs CMTG Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, CMTG has a market cap of 319.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while CMTG trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas CMTG's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CMTG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is less volatile compared to CMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check CMTG's competition here
RWT vs NREF Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, NREF has a market cap of 319.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while NREF trades at $16.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas NREF's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NREF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to NREF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check NREF's competition here
RWT vs NREF-PA Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, NREF-PA has a market cap of 282.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while NREF-PA trades at $24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas NREF-PA's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NREF-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to NREF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check NREF-PA's competition here
RWT vs RC-PC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, RC-PC has a market cap of 267.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while RC-PC trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas RC-PC's P/E ratio is -6.39. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RC-PC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to RC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check RC-PC's competition here
RWT vs RC-PE Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, RC-PE has a market cap of 262M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while RC-PE trades at $11.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas RC-PE's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RC-PE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to RC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check RC-PE's competition here
RWT vs RCD Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, RCD has a market cap of 260.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while RCD trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas RCD's P/E ratio is -29.97. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RCD's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to RCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check RCD's competition here
RWT vs RC Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, RC has a market cap of 256.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while RC trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas RC's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to RC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is less volatile compared to RC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check RC's competition here
RWT vs ACRE Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, ACRE has a market cap of 256.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while ACRE trades at $4.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ACRE's P/E ratio is -23.10. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ACRE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to ACRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check ACRE's competition here
RWT vs MITP Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, MITP has a market cap of 248M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while MITP trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas MITP's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MITP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to MITP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check MITP's competition here
RWT vs MITT Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, MITT has a market cap of 242.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while MITT trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas MITT's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MITT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to MITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check MITT's competition here
RWT vs MITT-PA Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, MITT-PA has a market cap of 227.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while MITT-PA trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas MITT-PA's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MITT-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to MITT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check MITT-PA's competition here
RWT vs AOMR Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, AOMR has a market cap of 227.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while AOMR trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas AOMR's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AOMR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to AOMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check AOMR's competition here
RWT vs REFI Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, REFI has a market cap of 226.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while REFI trades at $10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas REFI's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to REFI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to REFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check REFI's competition here
RWT vs MITT-PB Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, MITT-PB has a market cap of 217.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while MITT-PB trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas MITT-PB's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MITT-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to MITT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check MITT-PB's competition here
RWT vs ICR-PA Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, ICR-PA has a market cap of 191.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while ICR-PA trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas ICR-PA's P/E ratio is -2198.23. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ICR-PA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to ICR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check ICR-PA's competition here
RWT vs SEVN Comparison July 2026
RWT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RWT stands at 641.7M. In comparison, SEVN has a market cap of 146.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RWT is priced at $5.12, while SEVN trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RWT currently has a P/E ratio of 5.57, whereas SEVN's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, RWT's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SEVN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RWT is more volatile compared to SEVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RWT.Check SEVN's competition here