Tanger Inc.
Tanger Inc. (SKT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SKT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKT | $35.51 | -1.00% | 4.1B | 35.85 | $0.99 | +3.30% |
| SPG | $189.56 | -1.31% | 61.9B | 13.39 | $14.16 | +4.59% |
| O | $64.71 | -0.26% | 60.3B | 55.30 | $1.17 | +5.01% |
| SPG-PJ | $54.17 | -0.20% | 55.9B | 7.99 | $6.78 | +4.59% |
| KIM-PN | $61.07 | +0.00% | 41.2B | N/A | N/A | +4.43% |
| KIM | $23.17 | +0.04% | 15.7B | 28.27 | $0.82 | +4.43% |
| REG | $77.67 | -0.63% | 14.2B | 27.54 | $2.82 | +3.78% |
| KIM-PM | $20.49 | -0.77% | 13.8B | 12.45 | $1.65 | +4.43% |
| KIM-PL | $19.95 | -0.50% | 13.5B | 12.14 | $1.65 | +4.43% |
| ADC | $79.85 | -0.80% | 9.6B | 45.11 | $1.77 | +3.88% |
Stock Comparison
SKT vs SPG Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while SPG trades at $189.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPG's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check SPG's competition here
SKT vs O Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, O has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while O trades at $64.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas O's P/E ratio is 55.30. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check O's competition here
SKT vs SPG-PJ Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while SPG-PJ trades at $54.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check SPG-PJ's competition here
SKT vs KIM-PN Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while KIM-PN trades at $61.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check KIM-PN's competition here
SKT vs KIM Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while KIM trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 28.27. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check KIM's competition here
SKT vs REG Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while REG trades at $77.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 27.54. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check REG's competition here
SKT vs KIM-PM Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while KIM-PM trades at $20.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check KIM-PM's competition here
SKT vs KIM-PL Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while KIM-PL trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 12.14. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check KIM-PL's competition here
SKT vs ADC Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while ADC trades at $79.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 45.11. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check ADC's competition here
SKT vs FRT Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while FRT trades at $107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 22.87. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check FRT's competition here
SKT vs BRX Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while BRX trades at $29.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check BRX's competition here
SKT vs NNN Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while NNN trades at $45.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check NNN's competition here
SKT vs FRT-PC Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while FRT-PC trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check FRT-PC's competition here
SKT vs KRG Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while KRG trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check KRG's competition here
SKT vs MAC Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while MAC trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is -24.82. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check MAC's competition here
SKT vs PECO Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while PECO trades at $38.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 43.15. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check PECO's competition here
SKT vs REGCP Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while REGCP trades at $23.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check REGCP's competition here
SKT vs REGCO Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while REGCO trades at $22.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check REGCO's competition here
SKT vs CURB Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while CURB trades at $26.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 72.41. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check CURB's competition here
SKT vs FCPT Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while FCPT trades at $25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check FCPT's competition here
SKT vs AKR Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while AKR trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 205.95. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check AKR's competition here
SKT vs IVT Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while IVT trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check IVT's competition here
SKT vs ROIC Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check ROIC's competition here
SKT vs GTY Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while GTY trades at $33.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT and GTY have similar daily volatility (1.27).Check GTY's competition here
SKT vs ADC-PA Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while ADC-PA trades at $17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check ADC-PA's competition here
SKT vs NTST Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while NTST trades at $20.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is 253.87. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check NTST's competition here
SKT vs ALX Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while ALX trades at $245.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 44.72. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check ALX's competition here
SKT vs CBL Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while CBL trades at $38.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check CBL's competition here
SKT vs RPT-PD Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check RPT-PD's competition here
SKT vs WSR Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 847.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while WSR trades at $16.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check WSR's competition here
SKT vs UBP Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check UBP's competition here
SKT vs UBA Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check UBA's competition here
SKT vs BFS Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 821.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while BFS trades at $33.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check BFS's competition here
SKT vs UBP-PK Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check UBP-PK's competition here
SKT vs BFS-PD Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 767.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while BFS-PD trades at $20.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check BFS-PD's competition here
SKT vs UBP-PH Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check UBP-PH's competition here
SKT vs BFS-PE Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 548.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while BFS-PE trades at $22.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check BFS-PE's competition here
SKT vs SITC-PA Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check SITC-PA's competition here
SKT vs SITC Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 309M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while SITC trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check SITC's competition here
SKT vs PINE Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 288.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while PINE trades at $19.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is -87.00. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PINE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check PINE's competition here
SKT vs CDR-PC Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 270.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while CDR-PC trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check CDR-PC's competition here
SKT vs CDR-PB Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 270.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while CDR-PB trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check CDR-PB's competition here
SKT vs SRG-PA Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 172.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while SRG-PA trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -13.43. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check SRG-PA's competition here
SKT vs SRG Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 158.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while SRG trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check SRG's competition here
SKT vs WHLRL Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while WHLRL trades at $88.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -47.11. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check WHLRL's competition here
SKT vs WHLRP Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while WHLRP trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -3.67. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check WHLRP's competition here
SKT vs WHLRD Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while WHLRD trades at $36.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -19.40. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check WHLRD's competition here
SKT vs WHLR Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 319.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while WHLR trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check WHLR's competition here
SKT vs NNN-PF Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check NNN-PF's competition here
SKT vs RVI Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while RVI trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check RVI's competition here
SKT vs PEI-PC Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check PEI-PC's competition here
SKT vs BPYUP Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check BPYUP's competition here
SKT vs PEI-PB Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check PEI-PB's competition here
SKT vs PEI-PD Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check PEI-PD's competition here
SKT vs WPG Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check WPG's competition here
SKT vs BPYU Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check BPYU's competition here
SKT vs PEI Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check PEI's competition here
SKT vs CDR Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check CDR's competition here
SKT vs WRI Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check WRI's competition here
SKT vs HMG Comparison March 2026
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $35.51, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 35.85, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.Check HMG's competition here