Prudential plc
Prudential plc (PUK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PUK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Life Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PUK | $30.17 | -0.20% | 38.2B | 9.82 | $3.07 | +1.70% |
| MFC | $39.10 | -0.48% | 65.6B | 17.38 | $2.25 | +3.32% |
| AFL | $112.88 | -0.69% | 58.2B | 12.90 | $8.75 | +2.08% |
| MET | $80.23 | +0.16% | 52.3B | 17.03 | $4.71 | +2.82% |
| MET-PE | $22.74 | -0.26% | 48B | 2.91 | $7.81 | +2.82% |
| MET-PA | $21.38 | +0.99% | 41.4B | 2.73 | $7.81 | +2.82% |
| PRU | $98.62 | +0.52% | 34.3B | 9.87 | $9.99 | +5.52% |
| UNM | $80.84 | +0.57% | 12.9B | 17.50 | $4.62 | +2.28% |
| MET-PF | $19.10 | -0.47% | 12.5B | 2.45 | $7.81 | +2.82% |
| GL | $152.72 | -1.02% | 12B | 10.58 | $14.44 | +0.74% |
Stock Comparison
PUK vs MFC Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, MFC has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while MFC trades at $39.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas MFC's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to MFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check MFC's competition here
PUK vs AFL Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, AFL has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while AFL trades at $112.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas AFL's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AFL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to AFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check AFL's competition here
PUK vs MET Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, MET has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while MET trades at $80.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas MET's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MET's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to MET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check MET's competition here
PUK vs MET-PE Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, MET-PE has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while MET-PE trades at $22.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas MET-PE's P/E ratio is 2.91. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MET-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to MET-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check MET-PE's competition here
PUK vs MET-PA Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, MET-PA has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while MET-PA trades at $21.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas MET-PA's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MET-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to MET-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check MET-PA's competition here
PUK vs PRU Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, PRU has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while PRU trades at $98.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas PRU's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRU's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to PRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check PRU's competition here
PUK vs UNM Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, UNM has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while UNM trades at $80.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas UNM's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UNM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to UNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check UNM's competition here
PUK vs MET-PF Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, MET-PF has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while MET-PF trades at $19.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas MET-PF's P/E ratio is 2.45. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MET-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to MET-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check MET-PF's competition here
PUK vs GL Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, GL has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while GL trades at $152.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas GL's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to GL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check GL's competition here
PUK vs PRI Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, PRI has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while PRI trades at $276.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas PRI's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRI's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to PRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check PRI's competition here
PUK vs PRH Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, PRH has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while PRH trades at $23.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas PRH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to PRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check PRH's competition here
PUK vs JXN Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, JXN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while JXN trades at $114.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas JXN's P/E ratio is -476.08. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JXN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to JXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check JXN's competition here
PUK vs PRS Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, PRS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while PRS trades at $22.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas PRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PRS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to PRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check PRS's competition here
PUK vs LNC Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, LNC has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while LNC trades at $37.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas LNC's P/E ratio is 6.44. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to LNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check LNC's competition here
PUK vs LNC-PD Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, LNC-PD has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while LNC-PD trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas LNC-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LNC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to LNC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check LNC-PD's competition here
PUK vs AEL Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, AEL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while AEL trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas AEL's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AEL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to AEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check AEL's competition here
PUK vs FGN Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, FGN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while FGN trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas FGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to FGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check FGN's competition here
PUK vs CNO Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, CNO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while CNO trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas CNO's P/E ratio is 19.40. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CNO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to CNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check CNO's competition here
PUK vs FG Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, FG has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while FG trades at $28.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas FG's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to FG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check FG's competition here
PUK vs BHF Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, BHF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while BHF trades at $62.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas BHF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to BHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check BHF's competition here
PUK vs GNW Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, GNW has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while GNW trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas GNW's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to GNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check GNW's competition here
PUK vs BHFAP Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, BHFAP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while BHFAP trades at $16.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas BHFAP's P/E ratio is 1.27. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHFAP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to BHFAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check BHFAP's competition here
PUK vs ABLLL Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, ABLLL has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while ABLLL trades at $25.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas ABLLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABLLL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to ABLLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check ABLLL's competition here
PUK vs BHFAL Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, BHFAL has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while BHFAL trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas BHFAL's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHFAL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to BHFAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check BHFAL's competition here
PUK vs MLCIL Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, MLCIL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while MLCIL trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas MLCIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLCIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to MLCIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check MLCIL's competition here
PUK vs JXN-PA Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, JXN-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while JXN-PA trades at $26.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas JXN-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to JXN-PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to JXN-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check JXN-PA's competition here
PUK vs AEL-PB Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, AEL-PB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while AEL-PB trades at $24.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas AEL-PB's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AEL-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to AEL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check AEL-PB's competition here
PUK vs NWLI Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, NWLI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while NWLI trades at $499.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas NWLI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NWLI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to NWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check NWLI's competition here
PUK vs AEL-PA Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, AEL-PA has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while AEL-PA trades at $24.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas AEL-PA's P/E ratio is 3.28. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AEL-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to AEL-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check AEL-PA's competition here
PUK vs MHNC Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, MHNC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while MHNC trades at $13.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas MHNC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MHNC's ROE of -4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to MHNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check MHNC's competition here
PUK vs GL-PD Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, GL-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while GL-PD trades at $15.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas GL-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GL-PD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to GL-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check GL-PD's competition here
PUK vs LIFE Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, LIFE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while LIFE trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas LIFE's P/E ratio is 16.35. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LIFE's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to LIFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check LIFE's competition here
PUK vs BHFAO Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, BHFAO has a market cap of 952.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while BHFAO trades at $16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas BHFAO's P/E ratio is 1.32. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHFAO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to BHFAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check BHFAO's competition here
PUK vs ABX Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, ABX has a market cap of 904.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while ABX trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas ABX's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to ABX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check ABX's competition here
PUK vs ABL Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, ABL has a market cap of 790.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while ABL trades at $8.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas ABL's P/E ratio is 161.80. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to ABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check ABL's competition here
PUK vs BHFAN Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, BHFAN has a market cap of 749M. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while BHFAN trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas BHFAN's P/E ratio is 1.04. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHFAN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to BHFAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check BHFAN's competition here
PUK vs BHFAM Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, BHFAM has a market cap of 671.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while BHFAM trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas BHFAM's P/E ratio is 0.93. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHFAM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to BHFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check BHFAM's competition here
PUK vs ABLLW Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, ABLLW has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while ABLLW trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas ABLLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ABLLW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to ABLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check ABLLW's competition here
PUK vs CIA Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, CIA has a market cap of 270.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while CIA trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas CIA's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CIA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to CIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check CIA's competition here
PUK vs VERY Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, VERY has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while VERY trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas VERY's P/E ratio is -12.56. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VERY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to VERY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check VERY's competition here
PUK vs MDWT Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, MDWT has a market cap of 101M. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while MDWT trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas MDWT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MDWT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to MDWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check MDWT's competition here
PUK vs AAME Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, AAME has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while AAME trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas AAME's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AAME's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to AAME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check AAME's competition here
PUK vs GWGH Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, GWGH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while GWGH trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas GWGH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GWGH's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to GWGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check GWGH's competition here
PUK vs IHC Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, IHC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while IHC trades at $57.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas IHC's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IHC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is more volatile compared to IHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check IHC's competition here
PUK vs PNX Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, PNX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while PNX trades at $12.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas PNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PNX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to PNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check PNX's competition here
PUK vs MLG Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, MLG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while MLG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas MLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to MLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check MLG's competition here
PUK vs SFG Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, SFG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while SFG trades at $22,850.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas SFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to SFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check SFG's competition here
PUK vs LFC Comparison May 2026
PUK plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PUK stands at 38.2B. In comparison, LFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PUK is priced at $30.17, while LFC trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PUK currently has a P/E ratio of 9.82, whereas LFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PUK's ROE is +0.20%, compared to LFC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PUK is less volatile compared to LFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PUK.Check LFC's competition here