KDDL Limited
KDDL Limited (KDDL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KDDL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDDL.NS | ₹2,574.50 | +7.18% | 31.4B | 37.81 | ₹67.58 | +0.83% |
| TITAN.NS | ₹4,470.60 | -0.20% | 4T | 82.71 | ₹53.86 | +0.25% |
| TITAN.BO | ₹4,448.60 | -0.70% | 4T | 95.30 | ₹46.74 | +0.25% |
| KALYANKJIL.NS | ₹413.65 | -0.35% | 427.8B | 37.93 | ₹10.92 | +0.36% |
| KALYANKJIL.BO | ₹411.40 | -0.87% | 427.8B | 37.90 | ₹10.93 | +0.36% |
| THANGAMAYL.NS | ₹3,781.00 | -8.40% | 125B | 51.92 | ₹77.48 | +0.30% |
| THANGAMAYL.BO | ₹3,791.20 | -8.11% | 125B | 51.95 | ₹77.39 | +0.30% |
| PNGJL.NS | ₹672.50 | +0.68% | 91.4B | 23.14 | ₹29.11 | N/A |
| BLUESTONE.NS | ₹541.15 | -1.12% | 82.4B | -132.99 | -₹4.07 | N/A |
| ETHOSLTD.NS | ₹2,678.80 | +8.46% | 72.7B | 139.95 | ₹19.42 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KDDL.NS vs TITAN.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, TITAN.NS has a market cap of 4T. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while TITAN.NS trades at ₹4,470.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas TITAN.NS's P/E ratio is 82.71. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TITAN.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to TITAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check TITAN.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs TITAN.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, TITAN.BO has a market cap of 4T. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while TITAN.BO trades at ₹4,448.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas TITAN.BO's P/E ratio is 95.30. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TITAN.BO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to TITAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check TITAN.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs KALYANKJIL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.NS has a market cap of 427.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while KALYANKJIL.NS trades at ₹413.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas KALYANKJIL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.93. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KALYANKJIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check KALYANKJIL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs KALYANKJIL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.BO has a market cap of 427.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while KALYANKJIL.BO trades at ₹411.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas KALYANKJIL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.90. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KALYANKJIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check KALYANKJIL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs THANGAMAYL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.NS has a market cap of 125B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while THANGAMAYL.NS trades at ₹3,781.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas THANGAMAYL.NS's P/E ratio is 51.92. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THANGAMAYL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check THANGAMAYL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs THANGAMAYL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.BO has a market cap of 125B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while THANGAMAYL.BO trades at ₹3,791.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas THANGAMAYL.BO's P/E ratio is 51.95. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THANGAMAYL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check THANGAMAYL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs PNGJL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, PNGJL.NS has a market cap of 91.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while PNGJL.NS trades at ₹672.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas PNGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNGJL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to PNGJL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check PNGJL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs BLUESTONE.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, BLUESTONE.NS has a market cap of 82.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while BLUESTONE.NS trades at ₹541.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas BLUESTONE.NS's P/E ratio is -132.99. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLUESTONE.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTONE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check BLUESTONE.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs ETHOSLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.NS has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while ETHOSLTD.NS trades at ₹2,678.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas ETHOSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 139.95. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ETHOSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check ETHOSLTD.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs ETHOSLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.BO has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while ETHOSLTD.BO trades at ₹2,683.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas ETHOSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 139.33. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ETHOSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check ETHOSLTD.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs PCJEWELLER.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.BO has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while PCJEWELLER.BO trades at ₹9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas PCJEWELLER.BO's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCJEWELLER.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check PCJEWELLER.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SKYGOLD.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, SKYGOLD.BO has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while SKYGOLD.BO trades at ₹411.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas SKYGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to SKYGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SKYGOLD.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs PCJEWELLER.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.NS has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while PCJEWELLER.NS trades at ₹9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas PCJEWELLER.NS's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PCJEWELLER.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check PCJEWELLER.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SKYGOLD.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, SKYGOLD.NS has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while SKYGOLD.NS trades at ₹414.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas SKYGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKYGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to SKYGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SKYGOLD.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SENCO.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, SENCO.NS has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while SENCO.NS trades at ₹326.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas SENCO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SENCO.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to SENCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SENCO.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SENCO.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, SENCO.BO has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while SENCO.BO trades at ₹326.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas SENCO.BO's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SENCO.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to SENCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SENCO.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs GOLDIAM.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, GOLDIAM.NS has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while GOLDIAM.NS trades at ₹402.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas GOLDIAM.NS's P/E ratio is 28.91. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOLDIAM.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to GOLDIAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check GOLDIAM.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs GOLDIAM.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, GOLDIAM.BO has a market cap of 45.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while GOLDIAM.BO trades at ₹401.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas GOLDIAM.BO's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOLDIAM.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to GOLDIAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check GOLDIAM.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs VAIBHAVGBL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.BO has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while VAIBHAVGBL.BO trades at ₹224.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check VAIBHAVGBL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs VAIBHAVGBL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.NS has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while VAIBHAVGBL.NS trades at ₹224.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check VAIBHAVGBL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RAJESHEXPO.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.BO has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while RAJESHEXPO.BO trades at ₹129.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas RAJESHEXPO.BO's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RAJESHEXPO.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RAJESHEXPO.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.NS has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while RAJESHEXPO.NS trades at ₹128.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas RAJESHEXPO.NS's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RAJESHEXPO.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs KDDL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, KDDL.BO has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while KDDL.BO trades at ₹2,570.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas KDDL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.72. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KDDL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to KDDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check KDDL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs DPABHUSHAN.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, DPABHUSHAN.NS has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while DPABHUSHAN.NS trades at ₹1,136.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas DPABHUSHAN.NS's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check DPABHUSHAN.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs BRIGHOTEL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, BRIGHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while BRIGHOTEL.BO trades at ₹68.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas BRIGHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 53.65. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check BRIGHOTEL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs AAYUSHBULL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, AAYUSHBULL.BO has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while AAYUSHBULL.BO trades at ₹1,152.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas AAYUSHBULL.BO's P/E ratio is 1011.10. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check AAYUSHBULL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SHANTIGOLD.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.BO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while SHANTIGOLD.BO trades at ₹206.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas SHANTIGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SHANTIGOLD.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SHANTIGOLD.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.NS has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while SHANTIGOLD.NS trades at ₹206.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas SHANTIGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SHANTIGOLD.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs MOTISONS.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, MOTISONS.NS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while MOTISONS.NS trades at ₹14.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas MOTISONS.NS's P/E ratio is -73.95. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOTISONS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to MOTISONS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check MOTISONS.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RGL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, RGL.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while RGL.NS trades at ₹103.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas RGL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RGL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to RGL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RGL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RGL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, RGL.BO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while RGL.BO trades at ₹103.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas RGL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RGL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to RGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RGL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs TBZ.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, TBZ.NS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while TBZ.NS trades at ₹149.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas TBZ.NS's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBZ.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to TBZ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check TBZ.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs TBZ.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, TBZ.BO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while TBZ.BO trades at ₹149.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas TBZ.BO's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TBZ.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to TBZ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check TBZ.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs MVGJL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, MVGJL.BO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while MVGJL.BO trades at ₹178.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas MVGJL.BO's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MVGJL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to MVGJL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check MVGJL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs MVGJL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, MVGJL.NS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while MVGJL.NS trades at ₹177.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas MVGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MVGJL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to MVGJL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check MVGJL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RADHIKAJWE.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while RADHIKAJWE.BO trades at ₹66.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas RADHIKAJWE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RADHIKAJWE.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RADHIKAJWE.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.NS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while RADHIKAJWE.NS trades at ₹66.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas RADHIKAJWE.NS's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RADHIKAJWE.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RBZJEWEL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, RBZJEWEL.NS has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while RBZJEWEL.NS trades at ₹142.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas RBZJEWEL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RBZJEWEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to RBZJEWEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RBZJEWEL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs LGHL.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, LGHL.NS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while LGHL.NS trades at ₹271.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas LGHL.NS's P/E ratio is 119.54. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LGHL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to LGHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check LGHL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SILGO.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, SILGO.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while SILGO.NS trades at ₹76.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas SILGO.NS's P/E ratio is 31.79. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SILGO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to SILGO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SILGO.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs MOKSH.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, MOKSH.NS has a market cap of 933M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while MOKSH.NS trades at ₹11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas MOKSH.NS's P/E ratio is 8.91. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MOKSH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to MOKSH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check MOKSH.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs EFORU.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, EFORU.BO has a market cap of 549.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while EFORU.BO trades at ₹87.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas EFORU.BO's P/E ratio is 50.21. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EFORU.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to EFORU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check EFORU.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RRETAIL.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, RRETAIL.BO has a market cap of 424.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while RRETAIL.BO trades at ₹2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas RRETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is -27.10. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RRETAIL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to RRETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RRETAIL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs KANANIIND.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, KANANIIND.NS has a market cap of 336.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while KANANIIND.NS trades at ₹1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas KANANIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KANANIIND.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to KANANIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check KANANIIND.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs KANANIIND.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, KANANIIND.BO has a market cap of 334.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while KANANIIND.BO trades at ₹1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas KANANIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 18.78. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KANANIIND.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to KANANIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check KANANIIND.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs GOENKA.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, GOENKA.NS has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while GOENKA.NS trades at ₹0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas GOENKA.NS's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOENKA.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to GOENKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check GOENKA.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs ZODJRDMKJ.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, ZODJRDMKJ.NS has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while ZODJRDMKJ.NS trades at ₹31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas ZODJRDMKJ.NS's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check ZODJRDMKJ.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs LYPSAGEMS.BO Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.BO has a market cap of 161.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while LYPSAGEMS.BO trades at ₹5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas LYPSAGEMS.BO's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check LYPSAGEMS.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs LYPSAGEMS.NS Comparison April 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 31.4B. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.NS has a market cap of 158.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,574.50, while LYPSAGEMS.NS trades at ₹5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 37.81, whereas LYPSAGEMS.NS's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check LYPSAGEMS.NS's competition here