Manoj Vaibhav Gems 'N' Jewellers Limited (MVGJL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MVGJL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MVGJL.NS | ₹146.20 | +1.59% | 7.1B | 6.21 | ₹23.54 | N/A |
| TITAN.BO | ₹4,187.05 | +4.03% | 3.7T | 89.58 | ₹46.74 | +0.26% |
| TITAN.NS | ₹4,184.00 | +3.95% | 3.7T | 73.33 | ₹57.06 | +0.26% |
| KALYANKJIL.NS | ₹344.75 | +4.22% | 356B | 26.38 | ₹13.07 | +0.44% |
| KALYANKJIL.BO | ₹344.65 | +4.16% | 355.9B | 26.45 | ₹13.03 | +0.44% |
| THANGAMAYL.NS | ₹5,478.70 | +1.17% | 170.3B | 48.38 | ₹113.24 | +0.23% |
| THANGAMAYL.BO | ₹5,474.40 | +1.17% | 170.3B | 48.37 | ₹113.17 | +0.23% |
| BLUESTONE.NS | ₹520.50 | +1.01% | 79.3B | 505.34 | ₹1.03 | N/A |
| SKYGOLD.NS | ₹508.95 | +3.71% | 78.8B | 28.21 | ₹18.04 | N/A |
| SKYGOLD.BO | ₹509.25 | +3.61% | 78.7B | 28.23 | ₹18.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MVGJL.NS vs TITAN.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, TITAN.BO has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while TITAN.BO trades at ₹4,187.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas TITAN.BO's P/E ratio is 89.58. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TITAN.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to TITAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check TITAN.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs TITAN.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, TITAN.NS has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while TITAN.NS trades at ₹4,184.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas TITAN.NS's P/E ratio is 73.33. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TITAN.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to TITAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check TITAN.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs KALYANKJIL.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.NS has a market cap of 356B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while KALYANKJIL.NS trades at ₹344.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas KALYANKJIL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.38. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KALYANKJIL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check KALYANKJIL.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs KALYANKJIL.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, KALYANKJIL.BO has a market cap of 355.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while KALYANKJIL.BO trades at ₹344.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas KALYANKJIL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KALYANKJIL.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to KALYANKJIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check KALYANKJIL.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs THANGAMAYL.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.NS has a market cap of 170.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while THANGAMAYL.NS trades at ₹5,478.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas THANGAMAYL.NS's P/E ratio is 48.38. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THANGAMAYL.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check THANGAMAYL.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs THANGAMAYL.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, THANGAMAYL.BO has a market cap of 170.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while THANGAMAYL.BO trades at ₹5,474.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas THANGAMAYL.BO's P/E ratio is 48.37. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THANGAMAYL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to THANGAMAYL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check THANGAMAYL.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs BLUESTONE.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, BLUESTONE.NS has a market cap of 79.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while BLUESTONE.NS trades at ₹520.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas BLUESTONE.NS's P/E ratio is 505.34. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLUESTONE.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTONE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check BLUESTONE.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs SKYGOLD.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SKYGOLD.NS has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while SKYGOLD.NS trades at ₹508.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas SKYGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 28.21. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKYGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to SKYGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check SKYGOLD.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs SKYGOLD.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SKYGOLD.BO has a market cap of 78.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while SKYGOLD.BO trades at ₹509.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas SKYGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKYGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to SKYGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check SKYGOLD.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs PNGJL.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PNGJL.NS has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while PNGJL.NS trades at ₹547.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas PNGJL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNGJL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to PNGJL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check PNGJL.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs ETHOSLTD.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.NS has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while ETHOSLTD.NS trades at ₹2,391.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas ETHOSLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 65.85. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ETHOSLTD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check ETHOSLTD.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs PCJEWELLER.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.BO has a market cap of 63.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while PCJEWELLER.BO trades at ₹8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas PCJEWELLER.BO's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PCJEWELLER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check PCJEWELLER.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs PCJEWELLER.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, PCJEWELLER.NS has a market cap of 63.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while PCJEWELLER.NS trades at ₹8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas PCJEWELLER.NS's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PCJEWELLER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to PCJEWELLER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check PCJEWELLER.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs ETHOSLTD.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ETHOSLTD.BO has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while ETHOSLTD.BO trades at ₹2,376.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas ETHOSLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 65.57. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ETHOSLTD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to ETHOSLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check ETHOSLTD.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs SENCO.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SENCO.NS has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while SENCO.NS trades at ₹338.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas SENCO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SENCO.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to SENCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check SENCO.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs SENCO.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SENCO.BO has a market cap of 55.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while SENCO.BO trades at ₹338.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas SENCO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SENCO.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to SENCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check SENCO.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs GOLDIAM.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, GOLDIAM.NS has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while GOLDIAM.NS trades at ₹478.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas GOLDIAM.NS's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOLDIAM.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check GOLDIAM.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs GOLDIAM.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, GOLDIAM.BO has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while GOLDIAM.BO trades at ₹479.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas GOLDIAM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOLDIAM.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is less volatile compared to GOLDIAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check GOLDIAM.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs VAIBHAVGBL.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.NS has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while VAIBHAVGBL.NS trades at ₹230.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check VAIBHAVGBL.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs VAIBHAVGBL.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, VAIBHAVGBL.BO has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while VAIBHAVGBL.BO trades at ₹230.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas VAIBHAVGBL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to VAIBHAVGBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check VAIBHAVGBL.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs KDDL.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, KDDL.BO has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while KDDL.BO trades at ₹2,879.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas KDDL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.21. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KDDL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to KDDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check KDDL.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs KDDL.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, KDDL.NS has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while KDDL.NS trades at ₹2,869.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas KDDL.NS's P/E ratio is 40.01. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KDDL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to KDDL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check KDDL.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs RAJESHEXPO.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.BO has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while RAJESHEXPO.BO trades at ₹77.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas RAJESHEXPO.BO's P/E ratio is 20.22. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check RAJESHEXPO.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs RAJESHEXPO.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, RAJESHEXPO.NS has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while RAJESHEXPO.NS trades at ₹76.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas RAJESHEXPO.NS's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to RAJESHEXPO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check RAJESHEXPO.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs DPABHUSHAN.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, DPABHUSHAN.NS has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while DPABHUSHAN.NS trades at ₹897.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas DPABHUSHAN.NS's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to DPABHUSHAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check DPABHUSHAN.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs BRIGHOTEL.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, BRIGHOTEL.BO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while BRIGHOTEL.BO trades at ₹62.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas BRIGHOTEL.BO's P/E ratio is 36.99. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to BRIGHOTEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check BRIGHOTEL.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs AAYUSHBULL.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, AAYUSHBULL.BO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while AAYUSHBULL.BO trades at ₹1,184.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas AAYUSHBULL.BO's P/E ratio is 228.23. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to AAYUSHBULL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check AAYUSHBULL.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs SHANTIGOLD.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.BO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while SHANTIGOLD.BO trades at ₹225.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas SHANTIGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check SHANTIGOLD.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs SHANTIGOLD.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SHANTIGOLD.NS has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while SHANTIGOLD.NS trades at ₹225.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas SHANTIGOLD.NS's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGOLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check SHANTIGOLD.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs MOTISONS.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MOTISONS.NS has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while MOTISONS.NS trades at ₹14.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas MOTISONS.NS's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOTISONS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is less volatile compared to MOTISONS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check MOTISONS.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs TBZ.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, TBZ.BO has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while TBZ.BO trades at ₹183.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas TBZ.BO's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TBZ.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is less volatile compared to TBZ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check TBZ.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs TBZ.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, TBZ.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while TBZ.NS trades at ₹183.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas TBZ.NS's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TBZ.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is less volatile compared to TBZ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check TBZ.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs RGL.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, RGL.BO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while RGL.BO trades at ₹105.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas RGL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.90. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RGL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to RGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check RGL.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs RGL.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, RGL.NS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while RGL.NS trades at ₹104.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas RGL.NS's P/E ratio is 45.70. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RGL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to RGL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check RGL.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs OPAL.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, OPAL.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while OPAL.NS trades at ₹43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas OPAL.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OPAL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MVGJL.NS has daily volatility of 7.04 and OPAL.NS has daily volatility of N/A.Check OPAL.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs MVGJL.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MVGJL.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while MVGJL.BO trades at ₹146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas MVGJL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MVGJL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to MVGJL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check MVGJL.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs RADHIKAJWE.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while RADHIKAJWE.BO trades at ₹56.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas RADHIKAJWE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.93. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check RADHIKAJWE.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs RADHIKAJWE.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, RADHIKAJWE.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while RADHIKAJWE.NS trades at ₹56.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas RADHIKAJWE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to RADHIKAJWE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check RADHIKAJWE.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs RBZJEWEL.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, RBZJEWEL.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while RBZJEWEL.NS trades at ₹134.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas RBZJEWEL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.24. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RBZJEWEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to RBZJEWEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check RBZJEWEL.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs LGHL.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, LGHL.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while LGHL.NS trades at ₹226.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas LGHL.NS's P/E ratio is -755.40. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LGHL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to LGHL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check LGHL.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs SILGO.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, SILGO.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while SILGO.NS trades at ₹75.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas SILGO.NS's P/E ratio is 30.91. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SILGO.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to SILGO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check SILGO.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs MOKSH.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, MOKSH.NS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while MOKSH.NS trades at ₹12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas MOKSH.NS's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOKSH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to MOKSH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check MOKSH.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs EFORU.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, EFORU.BO has a market cap of 597.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while EFORU.BO trades at ₹100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas EFORU.BO's P/E ratio is 68.97. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EFORU.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is less volatile compared to EFORU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check EFORU.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs RRETAIL.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, RRETAIL.BO has a market cap of 417M. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while RRETAIL.BO trades at ₹2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas RRETAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 88.67. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RRETAIL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to RRETAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check RRETAIL.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs KANANIIND.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, KANANIIND.BO has a market cap of 314.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while KANANIIND.BO trades at ₹1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas KANANIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KANANIIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to KANANIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check KANANIIND.BO's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs KANANIIND.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, KANANIIND.NS has a market cap of 308.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while KANANIIND.NS trades at ₹1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas KANANIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KANANIIND.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to KANANIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check KANANIIND.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs GOENKA.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, GOENKA.NS has a market cap of 259.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while GOENKA.NS trades at ₹0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas GOENKA.NS's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOENKA.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to GOENKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check GOENKA.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs ZODJRDMKJ.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, ZODJRDMKJ.NS has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while ZODJRDMKJ.NS trades at ₹31.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas ZODJRDMKJ.NS's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to ZODJRDMKJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check ZODJRDMKJ.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs LYPSAGEMS.NS Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.NS has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while LYPSAGEMS.NS trades at ₹4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas LYPSAGEMS.NS's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check LYPSAGEMS.NS's competition here
MVGJL.NS vs LYPSAGEMS.BO Comparison June 2026
MVGJL.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MVGJL.NS stands at 7.1B. In comparison, LYPSAGEMS.BO has a market cap of 142.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MVGJL.NS is priced at ₹146.20, while LYPSAGEMS.BO trades at ₹4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MVGJL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.21, whereas LYPSAGEMS.BO's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, MVGJL.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MVGJL.NS is more volatile compared to LYPSAGEMS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVGJL.NS.Check LYPSAGEMS.BO's competition here