Silgo Retail Limited (SILGO.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SILGO.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILGO.NS | ₹82.82 | +0.71% | 2.2B | 33.13 | ₹2.50 | N/A |
| TITAN.BO | ₹4,079.05 | +1.34% | 3.6T | 87.27 | ₹46.74 | +0.27% |
| TITAN.NS | ₹4,078.10 | +1.33% | 3.6T | 71.48 | ₹57.05 | +0.27% |
| KALYANKJIL.NS | ₹353.10 | +2.66% | 364.7B | 27.02 | ₹13.07 | +0.42% |
| KALYANKJIL.BO | ₹353.10 | +2.57% | 364.7B | 27.08 | ₹13.04 | +0.42% |
| THANGAMAYL.NS | ₹4,590.70 | +7.16% | 142.7B | 40.59 | ₹113.11 | +0.27% |
| THANGAMAYL.BO | ₹4,589.65 | +7.18% | 142.7B | 40.60 | ₹113.04 | +0.27% |
| SKYGOLD.NS | ₹559.70 | +7.22% | 86.7B | 30.99 | ₹18.06 | N/A |
| SKYGOLD.BO | ₹559.15 | +6.93% | 86.6B | 31.00 | ₹18.04 | N/A |
| BLUESTONE.NS | ₹494.85 | -0.25% | 75.4B | 466.84 | ₹1.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SILGO.NS vs TITAN.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TITAN.BO has a market cap of 3.6T. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while TITAN.BO trades at ₹4,079.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas TITAN.BO's P/E ratio is 87.27. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TITAN.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to TITAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check TITAN.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs TITAN.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TITAN.NS has a market cap of 3.6T. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while TITAN.NS trades at ₹4,078.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas TITAN.NS's P/E ratio is 71.48. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TITAN.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to TITAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check TITAN.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs KALYANKJIL.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.NS has a market cap of 364.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while KALYANKJIL.NS trades at ₹353.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas KALYANKJIL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KALYANKJIL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check KALYANKJIL.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs KALYANKJIL.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.BO has a market cap of 364.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while KALYANKJIL.BO trades at ₹353.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas KALYANKJIL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KALYANKJIL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check KALYANKJIL.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs THANGAMAYL.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.NS has a market cap of 142.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while THANGAMAYL.NS trades at ₹4,590.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas THANGAMAYL.NS's P/E ratio is 40.59. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THANGAMAYL.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is less volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check THANGAMAYL.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs THANGAMAYL.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.BO has a market cap of 142.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while THANGAMAYL.BO trades at ₹4,589.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas THANGAMAYL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.60. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THANGAMAYL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is less volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check THANGAMAYL.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs SKYGOLD.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SKYGOLD.NS has a market cap of 86.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while SKYGOLD.NS trades at ₹559.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SKYGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKYGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is less volatile compared to SKYGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check SKYGOLD.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs SKYGOLD.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SKYGOLD.BO has a market cap of 86.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while SKYGOLD.BO trades at ₹559.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SKYGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SKYGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is less volatile compared to SKYGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check SKYGOLD.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs BLUESTONE.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BLUESTONE.NS has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while BLUESTONE.NS trades at ₹494.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas BLUESTONE.NS's P/E ratio is 466.84. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLUESTONE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTONE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check BLUESTONE.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs PNGJL.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PNGJL.NS has a market cap of 74.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while PNGJL.NS trades at ₹548.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas PNGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PNGJL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to PNGJL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check PNGJL.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs PCJEWELLER.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.BO has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while PCJEWELLER.BO trades at ₹9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas PCJEWELLER.BO's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PCJEWELLER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check PCJEWELLER.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs PCJEWELLER.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.NS has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while PCJEWELLER.NS trades at ₹9.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas PCJEWELLER.NS's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PCJEWELLER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check PCJEWELLER.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs ETHOSLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.NS has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while ETHOSLTD.NS trades at ₹2,359.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas ETHOSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 65.18. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ETHOSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check ETHOSLTD.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs ETHOSLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.BO has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while ETHOSLTD.BO trades at ₹2,357.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas ETHOSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 64.97. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ETHOSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check ETHOSLTD.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs SENCO.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SENCO.BO has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while SENCO.BO trades at ₹345.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SENCO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SENCO.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to SENCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check SENCO.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs SENCO.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SENCO.NS has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while SENCO.NS trades at ₹345.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SENCO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SENCO.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to SENCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check SENCO.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs GOLDIAM.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GOLDIAM.NS has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while GOLDIAM.NS trades at ₹424.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas GOLDIAM.NS's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOLDIAM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check GOLDIAM.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs GOLDIAM.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GOLDIAM.BO has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while GOLDIAM.BO trades at ₹424.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas GOLDIAM.BO's P/E ratio is 28.11. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOLDIAM.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check GOLDIAM.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs VAIBHAVGBL.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.BO has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while VAIBHAVGBL.BO trades at ₹234.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is less volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check VAIBHAVGBL.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs VAIBHAVGBL.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.NS has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while VAIBHAVGBL.NS trades at ₹234.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is less volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check VAIBHAVGBL.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs KDDL.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KDDL.NS has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while KDDL.NS trades at ₹2,831.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas KDDL.NS's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KDDL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is less volatile compared to KDDL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check KDDL.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs KDDL.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KDDL.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while KDDL.BO trades at ₹2,829.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas KDDL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KDDL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is less volatile compared to KDDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check KDDL.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs RAJESHEXPO.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.NS has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while RAJESHEXPO.NS trades at ₹106.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas RAJESHEXPO.NS's P/E ratio is 28.03. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check RAJESHEXPO.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs RAJESHEXPO.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.BO has a market cap of 31.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while RAJESHEXPO.BO trades at ₹106.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas RAJESHEXPO.BO's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check RAJESHEXPO.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs DPABHUSHAN.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, DPABHUSHAN.NS has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while DPABHUSHAN.NS trades at ₹927.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas DPABHUSHAN.NS's P/E ratio is 10.02. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check DPABHUSHAN.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs BRIGHOTEL.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BRIGHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while BRIGHOTEL.BO trades at ₹61.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas BRIGHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check BRIGHOTEL.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs AAYUSHBULL.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AAYUSHBULL.BO has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while AAYUSHBULL.BO trades at ₹1,174.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas AAYUSHBULL.BO's P/E ratio is 228.54. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check AAYUSHBULL.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs SHANTIGOLD.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.BO has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while SHANTIGOLD.BO trades at ₹231.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SHANTIGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check SHANTIGOLD.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs SHANTIGOLD.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.NS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while SHANTIGOLD.NS trades at ₹230.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas SHANTIGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check SHANTIGOLD.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs TBZ.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TBZ.NS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while TBZ.NS trades at ₹178.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas TBZ.NS's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TBZ.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is less volatile compared to TBZ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check TBZ.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs TBZ.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TBZ.BO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while TBZ.BO trades at ₹178.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas TBZ.BO's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TBZ.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is less volatile compared to TBZ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check TBZ.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs MOTISONS.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MOTISONS.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while MOTISONS.NS trades at ₹11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas MOTISONS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOTISONS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to MOTISONS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check MOTISONS.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs RGL.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RGL.BO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while RGL.BO trades at ₹103.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas RGL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.24. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RGL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to RGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check RGL.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs RGL.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RGL.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while RGL.NS trades at ₹103.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas RGL.NS's P/E ratio is 45.21. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RGL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to RGL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check RGL.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs MVGJL.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MVGJL.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while MVGJL.NS trades at ₹155.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas MVGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MVGJL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to MVGJL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check MVGJL.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs MVGJL.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MVGJL.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while MVGJL.BO trades at ₹154.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas MVGJL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MVGJL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to MVGJL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check MVGJL.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs RADHIKAJWE.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while RADHIKAJWE.NS trades at ₹56.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas RADHIKAJWE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.30. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check RADHIKAJWE.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs RADHIKAJWE.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while RADHIKAJWE.BO trades at ₹56.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas RADHIKAJWE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check RADHIKAJWE.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs RBZJEWEL.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RBZJEWEL.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while RBZJEWEL.NS trades at ₹125.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas RBZJEWEL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RBZJEWEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to RBZJEWEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check RBZJEWEL.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs LGHL.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LGHL.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while LGHL.NS trades at ₹234.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas LGHL.NS's P/E ratio is -836.96. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LGHL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to LGHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check LGHL.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs MOKSH.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, MOKSH.NS has a market cap of 979.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while MOKSH.NS trades at ₹11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas MOKSH.NS's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MOKSH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to MOKSH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check MOKSH.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs EFORU.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EFORU.BO has a market cap of 499.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while EFORU.BO trades at ₹83.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas EFORU.BO's P/E ratio is 57.66. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EFORU.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to EFORU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check EFORU.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs RRETAIL.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RRETAIL.BO has a market cap of 420.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while RRETAIL.BO trades at ₹2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas RRETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 89.33. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RRETAIL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is less volatile compared to RRETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check RRETAIL.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs KANANIIND.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KANANIIND.BO has a market cap of 312.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while KANANIIND.BO trades at ₹1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas KANANIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KANANIIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is less volatile compared to KANANIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check KANANIIND.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs KANANIIND.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, KANANIIND.NS has a market cap of 306.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while KANANIIND.NS trades at ₹1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas KANANIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KANANIIND.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to KANANIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check KANANIIND.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs GOENKA.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GOENKA.NS has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while GOENKA.NS trades at ₹0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas GOENKA.NS's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GOENKA.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to GOENKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check GOENKA.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs ZODJRDMKJ.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ZODJRDMKJ.NS has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while ZODJRDMKJ.NS trades at ₹31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas ZODJRDMKJ.NS's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is less volatile compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check ZODJRDMKJ.NS's competition here
SILGO.NS vs LYPSAGEMS.BO Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.BO has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while LYPSAGEMS.BO trades at ₹5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas LYPSAGEMS.BO's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check LYPSAGEMS.BO's competition here
SILGO.NS vs LYPSAGEMS.NS Comparison June 2026
SILGO.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SILGO.NS stands at 2.2B. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.NS has a market cap of 147.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SILGO.NS is priced at ₹82.82, while LYPSAGEMS.NS trades at ₹5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SILGO.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 33.13, whereas LYPSAGEMS.NS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, SILGO.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SILGO.NS is more volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SILGO.NS.Check LYPSAGEMS.NS's competition here