Trilogy Metals Inc.
Trilogy Metals Inc. (TMQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TMQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMQ | $1.80 | -3.23% | 294.8M | -29.92 | -$0.06 | N/A |
| RIO | $62.27 | +0.13% | 102.8B | 8.81 | $7.07 | +6.43% |
| BHP | $52.71 | +0.82% | 66.9B | 11.77 | $4.48 | +4.67% |
| VALE | $9.89 | +0.46% | 42.2B | 7.16 | $1.38 | +8.41% |
| TECK | $33.02 | -2.10% | 16.2B | 100.06 | $0.33 | +2.20% |
| MP | $60.26 | -6.01% | 10.7B | -92.75 | -$0.65 | N/A |
| TMC | $6.61 | -11.28% | 2.6B | -28.74 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| MTRN | $92.06 | -1.98% | 1.9B | 191.79 | $0.48 | +0.59% |
| SKE | $14.94 | +0.95% | 1.7B | -12.87 | -$1.16 | N/A |
| STR | $18.35 | -0.54% | 1.4B | 35.33 | $0.52 | +7.30% |
Stock Comparison
TMQ vs RIO Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 102.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while RIO trades at $62.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 8.81. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check RIO's competition here
TMQ vs BHP Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while BHP trades at $52.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check BHP's competition here
TMQ vs VALE Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while VALE trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check VALE's competition here
TMQ vs TECK Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while TECK trades at $33.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 100.06. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check TECK's competition here
TMQ vs MP Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while MP trades at $60.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -92.75. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check MP's competition here
TMQ vs TMC Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while TMC trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -28.74. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TMC's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check TMC's competition here
TMQ vs MTRN Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while MTRN trades at $92.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 191.79. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check MTRN's competition here
TMQ vs SKE Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while SKE trades at $14.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check SKE's competition here
TMQ vs STR Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while STR trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 35.33. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check STR's competition here
TMQ vs IPX Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while IPX trades at $40.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -15.79. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check IPX's competition here
TMQ vs VZLA Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while VZLA trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -157.00. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check VZLA's competition here
TMQ vs USAR Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while USAR trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USAR's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check USAR's competition here
TMQ vs CMP Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 840.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while CMP trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -5.67. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check CMP's competition here
TMQ vs GSM Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 838M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while GSM trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -19.52. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check GSM's competition here
TMQ vs SGML Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 666M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while SGML trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -18.14. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check SGML's competition here
TMQ vs NEXA Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 662.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while NEXA trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check NEXA's competition here
TMQ vs TMCWW Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 650.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while TMCWW trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check TMCWW's competition here
TMQ vs USAS Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 613.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while USAS trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -7.23. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check USAS's competition here
TMQ vs LAC Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 577.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while LAC trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check LAC's competition here
TMQ vs SLI Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 513.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while SLI trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 4.31. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check SLI's competition here
TMQ vs LAR Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 460M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while LAR trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check LAR's competition here
TMQ vs LAAC Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check LAAC's competition here
TMQ vs PLM Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check PLM's competition here
TMQ vs NAK Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 403M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while NAK trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check NAK's competition here
TMQ vs GRFX Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check GRFX's competition here
TMQ vs UAMY Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 364.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while UAMY trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -306.00. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check UAMY's competition here
TMQ vs LZM Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 361.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while LZM trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check LZM's competition here
TMQ vs CRMLW Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 354M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while CRMLW trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check CRMLW's competition here
TMQ vs CRML Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 333.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while CRML trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check CRML's competition here
TMQ vs EMX Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 333.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while EMX trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -102.83. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check EMX's competition here
TMQ vs USARW Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 299.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while USARW trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USARW's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check USARW's competition here
TMQ vs NMG Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 280.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while NMG trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check NMG's competition here
TMQ vs WRN Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 261M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while WRN trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -65.25. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check WRN's competition here
TMQ vs ABAT Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 217.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while ABAT trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check ABAT's competition here
TMQ vs NB Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 204.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while NB trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -14.84. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check NB's competition here
TMQ vs IONR Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 187.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while IONR trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -14.45. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check IONR's competition here
TMQ vs PLL Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 159.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while PLL trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check PLL's competition here
TMQ vs USGO Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 101.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while USGO trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -11.54. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check USGO's competition here
TMQ vs LGO Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while LGO trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check LGO's competition here
TMQ vs FURY Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 83.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while FURY trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check FURY's competition here
TMQ vs GRO Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while GRO trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check GRO's competition here
TMQ vs AMLI Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 68.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while AMLI trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check AMLI's competition here
TMQ vs XPL Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 61.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while XPL trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check XPL's competition here
TMQ vs WWR Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while WWR trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check WWR's competition here
TMQ vs LITM Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while LITM trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check LITM's competition here
TMQ vs ELBM Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 21.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while ELBM trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check ELBM's competition here
TMQ vs GTI Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while GTI trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check GTI's competition here
TMQ vs BYU Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check BYU's competition here
TMQ vs STR-WT Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 239.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check STR-WT's competition here
TMQ vs GLG Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check GLG's competition here
TMQ vs KMCM Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TMQ has daily volatility of 8.55 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.Check KMCM's competition here
TMQ vs SMTS Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check SMTS's competition here
TMQ vs BBL Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check BBL's competition here
TMQ vs IFFT Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IFFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check IFFT's competition here
TMQ vs VEDL Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is more volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check VEDL's competition here
TMQ vs EXN Comparison July 2025
TMQ plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMQ stands at 294.8M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMQ is priced at $1.80, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMQ currently has a P/E ratio of -29.92, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMQ's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMQ is less volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMQ.Check EXN's competition here