Paradeep Phosphates Limited
Paradeep Phosphates Limited (PARADEEP.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PARADEEP.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PARADEEP.NS | ₹107.49 | -4.99% | 90.5B | 10.92 | ₹10.14 | +0.90% |
| COROMANDEL.BO | ₹1,833.20 | -7.07% | 564.3B | 23.55 | ₹81.31 | +0.94% |
| COROMANDEL.NS | ₹1,842.70 | -6.64% | 563.2B | 23.54 | ₹81.19 | +0.94% |
| UPL.NS | ₹605.65 | -1.01% | 528.1B | 29.83 | ₹20.97 | +0.96% |
| FACT.BO | ₹757.60 | -3.91% | 512.2B | 1684.15 | ₹0.47 | +0.05% |
| FACT.NS | ₹762.75 | -3.20% | 512.1B | 1930.37 | ₹0.41 | +0.05% |
| PIIND.NS | ₹2,799.70 | -3.15% | 441.4B | 30.41 | ₹95.69 | +0.52% |
| PIIND.BO | ₹2,805.90 | -2.99% | 441.1B | 30.37 | ₹95.74 | +0.52% |
| BAYERCROP.NS | ₹4,499.40 | +0.70% | 212B | 31.58 | ₹149.38 | +2.65% |
| SUMICHEM.BO | ₹376.00 | -2.17% | 193.2B | 36.38 | ₹10.64 | +0.31% |
Stock Comparison
PARADEEP.NS vs COROMANDEL.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.BO has a market cap of 564.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while COROMANDEL.BO trades at ₹1,833.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas COROMANDEL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to COROMANDEL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to COROMANDEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check COROMANDEL.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs COROMANDEL.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, COROMANDEL.NS has a market cap of 563.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while COROMANDEL.NS trades at ₹1,842.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas COROMANDEL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to COROMANDEL.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to COROMANDEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check COROMANDEL.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs UPL.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, UPL.NS has a market cap of 528.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while UPL.NS trades at ₹605.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas UPL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.83. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to UPL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to UPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check UPL.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs FACT.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, FACT.BO has a market cap of 512.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while FACT.BO trades at ₹757.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas FACT.BO's P/E ratio is 1684.15. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FACT.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to FACT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check FACT.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs FACT.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, FACT.NS has a market cap of 512.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while FACT.NS trades at ₹762.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas FACT.NS's P/E ratio is 1930.37. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FACT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to FACT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check FACT.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs PIIND.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, PIIND.NS has a market cap of 441.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while PIIND.NS trades at ₹2,799.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas PIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 30.41. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PIIND.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to PIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check PIIND.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs PIIND.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, PIIND.BO has a market cap of 441.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while PIIND.BO trades at ₹2,805.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas PIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PIIND.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to PIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check PIIND.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs BAYERCROP.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, BAYERCROP.NS has a market cap of 212B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while BAYERCROP.NS trades at ₹4,499.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BAYERCROP.NS's P/E ratio is 31.58. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BAYERCROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to BAYERCROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check BAYERCROP.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs SUMICHEM.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.BO has a market cap of 193.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while SUMICHEM.BO trades at ₹376.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SUMICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 36.38. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SUMICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check SUMICHEM.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs SUMICHEM.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, SUMICHEM.NS has a market cap of 193.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while SUMICHEM.NS trades at ₹376.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SUMICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 36.41. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SUMICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to SUMICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check SUMICHEM.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs ATUL7.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, ATUL7.BO has a market cap of 179B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while ATUL7.BO trades at ₹7,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas ATUL7.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ATUL7.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to ATUL7.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check ATUL7.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs CHAMBLFERT.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.BO has a market cap of 171.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while CHAMBLFERT.BO trades at ₹415.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas CHAMBLFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs CHAMBLFERT.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, CHAMBLFERT.NS has a market cap of 171.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while CHAMBLFERT.NS trades at ₹417.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas CHAMBLFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to CHAMBLFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check CHAMBLFERT.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs EIDPARRY.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, EIDPARRY.BO has a market cap of 140.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while EIDPARRY.BO trades at ₹759.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas EIDPARRY.BO's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EIDPARRY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to EIDPARRY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check EIDPARRY.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs PARADEEP.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, PARADEEP.BO has a market cap of 90.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while PARADEEP.BO trades at ₹107.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas PARADEEP.BO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PARADEEP.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS and PARADEEP.BO have similar daily volatility (4.07).Check PARADEEP.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs SHARDACROP.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.NS has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while SHARDACROP.NS trades at ₹921.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SHARDACROP.NS's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHARDACROP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDACROP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check SHARDACROP.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs SHARDACROP.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, SHARDACROP.BO has a market cap of 88.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while SHARDACROP.BO trades at ₹919.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SHARDACROP.BO's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHARDACROP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to SHARDACROP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check SHARDACROP.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs RCF.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, RCF.BO has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while RCF.BO trades at ₹111.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas RCF.BO's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RCF.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to RCF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check RCF.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs RCF.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, RCF.NS has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while RCF.NS trades at ₹111.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas RCF.NS's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RCF.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to RCF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check RCF.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs GSFC.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, GSFC.BO has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while GSFC.BO trades at ₹148.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas GSFC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GSFC.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to GSFC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check GSFC.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs GSFC.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, GSFC.NS has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while GSFC.NS trades at ₹148.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas GSFC.NS's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GSFC.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to GSFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check GSFC.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs PICCADIL.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, PICCADIL.BO has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while PICCADIL.BO trades at ₹532.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas PICCADIL.BO's P/E ratio is 39.17. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PICCADIL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to PICCADIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check PICCADIL.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs RALLIS.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, RALLIS.NS has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while RALLIS.NS trades at ₹232.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas RALLIS.NS's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RALLIS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to RALLIS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check RALLIS.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs RALLIS.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, RALLIS.BO has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while RALLIS.BO trades at ₹231.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas RALLIS.BO's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RALLIS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to RALLIS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check RALLIS.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs DHANUKA.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, DHANUKA.NS has a market cap of 43.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while DHANUKA.NS trades at ₹942.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas DHANUKA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.15. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DHANUKA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check DHANUKA.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs DHANUKA.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, DHANUKA.BO has a market cap of 43.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while DHANUKA.BO trades at ₹944.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas DHANUKA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DHANUKA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to DHANUKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check DHANUKA.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs KSCL.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, KSCL.BO has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while KSCL.BO trades at ₹787.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas KSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KSCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to KSCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check KSCL.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs MBAPL.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, MBAPL.NS has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while MBAPL.NS trades at ₹443.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas MBAPL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.91. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MBAPL.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to MBAPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check MBAPL.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs MANGCHEFER.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.NS has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while MANGCHEFER.NS trades at ₹308.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas MANGCHEFER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MANGCHEFER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs MANGCHEFER.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, MANGCHEFER.BO has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while MANGCHEFER.BO trades at ₹308.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas MANGCHEFER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MANGCHEFER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to MANGCHEFER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check MANGCHEFER.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs BNHOLDINGS.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, BNHOLDINGS.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while BNHOLDINGS.BO trades at ₹355.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BNHOLDINGS.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to BNHOLDINGS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check BNHOLDINGS.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs NFL.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, NFL.NS has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while NFL.NS trades at ₹67.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas NFL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NFL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to NFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check NFL.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs NFL.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, NFL.BO has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while NFL.BO trades at ₹66.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas NFL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NFL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to NFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check NFL.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs KRISHANA.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, KRISHANA.NS has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while KRISHANA.NS trades at ₹472.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas KRISHANA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.16. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KRISHANA.NS's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to KRISHANA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check KRISHANA.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs CIANAGRO.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, CIANAGRO.BO has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while CIANAGRO.BO trades at ₹921.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas CIANAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 24.17. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CIANAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to CIANAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check CIANAGRO.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs NACLIND.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, NACLIND.NS has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while NACLIND.NS trades at ₹131.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas NACLIND.NS's P/E ratio is -67.98. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NACLIND.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to NACLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check NACLIND.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs NACLIND.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, NACLIND.BO has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while NACLIND.BO trades at ₹130.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas NACLIND.BO's P/E ratio is -67.59. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NACLIND.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to NACLIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check NACLIND.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs VENKYS.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, VENKYS.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while VENKYS.BO trades at ₹1,714.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas VENKYS.BO's P/E ratio is -57.49. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VENKYS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to VENKYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check VENKYS.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs BHAGCHEM.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.NS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while BHAGCHEM.NS trades at ₹196.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BHAGCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 176.89. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHAGCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs BHAGCHEM.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, BHAGCHEM.BO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while BHAGCHEM.BO trades at ₹183.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BHAGCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 176.62. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHAGCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to BHAGCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check BHAGCHEM.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs KSE.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, KSE.NS has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while KSE.NS trades at ₹697.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas KSE.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KSE.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to KSE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check KSE.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs INSECTICID.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, INSECTICID.BO has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while INSECTICID.BO trades at ₹577.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas INSECTICID.BO's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INSECTICID.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to INSECTICID.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check INSECTICID.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs INSECTICID.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, INSECTICID.NS has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while INSECTICID.NS trades at ₹589.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas INSECTICID.NS's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INSECTICID.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to INSECTICID.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check INSECTICID.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs IPL.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, IPL.BO has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while IPL.BO trades at ₹129.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas IPL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to IPL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check IPL.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs IPL.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, IPL.NS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while IPL.NS trades at ₹129.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas IPL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IPL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to IPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check IPL.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs SPIC.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, SPIC.BO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while SPIC.BO trades at ₹59.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SPIC.BO's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPIC.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to SPIC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check SPIC.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs ASTEC.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, ASTEC.NS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while ASTEC.NS trades at ₹531.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas ASTEC.NS's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASTEC.NS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to ASTEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check ASTEC.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs SPIC.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, SPIC.NS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while SPIC.NS trades at ₹59.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SPIC.NS's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPIC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to SPIC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check SPIC.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs ASTEC.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, ASTEC.BO has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while ASTEC.BO trades at ₹527.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas ASTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -13.26. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ASTEC.BO's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to ASTEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check ASTEC.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs MOL.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, MOL.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while MOL.NS trades at ₹40.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas MOL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MOL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to MOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check MOL.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs MOL.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, MOL.BO has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while MOL.BO trades at ₹40.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas MOL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.75. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MOL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to MOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check MOL.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs BHARATRAS.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.BO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while BHARATRAS.BO trades at ₹1,251.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BHARATRAS.BO's P/E ratio is 15.92. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHARATRAS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check BHARATRAS.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs BHARATRAS.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, BHARATRAS.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while BHARATRAS.NS trades at ₹1,254.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BHARATRAS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHARATRAS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to BHARATRAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check BHARATRAS.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs MADRASFERT.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.BO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while MADRASFERT.BO trades at ₹59.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas MADRASFERT.BO's P/E ratio is 135.56. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MADRASFERT.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to MADRASFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check MADRASFERT.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs MADRASFERT.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, MADRASFERT.NS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while MADRASFERT.NS trades at ₹59.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas MADRASFERT.NS's P/E ratio is 134.80. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MADRASFERT.NS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to MADRASFERT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check MADRASFERT.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs BLUECLOUDS.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, BLUECLOUDS.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while BLUECLOUDS.BO trades at ₹18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BLUECLOUDS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to BLUECLOUDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check BLUECLOUDS.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs ZUARI.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, ZUARI.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while ZUARI.NS trades at ₹188.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas ZUARI.NS's P/E ratio is 0.86. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZUARI.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to ZUARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check ZUARI.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs BSHSL.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, BSHSL.NS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while BSHSL.NS trades at ₹77.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BSHSL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.26. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BSHSL.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to BSHSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check BSHSL.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs DHARMAJ.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while DHARMAJ.NS trades at ₹233.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas DHARMAJ.NS's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DHARMAJ.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check DHARMAJ.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs DHARMAJ.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, DHARMAJ.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while DHARMAJ.BO trades at ₹234.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas DHARMAJ.BO's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DHARMAJ.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to DHARMAJ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check DHARMAJ.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs BAJAJST.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, BAJAJST.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while BAJAJST.BO trades at ₹361.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BAJAJST.BO's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BAJAJST.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to BAJAJST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check BAJAJST.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs HERANBA.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, HERANBA.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while HERANBA.NS trades at ₹172.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas HERANBA.NS's P/E ratio is -11.94. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HERANBA.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to HERANBA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check HERANBA.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs HERANBA.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, HERANBA.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while HERANBA.BO trades at ₹170.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas HERANBA.BO's P/E ratio is -11.92. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HERANBA.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to HERANBA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check HERANBA.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs KSE.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, KSE.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while KSE.BO trades at ₹187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas KSE.BO's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KSE.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to KSE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check KSE.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs SVRL.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, SVRL.BO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while SVRL.BO trades at ₹256.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SVRL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SVRL.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to SVRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check SVRL.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs SHINDL.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, SHINDL.BO has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while SHINDL.BO trades at ₹141.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SHINDL.BO's P/E ratio is 46.75. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHINDL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to SHINDL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check SHINDL.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs BESTAGRO.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.NS has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while BESTAGRO.NS trades at ₹13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BESTAGRO.NS's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BESTAGRO.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to BESTAGRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check BESTAGRO.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs BESTAGRO.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, BESTAGRO.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while BESTAGRO.BO trades at ₹13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BESTAGRO.BO's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BESTAGRO.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to BESTAGRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check BESTAGRO.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs KHAICHEM.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while KHAICHEM.BO trades at ₹47.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas KHAICHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KHAICHEM.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check KHAICHEM.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs KHAICHEM.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, KHAICHEM.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while KHAICHEM.NS trades at ₹47.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas KHAICHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KHAICHEM.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to KHAICHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check KHAICHEM.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs ARIES.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, ARIES.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while ARIES.NS trades at ₹346.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas ARIES.NS's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARIES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to ARIES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check ARIES.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs KNAGRI.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, KNAGRI.NS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while KNAGRI.NS trades at ₹163.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas KNAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KNAGRI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to KNAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check KNAGRI.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs MISHTANN.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, MISHTANN.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while MISHTANN.BO trades at ₹3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas MISHTANN.BO's P/E ratio is 1.25. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MISHTANN.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to MISHTANN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check MISHTANN.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs RAMAPHO.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.BO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while RAMAPHO.BO trades at ₹106.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas RAMAPHO.BO's P/E ratio is 7.81. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RAMAPHO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check RAMAPHO.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs RAMAPHO.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, RAMAPHO.NS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while RAMAPHO.NS trades at ₹107.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas RAMAPHO.NS's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RAMAPHO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to RAMAPHO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check RAMAPHO.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs MODINATUR.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, MODINATUR.BO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while MODINATUR.BO trades at ₹292.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas MODINATUR.BO's P/E ratio is 10.43. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MODINATUR.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to MODINATUR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check MODINATUR.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs IGCL.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, IGCL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while IGCL.NS trades at ₹54.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas IGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IGCL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to IGCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check IGCL.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs SHIVALIK.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, SHIVALIK.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while SHIVALIK.NS trades at ₹216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SHIVALIK.NS's P/E ratio is 31.80. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHIVALIK.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to SHIVALIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check SHIVALIK.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs GOODRICKE.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, GOODRICKE.BO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while GOODRICKE.BO trades at ₹146.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas GOODRICKE.BO's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GOODRICKE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to GOODRICKE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check GOODRICKE.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs NATHBIOGEN.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while NATHBIOGEN.BO trades at ₹135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas NATHBIOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs NATHBIOGEN.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, NATHBIOGEN.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while NATHBIOGEN.NS trades at ₹135.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas NATHBIOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to NATHBIOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check NATHBIOGEN.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs KINGSINFR.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, KINGSINFR.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while KINGSINFR.BO trades at ₹104.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas KINGSINFR.BO's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to KINGSINFR.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to KINGSINFR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check KINGSINFR.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs NAGAFERT.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while NAGAFERT.NS trades at ₹3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas NAGAFERT.NS's P/E ratio is -8.63. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NAGAFERT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to NAGAFERT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check NAGAFERT.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs NAGAFERT.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, NAGAFERT.BO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while NAGAFERT.BO trades at ₹3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas NAGAFERT.BO's P/E ratio is -8.52. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NAGAFERT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to NAGAFERT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check NAGAFERT.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs INDOUS.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, INDOUS.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while INDOUS.BO trades at ₹100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas INDOUS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INDOUS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to INDOUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check INDOUS.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs INDOUS.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, INDOUS.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while INDOUS.NS trades at ₹100.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas INDOUS.NS's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INDOUS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to INDOUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check INDOUS.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs NOVAAGRI.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, NOVAAGRI.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while NOVAAGRI.NS trades at ₹21.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas NOVAAGRI.NS's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NOVAAGRI.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to NOVAAGRI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check NOVAAGRI.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs RBS.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, RBS.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while RBS.NS trades at ₹71.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas RBS.NS's P/E ratio is 11.89. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RBS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to RBS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check RBS.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs EQUIPPP.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while EQUIPPP.BO trades at ₹17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas EQUIPPP.BO's P/E ratio is 257.14. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EQUIPPP.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to EQUIPPP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check EQUIPPP.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs EQUIPPP.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, EQUIPPP.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while EQUIPPP.NS trades at ₹17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas EQUIPPP.NS's P/E ratio is 256.57. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EQUIPPP.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to EQUIPPP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check EQUIPPP.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs HOACFOODS.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, HOACFOODS.NS has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while HOACFOODS.NS trades at ₹360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas HOACFOODS.NS's P/E ratio is 53.35. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to HOACFOODS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to HOACFOODS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check HOACFOODS.NS's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs VIJSOLX.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, VIJSOLX.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while VIJSOLX.BO trades at ₹457.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas VIJSOLX.BO's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to VIJSOLX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to VIJSOLX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check VIJSOLX.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs SBECSUG.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, SBECSUG.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while SBECSUG.BO trades at ₹31.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SBECSUG.BO's P/E ratio is -5.78. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SBECSUG.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is more volatile compared to SBECSUG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check SBECSUG.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs SPTRSHI.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, SPTRSHI.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while SPTRSHI.BO trades at ₹42.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SPTRSHI.BO's P/E ratio is 46.47. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SPTRSHI.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to SPTRSHI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check SPTRSHI.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs MSL.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, MSL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while MSL.BO trades at ₹117.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas MSL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MSL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to MSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check MSL.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs BHARATAGRI.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, BHARATAGRI.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while BHARATAGRI.BO trades at ₹23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas BHARATAGRI.BO's P/E ratio is -63.82. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BHARATAGRI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to BHARATAGRI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check BHARATAGRI.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs SSLEL.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, SSLEL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while SSLEL.BO trades at ₹228.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas SSLEL.BO's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SSLEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to SSLEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check SSLEL.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs INDSUCR.BO Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, INDSUCR.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while INDSUCR.BO trades at ₹70.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas INDSUCR.BO's P/E ratio is 3.02. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to INDSUCR.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to INDSUCR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check INDSUCR.BO's competition here
PARADEEP.NS vs NARMADA.NS Comparison March 2026
PARADEEP.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PARADEEP.NS stands at 90.5B. In comparison, NARMADA.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PARADEEP.NS is priced at ₹107.49, while NARMADA.NS trades at ₹31.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PARADEEP.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.92, whereas NARMADA.NS's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, PARADEEP.NS's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NARMADA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PARADEEP.NS is less volatile compared to NARMADA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PARADEEP.NS.Check NARMADA.NS's competition here