Goenka Diamond and Jewels Limited (GOENKA.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GOENKA.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOENKA.NS | ₹0.82 | +0.00% | 259.9M | -27.33 | -₹0.03 | N/A |
| TITAN.BO | ₹4,025.30 | -1.21% | 3.6T | 86.12 | ₹46.74 | +0.27% |
| TITAN.NS | ₹4,024.60 | -1.23% | 3.6T | 70.55 | ₹57.05 | +0.27% |
| KALYANKJIL.BO | ₹344.25 | -3.12% | 355.5B | 26.40 | ₹13.04 | +0.44% |
| KALYANKJIL.NS | ₹343.95 | -3.13% | 355.2B | 26.32 | ₹13.07 | +0.44% |
| THANGAMAYL.NS | ₹4,284.10 | +1.88% | 133.2B | 37.88 | ₹113.11 | +0.29% |
| THANGAMAYL.BO | ₹4,282.00 | +1.94% | 133.1B | 37.89 | ₹113.00 | +0.29% |
| SKYGOLD.BO | ₹522.90 | +0.49% | 81B | 28.95 | ₹18.06 | N/A |
| SKYGOLD.NS | ₹522.00 | +0.19% | 80.8B | 28.87 | ₹18.08 | N/A |
| BLUESTONE.NS | ₹496.10 | +3.44% | 75.6B | 468.02 | ₹1.06 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GOENKA.NS vs TITAN.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, TITAN.BO has a market cap of 3.6T. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while TITAN.BO trades at ₹4,025.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas TITAN.BO's P/E ratio is 86.12. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TITAN.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to TITAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check TITAN.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs TITAN.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, TITAN.NS has a market cap of 3.6T. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while TITAN.NS trades at ₹4,024.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas TITAN.NS's P/E ratio is 70.55. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TITAN.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to TITAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check TITAN.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs KALYANKJIL.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.BO has a market cap of 355.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while KALYANKJIL.BO trades at ₹344.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas KALYANKJIL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.40. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KALYANKJIL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check KALYANKJIL.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs KALYANKJIL.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.NS has a market cap of 355.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while KALYANKJIL.NS trades at ₹343.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas KALYANKJIL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KALYANKJIL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check KALYANKJIL.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs THANGAMAYL.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.NS has a market cap of 133.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while THANGAMAYL.NS trades at ₹4,284.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas THANGAMAYL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.88. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to THANGAMAYL.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check THANGAMAYL.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs THANGAMAYL.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.BO has a market cap of 133.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while THANGAMAYL.BO trades at ₹4,282.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas THANGAMAYL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.89. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to THANGAMAYL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check THANGAMAYL.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs SKYGOLD.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, SKYGOLD.BO has a market cap of 81B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while SKYGOLD.BO trades at ₹522.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas SKYGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SKYGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to SKYGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check SKYGOLD.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs SKYGOLD.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, SKYGOLD.NS has a market cap of 80.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while SKYGOLD.NS trades at ₹522.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas SKYGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SKYGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to SKYGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check SKYGOLD.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs BLUESTONE.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, BLUESTONE.NS has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while BLUESTONE.NS trades at ₹496.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas BLUESTONE.NS's P/E ratio is 468.02. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BLUESTONE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTONE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check BLUESTONE.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs PNGJL.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, PNGJL.NS has a market cap of 74.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while PNGJL.NS trades at ₹551.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas PNGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PNGJL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to PNGJL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check PNGJL.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs PCJEWELLER.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.NS has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while PCJEWELLER.NS trades at ₹9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas PCJEWELLER.NS's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PCJEWELLER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check PCJEWELLER.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs PCJEWELLER.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.BO has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while PCJEWELLER.BO trades at ₹9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas PCJEWELLER.BO's P/E ratio is 11.12. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PCJEWELLER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check PCJEWELLER.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs ETHOSLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.BO has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while ETHOSLTD.BO trades at ₹2,326.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas ETHOSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 64.23. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ETHOSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check ETHOSLTD.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs ETHOSLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.NS has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while ETHOSLTD.NS trades at ₹2,325.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas ETHOSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 64.25. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ETHOSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check ETHOSLTD.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs SENCO.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, SENCO.BO has a market cap of 55.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while SENCO.BO trades at ₹340.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas SENCO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.72. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SENCO.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to SENCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check SENCO.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs SENCO.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, SENCO.NS has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while SENCO.NS trades at ₹339.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas SENCO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.68. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SENCO.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to SENCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check SENCO.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs GOLDIAM.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, GOLDIAM.NS has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while GOLDIAM.NS trades at ₹409.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas GOLDIAM.NS's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GOLDIAM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check GOLDIAM.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs GOLDIAM.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, GOLDIAM.BO has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while GOLDIAM.BO trades at ₹408.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas GOLDIAM.BO's P/E ratio is 27.10. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GOLDIAM.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check GOLDIAM.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs VAIBHAVGBL.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.NS has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while VAIBHAVGBL.NS trades at ₹225.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check VAIBHAVGBL.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs VAIBHAVGBL.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.BO has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while VAIBHAVGBL.BO trades at ₹224.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check VAIBHAVGBL.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs KDDL.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, KDDL.BO has a market cap of 33.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while KDDL.BO trades at ₹2,706.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas KDDL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.09. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KDDL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to KDDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check KDDL.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs KDDL.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, KDDL.NS has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while KDDL.NS trades at ₹2,701.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas KDDL.NS's P/E ratio is 40.01. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KDDL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to KDDL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check KDDL.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs RAJESHEXPO.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.NS has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while RAJESHEXPO.NS trades at ₹112.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas RAJESHEXPO.NS's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check RAJESHEXPO.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs RAJESHEXPO.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.BO has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while RAJESHEXPO.BO trades at ₹111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas RAJESHEXPO.BO's P/E ratio is 19.51. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check RAJESHEXPO.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs DPABHUSHAN.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, DPABHUSHAN.NS has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while DPABHUSHAN.NS trades at ₹930.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas DPABHUSHAN.NS's P/E ratio is 10.03. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check DPABHUSHAN.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs BRIGHOTEL.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, BRIGHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while BRIGHOTEL.BO trades at ₹61.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas BRIGHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.63. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check BRIGHOTEL.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs AAYUSHBULL.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, AAYUSHBULL.BO has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while AAYUSHBULL.BO trades at ₹1,173.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas AAYUSHBULL.BO's P/E ratio is 228.29. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check AAYUSHBULL.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs SHANTIGOLD.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.NS has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while SHANTIGOLD.NS trades at ₹229.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas SHANTIGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check SHANTIGOLD.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs SHANTIGOLD.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.BO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while SHANTIGOLD.BO trades at ₹229.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas SHANTIGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check SHANTIGOLD.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs TBZ.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, TBZ.NS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while TBZ.NS trades at ₹173.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas TBZ.NS's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TBZ.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to TBZ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check TBZ.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs TBZ.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, TBZ.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while TBZ.BO trades at ₹173.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas TBZ.BO's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TBZ.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to TBZ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check TBZ.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs MOTISONS.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, MOTISONS.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while MOTISONS.NS trades at ₹11.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas MOTISONS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MOTISONS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to MOTISONS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check MOTISONS.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs RGL.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, RGL.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while RGL.NS trades at ₹103.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas RGL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RGL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to RGL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check RGL.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs RGL.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, RGL.BO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while RGL.BO trades at ₹103.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas RGL.BO's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RGL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to RGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check RGL.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs MVGJL.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, MVGJL.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while MVGJL.NS trades at ₹156.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas MVGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 6.64. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MVGJL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to MVGJL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check MVGJL.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs MVGJL.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, MVGJL.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while MVGJL.BO trades at ₹155.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas MVGJL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MVGJL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to MVGJL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check MVGJL.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs RADHIKAJWE.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while RADHIKAJWE.BO trades at ₹56.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas RADHIKAJWE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check RADHIKAJWE.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs RADHIKAJWE.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while RADHIKAJWE.NS trades at ₹56.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas RADHIKAJWE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check RADHIKAJWE.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs RBZJEWEL.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, RBZJEWEL.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while RBZJEWEL.NS trades at ₹125.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas RBZJEWEL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RBZJEWEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to RBZJEWEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check RBZJEWEL.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs LGHL.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, LGHL.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while LGHL.NS trades at ₹234.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas LGHL.NS's P/E ratio is -838.21. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LGHL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to LGHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check LGHL.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs SILGO.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, SILGO.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while SILGO.NS trades at ₹82.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas SILGO.NS's P/E ratio is 32.76. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SILGO.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to SILGO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check SILGO.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs MOKSH.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, MOKSH.NS has a market cap of 979.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while MOKSH.NS trades at ₹11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas MOKSH.NS's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MOKSH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to MOKSH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check MOKSH.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs EFORU.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, EFORU.BO has a market cap of 497M. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while EFORU.BO trades at ₹83.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas EFORU.BO's P/E ratio is 57.33. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EFORU.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to EFORU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check EFORU.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs RRETAIL.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, RRETAIL.BO has a market cap of 424.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while RRETAIL.BO trades at ₹2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas RRETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 90.33. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RRETAIL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to RRETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check RRETAIL.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs KANANIIND.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, KANANIIND.BO has a market cap of 306.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while KANANIIND.BO trades at ₹1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas KANANIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KANANIIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to KANANIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check KANANIIND.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs KANANIIND.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, KANANIIND.NS has a market cap of 304.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while KANANIIND.NS trades at ₹1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas KANANIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to KANANIIND.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to KANANIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check KANANIIND.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs ZODJRDMKJ.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, ZODJRDMKJ.NS has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while ZODJRDMKJ.NS trades at ₹31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas ZODJRDMKJ.NS's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check ZODJRDMKJ.NS's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs LYPSAGEMS.BO Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.BO has a market cap of 151.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while LYPSAGEMS.BO trades at ₹5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas LYPSAGEMS.BO's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is more volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check LYPSAGEMS.BO's competition here
GOENKA.NS vs LYPSAGEMS.NS Comparison June 2026
GOENKA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GOENKA.NS stands at 259.9M. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.NS has a market cap of 150.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GOENKA.NS is priced at ₹0.82, while LYPSAGEMS.NS trades at ₹5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GOENKA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of -27.33, whereas LYPSAGEMS.NS's P/E ratio is -1.08. In terms of profitability, GOENKA.NS's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GOENKA.NS is less volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GOENKA.NS.Check LYPSAGEMS.NS's competition here