Arcadia Biosciences, Inc.
Arcadia Biosciences, Inc. RKDA Peers
See (RKDA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RKDA | $4.03 | -2.66% | 5.51M | -7.07 | -$0.57 | N/A |
CTA-PB | $69.34 | -0.09% | 60.17B | N/A | N/A | +6.48% |
CTVA | $69.17 | +0.52% | 47.19B | 41.67 | $1.66 | +0.97% |
NTR | $58.68 | +1.21% | 28.67B | 55.36 | $1.06 | +3.70% |
CF | $87.95 | +0.41% | 14.25B | 11.63 | $7.56 | +2.29% |
MOS | $35.52 | +0.48% | 11.27B | 30.62 | $1.16 | +2.40% |
ICL | $6.59 | -0.08% | 8.50B | 21.24 | $0.31 | +2.85% |
FMC | $40.57 | +1.43% | 5.07B | 13.21 | $3.07 | +5.74% |
SMG | $62.85 | +0.05% | 3.63B | 108.36 | $0.58 | +4.20% |
UAN | $83.10 | -0.51% | 878.33M | 11.65 | $7.13 | +8.56% |
Stock Comparison
RKDA vs CTA-PB Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 60.17B. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while CTA-PB trades at $69.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs CTVA Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 47.19B. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while CTVA trades at $69.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs NTR Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 28.67B. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while NTR trades at $58.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 55.36. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is more volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs CF Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 14.25B. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while CF trades at $87.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is more volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs MOS Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 11.27B. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while MOS trades at $35.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is more volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs ICL Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 8.50B. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while ICL trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs FMC Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 5.07B. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while FMC trades at $40.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to FMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is more volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs SMG Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.63B. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while SMG trades at $62.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 108.36. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs UAN Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 878.33M. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while UAN trades at $83.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is more volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs IPI Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 492.19M. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while IPI trades at $36.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs LVRO Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 311.18M. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while LVRO trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -1.81. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs BIOX Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 291.61M. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while BIOX trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is 232.50. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BIOX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs AVD Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 126.09M. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while AVD trades at $4.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -4.21. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is more volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs MULG Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.09M. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs BHIL-WT Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49.03M. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs CGA Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.29M. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CGA's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs ENFY Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, ENFY has a market cap of 15.96M. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while ENFY trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas ENFY's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to ENFY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is more volatile compared to ENFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs SEED Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 8.86M. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while SEED trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SEED's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs NITO Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 7.21M. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while NITO trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is less volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs SVFD Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.17M. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs FMTO Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 2.79M. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while FMTO trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs BHIL Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.52M. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is less volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs YTEN Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345460.00. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to YTEN's ROE of +4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.
RKDA vs CTA-PA Comparison
RKDA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RKDA stands at 5.51M. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 10800.00. Regarding current trading prices, RKDA is priced at $4.03, while CTA-PA trades at $54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RKDA currently has a P/E ratio of -7.07, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RKDA's ROE is -0.22%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RKDA is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RKDA.