TMC the metals company Inc.
TMC the metals company Inc. (TMCWW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TMCWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMCWW | $1.50 | +18.18% | 548.7M | -2.17 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| RIO | $59.65 | -0.20% | 99.3B | 9.50 | $6.28 | +6.75% |
| BHP | $50.73 | +0.12% | 64.3B | 11.32 | $4.48 | +4.88% |
| VALE | $9.71 | +1.89% | 41.4B | 7.03 | $1.38 | +8.58% |
| TECK | $31.61 | -2.62% | 15.2B | 95.76 | $0.33 | +2.31% |
| MP | $63.69 | +3.56% | 11.3B | -101.08 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| TMC | $5.87 | -1.18% | 2.4B | -25.52 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| MTRN | $105.07 | -0.22% | 2.2B | 136.46 | $0.77 | +0.52% |
| SKE | $14.38 | +2.13% | 1.6B | -12.39 | -$1.16 | N/A |
| STR-WT | $0.01 | -46.87% | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | +7.58% |
Stock Comparison
TMCWW vs RIO Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 99.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while RIO trades at $59.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check RIO's competition here
TMCWW vs BHP Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while BHP trades at $50.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check BHP's competition here
TMCWW vs VALE Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while VALE trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check VALE's competition here
TMCWW vs TECK Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while TECK trades at $31.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 95.76. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check TECK's competition here
TMCWW vs MP Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while MP trades at $63.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -101.08. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check MP's competition here
TMCWW vs TMC Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while TMC trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -25.52. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to TMC's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check TMC's competition here
TMCWW vs MTRN Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while MTRN trades at $105.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 136.46. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check MTRN's competition here
TMCWW vs SKE Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while SKE trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -12.39. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check SKE's competition here
TMCWW vs STR-WT Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check STR-WT's competition here
TMCWW vs STR Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while STR trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 33.94. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check STR's competition here
TMCWW vs USAR Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while USAR trades at $13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to USAR's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check USAR's competition here
TMCWW vs IPX Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while IPX trades at $37.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -15.30. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check IPX's competition here
TMCWW vs VZLA Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 995.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while VZLA trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -145.25. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check VZLA's competition here
TMCWW vs CMP Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 823.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while CMP trades at $19.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check CMP's competition here
TMCWW vs GSM Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 740.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while GSM trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -17.26. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check GSM's competition here
TMCWW vs NEXA Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 621.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while NEXA trades at $4.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check NEXA's competition here
TMCWW vs USAS Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 605M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while USAS trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -7.13. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check USAS's competition here
TMCWW vs SGML Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 565.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while SGML trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -15.39. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check SGML's competition here
TMCWW vs LAC Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 559.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while LAC trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -11.61. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check LAC's competition here
TMCWW vs SLI Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 453.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while SLI trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 3.75. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check SLI's competition here
TMCWW vs LAAC Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check LAAC's competition here
TMCWW vs LAR Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 425.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while LAR trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -37.50. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check LAR's competition here
TMCWW vs USARW Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 409.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while USARW trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to USARW's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check USARW's competition here
TMCWW vs PLM Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check PLM's competition here
TMCWW vs NAK Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 407.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while NAK trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check NAK's competition here
TMCWW vs GRFX Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check GRFX's competition here
TMCWW vs CRMLW Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 393M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while CRMLW trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check CRMLW's competition here
TMCWW vs CRML Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 375.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while CRML trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check CRML's competition here
TMCWW vs UAMY Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 350.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while UAMY trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -294.50. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check UAMY's competition here
TMCWW vs LZM Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 332.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while LZM trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check LZM's competition here
TMCWW vs EMX Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 317M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while EMX trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -97.83. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check EMX's competition here
TMCWW vs NMG Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 269.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while NMG trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check NMG's competition here
TMCWW vs TMQ Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 261.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while TMQ trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check TMQ's competition here
TMCWW vs WRN Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 240M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while WRN trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check WRN's competition here
TMCWW vs NB Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 229.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while NB trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -16.63. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check NB's competition here
TMCWW vs ABAT Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 203.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while ABAT trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check ABAT's competition here
TMCWW vs IONR Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 172M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while IONR trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -15.37. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check IONR's competition here
TMCWW vs PLL Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 159.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while PLL trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check PLL's competition here
TMCWW vs USGO Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 97.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while USGO trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -11.09. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check USGO's competition here
TMCWW vs LGO Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while LGO trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check LGO's competition here
TMCWW vs FURY Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while FURY trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check FURY's competition here
TMCWW vs AMLI Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 64.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while AMLI trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is less volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check AMLI's competition here
TMCWW vs GRO Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while GRO trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check GRO's competition here
TMCWW vs WWR Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while WWR trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check WWR's competition here
TMCWW vs XPL Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while XPL trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check XPL's competition here
TMCWW vs LITM Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while LITM trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check LITM's competition here
TMCWW vs ELBM Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while ELBM trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check ELBM's competition here
TMCWW vs GTI Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while GTI trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check GTI's competition here
TMCWW vs BYU Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check BYU's competition here
TMCWW vs GLG Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check GLG's competition here
TMCWW vs KMCM Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TMCWW has daily volatility of 26.42 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.Check KMCM's competition here
TMCWW vs SMTS Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check SMTS's competition here
TMCWW vs VEDL Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check VEDL's competition here
TMCWW vs IFFT Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to IFFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check IFFT's competition here
TMCWW vs EXN Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check EXN's competition here
TMCWW vs BBL Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 548.7M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $1.50, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -2.17, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check BBL's competition here