Truist Financial Corporation

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 186.31B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while HDB trades at $73.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 70.98B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while PNC trades at $179.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 69.99B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while USB trades at $44.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 69.46B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while USB-PS trades at $18.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 69.18B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while USB-PA trades at $845.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 240.80. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 69.00B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while USB-PP trades at $22.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.89. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 68.88B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while USB-PH trades at $21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.53. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 68.22B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while ITUB trades at $6.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 64.37B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while MFG trades at $5.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 60.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while IBN trades at $33.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 60.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while LYG trades at $4.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 54.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while DB trades at $27.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 39.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while BSBR trades at $5.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 37.03B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while HBANL trades at $25.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 32.71B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while HBANM trades at $22.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.86. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 31.11B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while TFC-PI trades at $23.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 30.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while MTB trades at $187.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.30B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while TFC-PO trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 26.98B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while BBD trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 26.88B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while BBDO trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 26.46B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while FITB trades at $39.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 25.82B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while FCNCP trades at $21.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 25.73B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while FCNCO trades at $22.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 25.68B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while FCNCA trades at $1,953.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 25.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while HBANP trades at $17.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.51B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while USB-PR trades at $16.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 25.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while KB trades at $67.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.55B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while TFC-PR trades at $18.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.18. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.95B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while USB-PQ trades at $15.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 23.57B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while HBAN trades at $16.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC and HBAN have similar daily volatility (1.43).

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.87B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while RF-PF trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 20.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while RF trades at $22.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 20.06B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while RF-PC trades at $23.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 18.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while KEY-PK trades at $20.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 18.25B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while KEY-PI trades at $25.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 18.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while KEY-PL trades at $24.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 18.22B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while KEY trades at $16.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -87.50. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 18.19B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 18.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while CFG trades at $41.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.98B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while FITBI trades at $25.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 16.44B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while BAP trades at $206.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.31B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while FITBP trades at $24.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 15.84B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while SHG trades at $31.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 5.49. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 15.75B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while BCH trades at $31.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 12.94. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.51B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while RF-PE trades at $17.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.91B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 14.44B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while FITBO trades at $21.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while FHN-PB trades at $25.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.68B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while FHN-PC trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.21B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while CFG-PH trades at $26.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.12B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while FHN-PE trades at $23.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 10.87B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while CIB trades at $41.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 10.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while FHN trades at $20.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 10.27B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while GGAL trades at $62.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 9.48B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while WF trades at $38.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.27B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while SSB trades at $91.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.93B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while FHN-PF trades at $17.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 8.90B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while WBS trades at $52.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.89B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.76B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while CBSH trades at $65.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 8.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while PNFP trades at $111.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.63B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while WAL trades at $78.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.44B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while CFR trades at $131.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 8.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while ONBPO trades at $24.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 8.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while ONBPP trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.28. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while CFG-PE trades at $19.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, WTFCM has a market cap of 8.22B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while WTFCM trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas WTFCM's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WTFCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to WTFCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 8.19B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while ONB trades at $22.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.19B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while WTFC trades at $122.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while UMBF trades at $107.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 7.73B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while CMA trades at $58.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.41B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while BSMX trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 7.26B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while ZION trades at $49.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.61. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.16B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while BPOP trades at $104.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.92B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while PB trades at $72.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.89B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while SNV-PD trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.88B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while SNV trades at $49.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.27B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while BOKF trades at $97.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 5.87B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while BMA trades at $92.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 5.82B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while CADE trades at $31.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.79B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while HOMB trades at $29.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while OZK trades at $46.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.29B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while UBSI trades at $37.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while COLB trades at $25.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.25B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while BXS trades at $28.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while FLG trades at $12.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.20B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while FNB trades at $14.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while VLYPP trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while VLY trades at $9.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while FFIN trades at $35.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.13B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while VLYPO trades at $25.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 4.95B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while HWCPZ trades at $24.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while HWC trades at $56.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 4.85B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while GBCI trades at $42.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 4.41B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while AUB trades at $30.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, NYCB has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while NYCB trades at $10.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas NYCB's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NYCB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to NYCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while ABCB trades at $63.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, BBAR has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while BBAR trades at $21.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas BBAR's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBAR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is less volatile compared to BBAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.

TFC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TFC stands at 54.24B. In comparison, BANF has a market cap of 4.27B. Regarding current trading prices, TFC is priced at $41.42, while BANF trades at $128.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TFC currently has a P/E ratio of -218.00, whereas BANF's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, TFC's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BANF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TFC is more volatile compared to BANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TFC.