Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, GEHCV has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while GEHCV trades at $56.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas GEHCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GEHCV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to GEHCV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check GEHCV's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, BTSG has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while BTSG trades at $60.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas BTSG's P/E ratio is 41.41. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTSG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to BTSG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check BTSG's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, BTSGU has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while BTSGU trades at $197.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas BTSGU's P/E ratio is 136.08. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTSGU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to BTSGU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check BTSGU's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, TEM has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while TEM trades at $64.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas TEM's P/E ratio is -129.44. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TEM's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to TEM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check TEM's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, SGFY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while SGFY trades at $30.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas SGFY's P/E ratio is 70.91. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGFY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to SGFY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check SGFY's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, HNGE has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while HNGE trades at $99.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas HNGE's P/E ratio is 53.01. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HNGE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to HNGE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check HNGE's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, HQY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while HQY trades at $92.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas HQY's P/E ratio is 21.50. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HQY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to HQY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check HQY's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, RCM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while RCM trades at $14.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas RCM's P/E ratio is -102.21. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RCM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to RCM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check RCM's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, DOCS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while DOCS trades at $30.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas DOCS's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DOCS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to DOCS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check DOCS's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while WAY trades at $27.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check WAY's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, HTFL has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while HTFL trades at $48.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas HTFL's P/E ratio is -24.02. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HTFL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to HTFL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check HTFL's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, ONEM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while ONEM trades at $16.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas ONEM's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ONEM's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to ONEM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check ONEM's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, PRVA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while PRVA trades at $22.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas PRVA's P/E ratio is 107.24. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PRVA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to PRVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check PRVA's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, OMCL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while OMCL trades at $35.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas OMCL's P/E ratio is 18.53. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OMCL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to OMCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check OMCL's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, NXGN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while NXGN trades at $23.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas NXGN's P/E ratio is -266.00. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NXGN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to NXGN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check NXGN's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, CERT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while CERT trades at $9.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas CERT's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CERT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to CERT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check CERT's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, AGTI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while AGTI trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas AGTI's P/E ratio is -71.79. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AGTI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to AGTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check AGTI's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, GDRX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while GDRX trades at $3.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas GDRX's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GDRX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to GDRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check GDRX's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, OMDA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while OMDA trades at $17.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas OMDA's P/E ratio is 76.65. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OMDA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to OMDA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check OMDA's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, TDOC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while TDOC trades at $5.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas TDOC's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TDOC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to TDOC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check TDOC's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, HSTM has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while HSTM trades at $33.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas HSTM's P/E ratio is 46.01. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HSTM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to HSTM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check HSTM's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, CCLDO has a market cap of 857.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while CCLDO trades at $27.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas CCLDO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCLDO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to CCLDO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check CCLDO's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, MPLN-WT has a market cap of 625.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while MPLN-WT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas MPLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MPLN-WT's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to MPLN-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check MPLN-WT's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, ACCD has a market cap of 575.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while ACCD trades at $7.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas ACCD's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACCD's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to ACCD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check ACCD's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, SOPH has a market cap of 572.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while SOPH trades at $6.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas SOPH's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SOPH's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to SOPH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check SOPH's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, SHCR has a market cap of 531.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while SHCR trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas SHCR's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHCR's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to SHCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check SHCR's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, EVH has a market cap of 514.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while EVH trades at $4.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas EVH's P/E ratio is 35.19. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EVH's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to EVH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check EVH's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, NRC has a market cap of 445.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while NRC trades at $20.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas NRC's P/E ratio is 24.57. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NRC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to NRC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check NRC's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, SLGC has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while SLGC trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas SLGC's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLGC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to SLGC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check SLGC's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, SLGCW has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while SLGCW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas SLGCW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SLGCW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to SLGCW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check SLGCW's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, TBRG has a market cap of 393.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while TBRG trades at $26.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas TBRG's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TBRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to TBRG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check TBRG's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, MPLN has a market cap of 375M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while MPLN trades at $23.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas MPLN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MPLN's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to MPLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check MPLN's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, CTEV has a market cap of 374.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while CTEV trades at $22.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas CTEV's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTEV's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to CTEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check CTEV's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, CARL has a market cap of 367.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while CARL trades at $13.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas CARL's P/E ratio is -9.41. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CARL's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to CARL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check CARL's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, SY has a market cap of 296.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while SY trades at $2.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas SY's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to SY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check SY's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, TRHC has a market cap of 284M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while TRHC trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas TRHC's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRHC's ROE of +121.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to TRHC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check TRHC's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, SMFR has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while SMFR trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas SMFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMFR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to SMFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check SMFR's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, SPOK has a market cap of 221.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while SPOK trades at $10.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas SPOK's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SPOK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to SPOK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check SPOK's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, AMWL has a market cap of 197.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while AMWL trades at $11.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas AMWL's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMWL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to AMWL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check AMWL's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, OPRX has a market cap of 160.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while OPRX trades at $8.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas OPRX's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OPRX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to OPRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check OPRX's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, LFMDP has a market cap of 151.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while LFMDP trades at $22.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas LFMDP's P/E ratio is -685.21. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LFMDP's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to LFMDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check LFMDP's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, CPSI has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while CPSI trades at $9.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas CPSI's P/E ratio is -183.80. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CPSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to CPSI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check CPSI's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, HCAT has a market cap of 129.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while HCAT trades at $1.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas HCAT's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HCAT's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to HCAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check HCAT's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, AUGX has a market cap of 115.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while AUGX trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas AUGX's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUGX's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to AUGX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check AUGX's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, LFMD has a market cap of 112.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while LFMD trades at $2.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas LFMD's P/E ratio is -4.68. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LFMD's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to LFMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check LFMD's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, DH has a market cap of 108.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while DH trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas DH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DH's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to DH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check DH's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, CCLD has a market cap of 78.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while CCLD trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas CCLD's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCLD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to CCLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check CCLD's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, FORA has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while FORA trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas FORA's P/E ratio is -24.11. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FORA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to FORA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check FORA's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, CCLDP has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while CCLDP trades at $19.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas CCLDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CCLDP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to CCLDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check CCLDP's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, SNCE has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while SNCE trades at $5.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas SNCE's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SNCE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to SNCE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check SNCE's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, AKLI has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while AKLI trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas AKLI's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AKLI's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to AKLI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check AKLI's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, SHLT has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while SHLT trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas SHLT's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHLT's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to SHLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check SHLT's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, SHCRW has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while SHCRW trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas SHCRW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SHCRW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to SHCRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check SHCRW's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, ONMDW has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while ONMDW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas ONMDW's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ONMDW's ROE of +2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to ONMDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check ONMDW's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, ONMD has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while ONMD trades at $4.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas ONMD's P/E ratio is -28.19. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ONMD's ROE of +2.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to ONMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check ONMD's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, STRM has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while STRM trades at $5.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas STRM's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to STRM's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to STRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check STRM's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, RNLX has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while RNLX trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas RNLX's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RNLX's ROE of -6.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to RNLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check RNLX's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, LIFW has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while LIFW trades at $3.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas LIFW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIFW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to LIFW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check LIFW's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, WORX has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while WORX trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas WORX's P/E ratio is -1.57. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WORX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to WORX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check WORX's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, BBLN has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while BBLN trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas BBLN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BBLN's ROE of +4.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to BBLN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check BBLN's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, ETAO has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while ETAO trades at $1.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas ETAO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ETAO's ROE of -13.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to ETAO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check ETAO's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, BFRG has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while BFRG trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas BFRG's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BFRG's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to BFRG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check BFRG's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, MGRX has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while MGRX trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas MGRX's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MGRX's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to MGRX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check MGRX's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, HCTI has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while HCTI trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas HCTI's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HCTI's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to HCTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check HCTI's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, UPH has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while UPH trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas UPH's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UPH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to UPH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check UPH's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, UPH-WT has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while UPH-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas UPH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UPH-WT's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to UPH-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check UPH-WT's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, ACON has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while ACON trades at $1.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas ACON's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACON's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to ACON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check ACON's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, PEAR has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while PEAR trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas PEAR's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PEAR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to PEAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check PEAR's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, PEARW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while PEARW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas PEARW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PEARW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to PEARW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check PEARW's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, OTRK has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while OTRK trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas OTRK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OTRK's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to OTRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check OTRK's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, CMAX has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while CMAX trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas CMAX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMAX's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to CMAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check CMAX's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, BFRGW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while BFRGW trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas BFRGW's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BFRGW's ROE of -1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to BFRGW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check BFRGW's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, VSEE has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while VSEE trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas VSEE's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VSEE's ROE of -4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to VSEE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check VSEE's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, LIFWZ has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while LIFWZ trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas LIFWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIFWZ's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to LIFWZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check LIFWZ's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, VSEEW has a market cap of 560.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while VSEEW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas VSEEW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VSEEW's ROE of -4.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to VSEEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check VSEEW's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, MSPRZ has a market cap of 550.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while MSPRZ trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas MSPRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MSPRZ's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to MSPRZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check MSPRZ's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, KERNW has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while KERNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas KERNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KERNW's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to KERNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check KERNW's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, KERN has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while KERN trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas KERN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KERN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to KERN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check KERN's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, LIFWW has a market cap of 60.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while LIFWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas LIFWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIFWW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to LIFWW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check LIFWW's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, CMAXW has a market cap of 36.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while CMAXW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas CMAXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMAXW's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to CMAXW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check CMAXW's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, ZCMD has a market cap of 22.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while ZCMD trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas ZCMD's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ZCMD's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to ZCMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check ZCMD's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, ACONW has a market cap of 14.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while ACONW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas ACONW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ACONW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to ACONW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check ACONW's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, MTBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while MTBC trades at $3.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas MTBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTBC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to MTBC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check MTBC's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, CHNG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while CHNG trades at $27.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas CHNG's P/E ratio is -152.72. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHNG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to CHNG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check CHNG's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, NH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while NH trades at $1.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas NH's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NH's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to NH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check NH's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, MTBCO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while MTBCO trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas MTBCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTBCO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to MTBCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check MTBCO's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, NAVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while NAVA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas NAVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NAVA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is not fully comparable compared to NAVA. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check NAVA's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, CNVY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while CNVY trades at $10.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas CNVY's P/E ratio is -71.50. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNVY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to CNVY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check CNVY's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, CERN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while CERN trades at $94.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas CERN's P/E ratio is 55.84. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CERN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to CERN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check CERN's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, MTBCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while MTBCP trades at $26.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas MTBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MTBCP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to MTBCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check MTBCP's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, CSLT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while CSLT trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas CSLT's P/E ratio is -37.27. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CSLT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to CSLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check CSLT's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, CHNGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while CHNGU trades at $73.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas CHNGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHNGU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to CHNGU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check CHNGU's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, KURIU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while KURIU trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas KURIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KURIU's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to KURIU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check KURIU's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, IMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while IMS trades at $31.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas IMS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IMS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to IMS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check IMS's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, SMFRW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while SMFRW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas SMFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SMFRW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to SMFRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check SMFRW's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, AFFX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while AFFX trades at $14.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas AFFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AFFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is more volatile compared to AFFX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check AFFX's competition here

Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PHR stands at 678.7M. In comparison, MSPRV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PHR is priced at $10.94 on the NYSE, while MSPRV trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PHR currently has a P/E ratio of 39.05, whereas MSPRV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PHR's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MSPRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PHR is less volatile compared to MSPRV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PHR.Check MSPRV's competition here