TMC the metals company Inc.
TMC the metals company Inc. TMCWW Peers
See (TMCWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMCWW | $1.22 | +29.62% | 2.1B | -1.94 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| RIO | $58.34 | +0.59% | 94.8B | 8.25 | $7.07 | +6.88% |
| BHP | $48.91 | +0.74% | 62.1B | 10.92 | $4.48 | +5.02% |
| VALE | $9.80 | +3.54% | 41.8B | 7.05 | $1.39 | +8.45% |
| TECK | $39.15 | +1.42% | 19.2B | 783.00 | $0.05 | +2.09% |
| MP | $34.62 | +13.33% | 5.7B | -54.96 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| TMC | $5.59 | +28.80% | 2.1B | -24.30 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| SKE | $14.74 | +0.34% | 1.7B | -12.71 | -$1.16 | N/A |
| MTRN | $79.60 | +1.71% | 1.7B | 165.83 | $0.48 | +0.69% |
| STR | $20.06 | -2.10% | 1.6B | 38.58 | $0.52 | +6.68% |
Stock Comparison
TMCWW vs RIO Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 94.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while RIO trades at $58.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs BHP Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while BHP trades at $48.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs VALE Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while VALE trades at $9.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs TECK Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while TECK trades at $39.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 783.00. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs MP Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while MP trades at $34.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -54.96. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs TMC Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while TMC trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -24.30. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to TMC's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs SKE Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while SKE trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -12.71. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs MTRN Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while MTRN trades at $79.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 165.83. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs STR Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while STR trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 38.58. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs USAR Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while USAR trades at $13.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 18.38. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to USAR's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs VZLA Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while VZLA trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -176.25. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs IPX Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 930.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while IPX trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -17.74. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs CMP Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 834.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while CMP trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs GSM Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 731.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while GSM trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -17.04. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs NAK Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 695M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while NAK trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -12.90. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs NEXA Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 652.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while NEXA trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs LAC Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 586.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while LAC trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -12.18. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs SGML Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 566.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while SGML trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -15.42. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs USAS Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 521.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while USAS trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -6.15. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs LAAC Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs PLM Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs GRFX Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs SLI Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 372.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while SLI trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs LZM Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 345M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while LZM trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs UAMY Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 344.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while UAMY trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -289.00. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs LAR Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 336.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while LAR trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -29.64. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs CRML Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 298.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while CRML trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs USARW Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 289.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while USARW trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to USARW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs WRN Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 271M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while WRN trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -45.17. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs EMX Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 266.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while EMX trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -82.17. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs NMG Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 264.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while NMG trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs CRMLW Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 254.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while CRMLW trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs TMQ Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 211.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while TMQ trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -25.80. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs IONR Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 179M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while IONR trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs NB Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 167.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while NB trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -15.79. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs PLL Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 134.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while PLL trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs USGO Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while USGO trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -14.14. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs ABAT Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 122.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while ABAT trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs AMLI Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while AMLI trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs FURY Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while FURY trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs LGO Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while LGO trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs GRO Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while GRO trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs XPL Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 55.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while XPL trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -9.60. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs WWR Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while WWR trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs LITM Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while LITM trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs ELBM Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 19.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while ELBM trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs GTI Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while GTI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -7.66. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs BYU Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs STR-WT Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 239.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs GLG Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs KMCM Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TMCWW has daily volatility of 26.46 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.
TMCWW vs SMTS Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs EXN Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs BBL Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs IFFT Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to IFFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs VEDL Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 2.1B. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.22, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.94, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.