TMC the metals company Inc.
TMC the metals company Inc. (TMCWW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TMCWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMCWW | $0.90 | +38.46% | 365.8M | -1.43 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| RIO | $61.30 | +1.12% | 99.6B | 9.77 | $6.28 | +6.08% |
| BHP | $54.50 | +1.70% | 69.1B | 15.35 | $3.55 | +4.53% |
| VALE | $9.81 | +0.93% | 41.9B | 8.04 | $1.22 | +8.19% |
| TECK | $31.76 | +1.57% | 15.3B | 96.27 | $0.33 | +2.29% |
| MP | $68.28 | +0.16% | 12.1B | -110.27 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| MTRN | $109.59 | -0.12% | 2.3B | 140.41 | $0.78 | +0.50% |
| TMC | $4.95 | +6.00% | 2B | -13.03 | -$0.38 | N/A |
| SKE | $15.08 | -0.79% | 1.7B | -13.95 | -$1.08 | N/A |
| USAR | $15.27 | +7.01% | 1.5B | -19.33 | -$0.79 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TMCWW vs RIO Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 99.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while RIO trades at $61.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check RIO's competition here
TMCWW vs BHP Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while BHP trades at $54.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check BHP's competition here
TMCWW vs VALE Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while VALE trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check VALE's competition here
TMCWW vs TECK Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while TECK trades at $31.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 96.27. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check TECK's competition here
TMCWW vs MP Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while MP trades at $68.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -110.27. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check MP's competition here
TMCWW vs MTRN Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while MTRN trades at $109.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 140.41. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check MTRN's competition here
TMCWW vs TMC Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while TMC trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -13.03. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to TMC's ROE of -19.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check TMC's competition here
TMCWW vs SKE Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while SKE trades at $15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -13.95. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check SKE's competition here
TMCWW vs USAR Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while USAR trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is -19.33. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to USAR's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check USAR's competition here
TMCWW vs STR-WT Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check STR-WT's competition here
TMCWW vs STR Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while STR trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check STR's competition here
TMCWW vs IPX Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while IPX trades at $41.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -15.84. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check IPX's competition here
TMCWW vs VZLA Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while VZLA trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -172.25. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check VZLA's competition here
TMCWW vs CMP Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 795M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while CMP trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -6.58. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check CMP's competition here
TMCWW vs GSM Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 780.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while GSM trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is 5.89. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check GSM's competition here
TMCWW vs SGML Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 662.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while SGML trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -14.51. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check SGML's competition here
TMCWW vs NEXA Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 651.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while NEXA trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -7.24. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check NEXA's competition here
TMCWW vs LAC Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 610.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while LAC trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -10.94. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check LAC's competition here
TMCWW vs USAS Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 585.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while USAS trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -6.41. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check USAS's competition here
TMCWW vs CRML Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 578.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while CRML trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check CRML's competition here
TMCWW vs SLI Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 550.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while SLI trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check SLI's competition here
TMCWW vs UAMY Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 546.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while UAMY trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -453.00. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check UAMY's competition here
TMCWW vs LAR Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while LAR trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check LAR's competition here
TMCWW vs USARW Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 510.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while USARW trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to USARW's ROE of +1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check USARW's competition here
TMCWW vs NAK Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 468.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while NAK trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -7.90. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to NAK's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check NAK's competition here
TMCWW vs CRMLW Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 465.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while CRMLW trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check CRMLW's competition here
TMCWW vs LAAC Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to LAAC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check LAAC's competition here
TMCWW vs PLM Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check PLM's competition here
TMCWW vs GRFX Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check GRFX's competition here
TMCWW vs LZM Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 350.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while LZM trades at $4.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check LZM's competition here
TMCWW vs EMX Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 335.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while EMX trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is 62.06. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check EMX's competition here
TMCWW vs NB Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 303.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while NB trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check NB's competition here
TMCWW vs NMG Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 275.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while NMG trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check NMG's competition here
TMCWW vs TMQ Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 270.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while TMQ trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -27.42. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check TMQ's competition here
TMCWW vs WRN Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while WRN trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -126.50. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check WRN's competition here
TMCWW vs ABAT Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 224.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while ABAT trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -2.67. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check ABAT's competition here
TMCWW vs PLL Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 199.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while PLL trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check PLL's competition here
TMCWW vs IONR Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 190.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while IONR trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -15.38. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check IONR's competition here
TMCWW vs USGO Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while USGO trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -12.18. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check USGO's competition here
TMCWW vs LGO Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 90.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while LGO trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check LGO's competition here
TMCWW vs FURY Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while FURY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to FURY's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check FURY's competition here
TMCWW vs GRO Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while GRO trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check GRO's competition here
TMCWW vs XPL Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while XPL trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -11.18. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check XPL's competition here
TMCWW vs AMLI Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 64.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while AMLI trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check AMLI's competition here
TMCWW vs WWR Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while WWR trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check WWR's competition here
TMCWW vs LITM Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 36.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while LITM trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check LITM's competition here
TMCWW vs ELBM Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while ELBM trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check ELBM's competition here
TMCWW vs GTI Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while GTI trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to GTI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check GTI's competition here
TMCWW vs BYU Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check BYU's competition here
TMCWW vs GLG Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check GLG's competition here
TMCWW vs KMCM Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TMCWW has daily volatility of 39.82 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.Check KMCM's competition here
TMCWW vs BBL Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check BBL's competition here
TMCWW vs VEDL Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check VEDL's competition here
TMCWW vs SMTS Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check SMTS's competition here
TMCWW vs IFFT Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to IFFT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check IFFT's competition here
TMCWW vs EXN Comparison August 2025
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 365.8M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is -19.85%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.Check EXN's competition here