American Equity Investment Life Holding Company
American Equity Investment Life Holding Company (AEL-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AEL-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEL-PA | $24.65 | +0.57% | 1.8B | 3.28 | $7.52 | +0.67% |
| MFC | $38.52 | -1.48% | 64.6B | 17.19 | $2.24 | +3.38% |
| AFL | $113.33 | +0.40% | 58.4B | 12.95 | $8.75 | +2.08% |
| MET | $78.95 | -1.60% | 51.5B | 16.76 | $4.71 | +2.87% |
| MET-PE | $22.72 | -0.09% | 47.9B | 2.91 | $7.81 | +2.87% |
| MET-PA | $21.44 | +0.28% | 41.6B | 2.74 | $7.81 | +2.87% |
| PUK | $29.23 | -3.12% | 37B | 9.52 | $3.07 | +1.75% |
| PRU | $97.65 | -0.98% | 34B | 9.77 | $9.99 | +5.57% |
| UNM | $80.24 | -0.74% | 12.8B | 17.36 | $4.62 | +2.29% |
| MET-PF | $19.10 | +0.00% | 12.4B | 2.44 | $7.81 | +2.87% |
Stock Comparison
AEL-PA vs MFC Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while MFC trades at $38.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check MFC's competition here
AEL-PA vs AFL Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 58.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while AFL trades at $113.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check AFL's competition here
AEL-PA vs MET Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while MET trades at $78.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check MET's competition here
AEL-PA vs MET-PE Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while MET-PE trades at $22.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 2.91. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check MET-PE's competition here
AEL-PA vs MET-PA Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while MET-PA trades at $21.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check MET-PA's competition here
AEL-PA vs PUK Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while PUK trades at $29.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check PUK's competition here
AEL-PA vs PRU Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while PRU trades at $97.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check PRU's competition here
AEL-PA vs UNM Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while UNM trades at $80.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check UNM's competition here
AEL-PA vs MET-PF Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while MET-PF trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.44. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check MET-PF's competition here
AEL-PA vs GL Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while GL trades at $152.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check GL's competition here
AEL-PA vs PRI Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while PRI trades at $270.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 11.82. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check PRI's competition here
AEL-PA vs PRH Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while PRH trades at $23.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check PRH's competition here
AEL-PA vs JXN Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while JXN trades at $113.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is -472.87. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check JXN's competition here
AEL-PA vs PRS Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while PRS trades at $22.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check PRS's competition here
AEL-PA vs LNC Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while LNC trades at $36.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 6.33. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check LNC's competition here
AEL-PA vs LNC-PD Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while LNC-PD trades at $26.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check LNC-PD's competition here
AEL-PA vs AEL Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check AEL's competition here
AEL-PA vs FGN Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while FGN trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check FGN's competition here
AEL-PA vs CNO Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while CNO trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 17.84. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check CNO's competition here
AEL-PA vs FG Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while FG trades at $28.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check FG's competition here
AEL-PA vs BHF Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while BHF trades at $62.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is more volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check BHF's competition here
AEL-PA vs GNW Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while GNW trades at $8.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check GNW's competition here
AEL-PA vs BHFAP Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while BHFAP trades at $15.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.24. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check BHFAP's competition here
AEL-PA vs ABLLL Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while ABLLL trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check ABLLL's competition here
AEL-PA vs BHFAL Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while BHFAL trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check BHFAL's competition here
AEL-PA vs MLCIL Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MLCIL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while MLCIL trades at $23.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas MLCIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MLCIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is more volatile compared to MLCIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check MLCIL's competition here
AEL-PA vs JXN-PA Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while JXN-PA trades at $26.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check JXN-PA's competition here
AEL-PA vs AEL-PB Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check AEL-PB's competition here
AEL-PA vs NWLI Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check NWLI's competition here
AEL-PA vs MHNC Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while MHNC trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check MHNC's competition here
AEL-PA vs GL-PD Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while GL-PD trades at $15.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check GL-PD's competition here
AEL-PA vs LIFE Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LIFE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while LIFE trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas LIFE's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LIFE's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to LIFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check LIFE's competition here
AEL-PA vs BHFAO Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 940.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while BHFAO trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check BHFAO's competition here
AEL-PA vs ABX Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ABX has a market cap of 885M. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while ABX trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas ABX's P/E ratio is 25.57. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to ABX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check ABX's competition here
AEL-PA vs ABL Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 790.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while ABL trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is 161.80. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check ABL's competition here
AEL-PA vs BHFAN Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 732M. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while BHFAN trades at $12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.02. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check BHFAN's competition here
AEL-PA vs BHFAM Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 660.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while BHFAM trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check BHFAM's competition here
AEL-PA vs ABLLW Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while ABLLW trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is more volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check ABLLW's competition here
AEL-PA vs CIA Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 265.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while CIA trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 18.82. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check CIA's competition here
AEL-PA vs VERY Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check VERY's competition here
AEL-PA vs MDWT Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check MDWT's competition here
AEL-PA vs AAME Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 50.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while AAME trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AAME's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check AAME's competition here
AEL-PA vs GWGH Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check GWGH's competition here
AEL-PA vs IHC Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check IHC's competition here
AEL-PA vs SFG Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SFG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while SFG trades at $22,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas SFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to SFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check SFG's competition here
AEL-PA vs MLG Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, MLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while MLG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas MLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to MLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check MLG's competition here
AEL-PA vs PNX Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, PNX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while PNX trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas PNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PNX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to PNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check PNX's competition here
AEL-PA vs LFC Comparison May 2026
AEL-PA plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AEL-PA stands at 1.8B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AEL-PA is priced at $24.65, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AEL-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 3.28, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AEL-PA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AEL-PA is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AEL-PA.Check LFC's competition here