Aflac Incorporated (AFL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AFL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFL | $116.24 | -1.00% | 59.2B | 13.38 | $8.69 | +2.04% |
| MFC | $40.39 | -1.76% | 67.4B | 16.28 | $2.48 | +3.30% |
| MET-PF | $18.62 | -0.05% | 55.9B | 2.38 | $7.81 | +2.66% |
| MET | $85.85 | -1.77% | 55.2B | 16.60 | $5.17 | +2.66% |
| MET-PE | $22.30 | -0.31% | 47.1B | 2.86 | $7.81 | +2.66% |
| MET-PA | $21.74 | -0.32% | 42.2B | 2.78 | $7.81 | +2.66% |
| PRU | $107.01 | -1.97% | 37.2B | 11.01 | $9.72 | +5.12% |
| PUK | $26.79 | -1.14% | 33.5B | 8.73 | $3.07 | +1.98% |
| UNM | $91.62 | -0.74% | 14.6B | 19.83 | $4.62 | +2.00% |
| GL | $171.25 | +1.23% | 13.3B | 11.85 | $14.45 | +0.67% |
Stock Comparison
AFL vs MFC Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while MFC trades at $40.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check MFC's competition here
AFL vs MET-PF Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while MET-PF trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.38. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check MET-PF's competition here
AFL vs MET Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while MET trades at $85.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check MET's competition here
AFL vs MET-PE Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while MET-PE trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 2.86. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check MET-PE's competition here
AFL vs MET-PA Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while MET-PA trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.78. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check MET-PA's competition here
AFL vs PRU Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while PRU trades at $107.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 11.01. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check PRU's competition here
AFL vs PUK Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 33.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while PUK trades at $26.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 8.73. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check PUK's competition here
AFL vs UNM Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while UNM trades at $91.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check UNM's competition here
AFL vs GL Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while GL trades at $171.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check GL's competition here
AFL vs GL-PD Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while GL-PD trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check GL-PD's competition here
AFL vs PRI Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while PRI trades at $281.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check PRI's competition here
AFL vs PRH Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while PRH trades at $22.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check PRH's competition here
AFL vs PRS Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while PRS trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PRS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check PRS's competition here
AFL vs JXN-PA Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while JXN-PA trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check JXN-PA's competition here
AFL vs JXN Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while JXN trades at $108.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is -18.06. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to JXN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check JXN's competition here
AFL vs LNC-PD Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while LNC-PD trades at $26.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check LNC-PD's competition here
AFL vs LNC Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while LNC trades at $37.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check LNC's competition here
AFL vs CNO Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while CNO trades at $51.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check CNO's competition here
AFL vs AEL Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check AEL's competition here
AFL vs FGN Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while FGN trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check FGN's competition here
AFL vs BHF Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while BHF trades at $63.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is -20.59. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check BHF's competition here
AFL vs FG Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while FG trades at $26.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check FG's competition here
AFL vs GNW Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while GNW trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check GNW's competition here
AFL vs ABLLL Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while ABLLL trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check ABLLL's competition here
AFL vs BHFAP Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while BHFAP trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.20. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check BHFAP's competition here
AFL vs BHFAL Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while BHFAL trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.29. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check BHFAL's competition here
AFL vs MLCIL Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, MLCIL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while MLCIL trades at $22.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MLCIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLCIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to MLCIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check MLCIL's competition here
AFL vs AEL-PB Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check AEL-PB's competition here
AFL vs NWLI Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check NWLI's competition here
AFL vs AEL-PA Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check AEL-PA's competition here
AFL vs MHNC Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while MHNC trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check MHNC's competition here
AFL vs LIFE Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, LIFE has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while LIFE trades at $15.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas LIFE's P/E ratio is -9.32. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIFE's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to LIFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check LIFE's competition here
AFL vs ABX Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, ABX has a market cap of 928M. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while ABX trades at $9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ABX's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to ABX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check ABX's competition here
AFL vs BHFAO Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 878.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while BHFAO trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.22. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check BHFAO's competition here
AFL vs ABL Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 790.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while ABL trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is 161.80. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check ABL's competition here
AFL vs BHFAN Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 701.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while BHFAN trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 0.97. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check BHFAN's competition here
AFL vs ABLLW Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while ABLLW trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check ABLLW's competition here
AFL vs BHFAM Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 609M. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while BHFAM trades at $10.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.84. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check BHFAM's competition here
AFL vs CIA Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 286.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while CIA trades at $5.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check CIA's competition here
AFL vs VERY Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check VERY's competition here
AFL vs MDWT Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check MDWT's competition here
AFL vs AAME Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while AAME trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AAME's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check AAME's competition here
AFL vs SFG Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, SFG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while SFG trades at $22,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas SFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to SFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check SFG's competition here
AFL vs IHC Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check IHC's competition here
AFL vs LFC Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check LFC's competition here
AFL vs PNX Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, PNX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while PNX trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas PNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PNX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to PNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check PNX's competition here
AFL vs MLG Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, MLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while MLG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas MLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to MLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check MLG's competition here
AFL vs GWGH Comparison June 2026
AFL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AFL stands at 59.2B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFL is priced at $116.24, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AFL currently has a P/E ratio of 13.38, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, AFL's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AFL is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFL.Check GWGH's competition here