TMC the metals company Inc.
TMC the metals company Inc. TMCWW Peers
See (TMCWW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMCWW | $0.90 | +19.76% | 1.62B | -1.43 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| RIO | $62.40 | -0.38% | 101.38B | 8.83 | $7.07 | +6.45% |
| BHP | $50.35 | -0.32% | 63.88B | 11.24 | $4.48 | +4.91% |
| VALE | $9.83 | +0.26% | 41.94B | 7.12 | $1.38 | +8.44% |
| TECK | $35.99 | +0.85% | 17.65B | 719.70 | $0.05 | +2.02% |
| MP | $21.26 | -0.24% | 3.47B | -33.74 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| MTRN | $80.46 | +1.12% | 1.67B | 167.63 | $0.48 | +0.67% |
| TMC | $4.45 | +22.25% | 1.65B | -19.35 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| SKE | $12.49 | +2.59% | 1.43B | -11.35 | -$1.10 | N/A |
| STR | $18.07 | -1.15% | 1.40B | 34.75 | $0.52 | +7.79% |
Stock Comparison
TMCWW vs RIO Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 101.38B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while RIO trades at $62.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs BHP Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 63.88B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while BHP trades at $50.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs VALE Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 41.94B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while VALE trades at $9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs TECK Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 17.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while TECK trades at $35.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 719.70. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs MP Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 3.47B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while MP trades at $21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -33.74. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs MTRN Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while MTRN trades at $80.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 167.63. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs TMC Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while TMC trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -19.35. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to TMC's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is less volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs SKE Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.43B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while SKE trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs STR Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.40B. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while STR trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs USAR Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 878.09M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while USAR trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 107.67. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to USAR's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs CMP Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 801.19M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while CMP trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs GSM Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 714.78M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while GSM trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -16.65. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs VZLA Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 704.67M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while VZLA trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -121.50. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs NEXA Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 701.93M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while NEXA trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs SGML Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 670.02M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while SGML trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs LAC Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 619.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while LAC trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -12.86. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs NAK Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 503.84M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while NAK trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs LAAC Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.69M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs PLM Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.37M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs USAS Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 385.74M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while USAS trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs UAMY Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 321.34M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while UAMY trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -272.50. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs LAR Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 312.53M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while LAR trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -27.57. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs NMG Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 283.21M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while NMG trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -3.65. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs LZM Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 272.57M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while LZM trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs SLI Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 257.94M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while SLI trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs EMX Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 234.47M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while EMX trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -71.83. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs TMQ Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 220.05M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while TMQ trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -26.80. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is less volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs WRN Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 211.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while WRN trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -35.17. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs USARW Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 165.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while USARW trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to USARW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs CRML Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 142.97M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while CRML trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs PLL Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 139.58M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while PLL trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs NB Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 132.59M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while NB trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs ABAT Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 127.72M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while ABAT trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs USGO Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 122.34M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while USGO trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -14.38. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs AMLI Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 86.14M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while AMLI trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs LGO Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 83.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while LGO trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs IPX Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 67.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while IPX trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -15.84. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs GRO Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 62.23M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while GRO trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs FURY Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 59.00M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while FURY trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs XPL Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 50.42M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while XPL trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -8.71. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs WWR Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 36.62M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while WWR trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs LITM Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 29.49M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while LITM trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs GTI Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 22.39M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while GTI trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -15.26. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is less volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs GRFX Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 20.09M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs ELBM Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 18.14M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while ELBM trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs CRMLW Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 16.16M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while CRMLW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs BYU Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.94M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs IONR Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 5.17M. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while IONR trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -20.65. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs STR-WT Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 239189.00. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs GLG Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221055.00. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TMCWW is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TMCWW.
TMCWW vs KMCM Comparison
TMCWW plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TMCWW stands at 1.62B. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238.00. Regarding current trading prices, TMCWW is priced at $0.90, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TMCWW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.43, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TMCWW's ROE is +3.49%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TMCWW has daily volatility of 17.97 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.