Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY-PG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NLY-PG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Mortgage Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLY-PG | $24.88 | -1.72% | 13.7B | 14.28 | $1.77 | +12.82% |
| RCB | $25.34 | -0.04% | 61.3B | 15.98 | $1.59 | +6.12% |
| NLY-PI | $25.24 | -1.77% | 17.3B | 14.54 | $1.77 | +12.82% |
| NLY | $21.70 | +0.44% | 16B | 7.05 | $3.10 | +12.82% |
| RITM-PA | $25.27 | -0.34% | 13.8B | 17.32 | $1.46 | +10.72% |
| RITM-PB | $25.18 | -0.07% | 13.8B | N/A | N/A | +10.72% |
| RITM-PD | $24.88 | -0.16% | 13.6B | N/A | N/A | +10.72% |
| NLY-PF | $25.63 | -1.80% | 13.6B | 14.72 | $1.77 | +12.82% |
| RITM-PC | $24.54 | -0.18% | 13.4B | N/A | N/A | +10.72% |
| AGNC | $10.32 | -2.16% | 11.9B | 8.13 | $1.28 | +13.81% |
Stock Comparison
NLY-PG vs RCB Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RCB has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while RCB trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas RCB's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RCB's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to RCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check RCB's competition here
NLY-PG vs NLY-PI Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NLY-PI has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while NLY-PI trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas NLY-PI's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NLY-PI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to NLY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check NLY-PI's competition here
NLY-PG vs NLY Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NLY has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while NLY trades at $21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas NLY's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to NLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check NLY's competition here
NLY-PG vs RITM-PA Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RITM-PA has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while RITM-PA trades at $25.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas RITM-PA's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RITM-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to RITM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check RITM-PA's competition here
NLY-PG vs RITM-PB Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RITM-PB has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while RITM-PB trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas RITM-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RITM-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to RITM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check RITM-PB's competition here
NLY-PG vs RITM-PD Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RITM-PD has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while RITM-PD trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas RITM-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RITM-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to RITM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check RITM-PD's competition here
NLY-PG vs NLY-PF Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NLY-PF has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while NLY-PF trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas NLY-PF's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NLY-PF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to NLY-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check NLY-PF's competition here
NLY-PG vs RITM-PC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RITM-PC has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while RITM-PC trades at $24.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas RITM-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RITM-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to RITM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check RITM-PC's competition here
NLY-PG vs AGNC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, AGNC has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while AGNC trades at $10.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas AGNC's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to AGNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check AGNC's competition here
NLY-PG vs AGNCO Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, AGNCO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while AGNCO trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas AGNCO's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGNCO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to AGNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check AGNCO's competition here
NLY-PG vs AGNCP Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, AGNCP has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while AGNCP trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas AGNCP's P/E ratio is -13.51. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGNCP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to AGNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check AGNCP's competition here
NLY-PG vs AGNCL Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, AGNCL has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while AGNCL trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas AGNCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGNCL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to AGNCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check AGNCL's competition here
NLY-PG vs AGNCM Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, AGNCM has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while AGNCM trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas AGNCM's P/E ratio is -13.41. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGNCM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to AGNCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check AGNCM's competition here
NLY-PG vs AGNCN Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, AGNCN has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while AGNCN trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas AGNCN's P/E ratio is -13.87. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AGNCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to AGNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check AGNCN's competition here
NLY-PG vs STWD Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, STWD has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while STWD trades at $16.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas STWD's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STWD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to STWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check STWD's competition here
NLY-PG vs RITM Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RITM has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while RITM trades at $9.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas RITM's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RITM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to RITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check RITM's competition here
NLY-PG vs NRZ Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NRZ has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while NRZ trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas NRZ's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NRZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to NRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check NRZ's competition here
NLY-PG vs EFC-PE Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, EFC-PE has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while EFC-PE trades at $51.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas EFC-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EFC-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to EFC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check EFC-PE's competition here
NLY-PG vs ABR-PF Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ABR-PF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while ABR-PF trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas ABR-PF's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABR-PF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to ABR-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check ABR-PF's competition here
NLY-PG vs RCD Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RCD has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while RCD trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas RCD's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RCD's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to RCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check RCD's competition here
NLY-PG vs ABR-PD Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ABR-PD has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while ABR-PD trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas ABR-PD's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABR-PD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to ABR-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check ABR-PD's competition here
NLY-PG vs ABR-PE Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ABR-PE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while ABR-PE trades at $16.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas ABR-PE's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABR-PE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to ABR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check ABR-PE's competition here
NLY-PG vs RWTN Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RWTN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while RWTN trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas RWTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWTN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to RWTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check RWTN's competition here
NLY-PG vs RWTQ Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RWTQ has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while RWTQ trades at $24.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas RWTQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWTQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to RWTQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check RWTQ's competition here
NLY-PG vs RWT-PA Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RWT-PA has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while RWT-PA trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas RWT-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWT-PA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to RWT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check RWT-PA's competition here
NLY-PG vs BXMT Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BXMT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while BXMT trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas BXMT's P/E ratio is 30.47. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BXMT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to BXMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check BXMT's competition here
NLY-PG vs EFC-PC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, EFC-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while EFC-PC trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas EFC-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to EFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check EFC-PC's competition here
NLY-PG vs TWO-PC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, TWO-PC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while TWO-PC trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas TWO-PC's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TWO-PC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to TWO-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check TWO-PC's competition here
NLY-PG vs TWO-PA Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, TWO-PA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while TWO-PA trades at $24.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas TWO-PA's P/E ratio is 44.86. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TWO-PA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to TWO-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check TWO-PA's competition here
NLY-PG vs TWO-PB Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, TWO-PB has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while TWO-PB trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas TWO-PB's P/E ratio is 44.68. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TWO-PB's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to TWO-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check TWO-PB's competition here
NLY-PG vs MFAN Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MFAN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while MFAN trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas MFAN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to MFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check MFAN's competition here
NLY-PG vs MFAO Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MFAO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while MFAO trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas MFAO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to MFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check MFAO's competition here
NLY-PG vs EFC-PB Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, EFC-PB has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while EFC-PB trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas EFC-PB's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EFC-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to EFC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check EFC-PB's competition here
NLY-PG vs EFC-PD Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, EFC-PD has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while EFC-PD trades at $23.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas EFC-PD's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to EFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check EFC-PD's competition here
NLY-PG vs MFA-PC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MFA-PC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while MFA-PC trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas MFA-PC's P/E ratio is 20.48. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFA-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to MFA-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check MFA-PC's competition here
NLY-PG vs ADAMH Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ADAMH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while ADAMH trades at $25.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas ADAMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADAMH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to ADAMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check ADAMH's competition here
NLY-PG vs NYMTH Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NYMTH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while NYMTH trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas NYMTH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NYMTH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to NYMTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check NYMTH's competition here
NLY-PG vs ADAMI Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ADAMI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while ADAMI trades at $25.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas ADAMI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADAMI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to ADAMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check ADAMI's competition here
NLY-PG vs ADAMM Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ADAMM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while ADAMM trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas ADAMM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADAMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to ADAMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check ADAMM's competition here
NLY-PG vs NYMTM Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NYMTM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while NYMTM trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas NYMTM's P/E ratio is 531.49. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NYMTM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to NYMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check NYMTM's competition here
NLY-PG vs PMTU Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while PMTU trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check PMTU's competition here
NLY-PG vs ARR Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ARR has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while ARR trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas ARR's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to ARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check ARR's competition here
NLY-PG vs RC-PC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RC-PC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while RC-PC trades at $12.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas RC-PC's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RC-PC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to RC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check RC-PC's competition here
NLY-PG vs CIMN Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, CIMN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while CIMN trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas CIMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to CIMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check CIMN's competition here
NLY-PG vs ADAMN Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ADAMN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while ADAMN trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas ADAMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADAMN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to ADAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check ADAMN's competition here
NLY-PG vs RC-PE Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RC-PE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while RC-PE trades at $12.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas RC-PE's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RC-PE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to RC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check RC-PE's competition here
NLY-PG vs MFA-PB Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MFA-PB has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while MFA-PB trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas MFA-PB's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFA-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to MFA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check MFA-PB's competition here
NLY-PG vs CIMP Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, CIMP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while CIMP trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas CIMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIMP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to CIMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check CIMP's competition here
NLY-PG vs DX Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, DX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while DX trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas DX's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to DX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check DX's competition here
NLY-PG vs IVR-PC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, IVR-PC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while IVR-PC trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas IVR-PC's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IVR-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to IVR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check IVR-PC's competition here
NLY-PG vs DX-PC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, DX-PC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while DX-PC trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas DX-PC's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DX-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to DX-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check DX-PC's competition here
NLY-PG vs FBRT-PE Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, FBRT-PE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while FBRT-PE trades at $19.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas FBRT-PE's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FBRT-PE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to FBRT-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check FBRT-PE's competition here
NLY-PG vs PMT-PC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, PMT-PC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while PMT-PC trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas PMT-PC's P/E ratio is -25.44. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PMT-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to PMT-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check PMT-PC's competition here
NLY-PG vs TRTX-PC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, TRTX-PC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while TRTX-PC trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas TRTX-PC's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRTX-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to TRTX-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check TRTX-PC's competition here
NLY-PG vs ARI Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ARI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while ARI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas ARI's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to ARI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check ARI's competition here
NLY-PG vs ARR-PC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ARR-PC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while ARR-PC trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas ARR-PC's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ARR-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to ARR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check ARR-PC's competition here
NLY-PG vs EFC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, EFC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while EFC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas EFC's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to EFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check EFC's competition here
NLY-PG vs NYMTO Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NYMTO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while NYMTO trades at $25.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas NYMTO's P/E ratio is 30.49. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NYMTO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to NYMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check NYMTO's competition here
NLY-PG vs TWO Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, TWO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while TWO trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas TWO's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TWO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to TWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check TWO's competition here
NLY-PG vs SCCG Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, SCCG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while SCCG trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas SCCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCCG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to SCCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check SCCG's competition here
NLY-PG vs SCCC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, SCCC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while SCCC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas SCCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCCC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to SCCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check SCCC's competition here
NLY-PG vs KREF-PA Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, KREF-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while KREF-PA trades at $17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas KREF-PA's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KREF-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to KREF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check KREF-PA's competition here
NLY-PG vs CIM Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, CIM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while CIM trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas CIM's P/E ratio is -16.41. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to CIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check CIM's competition here
NLY-PG vs CIM-PC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, CIM-PC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while CIM-PC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas CIM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.83. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIM-PC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to CIM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check CIM-PC's competition here
NLY-PG vs CIM-PD Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, CIM-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while CIM-PD trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas CIM-PD's P/E ratio is 33.40. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIM-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to CIM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check CIM-PD's competition here
NLY-PG vs ABR Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ABR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while ABR trades at $5.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas ABR's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to ABR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check ABR's competition here
NLY-PG vs CIM-PA Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, CIM-PA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while CIM-PA trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas CIM-PA's P/E ratio is 30.11. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIM-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to CIM-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check CIM-PA's competition here
NLY-PG vs CIM-PB Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, CIM-PB has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while CIM-PB trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas CIM-PB's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CIM-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to CIM-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check CIM-PB's competition here
NLY-PG vs ORC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ORC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while ORC trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas ORC's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ORC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to ORC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check ORC's competition here
NLY-PG vs PMT-PA Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, PMT-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while PMT-PA trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas PMT-PA's P/E ratio is -31.42. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PMT-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to PMT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check PMT-PA's competition here
NLY-PG vs PMT-PB Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, PMT-PB has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while PMT-PB trades at $22.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas PMT-PB's P/E ratio is -31.40. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PMT-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to PMT-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check PMT-PB's competition here
NLY-PG vs LFT-PA Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, LFT-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while LFT-PA trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas LFT-PA's P/E ratio is 84.15. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LFT-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to LFT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check LFT-PA's competition here
NLY-PG vs MFA Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MFA has a market cap of 980.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while MFA trades at $9.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas MFA's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to MFA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check MFA's competition here
NLY-PG vs SACH-PA Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, SACH-PA has a market cap of 973.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while SACH-PA trades at $20.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas SACH-PA's P/E ratio is 48.14. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SACH-PA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to SACH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check SACH-PA's competition here
NLY-PG vs GPMT-PA Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, GPMT-PA has a market cap of 927.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while GPMT-PA trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas GPMT-PA's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GPMT-PA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to GPMT-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check GPMT-PA's competition here
NLY-PG vs PMT Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, PMT has a market cap of 912.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while PMT trades at $10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas PMT's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to PMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check PMT's competition here
NLY-PG vs ADAM Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ADAM has a market cap of 826.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while ADAM trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas ADAM's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to ADAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check ADAM's competition here
NLY-PG vs MITN Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MITN has a market cap of 802.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while MITN trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas MITN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MITN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to MITN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check MITN's competition here
NLY-PG vs MITP Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MITP has a market cap of 799.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while MITP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas MITP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MITP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to MITP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check MITP's competition here
NLY-PG vs CHMI-PA Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, CHMI-PA has a market cap of 769M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while CHMI-PA trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas CHMI-PA's P/E ratio is 37.99. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHMI-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to CHMI-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check CHMI-PA's competition here
NLY-PG vs MITT-PC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MITT-PC has a market cap of 760.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while MITT-PC trades at $24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas MITT-PC's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MITT-PC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to MITT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check MITT-PC's competition here
NLY-PG vs RWT Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RWT has a market cap of 677.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while RWT trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas RWT's P/E ratio is -6.76. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RWT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to RWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check RWT's competition here
NLY-PG vs FBRT Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, FBRT has a market cap of 667.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while FBRT trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas FBRT's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FBRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to FBRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check FBRT's competition here
NLY-PG vs EFC-PA Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, EFC-PA has a market cap of 658.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while EFC-PA trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas EFC-PA's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to EFC-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check EFC-PA's competition here
NLY-PG vs TRTX Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, TRTX has a market cap of 650.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while TRTX trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas TRTX's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRTX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to TRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check TRTX's competition here
NLY-PG vs NYMT Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NYMT has a market cap of 642.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while NYMT trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas NYMT's P/E ratio is 37.42. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NYMT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to NYMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check NYMT's competition here
NLY-PG vs BRMK Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, BRMK has a market cap of 635M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while BRMK trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas BRMK's P/E ratio is -4.87. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BRMK's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to BRMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check BRMK's competition here
NLY-PG vs NYMTZ Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NYMTZ has a market cap of 633.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while NYMTZ trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas NYMTZ's P/E ratio is 396.39. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NYMTZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to NYMTZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check NYMTZ's competition here
NLY-PG vs AIC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, AIC has a market cap of 631.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while AIC trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas AIC's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIC's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to AIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check AIC's competition here
NLY-PG vs NYMTN Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NYMTN has a market cap of 613.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while NYMTN trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas NYMTN's P/E ratio is 460.96. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NYMTN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to NYMTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check NYMTN's competition here
NLY-PG vs NYMTL Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NYMTL has a market cap of 611.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while NYMTL trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas NYMTL's P/E ratio is 464.26. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NYMTL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to NYMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check NYMTL's competition here
NLY-PG vs IVR Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, IVR has a market cap of 563.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while IVR trades at $7.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas IVR's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IVR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to IVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check IVR's competition here
NLY-PG vs NREF-PA Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NREF-PA has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while NREF-PA trades at $24.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas NREF-PA's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NREF-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to NREF-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check NREF-PA's competition here
NLY-PG vs KREF Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, KREF has a market cap of 428.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while KREF trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas KREF's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KREF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to KREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check KREF's competition here
NLY-PG vs CMTG Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, CMTG has a market cap of 342.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while CMTG trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas CMTG's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMTG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to CMTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check CMTG's competition here
NLY-PG vs NREF Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, NREF has a market cap of 295.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while NREF trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas NREF's P/E ratio is 6.10. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NREF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to NREF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check NREF's competition here
NLY-PG vs RC Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, RC has a market cap of 292.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while RC trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas RC's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is less volatile compared to RC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check RC's competition here
NLY-PG vs ACRE Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, ACRE has a market cap of 274.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while ACRE trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas ACRE's P/E ratio is -13.74. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACRE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to ACRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check ACRE's competition here
NLY-PG vs MITT Comparison June 2026
NLY-PG plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLY-PG stands at 13.7B. In comparison, MITT has a market cap of 245.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NLY-PG is priced at $24.88, while MITT trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLY-PG currently has a P/E ratio of 14.28, whereas MITT's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, NLY-PG's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MITT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLY-PG is more volatile compared to MITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLY-PG.Check MITT's competition here