StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (SFG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SFG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFG | $22,850.00 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MFC | $40.74 | +1.07% | 68B | 16.37 | $2.49 | +3.28% |
| AFL | $116.96 | -0.71% | 59.5B | 13.37 | $8.75 | +2.03% |
| MET-PF | $18.62 | +0.65% | 57.5B | 2.39 | $7.81 | +2.59% |
| MET | $87.66 | -1.33% | 56.4B | 16.96 | $5.17 | +2.59% |
| MET-PE | $22.35 | +0.59% | 47B | 2.86 | $7.81 | +2.59% |
| MET-PA | $21.89 | +0.23% | 42.5B | 2.80 | $7.81 | +2.59% |
| PRU | $108.69 | +0.18% | 37.8B | 11.20 | $9.71 | +5.02% |
| PUK | $27.14 | +2.11% | 33.9B | 8.84 | $3.07 | +1.95% |
| UNM | $91.82 | -0.98% | 14.7B | 19.88 | $4.62 | +2.00% |
Stock Comparison
SFG vs MFC Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MFC trades at $40.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MFC's competition here
SFG vs AFL Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while AFL trades at $116.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check AFL's competition here
SFG vs MET-PF Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MET-PF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MET-PF's competition here
SFG vs MET Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MET trades at $87.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MET's competition here
SFG vs MET-PE Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 47B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MET-PE trades at $22.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 2.86. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MET-PE's competition here
SFG vs MET-PA Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MET-PA trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MET-PA's competition here
SFG vs PRU Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while PRU trades at $108.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check PRU's competition here
SFG vs PUK Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while PUK trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check PUK's competition here
SFG vs UNM Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while UNM trades at $91.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check UNM's competition here
SFG vs GL Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while GL trades at $167.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check GL's competition here
SFG vs GL-PD Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while GL-PD trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check GL-PD's competition here
SFG vs PRI Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while PRI trades at $280.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check PRI's competition here
SFG vs PRH Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while PRH trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check PRH's competition here
SFG vs PRS Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while PRS trades at $22.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check PRS's competition here
SFG vs JXN Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while JXN trades at $109.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is -18.29. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JXN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check JXN's competition here
SFG vs JXN-PA Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while JXN-PA trades at $25.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check JXN-PA's competition here
SFG vs LNC Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while LNC trades at $37.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.11. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check LNC's competition here
SFG vs LNC-PD Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while LNC-PD trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check LNC-PD's competition here
SFG vs CNO Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while CNO trades at $50.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check CNO's competition here
SFG vs AEL Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check AEL's competition here
SFG vs FGN Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while FGN trades at $24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check FGN's competition here
SFG vs FG Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while FG trades at $28.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check FG's competition here
SFG vs BHF Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while BHF trades at $62.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is -20.50. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check BHF's competition here
SFG vs GNW Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while GNW trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check GNW's competition here
SFG vs ABLLL Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while ABLLL trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check ABLLL's competition here
SFG vs BHFAP Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while BHFAP trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check BHFAP's competition here
SFG vs BHFAL Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while BHFAL trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check BHFAL's competition here
SFG vs MLCIL Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MLCIL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MLCIL trades at $23.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLCIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLCIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to MLCIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MLCIL's competition here
SFG vs AEL-PB Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check AEL-PB's competition here
SFG vs NWLI Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check NWLI's competition here
SFG vs AEL-PA Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check AEL-PA's competition here
SFG vs MHNC Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MHNC trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MHNC's competition here
SFG vs LIFE Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, LIFE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while LIFE trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIFE's P/E ratio is -9.62. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIFE's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to LIFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check LIFE's competition here
SFG vs ABX Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, ABX has a market cap of 928M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while ABX trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABX's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to ABX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check ABX's competition here
SFG vs BHFAO Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 880M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while BHFAO trades at $15.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.22. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check BHFAO's competition here
SFG vs ABL Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 790.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while ABL trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is 161.80. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check ABL's competition here
SFG vs BHFAN Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 703.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while BHFAN trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 0.97. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check BHFAN's competition here
SFG vs BHFAM Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 619.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while BHFAM trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check BHFAM's competition here
SFG vs ABLLW Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while ABLLW trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check ABLLW's competition here
SFG vs CIA Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while CIA trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check CIA's competition here
SFG vs VERY Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check VERY's competition here
SFG vs MDWT Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MDWT's competition here
SFG vs AAME Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while AAME trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAME's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check AAME's competition here
SFG vs MLG Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MLG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to MLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MLG's competition here
SFG vs GWGH Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check GWGH's competition here
SFG vs LFC Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check LFC's competition here
SFG vs PNX Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, PNX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while PNX trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to PNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check PNX's competition here
SFG vs IHC Comparison June 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check IHC's competition here