Resolute Forest Products Inc.
Resolute Forest Products Inc. (RFP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RFP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFP | $21.92 | -0.36% | 1.7B | 18.96 | $1.16 | N/A |
| SUZ | $9.88 | -1.25% | 12.5B | 4.90 | $2.06 | +1.81% |
| UFPI | $90.89 | -1.34% | 5.2B | 18.23 | $5.00 | +1.54% |
| LPX | $70.87 | -2.58% | 5.1B | 35.47 | $2.05 | +1.56% |
| WFG | $64.59 | -1.07% | 5B | -5.41 | -$12.08 | +1.95% |
| SLVM | $42.15 | -0.22% | 1.7B | 13.19 | $3.24 | +4.24% |
| SWM | $23.41 | -6.21% | 1.3B | 10.79 | $2.17 | +7.52% |
| MATV | $8.57 | -1.49% | 476.6M | -1.41 | -$6.19 | +4.55% |
| CLW | $14.65 | +1.88% | 234.3M | -4.45 | -$3.28 | N/A |
| MERC | $1.40 | -1.41% | 92.4M | -0.19 | -$7.44 | +5.38% |
Stock Comparison
RFP vs SUZ Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SUZ has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while SUZ trades at $9.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas SUZ's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SUZ's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is less volatile compared to SUZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check SUZ's competition here
RFP vs UFPI Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UFPI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while UFPI trades at $90.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas UFPI's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UFPI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is less volatile compared to UFPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check UFPI's competition here
RFP vs LPX Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, LPX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while LPX trades at $70.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas LPX's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LPX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is less volatile compared to LPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check LPX's competition here
RFP vs WFG Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WFG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while WFG trades at $64.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas WFG's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WFG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is less volatile compared to WFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check WFG's competition here
RFP vs SLVM Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SLVM has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while SLVM trades at $42.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas SLVM's P/E ratio is 13.19. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SLVM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is less volatile compared to SLVM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check SLVM's competition here
RFP vs SWM Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SWM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while SWM trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas SWM's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SWM's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is less volatile compared to SWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check SWM's competition here
RFP vs MATV Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MATV has a market cap of 476.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while MATV trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas MATV's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MATV's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is less volatile compared to MATV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check MATV's competition here
RFP vs CLW Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CLW has a market cap of 234.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while CLW trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas CLW's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is less volatile compared to CLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check CLW's competition here
RFP vs MERC Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MERC has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while MERC trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas MERC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MERC's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is less volatile compared to MERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check MERC's competition here
RFP vs GLT Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GLT has a market cap of 73.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while GLT trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas GLT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GLT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is more volatile compared to GLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check GLT's competition here
RFP vs EVA Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EVA has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while EVA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas EVA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EVA's ROE of -6.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is less volatile compared to EVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check EVA's competition here
RFP vs JCTCF Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JCTCF has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while JCTCF trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas JCTCF's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JCTCF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is more volatile compared to JCTCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check JCTCF's competition here
RFP vs NWGL Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, NWGL has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while NWGL trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas NWGL's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NWGL's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is less volatile compared to NWGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check NWGL's competition here
RFP vs JCTC Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, JCTC has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while JCTC trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas JCTC's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JCTC's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is less volatile compared to JCTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check JCTC's competition here
RFP vs ITP Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ITP has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while ITP trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas ITP's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ITP's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is less volatile compared to ITP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check ITP's competition here
RFP vs DEL Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, DEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while DEL trades at $93.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas DEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DEL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is less volatile compared to DEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check DEL's competition here
RFP vs VRS Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, VRS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while VRS trades at $26.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas VRS's P/E ratio is -278.25. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is more volatile compared to VRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check VRS's competition here
RFP vs KS Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, KS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while KS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas KS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is more volatile compared to KS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check KS's competition here
RFP vs AEPI Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AEPI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while AEPI trades at $109.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas AEPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AEPI's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is more volatile compared to AEPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check AEPI's competition here
RFP vs UFS Comparison April 2026
RFP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RFP stands at 1.7B. In comparison, UFS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RFP is priced at $21.92, while UFS trades at $55.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RFP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.96, whereas UFS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RFP's ROE is +0.24%, compared to UFS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, RFP is more volatile compared to UFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RFP.Check UFS's competition here