Rajgor Castor Derivatives Ltd.
Rajgor Castor Derivatives Ltd. (RCDL.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RCDL.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCDL.NS | ₹24.00 | -5.14% | 605.1M | 6.78 | ₹3.73 | N/A |
| COROMANDEL.NS | ₹2,031.10 | -0.43% | 590.6B | 24.68 | ₹81.19 | +0.90% |
| COROMANDEL.BO | ₹2,031.50 | -0.34% | 587.8B | 24.58 | ₹81.13 | +0.90% |
| FACT.BO | ₹907.30 | -1.60% | 576.2B | 1935.76 | ₹0.46 | +0.04% |
| FACT.NS | ₹907.40 | -1.54% | 575.8B | 1934.57 | ₹0.46 | +0.04% |
| UPL.NS | ₹639.50 | -0.40% | 533B | 30.15 | ₹20.94 | +0.95% |
| PIIND.BO | ₹3,088.45 | +0.66% | 467.3B | 32.17 | ₹95.76 | +0.49% |
| PIIND.NS | ₹3,083.60 | +0.46% | 466.5B | 32.14 | ₹95.69 | +0.49% |
| SUMICHEM.NS | ₹444.80 | -0.63% | 217B | 40.82 | ₹10.65 | +0.28% |
| SUMICHEM.BO | ₹443.90 | -0.67% | 216.6B | 40.74 | ₹10.65 | +0.28% |
Stock Comparison
RCDL.NS vs COROMANDEL.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, COROMANDEL.NS has a market cap of 590.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while COROMANDEL.NS trades at ₹2,031.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas COROMANDEL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to COROMANDEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to COROMANDEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check COROMANDEL.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs COROMANDEL.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, COROMANDEL.BO has a market cap of 587.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while COROMANDEL.BO trades at ₹2,031.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas COROMANDEL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to COROMANDEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to COROMANDEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check COROMANDEL.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs FACT.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, FACT.BO has a market cap of 576.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while FACT.BO trades at ₹907.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas FACT.BO's P/E ratio is 1935.76. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to FACT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to FACT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check FACT.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs FACT.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, FACT.NS has a market cap of 575.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while FACT.NS trades at ₹907.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas FACT.NS's P/E ratio is 1934.57. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to FACT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to FACT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check FACT.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs UPL.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, UPL.NS has a market cap of 533B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while UPL.NS trades at ₹639.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas UPL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to UPL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to UPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check UPL.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs PIIND.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, PIIND.BO has a market cap of 467.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while PIIND.BO trades at ₹3,088.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas PIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PIIND.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to PIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check PIIND.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs PIIND.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, PIIND.NS has a market cap of 466.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while PIIND.NS trades at ₹3,083.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas PIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PIIND.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to PIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check PIIND.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs SUMICHEM.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, SUMICHEM.NS has a market cap of 217B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while SUMICHEM.NS trades at ₹444.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SUMICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 40.82. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SUMICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to SUMICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check SUMICHEM.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs SUMICHEM.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, SUMICHEM.BO has a market cap of 216.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while SUMICHEM.BO trades at ₹443.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SUMICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 40.74. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SUMICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to SUMICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check SUMICHEM.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs BAYERCROP.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, BAYERCROP.NS has a market cap of 209.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while BAYERCROP.NS trades at ₹4,676.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas BAYERCROP.NS's P/E ratio is 31.26. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BAYERCROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to BAYERCROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check BAYERCROP.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs ATUL7.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, ATUL7.BO has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while ATUL7.BO trades at ₹7,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas ATUL7.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ATUL7.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to ATUL7.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check ATUL7.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs CHAMBLFERT.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.NS has a market cap of 176.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while CHAMBLFERT.NS trades at ₹445.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas CHAMBLFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs CHAMBLFERT.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.BO has a market cap of 176.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while CHAMBLFERT.BO trades at ₹446.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas CHAMBLFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs EIDPARRY.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, EIDPARRY.BO has a market cap of 149.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while EIDPARRY.BO trades at ₹853.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas EIDPARRY.BO's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EIDPARRY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to EIDPARRY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check EIDPARRY.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs PARADEEP.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, PARADEEP.NS has a market cap of 109.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while PARADEEP.NS trades at ₹135.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas PARADEEP.NS's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PARADEEP.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check PARADEEP.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs PARADEEP.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, PARADEEP.BO has a market cap of 109.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while PARADEEP.BO trades at ₹136.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas PARADEEP.BO's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PARADEEP.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to PARADEEP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check PARADEEP.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs SHARDACROP.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, SHARDACROP.BO has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while SHARDACROP.BO trades at ₹1,124.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SHARDACROP.BO's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHARDACROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDACROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check SHARDACROP.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs SHARDACROP.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, SHARDACROP.NS has a market cap of 100.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while SHARDACROP.NS trades at ₹1,124.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SHARDACROP.NS's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHARDACROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDACROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check SHARDACROP.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs RCF.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, RCF.BO has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while RCF.BO trades at ₹130.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas RCF.BO's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RCF.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to RCF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check RCF.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs RCF.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, RCF.NS has a market cap of 70.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while RCF.NS trades at ₹130.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas RCF.NS's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RCF.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to RCF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check RCF.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs GSFC.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, GSFC.BO has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while GSFC.BO trades at ₹174.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas GSFC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GSFC.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to GSFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check GSFC.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs GSFC.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, GSFC.NS has a market cap of 68.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while GSFC.NS trades at ₹174.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas GSFC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GSFC.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to GSFC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check GSFC.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs PICCADIL.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, PICCADIL.BO has a market cap of 61.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while PICCADIL.BO trades at ₹657.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas PICCADIL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.53. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to PICCADIL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to PICCADIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check PICCADIL.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs RALLIS.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, RALLIS.NS has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while RALLIS.NS trades at ₹261.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas RALLIS.NS's P/E ratio is 29.86. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RALLIS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to RALLIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check RALLIS.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs RALLIS.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, RALLIS.BO has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while RALLIS.BO trades at ₹261.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas RALLIS.BO's P/E ratio is 29.89. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RALLIS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to RALLIS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check RALLIS.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs KSCL.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, KSCL.BO has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while KSCL.BO trades at ₹927.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas KSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KSCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to KSCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check KSCL.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs DHANUKA.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, DHANUKA.NS has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while DHANUKA.NS trades at ₹1,071.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas DHANUKA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DHANUKA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to DHANUKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check DHANUKA.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs DHANUKA.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, DHANUKA.BO has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while DHANUKA.BO trades at ₹1,069.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas DHANUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DHANUKA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to DHANUKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check DHANUKA.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs MBAPL.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, MBAPL.NS has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while MBAPL.NS trades at ₹519.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas MBAPL.NS's P/E ratio is 42.44. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MBAPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to MBAPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check MBAPL.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs KRISHANA.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, KRISHANA.NS has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while KRISHANA.NS trades at ₹686.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas KRISHANA.NS's P/E ratio is 30.51. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KRISHANA.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to KRISHANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check KRISHANA.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs CIANAGRO.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, CIANAGRO.BO has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while CIANAGRO.BO trades at ₹1,407.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas CIANAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 33.41. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to CIANAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to CIANAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check CIANAGRO.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs NFL.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, NFL.BO has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while NFL.BO trades at ₹77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas NFL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NFL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to NFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check NFL.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs NFL.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, NFL.NS has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while NFL.NS trades at ₹76.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas NFL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NFL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to NFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check NFL.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs MANGCHEFER.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while MANGCHEFER.NS trades at ₹308.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas MANGCHEFER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MANGCHEFER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs MANGCHEFER.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while MANGCHEFER.BO trades at ₹308.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas MANGCHEFER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MANGCHEFER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs BNHOLDINGS.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, BNHOLDINGS.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while BNHOLDINGS.BO trades at ₹355.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas BNHOLDINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check BNHOLDINGS.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs BHAGCHEM.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.NS has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while BHAGCHEM.NS trades at ₹272.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas BHAGCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 254.21. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BHAGCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs BHAGCHEM.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.BO has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while BHAGCHEM.BO trades at ₹272.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas BHAGCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 256.29. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BHAGCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs NACLIND.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, NACLIND.NS has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while NACLIND.NS trades at ₹156.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas NACLIND.NS's P/E ratio is -75.96. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NACLIND.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to NACLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check NACLIND.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs NACLIND.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, NACLIND.BO has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while NACLIND.BO trades at ₹156.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas NACLIND.BO's P/E ratio is -75.79. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NACLIND.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to NACLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check NACLIND.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs VENKYS.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, VENKYS.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while VENKYS.BO trades at ₹1,714.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas VENKYS.BO's P/E ratio is -57.49. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VENKYS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to VENKYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check VENKYS.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs KSE.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, KSE.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while KSE.NS trades at ₹697.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas KSE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KSE.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS and KSE.NS have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KSE.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs INSECTICID.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, INSECTICID.NS has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while INSECTICID.NS trades at ₹696.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas INSECTICID.NS's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INSECTICID.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to INSECTICID.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check INSECTICID.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs INSECTICID.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, INSECTICID.BO has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while INSECTICID.BO trades at ₹695.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas INSECTICID.BO's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INSECTICID.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to INSECTICID.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check INSECTICID.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs IPL.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, IPL.BO has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while IPL.BO trades at ₹150.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas IPL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to IPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to IPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check IPL.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs IPL.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, IPL.NS has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while IPL.NS trades at ₹150.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas IPL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to IPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to IPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check IPL.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs ASTEC.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, ASTEC.BO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while ASTEC.BO trades at ₹749.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas ASTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -17.09. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASTEC.BO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to ASTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check ASTEC.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs ASTEC.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, ASTEC.NS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while ASTEC.NS trades at ₹749.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas ASTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -17.04. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ASTEC.NS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to ASTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check ASTEC.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs SPIC.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, SPIC.NS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while SPIC.NS trades at ₹70.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SPIC.NS's P/E ratio is 6.97. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SPIC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to SPIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check SPIC.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs SPIC.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, SPIC.BO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while SPIC.BO trades at ₹71.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SPIC.BO's P/E ratio is 7.55. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SPIC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to SPIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check SPIC.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs MOL.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, MOL.NS has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while MOL.NS trades at ₹52.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas MOL.NS's P/E ratio is 33.03. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MOL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to MOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check MOL.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs MOL.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, MOL.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while MOL.BO trades at ₹52.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas MOL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.02. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MOL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to MOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check MOL.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs BHARATRAS.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, BHARATRAS.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while BHARATRAS.BO trades at ₹1,396.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas BHARATRAS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BHARATRAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATRAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check BHARATRAS.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs BHARATRAS.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, BHARATRAS.NS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while BHARATRAS.NS trades at ₹1,394.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas BHARATRAS.NS's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BHARATRAS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATRAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check BHARATRAS.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs MADRASFERT.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, MADRASFERT.NS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while MADRASFERT.NS trades at ₹68.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas MADRASFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 149.80. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MADRASFERT.NS's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to MADRASFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check MADRASFERT.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs MADRASFERT.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, MADRASFERT.BO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while MADRASFERT.BO trades at ₹68.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas MADRASFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 149.33. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MADRASFERT.BO's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to MADRASFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check MADRASFERT.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs BSHSL.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, BSHSL.NS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while BSHSL.NS trades at ₹100.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas BSHSL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.10. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BSHSL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to BSHSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check BSHSL.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs ZUARI.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, ZUARI.NS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while ZUARI.NS trades at ₹248.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas ZUARI.NS's P/E ratio is 1.07. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ZUARI.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to ZUARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check ZUARI.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs BAJAJST.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, BAJAJST.BO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while BAJAJST.BO trades at ₹460.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas BAJAJST.BO's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BAJAJST.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check BAJAJST.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs BLUECLOUDS.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, BLUECLOUDS.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while BLUECLOUDS.BO trades at ₹19.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas BLUECLOUDS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check BLUECLOUDS.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs DHARMAJ.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, DHARMAJ.NS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while DHARMAJ.NS trades at ₹256.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas DHARMAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DHARMAJ.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to DHARMAJ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check DHARMAJ.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs DHARMAJ.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, DHARMAJ.BO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while DHARMAJ.BO trades at ₹258.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas DHARMAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to DHARMAJ.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to DHARMAJ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check DHARMAJ.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs HERANBA.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, HERANBA.BO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while HERANBA.BO trades at ₹228.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas HERANBA.BO's P/E ratio is -14.16. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HERANBA.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to HERANBA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check HERANBA.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs HERANBA.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, HERANBA.NS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while HERANBA.NS trades at ₹228.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas HERANBA.NS's P/E ratio is -14.15. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HERANBA.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to HERANBA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check HERANBA.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs KSE.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, KSE.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while KSE.BO trades at ₹206.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas KSE.BO's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KSE.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to KSE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check KSE.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs BESTAGRO.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, BESTAGRO.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while BESTAGRO.NS trades at ₹17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas BESTAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BESTAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check BESTAGRO.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs BESTAGRO.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, BESTAGRO.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while BESTAGRO.BO trades at ₹17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas BESTAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BESTAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check BESTAGRO.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs SHINDL.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, SHINDL.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while SHINDL.BO trades at ₹147.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SHINDL.BO's P/E ratio is 47.12. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHINDL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to SHINDL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check SHINDL.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs SVRL.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, SVRL.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while SVRL.BO trades at ₹240.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SVRL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SVRL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to SVRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check SVRL.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs KHAICHEM.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, KHAICHEM.BO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while KHAICHEM.BO trades at ₹53.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas KHAICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KHAICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check KHAICHEM.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs KHAICHEM.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, KHAICHEM.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while KHAICHEM.NS trades at ₹53.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas KHAICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KHAICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check KHAICHEM.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs MISHTANN.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, MISHTANN.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while MISHTANN.BO trades at ₹4.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas MISHTANN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MISHTANN.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to MISHTANN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check MISHTANN.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs KNAGRI.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, KNAGRI.NS has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while KNAGRI.NS trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas KNAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KNAGRI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to KNAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check KNAGRI.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs MODINATUR.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, MODINATUR.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while MODINATUR.BO trades at ₹369.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas MODINATUR.BO's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MODINATUR.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to MODINATUR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check MODINATUR.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs ARIES.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, ARIES.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while ARIES.NS trades at ₹382.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas ARIES.NS's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to ARIES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to ARIES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check ARIES.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs RAMAPHO.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, RAMAPHO.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while RAMAPHO.BO trades at ₹136.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas RAMAPHO.BO's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RAMAPHO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check RAMAPHO.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs RAMAPHO.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, RAMAPHO.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while RAMAPHO.NS trades at ₹136.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas RAMAPHO.NS's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RAMAPHO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check RAMAPHO.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs SHIVALIK.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, SHIVALIK.NS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while SHIVALIK.NS trades at ₹267.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SHIVALIK.NS's P/E ratio is 35.88. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SHIVALIK.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to SHIVALIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check SHIVALIK.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs IGCL.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, IGCL.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while IGCL.NS trades at ₹62.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas IGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.15. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to IGCL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to IGCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check IGCL.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs GOODRICKE.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, GOODRICKE.BO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while GOODRICKE.BO trades at ₹170.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas GOODRICKE.BO's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to GOODRICKE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to GOODRICKE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check GOODRICKE.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs NATHBIOGEN.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while NATHBIOGEN.BO trades at ₹174.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas NATHBIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 7.49. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs NATHBIOGEN.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while NATHBIOGEN.NS trades at ₹173.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas NATHBIOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs KINGSINFR.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, KINGSINFR.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while KINGSINFR.BO trades at ₹123.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas KINGSINFR.BO's P/E ratio is 22.30. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to KINGSINFR.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to KINGSINFR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check KINGSINFR.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs NOVAAGRI.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, NOVAAGRI.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while NOVAAGRI.NS trades at ₹28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas NOVAAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NOVAAGRI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to NOVAAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check NOVAAGRI.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs RBS.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, RBS.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while RBS.NS trades at ₹105.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas RBS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to RBS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to RBS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check RBS.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs NAGAFERT.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, NAGAFERT.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while NAGAFERT.NS trades at ₹3.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas NAGAFERT.NS's P/E ratio is -8.51. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NAGAFERT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to NAGAFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check NAGAFERT.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs NAGAFERT.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, NAGAFERT.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while NAGAFERT.BO trades at ₹4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas NAGAFERT.BO's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to NAGAFERT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to NAGAFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check NAGAFERT.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs INDOUS.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, INDOUS.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while INDOUS.NS trades at ₹103.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas INDOUS.NS's P/E ratio is 13.87. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INDOUS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to INDOUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check INDOUS.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs INDOUS.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, INDOUS.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while INDOUS.BO trades at ₹103.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas INDOUS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INDOUS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to INDOUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check INDOUS.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs VIJSOLX.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, VIJSOLX.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while VIJSOLX.BO trades at ₹595.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas VIJSOLX.BO's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to VIJSOLX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to VIJSOLX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check VIJSOLX.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs HOACFOODS.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, HOACFOODS.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while HOACFOODS.NS trades at ₹399.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas HOACFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 59.97. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to HOACFOODS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to HOACFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check HOACFOODS.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs EQUIPPP.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, EQUIPPP.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while EQUIPPP.BO trades at ₹17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas EQUIPPP.BO's P/E ratio is 236.71. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EQUIPPP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check EQUIPPP.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs EQUIPPP.NS Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, EQUIPPP.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while EQUIPPP.NS trades at ₹17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas EQUIPPP.NS's P/E ratio is 235.57. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to EQUIPPP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check EQUIPPP.NS's competition here
RCDL.NS vs SSLEL.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, SSLEL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while SSLEL.BO trades at ₹288.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SSLEL.BO's P/E ratio is -6.41. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SSLEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to SSLEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check SSLEL.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs MSL.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, MSL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while MSL.BO trades at ₹127.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas MSL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to MSL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to MSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check MSL.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs BHARATAGRI.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, BHARATAGRI.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while BHARATAGRI.BO trades at ₹28.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas BHARATAGRI.BO's P/E ratio is -75.13. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to BHARATAGRI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATAGRI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check BHARATAGRI.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs SBECSUG.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, SBECSUG.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while SBECSUG.BO trades at ₹30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SBECSUG.BO's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SBECSUG.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to SBECSUG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check SBECSUG.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs INDSUCR.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, INDSUCR.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while INDSUCR.BO trades at ₹79.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas INDSUCR.BO's P/E ratio is 3.24. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to INDSUCR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to INDSUCR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check INDSUCR.BO's competition here
RCDL.NS vs SPTRSHI.BO Comparison April 2026
RCDL.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RCDL.NS stands at 605.1M. In comparison, SPTRSHI.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RCDL.NS is priced at ₹24.00, while SPTRSHI.BO trades at ₹38.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RCDL.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 6.78, whereas SPTRSHI.BO's P/E ratio is 42.62. In terms of profitability, RCDL.NS's ROE is N/A, compared to SPTRSHI.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RCDL.NS is less volatile compared to SPTRSHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RCDL.NS.Check SPTRSHI.BO's competition here