StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (SFG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SFG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFG | $22,850.00 | +0.00% | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| MFC | $41.29 | -0.48% | 69B | 13.33 | $3.10 | +3.23% |
| AFL | $121.91 | -0.06% | 62B | 16.06 | $7.59 | +1.95% |
| MET | $91.65 | +0.55% | 59B | 9.79 | $9.36 | +2.50% |
| MET-PF | $18.53 | +0.05% | 58.1B | 2.53 | $7.33 | +2.50% |
| MET-PE | $22.57 | +0.04% | 47.6B | 3.08 | $7.33 | +2.50% |
| MET-PA | $21.20 | -0.24% | 41.3B | 2.90 | $7.33 | +2.50% |
| PRU | $115.37 | +0.32% | 40.1B | 7.82 | $14.75 | +4.76% |
| PUK | $28.13 | +1.33% | 35.1B | 9.18 | $3.07 | +1.89% |
| ATHS | $24.60 | +0.04% | 19.8B | 10.75 | $2.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SFG vs MFC Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MFC trades at $41.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MFC's competition here
SFG vs AFL Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while AFL trades at $121.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check AFL's competition here
SFG vs MET Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MET trades at $91.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MET's competition here
SFG vs MET-PF Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MET-PF trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.53. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MET-PF's competition here
SFG vs MET-PE Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MET-PE trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MET-PE's competition here
SFG vs MET-PA Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MET-PA trades at $21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.90. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MET-PA's competition here
SFG vs PRU Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while PRU trades at $115.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check PRU's competition here
SFG vs PUK Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while PUK trades at $28.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 9.18. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check PUK's competition here
SFG vs ATHS Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, ATHS has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while ATHS trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATHS's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATHS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to ATHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check ATHS's competition here
SFG vs ATH-PA Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, ATH-PA has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while ATH-PA trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATH-PA's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATH-PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to ATH-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check ATH-PA's competition here
SFG vs UNM Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while UNM trades at $87.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check UNM's competition here
SFG vs GL Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while GL trades at $179.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check GL's competition here
SFG vs GL-PD Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while GL-PD trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check GL-PD's competition here
SFG vs RZB Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, RZB has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while RZB trades at $25.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RZB's P/E ratio is 4.16. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RZB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to RZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check RZB's competition here
SFG vs PRI Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while PRI trades at $304.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.76. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check PRI's competition here
SFG vs JXN Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while JXN trades at $116.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JXN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check JXN's competition here
SFG vs PRH Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while PRH trades at $22.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is 2.11. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check PRH's competition here
SFG vs PRS Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while PRS trades at $22.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is 2.10. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check PRS's competition here
SFG vs JXN-PA Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while JXN-PA trades at $25.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is 1.66. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check JXN-PA's competition here
SFG vs LNC Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while LNC trades at $39.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check LNC's competition here
SFG vs LNC-PD Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while LNC-PD trades at $26.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check LNC-PD's competition here
SFG vs ATH-PE Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, ATH-PE has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while ATH-PE trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATH-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATH-PE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to ATH-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check ATH-PE's competition here
SFG vs CNO Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while CNO trades at $51.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check CNO's competition here
SFG vs AEL Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check AEL's competition here
SFG vs FGN Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while FGN trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check FGN's competition here
SFG vs FG Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while FG trades at $29.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 7.97. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check FG's competition here
SFG vs ATH-PB Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, ATH-PB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while ATH-PB trades at $18.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATH-PB's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATH-PB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to ATH-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check ATH-PB's competition here
SFG vs BHF Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while BHF trades at $66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check BHF's competition here
SFG vs BHFAN Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while BHFAN trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 0.82. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check BHFAN's competition here
SFG vs BHFAL Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while BHFAL trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check BHFAL's competition here
SFG vs BHFAM Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while BHFAM trades at $10.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.59. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check BHFAM's competition here
SFG vs BHFAO Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while BHFAO trades at $15.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 0.85. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check BHFAO's competition here
SFG vs ATH-PD Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, ATH-PD has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while ATH-PD trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATH-PD's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATH-PD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to ATH-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check ATH-PD's competition here
SFG vs ABLLL Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while ABLLL trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is 64.96. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check ABLLL's competition here
SFG vs BHFAP Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while BHFAP trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 0.83. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check BHFAP's competition here
SFG vs MLCIL Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MLCIL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MLCIL trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLCIL's P/E ratio is -13.87. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLCIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to MLCIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MLCIL's competition here
SFG vs AEL-PB Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check AEL-PB's competition here
SFG vs NWLI Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check NWLI's competition here
SFG vs AEL-PA Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check AEL-PA's competition here
SFG vs LIFE Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, LIFE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while LIFE trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIFE's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIFE's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to LIFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check LIFE's competition here
SFG vs MHNC Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MHNC trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is -107.21. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MHNC's competition here
SFG vs ABX Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, ABX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while ABX trades at $11.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABX's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to ABX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check ABX's competition here
SFG vs ABL Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 790.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while ABL trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is 161.80. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check ABL's competition here
SFG vs ABLLW Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while ABLLW trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is 2.98. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check ABLLW's competition here
SFG vs CIA Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 287.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while CIA trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 24.70. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check CIA's competition here
SFG vs VERY Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check VERY's competition here
SFG vs MDWT Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MDWT's competition here
SFG vs MLCI Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MLCI has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MLCI trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLCI's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLCI's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to MLCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MLCI's competition here
SFG vs AAME Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 34.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while AAME trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AAME's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check AAME's competition here
SFG vs MLG Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, MLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while MLG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to MLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check MLG's competition here
SFG vs GWGH Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check GWGH's competition here
SFG vs IHC Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check IHC's competition here
SFG vs PNX Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, PNX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while PNX trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNX's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to PNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check PNX's competition here
SFG vs LFC Comparison July 2026
SFG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SFG stands at 0. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SFG is priced at $22,850.00, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SFG currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFG's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFG is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFG.Check LFC's competition here