Renaissance Global Limited (RGL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RGL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGL.NS | ₹102.31 | -0.80% | 11B | 44.68 | ₹2.29 | N/A |
| TITAN.NS | ₹4,231.00 | +3.48% | 3.8T | 74.11 | ₹57.09 | +0.27% |
| TITAN.BO | ₹4,226.95 | +3.43% | 3.7T | 90.44 | ₹46.74 | +0.27% |
| KALYANKJIL.BO | ₹362.20 | +2.56% | 374.1B | 27.73 | ₹13.06 | +0.42% |
| KALYANKJIL.NS | ₹362.10 | +2.58% | 374B | 27.73 | ₹13.06 | +0.42% |
| THANGAMAYL.BO | ₹5,522.20 | +15.20% | 171.6B | 48.81 | ₹113.13 | +0.26% |
| THANGAMAYL.NS | ₹5,520.60 | +15.13% | 171.6B | 48.79 | ₹113.16 | +0.26% |
| SKYGOLD.NS | ₹571.40 | +1.45% | 88.5B | 31.60 | ₹18.08 | N/A |
| SKYGOLD.BO | ₹571.35 | +1.38% | 88.5B | 31.69 | ₹18.03 | N/A |
| BLUESTONE.NS | ₹535.05 | +5.27% | 81.5B | 514.47 | ₹1.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
RGL.NS vs TITAN.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, TITAN.NS has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while TITAN.NS trades at ₹4,231.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas TITAN.NS's P/E ratio is 74.11. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TITAN.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to TITAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check TITAN.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs TITAN.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, TITAN.BO has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while TITAN.BO trades at ₹4,226.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas TITAN.BO's P/E ratio is 90.44. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TITAN.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to TITAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check TITAN.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs KALYANKJIL.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.BO has a market cap of 374.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while KALYANKJIL.BO trades at ₹362.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas KALYANKJIL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KALYANKJIL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check KALYANKJIL.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs KALYANKJIL.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.NS has a market cap of 374B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while KALYANKJIL.NS trades at ₹362.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas KALYANKJIL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KALYANKJIL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check KALYANKJIL.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs THANGAMAYL.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.BO has a market cap of 171.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while THANGAMAYL.BO trades at ₹5,522.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas THANGAMAYL.BO's P/E ratio is 48.81. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THANGAMAYL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check THANGAMAYL.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs THANGAMAYL.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.NS has a market cap of 171.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while THANGAMAYL.NS trades at ₹5,520.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas THANGAMAYL.NS's P/E ratio is 48.79. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to THANGAMAYL.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check THANGAMAYL.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs SKYGOLD.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, SKYGOLD.NS has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while SKYGOLD.NS trades at ₹571.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas SKYGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKYGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to SKYGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check SKYGOLD.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs SKYGOLD.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, SKYGOLD.BO has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while SKYGOLD.BO trades at ₹571.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas SKYGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 31.69. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKYGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to SKYGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check SKYGOLD.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs BLUESTONE.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, BLUESTONE.NS has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while BLUESTONE.NS trades at ₹535.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas BLUESTONE.NS's P/E ratio is 514.47. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BLUESTONE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to BLUESTONE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check BLUESTONE.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs PNGJL.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, PNGJL.NS has a market cap of 74.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while PNGJL.NS trades at ₹549.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas PNGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PNGJL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is more volatile compared to PNGJL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check PNGJL.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs PCJEWELLER.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.BO has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while PCJEWELLER.BO trades at ₹9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas PCJEWELLER.BO's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCJEWELLER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check PCJEWELLER.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs PCJEWELLER.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.NS has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while PCJEWELLER.NS trades at ₹9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas PCJEWELLER.NS's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PCJEWELLER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check PCJEWELLER.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs ETHOSLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.NS has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while ETHOSLTD.NS trades at ₹2,380.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas ETHOSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 65.95. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ETHOSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check ETHOSLTD.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs ETHOSLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.BO has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while ETHOSLTD.BO trades at ₹2,374.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas ETHOSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 65.41. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ETHOSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check ETHOSLTD.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs SENCO.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, SENCO.NS has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while SENCO.NS trades at ₹344.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas SENCO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SENCO.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is more volatile compared to SENCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check SENCO.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs SENCO.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, SENCO.BO has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while SENCO.BO trades at ₹344.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas SENCO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SENCO.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is more volatile compared to SENCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check SENCO.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs GOLDIAM.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, GOLDIAM.NS has a market cap of 48.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while GOLDIAM.NS trades at ₹431.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas GOLDIAM.NS's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GOLDIAM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check GOLDIAM.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs GOLDIAM.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, GOLDIAM.BO has a market cap of 48.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while GOLDIAM.BO trades at ₹430.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas GOLDIAM.BO's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GOLDIAM.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check GOLDIAM.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs VAIBHAVGBL.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.NS has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while VAIBHAVGBL.NS trades at ₹232.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check VAIBHAVGBL.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs VAIBHAVGBL.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.BO has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while VAIBHAVGBL.BO trades at ₹232.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check VAIBHAVGBL.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs KDDL.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, KDDL.NS has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while KDDL.NS trades at ₹2,946.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas KDDL.NS's P/E ratio is 43.62. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KDDL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to KDDL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check KDDL.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs KDDL.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, KDDL.BO has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while KDDL.BO trades at ₹2,935.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas KDDL.BO's P/E ratio is 43.39. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KDDL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to KDDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check KDDL.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs RAJESHEXPO.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.BO has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while RAJESHEXPO.BO trades at ₹104.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas RAJESHEXPO.BO's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is more volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check RAJESHEXPO.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs RAJESHEXPO.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.NS has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while RAJESHEXPO.NS trades at ₹103.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas RAJESHEXPO.NS's P/E ratio is 27.28. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is more volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check RAJESHEXPO.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs DPABHUSHAN.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, DPABHUSHAN.NS has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while DPABHUSHAN.NS trades at ₹931.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas DPABHUSHAN.NS's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check DPABHUSHAN.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs BRIGHOTEL.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, BRIGHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while BRIGHOTEL.BO trades at ₹62.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas BRIGHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.90. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check BRIGHOTEL.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs AAYUSHBULL.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, AAYUSHBULL.BO has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while AAYUSHBULL.BO trades at ₹1,178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas AAYUSHBULL.BO's P/E ratio is 228.29. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is more volatile compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check AAYUSHBULL.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs SHANTIGOLD.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.BO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while SHANTIGOLD.BO trades at ₹223.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas SHANTIGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check SHANTIGOLD.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs SHANTIGOLD.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.NS has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while SHANTIGOLD.NS trades at ₹222.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas SHANTIGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check SHANTIGOLD.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs TBZ.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, TBZ.NS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while TBZ.NS trades at ₹175.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas TBZ.NS's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TBZ.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is more volatile compared to TBZ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check TBZ.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs TBZ.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, TBZ.BO has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while TBZ.BO trades at ₹174.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas TBZ.BO's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TBZ.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is more volatile compared to TBZ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check TBZ.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs MOTISONS.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, MOTISONS.NS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while MOTISONS.NS trades at ₹11.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas MOTISONS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MOTISONS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to MOTISONS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check MOTISONS.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs RGL.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, RGL.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while RGL.BO trades at ₹102.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas RGL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.91. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RGL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is more volatile compared to RGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check RGL.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs MVGJL.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, MVGJL.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while MVGJL.BO trades at ₹155.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas MVGJL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MVGJL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to MVGJL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check MVGJL.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs MVGJL.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, MVGJL.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while MVGJL.NS trades at ₹153.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas MVGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.53. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MVGJL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to MVGJL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check MVGJL.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs RADHIKAJWE.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while RADHIKAJWE.BO trades at ₹57.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas RADHIKAJWE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is more volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check RADHIKAJWE.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs RADHIKAJWE.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while RADHIKAJWE.NS trades at ₹57.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas RADHIKAJWE.NS's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is more volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check RADHIKAJWE.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs RBZJEWEL.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, RBZJEWEL.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while RBZJEWEL.NS trades at ₹125.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas RBZJEWEL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RBZJEWEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS and RBZJEWEL.NS have similar daily volatility (2.96).Check RBZJEWEL.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs LGHL.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, LGHL.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while LGHL.NS trades at ₹233.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas LGHL.NS's P/E ratio is -777.03. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LGHL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to LGHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check LGHL.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs SILGO.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, SILGO.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while SILGO.NS trades at ₹81.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas SILGO.NS's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SILGO.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to SILGO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check SILGO.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs MOKSH.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, MOKSH.NS has a market cap of 975.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while MOKSH.NS trades at ₹11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas MOKSH.NS's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MOKSH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to MOKSH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check MOKSH.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs EFORU.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, EFORU.BO has a market cap of 508.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while EFORU.BO trades at ₹85.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas EFORU.BO's P/E ratio is 58.68. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EFORU.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to EFORU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check EFORU.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs RRETAIL.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, RRETAIL.BO has a market cap of 451.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while RRETAIL.BO trades at ₹2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas RRETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 96.00. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RRETAIL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to RRETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check RRETAIL.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs KANANIIND.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, KANANIIND.NS has a market cap of 304.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while KANANIIND.NS trades at ₹1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas KANANIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KANANIIND.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to KANANIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check KANANIIND.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs KANANIIND.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, KANANIIND.BO has a market cap of 304.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while KANANIIND.BO trades at ₹1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas KANANIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KANANIIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to KANANIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check KANANIIND.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs GOENKA.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, GOENKA.NS has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while GOENKA.NS trades at ₹0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas GOENKA.NS's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GOENKA.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to GOENKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check GOENKA.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs ZODJRDMKJ.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, ZODJRDMKJ.NS has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while ZODJRDMKJ.NS trades at ₹31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas ZODJRDMKJ.NS's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check ZODJRDMKJ.NS's competition here
RGL.NS vs LYPSAGEMS.BO Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.BO has a market cap of 145.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while LYPSAGEMS.BO trades at ₹4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas LYPSAGEMS.BO's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check LYPSAGEMS.BO's competition here
RGL.NS vs LYPSAGEMS.NS Comparison June 2026
RGL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RGL.NS stands at 11B. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.NS has a market cap of 145.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RGL.NS is priced at ₹102.31, while LYPSAGEMS.NS trades at ₹4.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RGL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 44.68, whereas LYPSAGEMS.NS's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, RGL.NS's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RGL.NS is less volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RGL.NS.Check LYPSAGEMS.NS's competition here