Thomson Reuters Corporation
Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRI | $96.34 | -2.96% | 42.8B | 29.28 | $3.29 | +2.50% |
| CTAS | $194.28 | +0.53% | 78.1B | 42.05 | $4.62 | +0.89% |
| CPRT | $34.09 | +0.35% | 33B | 21.44 | $1.59 | N/A |
| RBA | $98.68 | +0.79% | 18.3B | 48.38 | $2.04 | +1.23% |
| ULS | $83.22 | -0.61% | 16.7B | 52.04 | $1.60 | +0.64% |
| RTO | $32.34 | -0.77% | 16.3B | 56.73 | $0.57 | +1.72% |
| GPN | $68.67 | -2.39% | 16.3B | 15.51 | $4.43 | +1.45% |
| BIPI | $0.00 | -100.00% | 13.3B | N/A | N/A | +7.64% |
| ARMK | $40.00 | +0.03% | 10.5B | 33.89 | $1.18 | +1.11% |
| IAA | $39.89 | -0.10% | 5.3B | 18.55 | $2.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRI vs CTAS Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while CTAS trades at $194.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 42.05. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CTAS's competition here
TRI vs CPRT Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 33B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while CPRT trades at $34.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CPRT's competition here
TRI vs RBA Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while RBA trades at $98.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 48.38. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RBA's competition here
TRI vs ULS Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while ULS trades at $83.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 52.04. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ULS's competition here
TRI vs RTO Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while RTO trades at $32.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 56.73. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RTO's competition here
TRI vs GPN Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while GPN trades at $68.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check GPN's competition here
TRI vs BIPI Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while BIPI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRI has daily volatility of 3.90 and BIPI has daily volatility of N/A.Check BIPI's competition here
TRI vs ARMK Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while ARMK trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ARMK's competition here
TRI vs IAA Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check IAA's competition here
TRI vs UNF Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while UNF trades at $273.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 36.19. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check UNF's competition here
TRI vs MMS Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while MMS trades at $72.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check MMS's competition here
TRI vs ABM Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while ABM trades at $38.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ABM's competition here
TRI vs FA Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while FA trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -54.35. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check FA's competition here
TRI vs TIC Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while TIC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -7.38. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TIC's competition here
TRI vs CBZ Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while CBZ trades at $26.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CBZ's competition here
TRI vs VVI Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check VVI's competition here
TRI vs BV Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while BV trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 168.79. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BV's competition here
TRI vs LZ Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while LZ trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 77.13. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check LZ's competition here
TRI vs SP Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SP's competition here
TRI vs TDCX Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TDCX's competition here
TRI vs PRSU Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while PRSU trades at $36.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 41.22. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PRSU's competition here
TRI vs RHLD Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 948.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while RHLD trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RHLD's ROE of +15.16%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TRI has daily volatility of 3.90 and RHLD has daily volatility of N/A.Check RHLD's competition here
TRI vs TH Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 928.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while TH trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -93.10. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TH's competition here
TRI vs CASS Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 580.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while CASS trades at $44.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CASS's competition here
TRI vs KODK Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 579M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while KODK trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -21.81. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check KODK's competition here
TRI vs ACTG Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 470.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while ACTG trades at $4.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is 81.33. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACTG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ACTG's competition here
TRI vs PPHC Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 372.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while PPHC trades at $13.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PPHC's competition here
TRI vs SPIR Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 360.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while SPIR trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is 31.11. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPIR's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SPIR's competition here
TRI vs CVEO Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 358.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while CVEO trades at $28.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -17.27. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CVEO's competition here
TRI vs QUAD Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 342.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while QUAD trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check QUAD's competition here
TRI vs PFMT Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFMT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PFMT's competition here
TRI vs RHLDV Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RHLDV's competition here
TRI vs PFSW Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PFSW's competition here
TRI vs BUUU Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 165.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while BUUU trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is 235.83. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BUUU's competition here
TRI vs ARC Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ARC's competition here
TRI vs ANPA Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 107M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while ANPA trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 856.00. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ANPA's competition here
TRI vs DLHC Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while DLHC trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -74.87. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check DLHC's competition here
TRI vs TISI Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while TISI trades at $15.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TISI's ROE of +5.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TISI's competition here
TRI vs OMEX Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 47.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while OMEX trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -1.46. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check OMEX's competition here
TRI vs SMX Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 35.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while SMX trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMX's ROE of -3.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SMX's competition here
TRI vs NTIP Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while NTIP trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check NTIP's competition here
TRI vs YSXT Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while YSXT trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 6.29. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check YSXT's competition here
TRI vs PMEC Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while PMEC trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PMEC's competition here
TRI vs THH Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while THH trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check THH's competition here
TRI vs ZGM Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while ZGM trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ZGM's competition here
TRI vs SST Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while SST trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SST's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SST's competition here
TRI vs SGRP Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while SGRP trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SGRP's competition here
TRI vs WHLM Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while WHLM trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 33.10. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check WHLM's competition here
TRI vs CRE Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while CRE trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CRE's competition here
TRI vs ATTO Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ATTO's competition here
TRI vs MSGY Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while MSGY trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 4.29. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check MSGY's competition here
TRI vs LICN Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while LICN trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check LICN's competition here
TRI vs SFHG Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while SFHG trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -6.66. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SFHG's competition here
TRI vs PMAX Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 939.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while PMAX trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PMAX's competition here
TRI vs VSA Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 659.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while VSA trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VSA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check VSA's competition here
TRI vs THWWW Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check THWWW's competition here
TRI vs BLMZ Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BLMZ's competition here
TRI vs GPAK Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 20.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check GPAK's competition here
TRI vs PAE Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PAE's competition here
TRI vs INTX Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to INTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check INTX's competition here
TRI vs RRD Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RRD's competition here
TRI vs PAEWW Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PAEWW's competition here
TRI vs ALJJ Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ALJJ's competition here
TRI vs CRN Comparison March 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 42.8B. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $96.34, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 29.28, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CRN's competition here