Standard Lithium Ltd.
Standard Lithium Ltd. SLI Peers
See (SLI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLI | $1.90 | -2.32% | 376.3M | 3.11 | $0.61 | N/A |
| RIO | $55.88 | -1.86% | 90.8B | 7.90 | $7.07 | +7.19% |
| BHP | $46.12 | -3.15% | 58.5B | 10.29 | $4.48 | +5.35% |
| VALE | $9.06 | -2.58% | 38.7B | 6.57 | $1.38 | +9.22% |
| TECK | $37.46 | -2.04% | 18.4B | 749.20 | $0.05 | +1.93% |
| MP | $37.70 | +1.29% | 6.2B | -59.84 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| TMCWW | $1.46 | -2.35% | 2.5B | -2.31 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| TMC | $6.56 | -2.81% | 2.4B | -28.52 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| SKE | $15.04 | +1.55% | 1.7B | -12.97 | -$1.16 | N/A |
| MTRN | $76.80 | -0.46% | 1.6B | 159.99 | $0.48 | +0.71% |
Stock Comparison
SLI vs RIO Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 90.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while RIO trades at $55.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs BHP Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while BHP trades at $46.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs VALE Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 38.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while VALE trades at $9.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs TECK Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while TECK trades at $37.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 749.20. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs MP Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while MP trades at $37.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -59.84. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs TMCWW Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while TMCWW trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -2.31. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs TMC Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while TMC trades at $6.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -28.52. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TMC's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs SKE Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while SKE trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -12.97. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs MTRN Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while MTRN trades at $76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 159.99. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs STR Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while STR trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 37.79. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs USAR Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while USAR trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to USAR's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs VZLA Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 952.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while VZLA trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -164.25. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs IPX Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 870.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while IPX trades at $27.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -16.60. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs CMP Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 785M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while CMP trades at $18.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs NAK Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 724.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while NAK trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -13.45. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs GSM Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while GSM trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -16.09. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs NEXA Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 619.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while NEXA trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs LAC Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 554.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while LAC trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -11.52. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs SGML Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 529.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while SGML trades at $4.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs USAS Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 523.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while USAS trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -6.18. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs LAAC Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs PLM Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs GRFX Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs LZM Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 334.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while LZM trades at $4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs UAMY Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 326.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while UAMY trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -274.00. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs CRMLW Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 325M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while CRMLW trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs LAR Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 310.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while LAR trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs EMX Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 259.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while EMX trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -80.17. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs NMG Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 258.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while NMG trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -6.52. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs USARW Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 249.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while USARW trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to USARW's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs CRML Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 245.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while CRML trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -1.39. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs WRN Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 242M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while WRN trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -40.33. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs TMQ Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 226.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while TMQ trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -27.60. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs IONR Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 157.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while IONR trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -15.70. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs NB Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 144.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while NB trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -13.68. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs PLL Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 126M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while PLL trades at $5.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs USGO Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while USGO trades at $9.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -13.70. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs ABAT Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 118M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while ABAT trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs AMLI Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while AMLI trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs LGO Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while LGO trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs FURY Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 76.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while FURY trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs GRO Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 58.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while GRO trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs XPL Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while XPL trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -9.07. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs WWR Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while WWR trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs LITM Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while LITM trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs ELBM Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while ELBM trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs GTI Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while GTI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -7.61. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs BYU Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs STR-WT Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 239.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs GLG Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs KMCM Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SLI has daily volatility of 6.49 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.
SLI vs SMTS Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs EXN Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is less volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs BBL Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs VEDL Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.
SLI vs IFFT Comparison
SLI plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SLI stands at 376.3M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SLI is priced at $1.90, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SLI currently has a P/E ratio of 3.11, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, SLI's ROE is +0.66%, compared to IFFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SLI is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SLI.