KDDL Limited (KDDL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KDDL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KDDL.BO | ₹2,865.75 | +1.28% | 34.4B | 41.38 | ₹67.66 | +0.72% |
| TITAN.NS | ₹4,155.90 | +1.91% | 3.6T | 71.67 | ₹57.05 | +0.27% |
| TITAN.BO | ₹4,125.50 | +1.14% | 3.6T | 87.43 | ₹46.74 | +0.27% |
| KALYANKJIL.BO | ₹359.00 | +1.67% | 364.7B | 27.08 | ₹13.04 | +0.42% |
| KALYANKJIL.NS | ₹359.15 | +1.71% | 364.6B | 27.01 | ₹13.07 | +0.42% |
| THANGAMAYL.NS | ₹5,145.00 | +12.07% | 149B | 42.39 | ₹113.11 | +0.26% |
| THANGAMAYL.BO | ₹5,090.20 | +10.91% | 149B | 42.41 | ₹113.04 | +0.26% |
| SKYGOLD.BO | ₹572.45 | +2.38% | 87.3B | 31.20 | ₹18.06 | N/A |
| SKYGOLD.NS | ₹572.75 | +2.33% | 87.2B | 31.15 | ₹18.08 | N/A |
| BLUESTONE.NS | ₹540.45 | +9.21% | 77.4B | 488.70 | ₹1.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KDDL.BO vs TITAN.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, TITAN.NS has a market cap of 3.6T. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while TITAN.NS trades at ₹4,155.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas TITAN.NS's P/E ratio is 71.67. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TITAN.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to TITAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check TITAN.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs TITAN.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, TITAN.BO has a market cap of 3.6T. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while TITAN.BO trades at ₹4,125.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas TITAN.BO's P/E ratio is 87.43. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TITAN.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to TITAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check TITAN.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs KALYANKJIL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.BO has a market cap of 364.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while KALYANKJIL.BO trades at ₹359.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas KALYANKJIL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KALYANKJIL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check KALYANKJIL.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs KALYANKJIL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.NS has a market cap of 364.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while KALYANKJIL.NS trades at ₹359.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas KALYANKJIL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KALYANKJIL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check KALYANKJIL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs THANGAMAYL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.NS has a market cap of 149B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while THANGAMAYL.NS trades at ₹5,145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas THANGAMAYL.NS's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THANGAMAYL.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check THANGAMAYL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs THANGAMAYL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.BO has a market cap of 149B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while THANGAMAYL.BO trades at ₹5,090.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas THANGAMAYL.BO's P/E ratio is 42.41. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THANGAMAYL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check THANGAMAYL.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs SKYGOLD.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, SKYGOLD.BO has a market cap of 87.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while SKYGOLD.BO trades at ₹572.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas SKYGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKYGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to SKYGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check SKYGOLD.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs SKYGOLD.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, SKYGOLD.NS has a market cap of 87.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while SKYGOLD.NS trades at ₹572.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas SKYGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKYGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to SKYGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check SKYGOLD.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs BLUESTONE.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, BLUESTONE.NS has a market cap of 77.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while BLUESTONE.NS trades at ₹540.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas BLUESTONE.NS's P/E ratio is 488.70. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLUESTONE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to BLUESTONE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check BLUESTONE.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs PNGJL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, PNGJL.NS has a market cap of 74.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while PNGJL.NS trades at ₹546.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas PNGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNGJL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to PNGJL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check PNGJL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs PCJEWELLER.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.BO has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while PCJEWELLER.BO trades at ₹9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas PCJEWELLER.BO's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCJEWELLER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check PCJEWELLER.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs PCJEWELLER.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.NS has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while PCJEWELLER.NS trades at ₹9.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas PCJEWELLER.NS's P/E ratio is 10.98. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PCJEWELLER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check PCJEWELLER.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs ETHOSLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.NS has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while ETHOSLTD.NS trades at ₹2,356.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas ETHOSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 65.26. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETHOSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check ETHOSLTD.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs ETHOSLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.BO has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while ETHOSLTD.BO trades at ₹2,341.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas ETHOSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 64.54. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ETHOSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check ETHOSLTD.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs SENCO.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, SENCO.NS has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while SENCO.NS trades at ₹343.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas SENCO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SENCO.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to SENCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check SENCO.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs SENCO.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, SENCO.BO has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while SENCO.BO trades at ₹343.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas SENCO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SENCO.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to SENCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check SENCO.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs GOLDIAM.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, GOLDIAM.BO has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while GOLDIAM.BO trades at ₹435.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas GOLDIAM.BO's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOLDIAM.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check GOLDIAM.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs GOLDIAM.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, GOLDIAM.NS has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while GOLDIAM.NS trades at ₹433.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas GOLDIAM.NS's P/E ratio is 28.77. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOLDIAM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check GOLDIAM.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs VAIBHAVGBL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.NS has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while VAIBHAVGBL.NS trades at ₹236.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check VAIBHAVGBL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs VAIBHAVGBL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.BO has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while VAIBHAVGBL.BO trades at ₹236.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check VAIBHAVGBL.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs KDDL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, KDDL.NS has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while KDDL.NS trades at ₹2,861.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas KDDL.NS's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KDDL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to KDDL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check KDDL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs RAJESHEXPO.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.BO has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while RAJESHEXPO.BO trades at ₹104.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas RAJESHEXPO.BO's P/E ratio is 28.91. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check RAJESHEXPO.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs RAJESHEXPO.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.NS has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while RAJESHEXPO.NS trades at ₹103.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas RAJESHEXPO.NS's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check RAJESHEXPO.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs DPABHUSHAN.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, DPABHUSHAN.NS has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while DPABHUSHAN.NS trades at ₹939.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas DPABHUSHAN.NS's P/E ratio is 10.26. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check DPABHUSHAN.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs BRIGHOTEL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, BRIGHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while BRIGHOTEL.BO trades at ₹61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas BRIGHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check BRIGHOTEL.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs AAYUSHBULL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, AAYUSHBULL.BO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while AAYUSHBULL.BO trades at ₹1,184.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas AAYUSHBULL.BO's P/E ratio is 229.54. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check AAYUSHBULL.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs SHANTIGOLD.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.BO has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while SHANTIGOLD.BO trades at ₹223.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas SHANTIGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check SHANTIGOLD.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs SHANTIGOLD.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.NS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while SHANTIGOLD.NS trades at ₹223.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas SHANTIGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check SHANTIGOLD.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs TBZ.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, TBZ.NS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while TBZ.NS trades at ₹176.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas TBZ.NS's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TBZ.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to TBZ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check TBZ.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs TBZ.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, TBZ.BO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while TBZ.BO trades at ₹174.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas TBZ.BO's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TBZ.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to TBZ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check TBZ.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs MOTISONS.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, MOTISONS.NS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while MOTISONS.NS trades at ₹11.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas MOTISONS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOTISONS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to MOTISONS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check MOTISONS.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs RGL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, RGL.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while RGL.NS trades at ₹103.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas RGL.NS's P/E ratio is 45.03. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RGL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to RGL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check RGL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs RGL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, RGL.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while RGL.BO trades at ₹103.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas RGL.BO's P/E ratio is 44.80. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RGL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to RGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check RGL.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs MVGJL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, MVGJL.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while MVGJL.NS trades at ₹153.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas MVGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MVGJL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to MVGJL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check MVGJL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs MVGJL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, MVGJL.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while MVGJL.BO trades at ₹151.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas MVGJL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MVGJL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to MVGJL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check MVGJL.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs RADHIKAJWE.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while RADHIKAJWE.NS trades at ₹57.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas RADHIKAJWE.NS's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check RADHIKAJWE.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs RADHIKAJWE.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while RADHIKAJWE.BO trades at ₹57.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas RADHIKAJWE.BO's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check RADHIKAJWE.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs RBZJEWEL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, RBZJEWEL.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while RBZJEWEL.NS trades at ₹124.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas RBZJEWEL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RBZJEWEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to RBZJEWEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check RBZJEWEL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs LGHL.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, LGHL.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while LGHL.NS trades at ₹234.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas LGHL.NS's P/E ratio is -828.93. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LGHL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to LGHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check LGHL.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs SILGO.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, SILGO.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while SILGO.NS trades at ₹81.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas SILGO.NS's P/E ratio is 32.34. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SILGO.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to SILGO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check SILGO.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs MOKSH.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, MOKSH.NS has a market cap of 970.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while MOKSH.NS trades at ₹11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas MOKSH.NS's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOKSH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to MOKSH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check MOKSH.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs EFORU.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, EFORU.BO has a market cap of 475.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while EFORU.BO trades at ₹82.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas EFORU.BO's P/E ratio is 54.86. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFORU.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to EFORU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check EFORU.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs RRETAIL.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, RRETAIL.BO has a market cap of 438.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while RRETAIL.BO trades at ₹2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas RRETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 93.33. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RRETAIL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to RRETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check RRETAIL.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs KANANIIND.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, KANANIIND.BO has a market cap of 302.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while KANANIIND.BO trades at ₹1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas KANANIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KANANIIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is more volatile compared to KANANIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check KANANIIND.BO's competition here
KDDL.BO vs KANANIIND.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, KANANIIND.NS has a market cap of 298.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while KANANIIND.NS trades at ₹1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas KANANIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KANANIIND.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to KANANIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check KANANIIND.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs GOENKA.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, GOENKA.NS has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while GOENKA.NS trades at ₹0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas GOENKA.NS's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOENKA.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to GOENKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check GOENKA.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs ZODJRDMKJ.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, ZODJRDMKJ.NS has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while ZODJRDMKJ.NS trades at ₹31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas ZODJRDMKJ.NS's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check ZODJRDMKJ.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs LYPSAGEMS.NS Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.NS has a market cap of 146.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while LYPSAGEMS.NS trades at ₹5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas LYPSAGEMS.NS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check LYPSAGEMS.NS's competition here
KDDL.BO vs LYPSAGEMS.BO Comparison June 2026
KDDL.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KDDL.BO stands at 34.4B. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.BO has a market cap of 146.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KDDL.BO is priced at ₹2,865.75, while LYPSAGEMS.BO trades at ₹5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KDDL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 41.38, whereas LYPSAGEMS.BO's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, KDDL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KDDL.BO is less volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KDDL.BO.Check LYPSAGEMS.BO's competition here