Save Foods, Inc.
Save Foods, Inc. SVFD Peers
See (SVFD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVFD | $1.41 | -0.70% | 4.17M | 0.07 | $19.53 | N/A |
| CTA-PB | $69.40 | +0.33% | 60.23B | N/A | N/A | +6.44% |
| CTVA | $68.60 | +0.45% | 46.79B | 41.32 | $1.66 | +0.98% |
| NTR | $57.91 | +0.78% | 28.29B | 54.63 | $1.06 | +3.75% |
| CF | $87.80 | +1.82% | 14.22B | 11.61 | $7.56 | +2.28% |
| MOS | $35.22 | +1.57% | 11.17B | 30.36 | $1.16 | +2.42% |
| ICL | $6.74 | -0.66% | 8.69B | 21.05 | $0.32 | +2.78% |
| FMC | $40.02 | +2.04% | 5.00B | 13.04 | $3.07 | +5.81% |
| SMG | $58.93 | -0.12% | 3.40B | 101.60 | $0.58 | +4.25% |
| UAN | $82.16 | +1.13% | 868.40M | 11.52 | $7.13 | +8.62% |
Stock Comparison
SVFD vs CTA-PB Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 60.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while CTA-PB trades at $69.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs CTVA Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 46.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while CTVA trades at $68.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 41.32. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs NTR Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 28.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while NTR trades at $57.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 54.63. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs CF Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 14.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while CF trades at $87.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs MOS Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 11.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while MOS trades at $35.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs ICL Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 8.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while ICL trades at $6.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs FMC Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 5.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while FMC trades at $40.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to FMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs SMG Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while SMG trades at $58.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 101.60. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs UAN Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 868.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while UAN trades at $82.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs IPI Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 483.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while IPI trades at $36.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs LVRO Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 304.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while LVRO trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is less volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs BIOX Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 291.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while BIOX trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is 232.50. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to BIOX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs AVD Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 117.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while AVD trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs MULG Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.09M. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs BHIL-WT Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs CGA Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to CGA's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs ENFY Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, ENFY has a market cap of 17.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while ENFY trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas ENFY's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to ENFY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to ENFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs SEED Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 8.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while SEED trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to SEED's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs NITO Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 5.57M. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while NITO trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs RKDA Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 5.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while RKDA trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -7.11. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs FMTO Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 2.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while FMTO trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs BHIL Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is less volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs YTEN Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345460.00. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to YTEN's ROE of +4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.
SVFD vs CTA-PA Comparison
SVFD plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVFD stands at 4.17M. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 10862.00. Regarding current trading prices, SVFD is priced at $1.41, while CTA-PA trades at $54.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVFD currently has a P/E ratio of 0.07, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVFD's ROE is -2.89%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SVFD is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVFD.