PureCycle Technologies, Inc.
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. PCTTW Peers
See (PCTTW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCTTW | $2.22 | -7.50% | 398.6M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VLTO | $100.98 | -0.26% | 25B | 28.85 | $3.50 | +0.40% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ZWS | $36.16 | -0.90% | 6.1B | 37.67 | $0.96 | +0.97% |
| FSS | $94.07 | +0.20% | 5.7B | 27.59 | $3.41 | +0.55% |
| ATMU | $36.00 | -0.32% | 3B | 16.21 | $2.22 | +0.41% |
| PCTTU | $11.94 | -1.73% | 1.8B | -19.17 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| PCT | $9.50 | -2.62% | 1.7B | -8.48 | -$1.12 | N/A |
| CECO | $26.86 | -1.76% | 947.3M | 20.66 | $1.30 | N/A |
| ERII | $12.60 | +1.78% | 686.7M | 35.00 | $0.36 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PCTTW vs VLTO Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while VLTO trades at $100.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 28.85. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs AQUA Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs ZWS Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while ZWS trades at $36.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 37.67. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs FSS Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while FSS trades at $94.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs ATMU Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while ATMU trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs PCTTU Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while PCTTU trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -19.17. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs PCT Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while PCT trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -8.48. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to PCT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs CECO Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 947.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while CECO trades at $26.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs ERII Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 686.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while ERII trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs CECE Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs ARQ Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 208.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while ARQ trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -98.80. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs ADES Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ADES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs SCWO Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while SCWO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs FTEK Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while FTEK trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -18.44. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs CLIR Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 35.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while CLIR trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs BHTG Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs ZONE Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while ZONE trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -22.20. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs TOMZ Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while TOMZ trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs LIQT Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while LIQT trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs DEVS Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while DEVS trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs CLWT Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while CLWT trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs MKUL Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs RAINW Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while RAINW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs SPECW Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs SPEC Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 20.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs AERC Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs NEWA Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 398.6M. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $2.22, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.