Singularity Future Technology Ltd.
Singularity Future Technology Ltd. (SINO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SINO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Integrated Freight & Logistics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SINO | $4.19 | +1.70% | 91.9M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| UPS | $115.54 | -1.02% | 97.6B | 17.53 | $6.56 | +5.70% |
| FDX | $383.14 | -1.37% | 90.6B | 21.23 | $18.08 | +1.49% |
| XPO | $203.34 | -3.11% | 23.6B | 76.23 | $2.64 | N/A |
| JBHT | $225.72 | -1.93% | 21.1B | 36.29 | $6.12 | +0.79% |
| CHRW | $185.19 | -2.56% | 21B | 36.69 | $4.83 | +1.39% |
| EXPD | $150.70 | -3.58% | 20.3B | 24.35 | $6.14 | +1.03% |
| ZTO | $25.45 | +0.63% | 20.1B | 16.08 | $1.57 | +2.54% |
| GXO | $64.60 | -1.51% | 7.2B | 225.61 | $0.28 | N/A |
| LSTR | $150.06 | -2.01% | 5B | 44.11 | $3.31 | +2.44% |
Stock Comparison
SINO vs UPS Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, UPS has a market cap of 97.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while UPS trades at $115.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UPS's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to UPS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to UPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check UPS's competition here
SINO vs FDX Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, FDX has a market cap of 90.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while FDX trades at $383.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FDX's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to FDX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to FDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check FDX's competition here
SINO vs XPO Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, XPO has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while XPO trades at $203.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas XPO's P/E ratio is 76.23. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to XPO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to XPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check XPO's competition here
SINO vs JBHT Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, JBHT has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while JBHT trades at $225.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JBHT's P/E ratio is 36.29. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to JBHT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to JBHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check JBHT's competition here
SINO vs CHRW Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CHRW has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while CHRW trades at $185.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CHRW's P/E ratio is 36.69. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CHRW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to CHRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check CHRW's competition here
SINO vs EXPD Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, EXPD has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while EXPD trades at $150.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXPD's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to EXPD's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to EXPD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check EXPD's competition here
SINO vs ZTO Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, ZTO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while ZTO trades at $25.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZTO's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ZTO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to ZTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check ZTO's competition here
SINO vs GXO Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, GXO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while GXO trades at $64.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GXO's P/E ratio is 225.61. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to GXO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to GXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check GXO's competition here
SINO vs LSTR Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, LSTR has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while LSTR trades at $150.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSTR's P/E ratio is 44.11. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to LSTR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to LSTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check LSTR's competition here
SINO vs HUBG Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, HUBG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while HUBG trades at $41.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HUBG's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to HUBG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to HUBG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check HUBG's competition here
SINO vs PBI Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, PBI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while PBI trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PBI's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to PBI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to PBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check PBI's competition here
SINO vs FWRD Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, FWRD has a market cap of 790M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while FWRD trades at $27.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FWRD's P/E ratio is -6.24. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to FWRD's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to FWRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check FWRD's competition here
SINO vs CYRX Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CYRX has a market cap of 407.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while CYRX trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CYRX's P/E ratio is -6.67. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CYRX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to CYRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check CYRX's competition here
SINO vs RLGT Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, RLGT has a market cap of 336.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while RLGT trades at $7.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RLGT's P/E ratio is 24.79. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to RLGT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to RLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check RLGT's competition here
SINO vs PAL Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, PAL has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while PAL trades at $7.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAL's P/E ratio is -5.99. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to PAL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to PAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check PAL's competition here
SINO vs CRGO Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CRGO has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while CRGO trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRGO's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CRGO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to CRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check CRGO's competition here
SINO vs SFWL Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, SFWL has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while SFWL trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFWL's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SFWL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to SFWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check SFWL's competition here
SINO vs AIRTP Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 61.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while AIRTP trades at $20.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 60.54. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check AIRTP's competition here
SINO vs AIRT Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 61.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while AIRT trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is -9.22. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check AIRT's competition here
SINO vs FLX Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, FLX has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while FLX trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FLX's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to FLX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is less volatile compared to FLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check FLX's competition here
SINO vs NCEW Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, NCEW has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while NCEW trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCEW's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to NCEW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to NCEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check NCEW's competition here
SINO vs PSIG Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, PSIG has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while PSIG trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSIG's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to PSIG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to PSIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check PSIG's competition here
SINO vs BTOC Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, BTOC has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while BTOC trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTOC's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to BTOC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to BTOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check BTOC's competition here
SINO vs ELOG Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, ELOG has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while ELOG trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELOG's P/E ratio is 6.87. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ELOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to ELOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check ELOG's competition here
SINO vs CRGOW Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CRGOW has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while CRGOW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CRGOW's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is less volatile compared to CRGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check CRGOW's competition here
SINO vs JYD Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, JYD has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while JYD trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JYD's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to JYD's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to JYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check JYD's competition here
SINO vs LSH Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, LSH has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while LSH trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSH's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to LSH's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is less volatile compared to LSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check LSH's competition here
SINO vs CJMB Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, CJMB has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while CJMB trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CJMB's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CJMB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to CJMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check CJMB's competition here
SINO vs ATXG Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, ATXG has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while ATXG trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATXG's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ATXG's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to ATXG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check ATXG's competition here
SINO vs SGLY Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, SGLY has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while SGLY trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGLY's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SGLY's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to SGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check SGLY's competition here
SINO vs GVH Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, GVH has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while GVH trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GVH's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to GVH's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is less volatile compared to GVH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check GVH's competition here
SINO vs AIRTW Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, AIRTW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while AIRTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AIRTW's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AIRTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is less volatile compared to AIRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check AIRTW's competition here
SINO vs ECHO Comparison February 2026
SINO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SINO stands at 91.9M. In comparison, ECHO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SINO is priced at $4.19, while ECHO trades at $48.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SINO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECHO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SINO's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ECHO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SINO is more volatile compared to ECHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SINO.Check ECHO's competition here