Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See KERN's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Healthcare Information Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for KERN and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KERN | $0.31 | +36.94% | 162.3K | -0.01 | -$44.60 | N/A |
| VEEV | $194.98 | -1.21% | 31.7B | 23.46 | $8.33 | N/A |
| GEHC | $63.00 | -4.12% | 28.7B | 13.83 | $4.56 | +0.22% |
| GEHCV | $56.00 | -4.08% | 25.5B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| BTSG | $72.58 | +6.48% | 13.9B | 57.01 | $1.24 | N/A |
| BTSGU | $239.62 | +4.77% | 13.5B | 209.36 | $1.11 | N/A |
| TEM | $48.20 | -10.06% | 9.2B | -104.94 | -$0.50 | N/A |
| SGFY | $30.49 | +0.07% | 8.9B | 70.91 | $0.43 | N/A |
| HQY | $97.63 | +2.69% | 8.3B | 23.06 | $4.28 | N/A |
| HNGE | $86.74 | +0.88% | 6.7B | 44.66 | $1.95 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Veeva Systems Inc. (NYSE: VEEV)
KERN vs VEEV Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, VEEV has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while VEEV trades at $194.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VEEV's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to VEEV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to VEEV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check VEEV's competition here
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: GEHC)
KERN vs GEHC Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, GEHC has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while GEHC trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GEHC's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GEHC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to GEHC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check GEHC's competition here
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: GEHCV)
KERN vs GEHCV Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, GEHCV has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while GEHCV trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GEHCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GEHCV's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to GEHCV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check GEHCV's competition here
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: BTSG)
KERN vs BTSG Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, BTSG has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while BTSG trades at $72.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BTSG's P/E ratio is 57.01. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BTSG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to BTSG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check BTSG's competition here
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. Tangible Equity Unit (NASDAQ: BTSGU)
KERN vs BTSGU Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, BTSGU has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while BTSGU trades at $239.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BTSGU's P/E ratio is 209.36. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BTSGU's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to BTSGU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check BTSGU's competition here
Tempus AI, Inc. (NASDAQ: TEM)
KERN vs TEM Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, TEM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while TEM trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TEM's P/E ratio is -104.94. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TEM's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to TEM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check TEM's competition here
Signify Health, Inc. (NYSE: SGFY)
KERN vs SGFY Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, SGFY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while SGFY trades at $30.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SGFY's P/E ratio is 70.91. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SGFY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to SGFY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check SGFY's competition here
HealthEquity, Inc. (NASDAQ: HQY)
KERN vs HQY Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, HQY has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while HQY trades at $97.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HQY's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HQY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to HQY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check HQY's competition here
Hinge Health, Inc. (NYSE: HNGE)
KERN vs HNGE Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, HNGE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while HNGE trades at $86.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HNGE's P/E ratio is 44.66. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HNGE's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to HNGE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check HNGE's competition here
R1 RCM Inc. (NASDAQ: RCM)
KERN vs RCM Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, RCM has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while RCM trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RCM's P/E ratio is -102.21. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RCM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to RCM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check RCM's competition here
10x Genomics, Inc. (NASDAQ: TXG)
KERN vs TXG Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, TXG has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while TXG trades at $43.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TXG's P/E ratio is -257.29. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TXG's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to TXG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check TXG's competition here
Doximity, Inc. (NYSE: DOCS)
KERN vs DOCS Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, DOCS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while DOCS trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DOCS's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DOCS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to DOCS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check DOCS's competition here
1Life Healthcare, Inc. (NASDAQ: ONEM)
KERN vs ONEM Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, ONEM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while ONEM trades at $16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ONEM's P/E ratio is -7.77. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ONEM's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to ONEM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check ONEM's competition here
Privia Health Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: PRVA)
KERN vs PRVA Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, PRVA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while PRVA trades at $26.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PRVA's P/E ratio is 168.13. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PRVA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to PRVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check PRVA's competition here
Progyny, Inc. (NASDAQ: PGNY)
KERN vs PGNY Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, PGNY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while PGNY trades at $32.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PGNY's P/E ratio is 23.31. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PGNY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to PGNY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check PGNY's competition here
Heartflow, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: HTFL)
KERN vs HTFL Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, HTFL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while HTFL trades at $24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HTFL's P/E ratio is -12.92. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HTFL's ROE of +8.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to HTFL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check HTFL's competition here
GeneDx Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: WGS)
KERN vs WGS Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, WGS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while WGS trades at $62.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WGS's P/E ratio is 74.68. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to WGS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to WGS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check WGS's competition here
Teladoc Health, Inc. (NYSE: TDOC)
KERN vs TDOC Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, TDOC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while TDOC trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TDOC's P/E ratio is -10.47. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TDOC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to TDOC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check TDOC's competition here
NextGen Healthcare, Inc. (NASDAQ: NXGN)
KERN vs NXGN Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, NXGN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while NXGN trades at $23.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NXGN's P/E ratio is -266.00. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NXGN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to NXGN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check NXGN's competition here
Omada Health (NASDAQ: OMDA)
KERN vs OMDA Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, OMDA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while OMDA trades at $23.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OMDA's P/E ratio is 338.57. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to OMDA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to OMDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check OMDA's competition here
Agiliti, Inc. (NYSE: AGTI)
KERN vs AGTI Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, AGTI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while AGTI trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AGTI's P/E ratio is -71.79. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AGTI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to AGTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check AGTI's competition here
GoodRx Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: GDRX)
KERN vs GDRX Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, GDRX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while GDRX trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas GDRX's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to GDRX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to GDRX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check GDRX's competition here
Certara, Inc. (NASDAQ: CERT)
KERN vs CERT Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, CERT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while CERT trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CERT's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CERT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to CERT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check CERT's competition here
CareCloud, Inc. (NASDAQ: CCLDO)
KERN vs CCLDO Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, CCLDO has a market cap of 857.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while CCLDO trades at $27.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CCLDO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CCLDO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to CCLDO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check CCLDO's competition here
HealthStream, Inc. (NASDAQ: HSTM)
KERN vs HSTM Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, HSTM has a market cap of 845.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while HSTM trades at $28.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HSTM's P/E ratio is 38.08. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HSTM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to HSTM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check HSTM's competition here
GeneDx Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: WGSWW)
KERN vs WGSWW Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, WGSWW has a market cap of 748M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while WGSWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WGSWW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to WGSWW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is less volatile compared to WGSWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check WGSWW's competition here
Phreesia, Inc. (NYSE: PHR)
KERN vs PHR Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, PHR has a market cap of 662M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while PHR trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PHR's P/E ratio is 38.25. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PHR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to PHR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check PHR's competition here
Evolent Health, Inc. (NYSE: EVH)
KERN vs EVH Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, EVH has a market cap of 652.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while EVH trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EVH's P/E ratio is 580.00. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to EVH's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to EVH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check EVH's competition here
MultiPlan Corporation (NYSE: MPLN-WT)
KERN vs MPLN-WT Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, MPLN-WT has a market cap of 625.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while MPLN-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MPLN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MPLN-WT's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is less volatile compared to MPLN-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check MPLN-WT's competition here
Accolade, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACCD)
KERN vs ACCD Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, ACCD has a market cap of 575.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while ACCD trades at $7.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ACCD's P/E ratio is -3.08. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ACCD's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to ACCD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check ACCD's competition here
Sharecare, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHCR)
KERN vs SHCR Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, SHCR has a market cap of 531.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while SHCR trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SHCR's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SHCR's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to SHCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check SHCR's competition here
Claritev Corporation (NYSE: CTEV)
KERN vs CTEV Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, CTEV has a market cap of 517.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while CTEV trades at $30.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CTEV's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CTEV's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to CTEV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check CTEV's competition here
NRC Health (NASDAQ: NRC)
KERN vs NRC Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, NRC has a market cap of 490.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while NRC trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NRC's P/E ratio is 26.56. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NRC's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to NRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check NRC's competition here
SOPHiA GENETICS S.A. (NASDAQ: SOPH)
KERN vs SOPH Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, SOPH has a market cap of 403.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while SOPH trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SOPH's P/E ratio is -11.29. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SOPH's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to SOPH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check SOPH's competition here
SomaLogic, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLGC)
KERN vs SLGC Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, SLGC has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while SLGC trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SLGC's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SLGC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to SLGC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check SLGC's competition here
SomaLogic, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLGCW)
KERN vs SLGCW Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, SLGCW has a market cap of 396.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while SLGCW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SLGCW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SLGCW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is less volatile compared to SLGCW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check SLGCW's competition here
TruBridge, Inc. (NASDAQ: TBRG)
KERN vs TBRG Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, TBRG has a market cap of 393.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while TBRG trades at $26.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TBRG's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TBRG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to TBRG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check TBRG's competition here
MultiPlan Corporation (NYSE: MPLN)
KERN vs MPLN Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, MPLN has a market cap of 375M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while MPLN trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MPLN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MPLN's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to MPLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check MPLN's competition here
Simulations Plus, Inc. (NASDAQ: SLP)
KERN vs SLP Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, SLP has a market cap of 368.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while SLP trades at $18.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SLP's P/E ratio is 20.72. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SLP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to SLP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check SLP's competition here
Tabula Rasa HealthCare, Inc. (NASDAQ: TRHC)
KERN vs TRHC Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, TRHC has a market cap of 284M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while TRHC trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TRHC's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to TRHC's ROE of +121.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to TRHC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check TRHC's competition here
Sema4 Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SMFR)
KERN vs SMFR Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, SMFR has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while SMFR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SMFR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SMFR's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is less volatile compared to SMFR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check SMFR's competition here
Spok Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SPOK)
KERN vs SPOK Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, SPOK has a market cap of 222.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while SPOK trades at $10.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SPOK's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SPOK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to SPOK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check SPOK's competition here
So-Young International Inc. (NASDAQ: SY)
KERN vs SY Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, SY has a market cap of 220.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while SY trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SY's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to SY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check SY's competition here
American Well Corporation (NYSE: AMWL)
KERN vs AMWL Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, AMWL has a market cap of 220.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while AMWL trades at $12.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AMWL's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AMWL's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to AMWL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check AMWL's competition here
Health Catalyst, Inc. (NASDAQ: HCAT)
KERN vs HCAT Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, HCAT has a market cap of 166.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while HCAT trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HCAT's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HCAT's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to HCAT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check HCAT's competition here
Computer Programs and Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CPSI)
KERN vs CPSI Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, CPSI has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while CPSI trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CPSI's P/E ratio is -183.80. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CPSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to CPSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check CPSI's competition here
OptimizeRx Corp. (NASDAQ: OPRX)
KERN vs OPRX Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, OPRX has a market cap of 125.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while OPRX trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OPRX's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to OPRX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to OPRX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check OPRX's competition here
Augmedix, Inc. (NASDAQ: AUGX)
KERN vs AUGX Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, AUGX has a market cap of 115.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while AUGX trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AUGX's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AUGX's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to AUGX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check AUGX's competition here
CareCloud, Inc. (NASDAQ: CCLD)
KERN vs CCLD Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, CCLD has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while CCLD trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CCLD's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CCLD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to CCLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check CCLD's competition here
Definitive Healthcare Corp. (NASDAQ: DH)
KERN vs DH Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, DH has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while DH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DH's P/E ratio is 2.92. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to DH's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to DH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check DH's competition here
Forian Inc. (NASDAQ: FORA)
KERN vs FORA Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, FORA has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while FORA trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FORA's P/E ratio is -24.11. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to FORA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to FORA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check FORA's competition here
CareCloud, Inc. (NASDAQ: CCLDP)
KERN vs CCLDP Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, CCLDP has a market cap of 59.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while CCLDP trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CCLDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CCLDP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to CCLDP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check CCLDP's competition here
OneMedNet Corporation (NASDAQ: ONMD)
KERN vs ONMD Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, ONMD has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while ONMD trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ONMD's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ONMD's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to ONMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check ONMD's competition here
Science 37 Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SNCE)
KERN vs SNCE Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, SNCE has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while SNCE trades at $5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SNCE's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SNCE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to SNCE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check SNCE's competition here
Akili, Inc. (NASDAQ: AKLI)
KERN vs AKLI Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, AKLI has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while AKLI trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AKLI's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AKLI's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to AKLI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check AKLI's competition here
SHL Telemedicine Ltd. (NASDAQ: SHLT)
KERN vs SHLT Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, SHLT has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while SHLT trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SHLT's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SHLT's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to SHLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check SHLT's competition here
Sharecare, Inc. (NASDAQ: SHCRW)
KERN vs SHCRW Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, SHCRW has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while SHCRW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SHCRW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SHCRW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to SHCRW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check SHCRW's competition here
OneMedNet Corporation (NASDAQ: ONMDW)
KERN vs ONMDW Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, ONMDW has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while ONMDW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ONMDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ONMDW's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to ONMDW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check ONMDW's competition here
Streamline Health Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: STRM)
KERN vs STRM Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, STRM has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while STRM trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas STRM's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to STRM's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to STRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check STRM's competition here
Renalytix Plc (NASDAQ: RNLX)
KERN vs RNLX Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, RNLX has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while RNLX trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas RNLX's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to RNLX's ROE of -6.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to RNLX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check RNLX's competition here
MSP Recovery, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIFW)
KERN vs LIFW Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, LIFW has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while LIFW trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LIFW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LIFW's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to LIFW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check LIFW's competition here
EUDA Health Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: EUDA)
KERN vs EUDA Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, EUDA has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while EUDA trades at $13.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EUDA's P/E ratio is -21.32. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to EUDA's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to EUDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check EUDA's competition here
Babylon Holdings Limited (NYSE: BBLN)
KERN vs BBLN Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, BBLN has a market cap of 14.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while BBLN trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BBLN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BBLN's ROE of +4.89%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to BBLN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check BBLN's competition here
HeartBeam, Inc. (NASDAQ: BEATW)
KERN vs BEATW Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, BEATW has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while BEATW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BEATW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BEATW's ROE of -10.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to BEATW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check BEATW's competition here
ETAO International Co., Ltd. (NASDAQ: ETAO)
KERN vs ETAO Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, ETAO has a market cap of 9.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while ETAO trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ETAO's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ETAO's ROE of -13.69%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is less volatile compared to ETAO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check ETAO's competition here
Bullfrog AI Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: BFRG)
KERN vs BFRG Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, BFRG has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while BFRG trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BFRG's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to BFRG's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to BFRG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check BFRG's competition here
Cue Health Inc. (NASDAQ: HLTH)
KERN vs HLTH Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, HLTH has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while HLTH trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HLTH's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HLTH's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is less volatile compared to HLTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check HLTH's competition here
Scienture Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCNX)
KERN vs SCNX Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, SCNX has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while SCNX trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SCNX's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SCNX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to SCNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check SCNX's competition here
UpHealth, Inc. (NYSE: UPH)
KERN vs UPH Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, UPH has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while UPH trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UPH's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to UPH's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to UPH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check UPH's competition here
UpHealth, Inc. (NYSE: UPH-WT)
KERN vs UPH-WT Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, UPH-WT has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while UPH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas UPH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to UPH-WT's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is less volatile compared to UPH-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check UPH-WT's competition here
Mangoceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: MGRX)
KERN vs MGRX Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, MGRX has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while MGRX trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MGRX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MGRX's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to MGRX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check MGRX's competition here
Pear Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: PEARW)
KERN vs PEARW Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, PEARW has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while PEARW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PEARW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PEARW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is less volatile compared to PEARW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check PEARW's competition here
Pear Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: PEAR)
KERN vs PEAR Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, PEAR has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while PEAR trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PEAR's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to PEAR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is less volatile compared to PEAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check PEAR's competition here
Ontrak, Inc. (NASDAQ: OTRK)
KERN vs OTRK Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, OTRK has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while OTRK trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas OTRK's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to OTRK's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to OTRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check OTRK's competition here
VSee Health, Inc. (NASDAQ: VSEEW)
KERN vs VSEEW Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, VSEEW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while VSEEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VSEEW's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to VSEEW's ROE of -115.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to VSEEW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check VSEEW's competition here
Healthcare Triangle, Inc. (NASDAQ: HCTI)
KERN vs HCTI Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, HCTI has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while HCTI trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas HCTI's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to HCTI's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to HCTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check HCTI's competition here
CareMax, Inc. (NASDAQ: CMAX)
KERN vs CMAX Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, CMAX has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while CMAX trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CMAX's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CMAX's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to CMAX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check CMAX's competition here
VSee Health, Inc. (NASDAQ: VSEE)
KERN vs VSEE Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, VSEE has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while VSEE trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VSEE's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to VSEE's ROE of -115.71%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to VSEE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check VSEE's competition here
Aclarion, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACON)
KERN vs ACON Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, ACON has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while ACON trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ACON's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ACON's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to ACON. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check ACON's competition here
MSP Recovery, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIFWZ)
KERN vs LIFWZ Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, LIFWZ has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while LIFWZ trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LIFWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LIFWZ's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to LIFWZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check LIFWZ's competition here
EUDA Health Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: EUDAW)
KERN vs EUDAW Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, EUDAW has a market cap of 926.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while EUDAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EUDAW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to EUDAW's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is less volatile compared to EUDAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check EUDAW's competition here
SCWorx Corp. (NASDAQ: WORX)
KERN vs WORX Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, WORX has a market cap of 693.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while WORX trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas WORX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to WORX's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to WORX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check WORX's competition here
MSP Recovery, Inc. (NASDAQ: MSPRZ)
KERN vs MSPRZ Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, MSPRZ has a market cap of 550.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while MSPRZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MSPRZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MSPRZ's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is less volatile compared to MSPRZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check MSPRZ's competition here
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERNW)
KERN vs KERNW Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, KERNW has a market cap of 162.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while KERNW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KERNW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KERNW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is less volatile compared to KERNW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check KERNW's competition here
MSP Recovery, Inc. (NASDAQ: LIFWW)
KERN vs LIFWW Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, LIFWW has a market cap of 60.1K. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while LIFWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LIFWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to LIFWW's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to LIFWW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check LIFWW's competition here
Zhongchao Inc. (NASDAQ: ZCMD)
KERN vs ZCMD Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, ZCMD has a market cap of 58K. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while ZCMD trades at $1.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ZCMD's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ZCMD's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to ZCMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check ZCMD's competition here
CareMax, Inc. (NASDAQ: CMAXW)
KERN vs CMAXW Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, CMAXW has a market cap of 36.4K. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while CMAXW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CMAXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CMAXW's ROE of -2.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to CMAXW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check CMAXW's competition here
Aclarion, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACONW)
KERN vs ACONW Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, ACONW has a market cap of 11.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while ACONW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ACONW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to ACONW's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to ACONW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check ACONW's competition here
Castlight Health, Inc. (NYSE: CSLT)
KERN vs CSLT Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, CSLT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while CSLT trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CSLT's P/E ratio is -37.27. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CSLT's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to CSLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check CSLT's competition here
NantHealth, Inc. (NASDAQ: NH)
KERN vs NH Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, NH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while NH trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas NH's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to NH's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is less volatile compared to NH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check NH's competition here
CareCloud, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTBC)
KERN vs MTBC Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, MTBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while MTBC trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MTBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MTBC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to MTBC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check MTBC's competition here
CareCloud, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTBCP)
KERN vs MTBCP Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, MTBCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while MTBCP trades at $26.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MTBCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MTBCP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to MTBCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check MTBCP's competition here
Sema4 Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SMFRW)
KERN vs SMFRW Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, SMFRW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while SMFRW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SMFRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to SMFRW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is less volatile compared to SMFRW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check SMFRW's competition here
MSP Recovery, Inc. (NASDAQ: MSPRV)
KERN vs MSPRV Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, MSPRV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while MSPRV trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MSPRV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MSPRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is less volatile compared to MSPRV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check MSPRV's competition here
IMS Health Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: IMS)
KERN vs IMS Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, IMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while IMS trades at $31.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IMS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to IMS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to IMS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check IMS's competition here
Alkuri Global Acquisition Corp. (NASDAQ: KURIU)
KERN vs KURIU Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, KURIU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while KURIU trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KURIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to KURIU's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to KURIU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check KURIU's competition here
CareCloud, Inc. (NASDAQ: MTBCO)
KERN vs MTBCO Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, MTBCO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while MTBCO trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas MTBCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to MTBCO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to MTBCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check MTBCO's competition here
Change Healthcare Inc. (NASDAQ: CHNGU)
KERN vs CHNGU Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, CHNGU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while CHNGU trades at $73.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHNGU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to CHNGU's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to CHNGU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check CHNGU's competition here
Affymetrix, Inc. (NASDAQ: AFFX)
KERN vs AFFX Comparison July 2026
Akerna Corp. (NASDAQ: KERN) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KERN stands at 162.3K. In comparison, AFFX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KERN is priced at $0.31 on the NASDAQ, while AFFX trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KERN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AFFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KERN's ROE is -0.17%, compared to AFFX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KERN is more volatile compared to AFFX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KERN.Check AFFX's competition here