PureCycle Technologies, Inc.
PureCycle Technologies, Inc. PCTTW Peers
See (PCTTW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCTTW | $5.61 | +0.18% | 1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VLTO | $102.75 | +0.20% | 25.3B | 29.11 | $3.50 | +0.41% |
| FSS | $107.14 | -1.71% | 6.6B | 31.80 | $3.41 | +0.48% |
| ZWS | $38.24 | +3.94% | 6.3B | 39.02 | $0.96 | +0.94% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $37.96 | -0.94% | 3.2B | 17.29 | $2.22 | +0.52% |
| PCTTU | $19.00 | -13.52% | 3B | -37.40 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| PCT | $15.76 | -2.39% | 2.9B | -13.47 | -$1.18 | N/A |
| CECO | $33.76 | +5.14% | 1.2B | 26.03 | $1.30 | N/A |
| ERII | $13.95 | +2.05% | 754.8M | 38.47 | $0.36 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PCTTW vs VLTO Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while VLTO trades at $102.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs FSS Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while FSS trades at $107.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 31.80. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs ZWS Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while ZWS trades at $38.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 39.02. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs AQUA Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs ATMU Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while ATMU trades at $37.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 17.29. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs PCTTU Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while PCTTU trades at $19.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -37.40. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs PCT Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while PCT trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -13.47. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to PCT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs CECO Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while CECO trades at $33.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 26.03. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs ERII Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 754.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while ERII trades at $13.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 38.47. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs CECE Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs ARQ Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 242.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while ARQ trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -115.00. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs ADES Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ADES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs FTEK Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 86.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while FTEK trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -31.33. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs SCWO Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while SCWO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs ZONE Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while ZONE trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -21.21. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs CLIR Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while CLIR trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs BHTG Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs LIQT Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while LIQT trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs TOMZ Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while TOMZ trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -6.06. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs DEVS Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while DEVS trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs CLWT Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while CLWT trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs MKUL Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, MKUL has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while MKUL trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MKUL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to MKUL's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to MKUL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs RAINW Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while RAINW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to RAINW's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs SPECW Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs SPEC Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is more volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs AERC Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.
PCTTW vs NEWA Comparison
PCTTW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PCTTW stands at 1B. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PCTTW is priced at $5.61, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PCTTW currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, PCTTW's ROE is -0.82%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PCTTW is less volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PCTTW.