Thomson Reuters Corporation
Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TRI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRI | $79.95 | -6.12% | 37B | 25.29 | $3.29 | +2.92% |
| CTAS | $199.26 | +0.65% | 80.4B | 43.29 | $4.62 | +0.87% |
| CPRT | $35.78 | -4.98% | 35.3B | 22.38 | $1.63 | N/A |
| GPN | $80.63 | +0.47% | 19.5B | 12.52 | $6.59 | +1.22% |
| RBA | $100.58 | -3.00% | 19.2B | 51.20 | $2.02 | +1.18% |
| RTO | $31.39 | +0.18% | 16.2B | 50.81 | $0.63 | +1.74% |
| ULS | $79.48 | -3.83% | 16.1B | 47.98 | $1.67 | +0.65% |
| BIPI | $17.12 | -0.06% | 13.6B | N/A | N/A | +7.47% |
| ARMK | $40.37 | -0.39% | 10.8B | 34.38 | $1.19 | +1.10% |
| IAA | $39.89 | -0.10% | 5.3B | 18.55 | $2.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TRI vs CTAS Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 80.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while CTAS trades at $199.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 43.29. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CTAS's competition here
TRI vs CPRT Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while CPRT trades at $35.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CPRT's competition here
TRI vs GPN Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while GPN trades at $80.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check GPN's competition here
TRI vs RBA Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while RBA trades at $100.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 51.20. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RBA's competition here
TRI vs RTO Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while RTO trades at $31.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 50.81. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RTO's competition here
TRI vs ULS Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while ULS trades at $79.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 47.98. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ULS's competition here
TRI vs BIPI Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while BIPI trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BIPI's competition here
TRI vs ARMK Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while ARMK trades at $40.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ARMK's competition here
TRI vs IAA Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check IAA's competition here
TRI vs UNF Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while UNF trades at $233.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 31.47. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check UNF's competition here
TRI vs MMS Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while MMS trades at $72.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check MMS's competition here
TRI vs ABM Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while ABM trades at $44.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ABM's competition here
TRI vs TIC Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while TIC trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -8.09. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TIC's competition here
TRI vs FA Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while FA trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check FA's competition here
TRI vs RHLD Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while RHLD trades at $189.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RHLD's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RHLD's competition here
TRI vs CBZ Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while CBZ trades at $27.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CBZ's competition here
TRI vs BV Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while BV trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 197.43. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BV's competition here
TRI vs VVI Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check VVI's competition here
TRI vs LZ Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while LZ trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 54.67. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check LZ's competition here
TRI vs SP Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SP's competition here
TRI vs PRSU Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while PRSU trades at $35.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is -44.24. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PRSU's competition here
TRI vs TDCX Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TDCX's competition here
TRI vs TH Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 661.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while TH trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -66.30. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TH's competition here
TRI vs KODK Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 633.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while KODK trades at $7.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -23.87. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KODK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check KODK's competition here
TRI vs CASS Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 585M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while CASS trades at $43.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CASS's competition here
TRI vs ACTG Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 402.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while ACTG trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is 69.50. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACTG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ACTG's competition here
TRI vs CVEO Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 358.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while CVEO trades at $27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -13.66. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CVEO's competition here
TRI vs QUAD Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 356.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while QUAD trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check QUAD's competition here
TRI vs PPHC Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 350.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while PPHC trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PPHC's competition here
TRI vs SPIR Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 305.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while SPIR trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is 26.34. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPIR's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SPIR's competition here
TRI vs PFMT Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFMT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PFMT's competition here
TRI vs RHLDV Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RHLDV's competition here
TRI vs BUUU Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 187.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while BUUU trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is 229.57. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BUUU's competition here
TRI vs PFSW Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PFSW's competition here
TRI vs ARC Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ARC's competition here
TRI vs ANPA Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 116.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while ANPA trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 932.00. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ANPA's competition here
TRI vs SMX Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 89.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while SMX trades at $34.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMX's ROE of -3.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SMX's competition here
TRI vs DLHC Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 84.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while DLHC trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -72.62. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check DLHC's competition here
TRI vs TISI Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 63.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while TISI trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TISI's ROE of +13.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check TISI's competition here
TRI vs OMEX Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while OMEX trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check OMEX's competition here
TRI vs SST Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while SST trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SST's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SST's competition here
TRI vs NTIP Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while NTIP trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check NTIP's competition here
TRI vs THH Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while THH trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check THH's competition here
TRI vs PMEC Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 26.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while PMEC trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -13.79. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PMEC's competition here
TRI vs YSXT Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while YSXT trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check YSXT's competition here
TRI vs ZGM Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while ZGM trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ZGM's competition here
TRI vs SGRP Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while SGRP trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SGRP's competition here
TRI vs WHLM Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while WHLM trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 34.95. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check WHLM's competition here
TRI vs SFHG Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while SFHG trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check SFHG's competition here
TRI vs MSGY Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while MSGY trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check MSGY's competition here
TRI vs ATTO Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ATTO's competition here
TRI vs CRE Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while CRE trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CRE's competition here
TRI vs PMAX Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while PMAX trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PMAX's competition here
TRI vs LICN Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while LICN trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check LICN's competition here
TRI vs THWWW Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check THWWW's competition here
TRI vs BLMZ Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check BLMZ's competition here
TRI vs GPAK Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 12.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check GPAK's competition here
TRI vs ALJJ Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check ALJJ's competition here
TRI vs PAEWW Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PAEWW's competition here
TRI vs PAE Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check PAE's competition here
TRI vs CRN Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is less volatile compared to CRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check CRN's competition here
TRI vs RRD Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check RRD's competition here
TRI vs INTX Comparison February 2026
TRI plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRI stands at 37B. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRI is priced at $79.95, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRI currently has a P/E ratio of 25.29, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TRI is more volatile compared to INTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRI.Check INTX's competition here