F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FGN
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FGN
F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FGN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FGN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGN | $25.03 | +0.20% | 4.5B | N/A | N/A | +8.01% |
| MFC | $37.85 | +1.53% | 63.5B | 17.06 | $2.22 | +3.50% |
| AFL | $111.94 | -0.18% | 57.8B | 16.41 | $6.82 | +2.11% |
| MET | $76.04 | +0.90% | 50.1B | 16.15 | $4.71 | +3.03% |
| MET-PE | $23.05 | +0.57% | 48.5B | 2.95 | $7.81 | +3.03% |
| MET-PA | $21.07 | +0.43% | 40.9B | 2.70 | $7.81 | +3.03% |
| PUK | $30.87 | +0.75% | 39.1B | 10.06 | $3.07 | +1.64% |
| PRU | $98.76 | +0.28% | 34.4B | 9.89 | $9.99 | +5.56% |
| UNM | $77.53 | +0.43% | 13B | 18.16 | $4.27 | +2.34% |
| MET-PF | $19.21 | -0.05% | 12.5B | 2.46 | $7.81 | +3.03% |
Stock Comparison
FGN vs MFC Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while MFC trades at $37.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check MFC's competition here
FGN vs AFL Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while AFL trades at $111.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check AFL's competition here
FGN vs MET Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while MET trades at $76.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check MET's competition here
FGN vs MET-PE Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while MET-PE trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check MET-PE's competition here
FGN vs MET-PA Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while MET-PA trades at $21.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.70. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check MET-PA's competition here
FGN vs PUK Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PUK has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while PUK trades at $30.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PUK's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PUK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to PUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check PUK's competition here
FGN vs PRU Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while PRU trades at $98.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check PRU's competition here
FGN vs UNM Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while UNM trades at $77.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check UNM's competition here
FGN vs MET-PF Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while MET-PF trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check MET-PF's competition here
FGN vs GL Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while GL trades at $148.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check GL's competition here
FGN vs PRI Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while PRI trades at $267.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check PRI's competition here
FGN vs PRH Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while PRH trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check PRH's competition here
FGN vs PRS Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while PRS trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PRS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check PRS's competition here
FGN vs JXN Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while JXN trades at $105.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is -437.79. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check JXN's competition here
FGN vs LNC Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while LNC trades at $35.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check LNC's competition here
FGN vs LNC-PD Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while LNC-PD trades at $26.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check LNC-PD's competition here
FGN vs AEL Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check AEL's competition here
FGN vs CNO Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while CNO trades at $42.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check CNO's competition here
FGN vs BHF Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while BHF trades at $61.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check BHF's competition here
FGN vs FG Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while FG trades at $25.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check FG's competition here
FGN vs GNW Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while GNW trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check GNW's competition here
FGN vs BHFAP Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while BHFAP trades at $16.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check BHFAP's competition here
FGN vs ABLLL Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while ABLLL trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check ABLLL's competition here
FGN vs BHFAL Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while BHFAL trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check BHFAL's competition here
FGN vs MLCIL Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MLCIL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while MLCIL trades at $23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLCIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLCIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to MLCIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check MLCIL's competition here
FGN vs JXN-PA Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while JXN-PA trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check JXN-PA's competition here
FGN vs AEL-PB Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check AEL-PB's competition here
FGN vs NWLI Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check NWLI's competition here
FGN vs AEL-PA Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check AEL-PA's competition here
FGN vs GL-PD Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while GL-PD trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check GL-PD's competition here
FGN vs MHNC Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while MHNC trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check MHNC's competition here
FGN vs BHFAO Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 971M. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while BHFAO trades at $16.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.35. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check BHFAO's competition here
FGN vs LIFE Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LIFE has a market cap of 923.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while LIFE trades at $14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIFE's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LIFE's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to LIFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check LIFE's competition here
FGN vs ABX Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ABX has a market cap of 850.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while ABX trades at $8.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABX's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to ABX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check ABX's competition here
FGN vs ABL Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 790.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while ABL trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is 161.80. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check ABL's competition here
FGN vs BHFAN Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 765.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while BHFAN trades at $13.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check BHFAN's competition here
FGN vs BHFAM Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 686.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while BHFAM trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.95. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check BHFAM's competition here
FGN vs ABLLW Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while ABLLW trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is more volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check ABLLW's competition here
FGN vs CIA Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while CIA trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 19.64. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check CIA's competition here
FGN vs VERY Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check VERY's competition here
FGN vs MDWT Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check MDWT's competition here
FGN vs AAME Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 51.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while AAME trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AAME's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check AAME's competition here
FGN vs MLG Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, MLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while MLG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to MLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check MLG's competition here
FGN vs GWGH Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check GWGH's competition here
FGN vs IHC Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check IHC's competition here
FGN vs SFG Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, SFG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while SFG trades at $22,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to SFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check SFG's competition here
FGN vs PNX Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, PNX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while PNX trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to PNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check PNX's competition here
FGN vs LFC Comparison April 2026
FGN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGN stands at 4.5B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGN is priced at $25.03, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGN currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGN's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGN is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGN.Check LFC's competition here