Zodiac-JRD-MKJ Limited (ZODJRDMKJ.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ZODJRDMKJ.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZODJRDMKJ.NS | ₹31.85 | -0.31% | 164.9M | 24.13 | ₹1.32 | N/A |
| TITAN.NS | ₹4,024.60 | -2.74% | 3.6T | 71.36 | ₹57.10 | +0.27% |
| TITAN.BO | ₹4,025.30 | -2.87% | 3.6T | 87.18 | ₹46.74 | +0.27% |
| KALYANKJIL.BO | ₹345.85 | -2.52% | 367B | 27.21 | ₹13.06 | +0.42% |
| KALYANKJIL.NS | ₹344.80 | -2.80% | 366.7B | 27.21 | ₹13.05 | +0.42% |
| THANGAMAYL.NS | ₹4,268.00 | +8.77% | 130.7B | 37.21 | ₹113.01 | +0.30% |
| THANGAMAYL.BO | ₹4,251.05 | +9.00% | 130.6B | 37.19 | ₹112.96 | +0.30% |
| SKYGOLD.NS | ₹521.70 | +7.20% | 80.7B | 28.86 | ₹18.05 | N/A |
| SKYGOLD.BO | ₹521.00 | +7.15% | 80.6B | 28.84 | ₹18.04 | N/A |
| PNGJL.NS | ₹551.45 | +2.95% | 74.1B | 18.10 | ₹30.17 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs TITAN.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, TITAN.NS has a market cap of 3.6T. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while TITAN.NS trades at ₹4,024.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas TITAN.NS's P/E ratio is 71.36. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TITAN.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to TITAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check TITAN.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs TITAN.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, TITAN.BO has a market cap of 3.6T. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while TITAN.BO trades at ₹4,025.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas TITAN.BO's P/E ratio is 87.18. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TITAN.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to TITAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check TITAN.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs KALYANKJIL.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.BO has a market cap of 367B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while KALYANKJIL.BO trades at ₹345.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas KALYANKJIL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KALYANKJIL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check KALYANKJIL.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs KALYANKJIL.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.NS has a market cap of 366.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while KALYANKJIL.NS trades at ₹344.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas KALYANKJIL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KALYANKJIL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check KALYANKJIL.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs THANGAMAYL.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.NS has a market cap of 130.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while THANGAMAYL.NS trades at ₹4,268.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas THANGAMAYL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to THANGAMAYL.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check THANGAMAYL.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs THANGAMAYL.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.BO has a market cap of 130.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while THANGAMAYL.BO trades at ₹4,251.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas THANGAMAYL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to THANGAMAYL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check THANGAMAYL.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs SKYGOLD.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, SKYGOLD.NS has a market cap of 80.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while SKYGOLD.NS trades at ₹521.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SKYGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 28.86. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SKYGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to SKYGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check SKYGOLD.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs SKYGOLD.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, SKYGOLD.BO has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while SKYGOLD.BO trades at ₹521.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SKYGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.84. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SKYGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to SKYGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check SKYGOLD.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs PNGJL.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, PNGJL.NS has a market cap of 74.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while PNGJL.NS trades at ₹551.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas PNGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PNGJL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to PNGJL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check PNGJL.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs BLUESTONE.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, BLUESTONE.NS has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while BLUESTONE.NS trades at ₹496.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas BLUESTONE.NS's P/E ratio is 456.76. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BLUESTONE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTONE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check BLUESTONE.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs PCJEWELLER.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.NS has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while PCJEWELLER.NS trades at ₹9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas PCJEWELLER.NS's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PCJEWELLER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is less volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check PCJEWELLER.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs PCJEWELLER.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.BO has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while PCJEWELLER.BO trades at ₹9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas PCJEWELLER.BO's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PCJEWELLER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is less volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check PCJEWELLER.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs ETHOSLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.BO has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while ETHOSLTD.BO trades at ₹2,328.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas ETHOSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 65.83. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ETHOSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check ETHOSLTD.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs ETHOSLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.NS has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while ETHOSLTD.NS trades at ₹2,331.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas ETHOSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 65.73. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ETHOSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check ETHOSLTD.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs SENCO.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, SENCO.NS has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while SENCO.NS trades at ₹342.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SENCO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SENCO.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to SENCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check SENCO.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs SENCO.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, SENCO.BO has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while SENCO.BO trades at ₹340.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SENCO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.87. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SENCO.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to SENCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check SENCO.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs GOLDIAM.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, GOLDIAM.BO has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while GOLDIAM.BO trades at ₹411.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas GOLDIAM.BO's P/E ratio is 29.46. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GOLDIAM.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check GOLDIAM.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs GOLDIAM.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, GOLDIAM.NS has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while GOLDIAM.NS trades at ₹411.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas GOLDIAM.NS's P/E ratio is 29.27. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GOLDIAM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check GOLDIAM.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs VAIBHAVGBL.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.BO has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while VAIBHAVGBL.BO trades at ₹222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check VAIBHAVGBL.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs VAIBHAVGBL.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.NS has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while VAIBHAVGBL.NS trades at ₹222.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is less volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check VAIBHAVGBL.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs RAJESHEXPO.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.NS has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while RAJESHEXPO.NS trades at ₹112.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas RAJESHEXPO.NS's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check RAJESHEXPO.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs RAJESHEXPO.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.BO has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while RAJESHEXPO.BO trades at ₹110.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas RAJESHEXPO.BO's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is less volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check RAJESHEXPO.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs KDDL.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, KDDL.NS has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while KDDL.NS trades at ₹2,701.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas KDDL.NS's P/E ratio is 41.06. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KDDL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to KDDL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check KDDL.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs KDDL.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, KDDL.BO has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while KDDL.BO trades at ₹2,701.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas KDDL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.04. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KDDL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to KDDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check KDDL.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs DPABHUSHAN.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, DPABHUSHAN.NS has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while DPABHUSHAN.NS trades at ₹933.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas DPABHUSHAN.NS's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check DPABHUSHAN.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs BRIGHOTEL.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, BRIGHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while BRIGHOTEL.BO trades at ₹61.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas BRIGHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.32. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check BRIGHOTEL.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs AAYUSHBULL.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, AAYUSHBULL.BO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while AAYUSHBULL.BO trades at ₹1,174.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas AAYUSHBULL.BO's P/E ratio is 227.38. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check AAYUSHBULL.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs SHANTIGOLD.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.BO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while SHANTIGOLD.BO trades at ₹231.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SHANTIGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is less volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check SHANTIGOLD.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs SHANTIGOLD.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.NS has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while SHANTIGOLD.NS trades at ₹229.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SHANTIGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is less volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check SHANTIGOLD.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs MOTISONS.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, MOTISONS.NS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while MOTISONS.NS trades at ₹11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MOTISONS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MOTISONS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to MOTISONS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check MOTISONS.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs RGL.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, RGL.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while RGL.NS trades at ₹103.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas RGL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RGL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to RGL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check RGL.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs TBZ.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, TBZ.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while TBZ.BO trades at ₹174.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas TBZ.BO's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TBZ.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is less volatile compared to TBZ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check TBZ.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs TBZ.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, TBZ.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while TBZ.NS trades at ₹174.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas TBZ.NS's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TBZ.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is less volatile compared to TBZ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check TBZ.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs RGL.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, RGL.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while RGL.BO trades at ₹103.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas RGL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RGL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to RGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check RGL.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs MVGJL.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, MVGJL.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while MVGJL.BO trades at ₹156.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MVGJL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MVGJL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is less volatile compared to MVGJL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check MVGJL.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs MVGJL.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, MVGJL.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while MVGJL.NS trades at ₹155.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MVGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MVGJL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to MVGJL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check MVGJL.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs RADHIKAJWE.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while RADHIKAJWE.NS trades at ₹56.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas RADHIKAJWE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check RADHIKAJWE.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs RADHIKAJWE.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while RADHIKAJWE.BO trades at ₹57.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas RADHIKAJWE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check RADHIKAJWE.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs RBZJEWEL.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, RBZJEWEL.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while RBZJEWEL.NS trades at ₹124.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas RBZJEWEL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RBZJEWEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to RBZJEWEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check RBZJEWEL.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs LGHL.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, LGHL.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while LGHL.NS trades at ₹240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas LGHL.NS's P/E ratio is -788.17. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LGHL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to LGHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check LGHL.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs SILGO.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, SILGO.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while SILGO.NS trades at ₹81.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas SILGO.NS's P/E ratio is 32.86. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SILGO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to SILGO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check SILGO.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs MOKSH.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, MOKSH.NS has a market cap of 989.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while MOKSH.NS trades at ₹11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas MOKSH.NS's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MOKSH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to MOKSH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check MOKSH.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs EFORU.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, EFORU.BO has a market cap of 511M. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while EFORU.BO trades at ₹86.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas EFORU.BO's P/E ratio is 58.94. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EFORU.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is less volatile compared to EFORU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check EFORU.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs RRETAIL.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, RRETAIL.BO has a market cap of 437.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while RRETAIL.BO trades at ₹2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas RRETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 93.00. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RRETAIL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is less volatile compared to RRETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check RRETAIL.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs KANANIIND.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, KANANIIND.BO has a market cap of 310.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while KANANIIND.BO trades at ₹1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas KANANIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KANANIIND.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is less volatile compared to KANANIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check KANANIIND.BO's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs KANANIIND.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, KANANIIND.NS has a market cap of 308.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while KANANIIND.NS trades at ₹1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas KANANIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KANANIIND.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is less volatile compared to KANANIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check KANANIIND.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs GOENKA.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, GOENKA.NS has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while GOENKA.NS trades at ₹0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas GOENKA.NS's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GOENKA.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to GOENKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check GOENKA.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs LYPSAGEMS.NS Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.NS has a market cap of 149.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while LYPSAGEMS.NS trades at ₹5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas LYPSAGEMS.NS's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check LYPSAGEMS.NS's competition here
ZODJRDMKJ.NS vs LYPSAGEMS.BO Comparison June 2026
ZODJRDMKJ.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ZODJRDMKJ.NS stands at 164.9M. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.BO has a market cap of 148.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is priced at ₹31.85, while LYPSAGEMS.BO trades at ₹5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ZODJRDMKJ.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.13, whereas LYPSAGEMS.BO's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ZODJRDMKJ.NS is more volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZODJRDMKJ.NS.Check LYPSAGEMS.BO's competition here