Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for BHFAM
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for BHFAM
Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHFAM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BHFAM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHFAM | $11.95 | +0.76% | 683.3M | 0.95 | $12.61 | N/A |
| MFC | $36.52 | -0.19% | 61.2B | 16.53 | $2.21 | +3.56% |
| AFL | $110.70 | -2.10% | 57.2B | 16.23 | $6.82 | +2.11% |
| MET | $73.88 | -1.03% | 48.7B | 15.69 | $4.71 | +3.06% |
| MET-PE | $22.87 | -0.09% | 48.1B | 2.92 | $7.81 | +3.06% |
| MET-PA | $20.78 | -1.00% | 40.4B | 2.66 | $7.81 | +3.06% |
| PUK | $30.30 | -0.72% | 38.3B | 9.87 | $3.07 | +1.66% |
| PRU | $96.90 | -0.21% | 33.7B | 9.70 | $9.99 | +5.63% |
| UNM | $76.67 | +0.05% | 12.8B | 17.96 | $4.27 | +2.35% |
| MET-PF | $18.90 | +0.37% | 12.3B | 2.42 | $7.81 | +3.06% |
Stock Comparison
BHFAM vs MFC Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 61.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while MFC trades at $36.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 16.53. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check MFC's competition here
BHFAM vs AFL Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while AFL trades at $110.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check AFL's competition here
BHFAM vs MET Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while MET trades at $73.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check MET's competition here
BHFAM vs MET-PE Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while MET-PE trades at $22.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check MET-PE's competition here
BHFAM vs MET-PA Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while MET-PA trades at $20.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.66. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check MET-PA's competition here
BHFAM vs PUK Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while PUK trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check PUK's competition here
BHFAM vs PRU Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while PRU trades at $96.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check PRU's competition here
BHFAM vs UNM Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while UNM trades at $76.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check UNM's competition here
BHFAM vs MET-PF Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while MET-PF trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check MET-PF's competition here
BHFAM vs GL Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while GL trades at $145.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check GL's competition here
BHFAM vs PRH Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while PRH trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check PRH's competition here
BHFAM vs PRI Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while PRI trades at $261.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check PRI's competition here
BHFAM vs PRS Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while PRS trades at $23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check PRS's competition here
BHFAM vs JXN Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while JXN trades at $101.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is -423.49. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check JXN's competition here
BHFAM vs LNC Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while LNC trades at $34.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check LNC's competition here
BHFAM vs LNC-PD Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while LNC-PD trades at $26.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check LNC-PD's competition here
BHFAM vs AEL Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check AEL's competition here
BHFAM vs FGN Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while FGN trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check FGN's competition here
BHFAM vs CNO Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while CNO trades at $42.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check CNO's competition here
BHFAM vs BHF Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while BHF trades at $60.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check BHF's competition here
BHFAM vs GNW Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while GNW trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check GNW's competition here
BHFAM vs FG Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while FG trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 12.78. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check FG's competition here
BHFAM vs BHFAP Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while BHFAP trades at $16.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check BHFAP's competition here
BHFAM vs ABLLL Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while ABLLL trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check ABLLL's competition here
BHFAM vs BHFAL Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while BHFAL trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check BHFAL's competition here
BHFAM vs MLCIL Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, MLCIL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while MLCIL trades at $23.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas MLCIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLCIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to MLCIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check MLCIL's competition here
BHFAM vs AEL-PB Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check AEL-PB's competition here
BHFAM vs NWLI Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check NWLI's competition here
BHFAM vs AEL-PA Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check AEL-PA's competition here
BHFAM vs JXN-PA Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while JXN-PA trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check JXN-PA's competition here
BHFAM vs GL-PD Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while GL-PD trades at $16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check GL-PD's competition here
BHFAM vs MHNC Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while MHNC trades at $12.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check MHNC's competition here
BHFAM vs BHFAO Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 975M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while BHFAO trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check BHFAO's competition here
BHFAM vs LIFE Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, LIFE has a market cap of 868.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while LIFE trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas LIFE's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LIFE's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to LIFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check LIFE's competition here
BHFAM vs ABX Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, ABX has a market cap of 793.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while ABX trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas ABX's P/E ratio is 22.56. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to ABX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check ABX's competition here
BHFAM vs ABL Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 790.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while ABL trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is 161.80. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check ABL's competition here
BHFAM vs BHFAN Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 765.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while BHFAN trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check BHFAN's competition here
BHFAM vs ABLLW Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while ABLLW trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check ABLLW's competition here
BHFAM vs CIA Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while CIA trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check CIA's competition here
BHFAM vs VERY Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check VERY's competition here
BHFAM vs MDWT Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check MDWT's competition here
BHFAM vs AAME Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while AAME trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAME's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check AAME's competition here
BHFAM vs LFC Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check LFC's competition here
BHFAM vs MLG Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, MLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while MLG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas MLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to MLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check MLG's competition here
BHFAM vs GWGH Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check GWGH's competition here
BHFAM vs IHC Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check IHC's competition here
BHFAM vs SFG Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, SFG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while SFG trades at $22,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas SFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to SFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check SFG's competition here
BHFAM vs PNX Comparison April 2026
BHFAM plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHFAM stands at 683.3M. In comparison, PNX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHFAM is priced at $11.95, while PNX trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHFAM currently has a P/E ratio of 0.95, whereas PNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHFAM's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, BHFAM is less volatile compared to PNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHFAM.Check PNX's competition here