Sitio Royalties Corp.
Sitio Royalties Corp. STR Peers
See (STR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STR | $19.95 | +2.62% | 1.5B | 38.37 | $0.52 | +6.69% |
| RIO | $59.02 | -0.38% | 95.9B | 8.35 | $7.07 | +6.79% |
| BHP | $49.57 | -0.53% | 62.9B | 11.06 | $4.48 | +4.97% |
| VALE | $9.50 | -0.05% | 40.5B | 6.83 | $1.39 | +8.74% |
| TECK | $38.57 | -0.08% | 18.9B | 771.40 | $0.05 | +1.87% |
| MP | $25.68 | -0.96% | 4.2B | -40.76 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| MTRN | $79.80 | +0.19% | 1.7B | 166.25 | $0.48 | +0.69% |
| SKE | $14.23 | -4.31% | 1.6B | -12.26 | -$1.16 | N/A |
| TMCWW | $0.82 | +1.23% | 1.5B | -1.30 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| TMC | $4.10 | +0.49% | 1.5B | -17.83 | -$0.23 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
STR vs RIO Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 95.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while RIO trades at $59.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs BHP Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while BHP trades at $49.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs VALE Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while VALE trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs TECK Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while TECK trades at $38.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 771.40. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs MP Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while MP trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -40.76. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs MTRN Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while MTRN trades at $79.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 166.25. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs SKE Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while SKE trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs TMCWW Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while TMCWW trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs TMC Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while TMC trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -17.83. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TMC's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs USAR Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while USAR trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USAR's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs VZLA Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 997.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while VZLA trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -172.00. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs IPX Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 885.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while IPX trades at $28.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -15.08. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs CMP Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 829.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while CMP trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs GSM Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 780.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while GSM trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -18.17. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs NAK Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 686.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while NAK trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -12.75. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs NEXA Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 650.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while NEXA trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs LAC Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 591M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while LAC trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -12.27. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs SGML Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 583.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while SGML trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -15.82. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs USAS Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 547.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while USAS trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -6.45. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs LAAC Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs PLM Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs UAMY Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 401.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while UAMY trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -337.50. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs GRFX Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs LZM Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 353.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while LZM trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs SLI Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while SLI trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs LAR Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 316.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while LAR trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -27.93. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs NMG Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 264.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while NMG trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs USARW Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 261.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while USARW trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USARW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs EMX Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 257M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while EMX trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -79.33. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs WRN Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 246M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while WRN trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -41.00. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs TMQ Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 219.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while TMQ trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -26.70. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs IONR Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 190.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while IONR trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -19.05. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs NB Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 144.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while NB trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -13.63. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs PLL Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while PLL trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs CRML Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 135.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while CRML trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs ABAT Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 134.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while ABAT trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs USGO Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 115.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while USGO trades at $9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -13.14. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs LGO Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 87.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while LGO trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs AMLI Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while AMLI trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is more volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs FURY Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while FURY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs GRO Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while GRO trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs XPL Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while XPL trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -9.70. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs WWR Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 39.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while WWR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs LITM Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while LITM trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs ELBM Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while ELBM trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs CRMLW Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while CRMLW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs GTI Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while GTI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -8.13. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs BYU Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs STR-WT Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 239.2K. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs GLG Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs KMCM Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. STR has daily volatility of 1.63 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.
STR vs SMTS Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs IFFT Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IFFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs VEDL Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs EXN Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.
STR vs BBL Comparison
STR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STR stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STR is priced at $19.95, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STR currently has a P/E ratio of 38.37, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, STR's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, STR is less volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STR.