F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FG | $27.49 | +2.61% | 3.7B | 7.14 | $3.86 | +3.57% |
| MFC | $40.61 | +0.54% | 67.8B | 16.38 | $2.48 | +3.30% |
| AFL | $115.47 | -0.66% | 58.8B | 13.20 | $8.75 | +2.07% |
| MET-PF | $18.69 | +0.38% | 56B | 2.39 | $7.81 | +2.68% |
| MET | $85.58 | -0.31% | 55.1B | 16.55 | $5.17 | +2.68% |
| MET-PE | $22.44 | +0.63% | 47.3B | 2.87 | $7.81 | +2.68% |
| MET-PA | $21.80 | +0.28% | 42.3B | 2.79 | $7.81 | +2.68% |
| PRU | $106.53 | -0.45% | 37B | 10.96 | $9.72 | +5.14% |
| PUK | $26.79 | +0.00% | 33.5B | 8.73 | $3.07 | +1.98% |
| UNM | $89.98 | -1.79% | 14.4B | 19.48 | $4.62 | +2.04% |
Stock Comparison
FG vs MFC Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while MFC trades at $40.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MFC's competition here
FG vs AFL Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 58.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while AFL trades at $115.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check AFL's competition here
FG vs MET-PF Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 56B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while MET-PF trades at $18.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.39. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MET-PF's competition here
FG vs MET Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 55.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while MET trades at $85.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MET's competition here
FG vs MET-PE Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while MET-PE trades at $22.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MET-PE's competition here
FG vs MET-PA Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while MET-PA trades at $21.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.79. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MET-PA's competition here
FG vs PRU Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while PRU trades at $106.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check PRU's competition here
FG vs PUK Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while PUK trades at $26.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check PUK's competition here
FG vs UNM Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while UNM trades at $89.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check UNM's competition here
FG vs GL-PD Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while GL-PD trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check GL-PD's competition here
FG vs GL Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while GL trades at $170.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check GL's competition here
FG vs PRI Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while PRI trades at $281.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check PRI's competition here
FG vs PRH Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while PRH trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check PRH's competition here
FG vs PRS Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while PRS trades at $22.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check PRS's competition here
FG vs JXN-PA Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while JXN-PA trades at $26.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check JXN-PA's competition here
FG vs JXN Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while JXN trades at $106.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is -17.80. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JXN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check JXN's competition here
FG vs LNC-PD Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while LNC-PD trades at $26.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check LNC-PD's competition here
FG vs LNC Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while LNC trades at $37.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.07. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check LNC's competition here
FG vs CNO Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while CNO trades at $50.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check CNO's competition here
FG vs AEL Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check AEL's competition here
FG vs FGN Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while FGN trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check FGN's competition here
FG vs BHF Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while BHF trades at $63.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is -20.60. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHF's competition here
FG vs GNW Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while GNW trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check GNW's competition here
FG vs BHFAP Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while BHFAP trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHFAP's competition here
FG vs ABLLL Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while ABLLL trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check ABLLL's competition here
FG vs BHFAL Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while BHFAL trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHFAL's competition here
FG vs MLCIL Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MLCIL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while MLCIL trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas MLCIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MLCIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MLCIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MLCIL's competition here
FG vs AEL-PB Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check AEL-PB's competition here
FG vs NWLI Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check NWLI's competition here
FG vs AEL-PA Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check AEL-PA's competition here
FG vs MHNC Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while MHNC trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MHNC's competition here
FG vs LIFE Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LIFE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while LIFE trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas LIFE's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LIFE's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to LIFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check LIFE's competition here
FG vs ABX Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ABX has a market cap of 889.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while ABX trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas ABX's P/E ratio is 24.39. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to ABX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check ABX's competition here
FG vs BHFAO Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 886.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while BHFAO trades at $15.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.23. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHFAO's competition here
FG vs ABL Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 790.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while ABL trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is 161.80. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check ABL's competition here
FG vs BHFAN Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 705.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while BHFAN trades at $12.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHFAN's competition here
FG vs BHFAM Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 619.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while BHFAM trades at $10.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check BHFAM's competition here
FG vs ABLLW Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while ABLLW trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check ABLLW's competition here
FG vs CIA Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 295.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while CIA trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check CIA's competition here
FG vs VERY Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check VERY's competition here
FG vs MDWT Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MDWT's competition here
FG vs AAME Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while AAME trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is 8.13. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AAME's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check AAME's competition here
FG vs SFG Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SFG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while SFG trades at $22,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas SFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to SFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check SFG's competition here
FG vs IHC Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check IHC's competition here
FG vs LFC Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check LFC's competition here
FG vs PNX Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PNX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while PNX trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas PNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PNX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is more volatile compared to PNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check PNX's competition here
FG vs MLG Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while MLG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas MLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MLG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to MLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check MLG's competition here
FG vs GWGH Comparison June 2026
FG plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FG stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FG is priced at $27.49, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FG currently has a P/E ratio of 7.14, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FG is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FG.Check GWGH's competition here