Thomson Reuters Corporation
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TRI
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRI | $89.07 | -1.24% | 40.3B | 27.54 | $3.29 | +2.69% |
| CTAS | $170.38 | -2.27% | 68.7B | 36.22 | $4.74 | +1.01% |
| CPRT | $32.95 | -1.36% | 31.8B | 20.65 | $1.59 | N/A |
| RBA | $97.70 | -0.65% | 18.2B | 47.99 | $2.04 | +1.24% |
| ULS | $83.56 | -1.23% | 16.9B | 52.52 | $1.60 | +0.64% |
| RTO | $32.46 | -0.98% | 16.5B | 57.65 | $0.57 | +1.69% |
| GPN | $63.26 | -1.23% | 15.4B | 14.68 | $4.43 | +1.54% |
| BIPI | $16.07 | +0.06% | 12.9B | N/A | N/A | +7.88% |
| ARMK | $42.13 | -0.99% | 11.2B | 35.74 | $1.19 | +1.06% |
| IAA | $39.89 | -0.10% | 5.3B | 18.55 | $2.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRI vs CTAS Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while CTAS trades at $170.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 36.22. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CTAS's competition here
TRI vs CPRT Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while CPRT trades at $32.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 20.65. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CPRT's competition here
TRI vs RBA Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while RBA trades at $97.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 47.99. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RBA's competition here
TRI vs ULS Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while ULS trades at $83.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 52.52. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ULS's competition here
TRI vs RTO Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while RTO trades at $32.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 57.65. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RTO's competition here
TRI vs GPN Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while GPN trades at $63.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check GPN's competition here
TRI vs BIPI Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while BIPI trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BIPI's competition here
TRI vs ARMK Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while ARMK trades at $42.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 35.74. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ARMK's competition here
TRI vs IAA Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check IAA's competition here
TRI vs UNF Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while UNF trades at $255.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 34.67. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check UNF's competition here
TRI vs MMS Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while MMS trades at $64.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check MMS's competition here
TRI vs ABM Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while ABM trades at $38.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ABM's competition here
TRI vs FA Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while FA trades at $11.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -55.95. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check FA's competition here
TRI vs TIC Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while TIC trades at $7.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -11.82. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TIC's competition here
TRI vs CBZ Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while CBZ trades at $28.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CBZ's competition here
TRI vs TH Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while TH trades at $13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -36.81. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TH's competition here
TRI vs RHLD Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while RHLD trades at $146.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -215.12. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RHLD's ROE of +7.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RHLD's competition here
TRI vs VVI Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check VVI's competition here
TRI vs KODK Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while KODK trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check KODK's competition here
TRI vs BV Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while BV trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 167.36. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BV's competition here
TRI vs PRSU Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while PRSU trades at $39.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 44.18. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PRSU's competition here
TRI vs LZ Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while LZ trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 76.00. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check LZ's competition here
TRI vs SP Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SP's competition here
TRI vs TDCX Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TDCX's competition here
TRI vs CASS Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 585.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while CASS trades at $44.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CASS's competition here
TRI vs SPIR Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 519M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while SPIR trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -249.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SPIR's competition here
TRI vs ACTG Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 484.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while ACTG trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACTG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ACTG's competition here
TRI vs PPHC Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 396.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while PPHC trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PPHC's competition here
TRI vs QUAD Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 369M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while QUAD trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check QUAD's competition here
TRI vs SPIR-WT Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SPIR-WT has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while SPIR-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas SPIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPIR-WT's ROE of -249.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SPIR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SPIR-WT's competition here
TRI vs CVEO Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 342.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while CVEO trades at $27.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -17.04. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CVEO's competition here
TRI vs PFMT Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PFMT's competition here
TRI vs RHLDV Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RHLDV's competition here
TRI vs BUUU Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 175.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while BUUU trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is 214.43. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BUUU's competition here
TRI vs PFSW Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PFSW's competition here
TRI vs ARC Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ARC's competition here
TRI vs ANPA Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 114.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while ANPA trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 914.00. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ANPA's competition here
TRI vs DLHC Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 81M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while DLHC trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -69.87. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check DLHC's competition here
TRI vs TISI Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while TISI trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TISI's ROE of -18.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TISI's competition here
TRI vs SST-WT Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SST-WT has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while SST-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas SST-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SST-WT's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SST-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SST-WT's competition here
TRI vs SST Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while SST trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SST's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SST's competition here
TRI vs NTIP Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while NTIP trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -12.95. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check NTIP's competition here
TRI vs SMX Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 31.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while SMX trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMX's ROE of -22.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SMX's competition here
TRI vs OMEX Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while OMEX trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check OMEX's competition here
TRI vs YSXT Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while YSXT trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check YSXT's competition here
TRI vs PMEC Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while PMEC trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PMEC's competition here
TRI vs THH Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while THH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check THH's competition here
TRI vs ZGM Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while ZGM trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ZGM's competition here
TRI vs WHLM Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while WHLM trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 32.50. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check WHLM's competition here
TRI vs SGRP Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while SGRP trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SGRP's competition here
TRI vs ATTO Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ATTO's competition here
TRI vs MSGY Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while MSGY trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check MSGY's competition here
TRI vs CRE Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while CRE trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 3.89. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CRE's competition here
TRI vs LICN Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while LICN trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check LICN's competition here
TRI vs SFHG Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while SFHG trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -4.11. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SFHG's competition here
TRI vs PMAX Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 592.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while PMAX trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PMAX's competition here
TRI vs VSA Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 584.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while VSA trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VSA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check VSA's competition here
TRI vs THWWW Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check THWWW's competition here
TRI vs BLMZ Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BLMZ's competition here
TRI vs GPAK Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 20.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check GPAK's competition here
TRI vs CRN Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CRN's competition here
TRI vs EPIQ Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, EPIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while EPIQ trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas EPIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to EPIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check EPIQ's competition here
TRI vs PAEWW Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PAEWW's competition here
TRI vs INTX Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to INTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check INTX's competition here
TRI vs PAE Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PAE's competition here
TRI vs ALJJ Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ALJJ's competition here
TRI vs RRD Comparison April 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 40.3B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $89.07, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.54, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RRD's competition here