Tanger Inc.
Tanger Inc. SKT Peers
See (SKT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKT | $31.37 | +1.32% | 3.6B | 36.92 | $0.85 | +3.57% |
| SPG | $165.84 | +0.96% | 54.1B | 26.39 | $6.28 | +5.02% |
| O | $57.75 | -0.09% | 52.2B | 52.51 | $1.10 | +5.97% |
| SPG-PJ | $55.50 | +0.89% | 51.8B | 8.19 | $6.78 | +5.02% |
| KIM-PN | $60.00 | +0.00% | 40.5B | N/A | N/A | +6.04% |
| KIM | $21.44 | +1.23% | 14.5B | 28.23 | $0.76 | +4.62% |
| KIM-PL | $19.76 | +0.82% | 14.3B | 12.03 | $1.65 | +4.62% |
| KIM-PM | $20.09 | +1.21% | 14.1B | 12.17 | $1.65 | +4.62% |
| REG | $70.80 | -0.44% | 12.9B | 33.55 | $2.11 | +3.93% |
| FRT-PC | $20.37 | +2.16% | 8.3B | 6.16 | $3.29 | +4.65% |
Stock Comparison
SKT vs SPG Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while SPG trades at $165.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPG's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs O Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, O has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while O trades at $57.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas O's P/E ratio is 52.51. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs SPG-PJ Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while SPG-PJ trades at $55.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs KIM-PN Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while KIM-PN trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs KIM Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while KIM trades at $21.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs KIM-PL Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while KIM-PL trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs KIM-PM Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while KIM-PM trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs REG Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while REG trades at $70.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 33.55. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs FRT-PC Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while FRT-PC trades at $20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs NNN Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while NNN trades at $43.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs FRT Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while FRT trades at $94.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs ADC Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while ADC trades at $72.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 40.72. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs BRX Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while BRX trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 24.64. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs KRG Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while KRG trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 326.43. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs PECO Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while PECO trades at $35.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 60.46. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs REGCP Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while REGCP trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs MAC Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while MAC trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is -33.95. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs REGCO Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while REGCO trades at $22.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs FCPT Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while FCPT trades at $27.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 25.35. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs AKR Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while AKR trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 108.76. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs CURB Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while CURB trades at $22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 190.92. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs ROIC Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs IVT Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while IVT trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 113.92. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs ADC-PA Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while ADC-PA trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs GTY Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while GTY trades at $27.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 23.29. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs NTST Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while NTST trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is -112.23. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NTST's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs ALX Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while ALX trades at $230.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 29.90. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs RPT-PD Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs BFS Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 850.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while BFS trades at $35.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs UBP Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs UBA Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs BFS-PD Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 815.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while BFS-PD trades at $20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs UBP-PK Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs CBL Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 801.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while CBL trades at $25.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs UBP-PH Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs WSR Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 646.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while WSR trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs SITC Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 613.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while SITC trades at $11.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.12. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs BFS-PE Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 521.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while BFS-PE trades at $21.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs SITC-PA Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs CDR-PB Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 215.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while CDR-PB trades at $15.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -3.59. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs PINE Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 208.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while PINE trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is 182.50. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs CDR-PC Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 204.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while CDR-PC trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs SRG Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 170.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while SRG trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs SRG-PA Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 169.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while SRG-PA trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -12.61. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs WHLRL Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while WHLRL trades at $151.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -81.10. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs WHLRP Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while WHLRP trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs WHLRD Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while WHLRD trades at $33.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -18.12. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs WHLR Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while WHLR trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs BPYUP Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs BPYU Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs WPG Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs WRI Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs PEI Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PEI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs HMG Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs RVI Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while RVI trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -3.57. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RVI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs NNN-PF Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs PEI-PD Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs CDR Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs PEI-PB Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.
SKT vs PEI-PC Comparison
SKT plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKT stands at 3.6B. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SKT is priced at $31.37, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKT currently has a P/E ratio of 36.92, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SKT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SKT is more volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKT.