KDDL Limited (KDDL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KDDL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDDL.NS | ₹2,778.00 | +2.66% | 34.2B | 41.06 | ₹67.65 | +0.72% |
| TITAN.NS | ₹4,074.90 | -1.52% | 3.6T | 71.36 | ₹57.10 | +0.27% |
| TITAN.BO | ₹4,074.65 | -1.68% | 3.6T | 87.18 | ₹46.74 | +0.27% |
| KALYANKJIL.BO | ₹355.35 | +0.16% | 367B | 27.21 | ₹13.06 | +0.42% |
| KALYANKJIL.NS | ₹355.05 | +0.08% | 366.7B | 27.21 | ₹13.05 | +0.42% |
| THANGAMAYL.NS | ₹4,204.90 | +7.16% | 130.7B | 37.21 | ₹113.01 | +0.30% |
| THANGAMAYL.BO | ₹4,200.65 | +7.71% | 130.6B | 37.19 | ₹112.96 | +0.30% |
| SKYGOLD.NS | ₹521.00 | +7.06% | 80.7B | 28.86 | ₹18.05 | N/A |
| SKYGOLD.BO | ₹520.35 | +7.01% | 80.6B | 28.84 | ₹18.04 | N/A |
| PNGJL.NS | ₹546.10 | +1.95% | 74.1B | 18.10 | ₹30.17 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KDDL.NS vs TITAN.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, TITAN.NS has a market cap of 3.6T. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while TITAN.NS trades at ₹4,074.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas TITAN.NS's P/E ratio is 71.36. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TITAN.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to TITAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check TITAN.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs TITAN.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, TITAN.BO has a market cap of 3.6T. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while TITAN.BO trades at ₹4,074.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas TITAN.BO's P/E ratio is 87.18. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TITAN.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to TITAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check TITAN.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs KALYANKJIL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.BO has a market cap of 367B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while KALYANKJIL.BO trades at ₹355.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas KALYANKJIL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KALYANKJIL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check KALYANKJIL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs KALYANKJIL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.NS has a market cap of 366.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while KALYANKJIL.NS trades at ₹355.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas KALYANKJIL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KALYANKJIL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check KALYANKJIL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs THANGAMAYL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.NS has a market cap of 130.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while THANGAMAYL.NS trades at ₹4,204.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas THANGAMAYL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THANGAMAYL.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check THANGAMAYL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs THANGAMAYL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.BO has a market cap of 130.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while THANGAMAYL.BO trades at ₹4,200.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas THANGAMAYL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THANGAMAYL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check THANGAMAYL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SKYGOLD.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, SKYGOLD.NS has a market cap of 80.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while SKYGOLD.NS trades at ₹521.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas SKYGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 28.86. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKYGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to SKYGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SKYGOLD.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SKYGOLD.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, SKYGOLD.BO has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while SKYGOLD.BO trades at ₹520.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas SKYGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKYGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to SKYGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SKYGOLD.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs PNGJL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, PNGJL.NS has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while PNGJL.NS trades at ₹546.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas PNGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNGJL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to PNGJL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check PNGJL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs BLUESTONE.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, BLUESTONE.NS has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while BLUESTONE.NS trades at ₹479.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas BLUESTONE.NS's P/E ratio is 456.76. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLUESTONE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to BLUESTONE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check BLUESTONE.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs PCJEWELLER.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.NS has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while PCJEWELLER.NS trades at ₹9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas PCJEWELLER.NS's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCJEWELLER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check PCJEWELLER.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs PCJEWELLER.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.BO has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while PCJEWELLER.BO trades at ₹9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas PCJEWELLER.BO's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCJEWELLER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check PCJEWELLER.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs ETHOSLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.BO has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while ETHOSLTD.BO trades at ₹2,382.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas ETHOSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 65.83. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETHOSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check ETHOSLTD.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs ETHOSLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.NS has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while ETHOSLTD.NS trades at ₹2,381.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas ETHOSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 65.73. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETHOSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check ETHOSLTD.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SENCO.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, SENCO.NS has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while SENCO.NS trades at ₹346.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas SENCO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SENCO.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to SENCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SENCO.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SENCO.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, SENCO.BO has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while SENCO.BO trades at ₹345.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas SENCO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SENCO.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to SENCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SENCO.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs GOLDIAM.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, GOLDIAM.BO has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while GOLDIAM.BO trades at ₹411.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas GOLDIAM.BO's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOLDIAM.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check GOLDIAM.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs GOLDIAM.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, GOLDIAM.NS has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while GOLDIAM.NS trades at ₹408.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas GOLDIAM.NS's P/E ratio is 29.27. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOLDIAM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check GOLDIAM.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs VAIBHAVGBL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.BO has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while VAIBHAVGBL.BO trades at ₹223.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check VAIBHAVGBL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs VAIBHAVGBL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.NS has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while VAIBHAVGBL.NS trades at ₹222.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check VAIBHAVGBL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RAJESHEXPO.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.NS has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while RAJESHEXPO.NS trades at ₹118.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas RAJESHEXPO.NS's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RAJESHEXPO.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RAJESHEXPO.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.BO has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while RAJESHEXPO.BO trades at ₹116.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas RAJESHEXPO.BO's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RAJESHEXPO.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs KDDL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, KDDL.BO has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while KDDL.BO trades at ₹2,777.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas KDDL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.04. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KDDL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to KDDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check KDDL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs DPABHUSHAN.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, DPABHUSHAN.NS has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while DPABHUSHAN.NS trades at ₹950.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas DPABHUSHAN.NS's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check DPABHUSHAN.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs BRIGHOTEL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, BRIGHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while BRIGHOTEL.BO trades at ₹61.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas BRIGHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.32. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check BRIGHOTEL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs AAYUSHBULL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, AAYUSHBULL.BO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while AAYUSHBULL.BO trades at ₹1,168.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas AAYUSHBULL.BO's P/E ratio is 227.38. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check AAYUSHBULL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SHANTIGOLD.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.BO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while SHANTIGOLD.BO trades at ₹221.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas SHANTIGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SHANTIGOLD.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SHANTIGOLD.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.NS has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while SHANTIGOLD.NS trades at ₹220.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas SHANTIGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SHANTIGOLD.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs MOTISONS.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, MOTISONS.NS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while MOTISONS.NS trades at ₹11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas MOTISONS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOTISONS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to MOTISONS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check MOTISONS.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RGL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, RGL.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while RGL.NS trades at ₹103.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas RGL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RGL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to RGL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RGL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs TBZ.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, TBZ.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while TBZ.BO trades at ₹165.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas TBZ.BO's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TBZ.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to TBZ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check TBZ.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs TBZ.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, TBZ.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while TBZ.NS trades at ₹165.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas TBZ.NS's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TBZ.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to TBZ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check TBZ.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RGL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, RGL.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while RGL.BO trades at ₹102.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas RGL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RGL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to RGL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RGL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs MVGJL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, MVGJL.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while MVGJL.BO trades at ₹153.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas MVGJL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MVGJL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to MVGJL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check MVGJL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs MVGJL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, MVGJL.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while MVGJL.NS trades at ₹152.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas MVGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MVGJL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to MVGJL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check MVGJL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RADHIKAJWE.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while RADHIKAJWE.NS trades at ₹58.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas RADHIKAJWE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RADHIKAJWE.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RADHIKAJWE.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while RADHIKAJWE.BO trades at ₹57.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas RADHIKAJWE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RADHIKAJWE.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RBZJEWEL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, RBZJEWEL.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while RBZJEWEL.NS trades at ₹124.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas RBZJEWEL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RBZJEWEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to RBZJEWEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RBZJEWEL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs LGHL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, LGHL.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while LGHL.NS trades at ₹236.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas LGHL.NS's P/E ratio is -788.17. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LGHL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to LGHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check LGHL.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs SILGO.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, SILGO.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while SILGO.NS trades at ₹82.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas SILGO.NS's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SILGO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to SILGO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check SILGO.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs MOKSH.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, MOKSH.NS has a market cap of 989.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while MOKSH.NS trades at ₹11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas MOKSH.NS's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOKSH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to MOKSH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check MOKSH.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs EFORU.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, EFORU.BO has a market cap of 511M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while EFORU.BO trades at ₹85.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas EFORU.BO's P/E ratio is 58.94. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFORU.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to EFORU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check EFORU.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs RRETAIL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, RRETAIL.BO has a market cap of 437.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while RRETAIL.BO trades at ₹2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas RRETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 93.00. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RRETAIL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to RRETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check RRETAIL.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs KANANIIND.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, KANANIIND.BO has a market cap of 310.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while KANANIIND.BO trades at ₹1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas KANANIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KANANIIND.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to KANANIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check KANANIIND.BO's competition here
KDDL.NS vs KANANIIND.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, KANANIIND.NS has a market cap of 308.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while KANANIIND.NS trades at ₹1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas KANANIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KANANIIND.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to KANANIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check KANANIIND.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs GOENKA.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, GOENKA.NS has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while GOENKA.NS trades at ₹0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas GOENKA.NS's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOENKA.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to GOENKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check GOENKA.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs ZODJRDMKJ.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, ZODJRDMKJ.NS has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while ZODJRDMKJ.NS trades at ₹31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas ZODJRDMKJ.NS's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is less volatile compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check ZODJRDMKJ.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs LYPSAGEMS.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.NS has a market cap of 149.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while LYPSAGEMS.NS trades at ₹5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas LYPSAGEMS.NS's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS and LYPSAGEMS.NS have similar daily volatility (4.71).Check LYPSAGEMS.NS's competition here
KDDL.NS vs LYPSAGEMS.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.NS stands at 34.2B. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.BO has a market cap of 148.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.NS is priced at ₹2,778.00, while LYPSAGEMS.BO trades at ₹5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.06, whereas LYPSAGEMS.BO's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, KDDL.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.NS is more volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.NS.Check LYPSAGEMS.BO's competition here