Thomson Reuters Corporation
Thomson Reuters Corporation TRI Peers
See (TRI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRI | $193.85 | -1.08% | 87.3B | 40.72 | $4.76 | +1.17% |
| CTAS | $218.65 | -0.80% | 88.3B | 50.73 | $4.31 | +0.98% |
| RBA | $104.90 | +0.28% | 19.4B | 51.67 | $2.03 | +1.10% |
| GPN | $76.62 | +0.60% | 18.7B | 12.40 | $6.18 | +1.30% |
| ULS | $70.63 | -0.35% | 14.2B | 42.29 | $1.67 | +0.72% |
| BIPI | $16.36 | +0.18% | 13B | N/A | N/A | +5.87% |
| RTO | $23.31 | +0.39% | 11.7B | 28.43 | $0.82 | +2.51% |
| ARMK | $40.10 | -0.05% | 10.5B | 30.85 | $1.30 | +1.03% |
| IAA | $39.89 | -0.10% | 5.3B | 18.55 | $2.15 | N/A |
| MMS | $66.99 | -3.17% | 3.8B | 13.42 | $4.99 | +1.79% |
Stock Comparison
TRI vs CTAS Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while CTAS trades at $218.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 50.73. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs RBA Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while RBA trades at $104.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 51.67. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs GPN Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while GPN trades at $76.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs ULS Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while ULS trades at $70.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 42.29. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs BIPI Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while BIPI trades at $16.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs RTO Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while RTO trades at $23.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI and RTO have similar daily volatility (1.45).
TRI vs ARMK Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while ARMK trades at $40.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 30.85. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs IAA Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs MMS Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while MMS trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs CBZ Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while CBZ trades at $67.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs UNF Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while UNF trades at $183.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs FA Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while FA trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -17.24. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs ABM Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while ABM trades at $43.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 34.78. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs LZ Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while LZ trades at $8.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 50.35. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs BV Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while BV trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas BV's P/E ratio is -779.00. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs VVI Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VVI's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs SP Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs TDCX Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs PRSU Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 769.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while PRSU trades at $27.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is -13.96. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs TH Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 703.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while TH trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas TH's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs CASS Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 552.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while CASS trades at $41.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 27.39. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs KODK Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 459.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while KODK trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KODK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs ACTG Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 344.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while ACTG trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is -32.55. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ACTG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs SPIR Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 309.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while SPIR trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -6.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs CVEO Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 300.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while CVEO trades at $22.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -14.30. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs PFMT Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PFMT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs QUAD Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 271.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while QUAD trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is -14.90. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to QUAD's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs RHLD Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 266.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while RHLD trades at $31.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RHLD's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs SST Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 252.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while SST trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SST's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs PFSW Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs ARC Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs YSXT Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 124M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while YSXT trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 33.06. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs TISI Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while TISI trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TISI's ROE of -11.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs DLHC Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 78.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while DLHC trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DLHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs PMEC Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while PMEC trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs OMEX Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while OMEX trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OMEX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs NTIP Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while NTIP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs SGRP Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while SGRP trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SGRP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs SMX Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while SMX trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SMX's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs WHLM Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while WHLM trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs SFHG Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while SFHG trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -33.75. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs ATTO Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs LICN Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while LICN trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs THWWW Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to THWWW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs GPAK Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 7.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs PAEWW Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs ALJJ Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs RRD Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.
TRI vs PAE Comparison
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 87.3B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $193.85, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 40.72, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.