Sitio Royalties Corp.
Sitio Royalties Corp. STR Peers
See (STR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STR | $18.19 | +0.22% | 2.7B | 34.99 | $0.52 | +7.34% |
| RIO | $64.33 | +3.67% | 105.8B | 9.10 | $7.07 | +6.24% |
| BHP | $55.06 | +3.54% | 69.8B | 12.28 | $4.48 | +4.48% |
| VALE | $10.37 | +2.37% | 44.2B | 7.51 | $1.38 | +8.00% |
| TECK | $38.79 | +2.16% | 19B | 775.20 | $0.05 | +1.88% |
| MP | $60.08 | +1.81% | 10.5B | -95.40 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| TMC | $7.23 | +2.41% | 2.9B | -31.43 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| MTRN | $96.30 | +1.16% | 2B | 200.71 | $0.48 | +0.56% |
| SKE | $16.79 | +1.27% | 1.9B | -14.48 | -$1.16 | N/A |
| USAR | $13.01 | -4.90% | 1.3B | 17.12 | $0.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
STR vs RIO Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 105.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while RIO trades at $64.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs BHP Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while BHP trades at $55.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs VALE Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while VALE trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs TECK Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while TECK trades at $38.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 775.20. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs MP Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while MP trades at $60.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -95.40. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs TMC Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while TMC trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -31.43. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TMC's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs MTRN Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while MTRN trades at $96.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 200.71. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs SKE Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while SKE trades at $16.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -14.48. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs USAR Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while USAR trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USAR's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs VZLA Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while VZLA trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -166.25. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs IPX Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while IPX trades at $33.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -17.65. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs GSM Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 884.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while GSM trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -20.61. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs CMP Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 881.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while CMP trades at $21.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -5.95. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs SGML Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 792.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while SGML trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -21.58. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs LAC Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 733.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while LAC trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -15.23. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs TMCWW Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 725M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while TMCWW trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -2.87. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs USAS Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 662.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while USAS trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -7.81. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs NEXA Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 645M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while NEXA trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs SLI Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 525.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while SLI trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs LAR Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 484.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while LAR trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -42.71. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs NAK Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 478.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while NAK trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -8.88. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs CRMLW Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 449.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while CRMLW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs LAAC Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs UAMY Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 422.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while UAMY trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -355.00. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs PLM Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs GRFX Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs CRML Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while CRML trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs LZM Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 390.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while LZM trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs USARW Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 374.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while USARW trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USARW's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs EMX Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 330.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while EMX trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -102.00. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs NMG Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 327.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while NMG trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs TMQ Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 318.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while TMQ trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -32.33. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs ABAT Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 266.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while ABAT trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs WRN Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 263.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while WRN trades at $1.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -65.94. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs IONR Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 211.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while IONR trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -16.32. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs NB Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 185.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while NB trades at $3.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -16.63. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs PLL Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 179.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while PLL trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs USGO Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 112.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while USGO trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -12.81. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs LGO Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 106.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while LGO trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs FURY Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 91.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while FURY trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs WWR Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while WWR trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs AMLI Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while AMLI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs GRO Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 61.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while GRO trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs XPL Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 57.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while XPL trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -9.96. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs LITM Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while LITM trades at $4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs ELBM Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while ELBM trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs GTI Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while GTI trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs BYU Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs STR-WT Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 239.2K. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs GLG Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs KMCM Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. STR has daily volatility of 2.18 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.
STR vs IFFT Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IFFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs SMTS Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs VEDL Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs EXN Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs BBL Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 2.7B. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $18.19, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 34.99, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.