NuStar Logistics, L.P. SB NT FX/FL 43
NuStar Logistics, L.P. SB NT FX/FL 43 NSS Peers
See (NSS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Midstream Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSS | $25.44 | +0.20% | 2B | -508.80 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| ET-PE | $81.43 | +4.82% | 170.2B | 75.82 | $1.07 | +7.29% |
| EP-PC | $48.75 | -0.71% | 108.3B | N/A | N/A | +4.87% |
| ENB | $45.59 | -0.98% | 99.4B | 23.14 | $1.97 | +4.22% |
| WMB | $60.60 | +0.83% | 74B | 32.58 | $1.86 | +3.17% |
| EPD | $31.43 | -0.22% | 68.2B | 11.68 | $2.69 | +6.74% |
| KMI | $27.96 | -0.83% | 62.1B | 24.10 | $1.16 | +4.12% |
| ET | $17.76 | -1.06% | 60.9B | 13.45 | $1.32 | +7.29% |
| MPLX | $50.84 | -0.63% | 51.9B | 11.74 | $4.33 | +7.32% |
| TRP | $49.90 | -0.38% | 51.9B | 16.97 | $2.94 | +5.15% |
Stock Comparison
NSS vs ET-PE Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, ET-PE has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while ET-PE trades at $81.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas ET-PE's P/E ratio is 75.82. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ET-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to ET-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs EP-PC Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while EP-PC trades at $48.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS and EP-PC have similar daily volatility (0.20).
NSS vs ENB Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, ENB has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while ENB trades at $45.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas ENB's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to ENB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs WMB Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, WMB has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while WMB trades at $60.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas WMB's P/E ratio is 32.58. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to WMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs EPD Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, EPD has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while EPD trades at $31.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas EPD's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EPD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to EPD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs KMI Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, KMI has a market cap of 62.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while KMI trades at $27.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas KMI's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KMI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to KMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs ET Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, ET has a market cap of 60.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while ET trades at $17.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas ET's P/E ratio is 13.45. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to ET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs MPLX Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, MPLX has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while MPLX trades at $50.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas MPLX's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MPLX's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to MPLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs TRP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, TRP has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while TRP trades at $49.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas TRP's P/E ratio is 16.97. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TRP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to TRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs LNG Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, LNG has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while LNG trades at $233.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas LNG's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LNG's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to LNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs OKE Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, OKE has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while OKE trades at $80.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas OKE's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OKE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to OKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs ET-PC Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, ET-PC has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while ET-PC trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas ET-PC's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ET-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS and ET-PC have similar daily volatility (0.20).
NSS vs ET-PD Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, ET-PD has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while ET-PD trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas ET-PD's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ET-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is more volatile compared to ET-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs ENBA Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, ENBA has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while ENBA trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas ENBA's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENBA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is more volatile compared to ENBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs ET-PI Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, ET-PI has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while ET-PI trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas ET-PI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ET-PI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to ET-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs TRGP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, TRGP has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while TRGP trades at $159.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas TRGP's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TRGP's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to TRGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs VG Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, VG has a market cap of 29B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while VG trades at $11.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas VG's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VG's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to VG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs CQP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, CQP has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while CQP trades at $58.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas CQP's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CQP's ROE of -7.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to CQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs PBA Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, PBA has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while PBA trades at $37.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas PBA's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PBA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to PBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs WES Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, WES has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while WES trades at $38.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas WES's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to WES's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to WES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs MMP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, MMP has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while MMP trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas MMP's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MMP's ROE of -8.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to MMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs PAA Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, PAA has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while PAA trades at $16.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas PAA's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PAA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to PAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs DTM Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, DTM has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while DTM trades at $104.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas DTM's P/E ratio is 28.57. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DTM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to DTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs AM Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, AM has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while AM trades at $18.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas AM's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to AM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to AM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs VNOM Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, VNOM has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while VNOM trades at $40.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas VNOM's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to VNOM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to VNOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs DCP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, DCP has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while DCP trades at $41.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas DCP's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DCP's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is more volatile compared to DCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs HESM Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, HESM has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while HESM trades at $38.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas HESM's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HESM's ROE of +1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to HESM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs DCP-PC Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, DCP-PC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while DCP-PC trades at $25.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas DCP-PC's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DCP-PC's ROE of -351.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is more volatile compared to DCP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs ENLC Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, ENLC has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while ENLC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas ENLC's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENLC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to ENLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs ETRN Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, ETRN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while ETRN trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas ETRN's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ETRN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to ETRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs GLNG Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, GLNG has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while GLNG trades at $41.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas GLNG's P/E ratio is 86.48. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to GLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs FRO Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while FRO trades at $17.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to FRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs PAGP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, PAGP has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while PAGP trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas PAGP's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PAGP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to PAGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs EURN Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, EURN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while EURN trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas EURN's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to EURN's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to EURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs CEQP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, CEQP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while CEQP trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas CEQP's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CEQP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to CEQP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs NS Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, NS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while NS trades at $21.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas NS's P/E ratio is 84.46. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs NS-PB Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, NS-PB has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while NS-PB trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas NS-PB's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NS-PB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is more volatile compared to NS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs NS-PA Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, NS-PA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while NS-PA trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas NS-PA's P/E ratio is -8.66. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NS-PA's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is more volatile compared to NS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs KNTK Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, KNTK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while KNTK trades at $45.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas KNTK's P/E ratio is 47.97. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to KNTK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to KNTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs HEP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, HEP has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while HEP trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas HEP's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HEP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to HEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs NS-PC Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, NS-PC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while NS-PC trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas NS-PC's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NS-PC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is more volatile compared to NS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs DKL Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, DKL has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while DKL trades at $41.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas DKL's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DKL's ROE of +584.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to DKL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs RTLR Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, RTLR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while RTLR trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas RTLR's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RTLR's ROE of -3260.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to RTLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs SEAL-PA Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, SEAL-PA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while SEAL-PA trades at $25.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas SEAL-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SEAL-PA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to SEAL-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs SEAL-PB Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, SEAL-PB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while SEAL-PB trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas SEAL-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SEAL-PB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is more volatile compared to SEAL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs STNG Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while STNG trades at $39.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 3.85. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs GEL Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, GEL has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while GEL trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas GEL's P/E ratio is -9.64. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GEL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to GEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs DHT Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while DHT trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to DHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs GLP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, GLP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while GLP trades at $53.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas GLP's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to GLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs INSW Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while INSW trades at $36.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs TRMD Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while TRMD trades at $16.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 3.43. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs TNK Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while TNK trades at $43.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to TNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs GLOG-PA Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, GLOG-PA has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while GLOG-PA trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas GLOG-PA's P/E ratio is 44.93. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLOG-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is more volatile compared to GLOG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs FLNG Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while FLNG trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs GLP-PA Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, GLP-PA has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while GLP-PA trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas GLP-PA's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLP-PA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to GLP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs CEQP-P Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, CEQP-P has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while CEQP-P trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas CEQP-P's P/E ratio is -12.22. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to CEQP-P's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to CEQP-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs TNP-PE Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, TNP-PE has a market cap of 991.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while TNP-PE trades at $78.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas TNP-PE's P/E ratio is -8.23. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TNP-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to TNP-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs NVGS Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 987M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while NVGS trades at $14.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs LPG Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, LPG has a market cap of 923.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while LPG trades at $21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas LPG's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to LPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to LPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs GLP-PB Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, GLP-PB has a market cap of 873M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while GLP-PB trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas GLP-PB's P/E ratio is 11.32. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLP-PB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to GLP-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs TEN-PE Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, TEN-PE has a market cap of 769.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while TEN-PE trades at $25.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas TEN-PE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TEN-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to TEN-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs TK Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, TK has a market cap of 686.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while TK trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas TK's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to TK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs OSG Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 612.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while OSG trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs TNP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, TNP has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while TNP trades at $18.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas TNP's P/E ratio is 3.69. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to TNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs TEN Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, TEN has a market cap of 537.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while TEN trades at $17.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas TEN's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to TEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs PBT Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, PBT has a market cap of 525.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while PBT trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas PBT's P/E ratio is 23.02. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PBT's ROE of +112.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to PBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs NGL Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, NGL has a market cap of 456.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while NGL trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas NGL's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NGL's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to NGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs NGL-PB Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, NGL-PB has a market cap of 439.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while NGL-PB trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas NGL-PB's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NGL-PB's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to NGL-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs NGL-PC Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, NGL-PC has a market cap of 435M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while NGL-PC trades at $21.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas NGL-PC's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to NGL-PC's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to NGL-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs GLOP-PB Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, GLOP-PB has a market cap of 417.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while GLOP-PB trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas GLOP-PB's P/E ratio is -58.88. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLOP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to GLOP-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs GLOP-PC Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, GLOP-PC has a market cap of 413.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while GLOP-PC trades at $25.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas GLOP-PC's P/E ratio is -58.32. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLOP-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to GLOP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs SMLP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, SMLP has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while SMLP trades at $38.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas SMLP's P/E ratio is 5.30. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SMLP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to SMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs GLOP-PA Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, GLOP-PA has a market cap of 404.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while GLOP-PA trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas GLOP-PA's P/E ratio is -57.08. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLOP-PA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to GLOP-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs DSSI Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, DSSI has a market cap of 384.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while DSSI trades at $9.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas DSSI's P/E ratio is -6.99. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DSSI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to DSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs BROG Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, BROG has a market cap of 377.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while BROG trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas BROG's P/E ratio is 84.20. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BROG's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to BROG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs SNMP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, SNMP has a market cap of 338.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while SNMP trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas SNMP's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SNMP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to SNMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs TNP-PF Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, TNP-PF has a market cap of 334.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while TNP-PF trades at $27.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas TNP-PF's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TNP-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to TNP-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs SMC Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, SMC has a market cap of 328.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while SMC trades at $26.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas SMC's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SMC's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to SMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs TNP-PD Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, TNP-PD has a market cap of 321.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while TNP-PD trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas TNP-PD's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TNP-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is more volatile compared to TNP-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs GPP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, GPP has a market cap of 286.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while GPP trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas GPP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GPP's ROE of -14.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to GPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs GLOP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, GLOP has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while GLOP trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas GLOP's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to GLOP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to GLOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs DLNG-PB Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, DLNG-PB has a market cap of 141M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while DLNG-PB trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas DLNG-PB's P/E ratio is 22.32. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DLNG-PB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to DLNG-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs DLNG-PA Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 139.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while DLNG-PA trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 262.50. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs DLNG Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 137.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while DLNG trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 3.58. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs MMLP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, MMLP has a market cap of 117.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while MMLP trades at $3.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas MMLP's P/E ratio is -12.58. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MMLP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to MMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs BANL Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, BANL has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while BANL trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas BANL's P/E ratio is -6.29. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BANL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to BANL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs PTLE Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, PTLE has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while PTLE trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas PTLE's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PTLE's ROE of -4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to PTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs MARPS Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, MARPS has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while MARPS trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas MARPS's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to MARPS's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to MARPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs RBNE Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, RBNE has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while RBNE trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas RBNE's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to RBNE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to RBNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs BROGW Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, BROGW has a market cap of 61.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while BROGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas BROGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BROGW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to BROGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs PSXP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, PSXP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while PSXP trades at $42.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas PSXP's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to PSXP's ROE of -518.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to PSXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs BKEPP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, BKEPP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while BKEPP trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas BKEPP's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BKEPP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is more volatile compared to BKEPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs TGP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, TGP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while TGP trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas TGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to TGP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is more volatile compared to TGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs OMP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, OMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while OMP trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas OMP's P/E ratio is 8.10. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to OMP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to OMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs BPMP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, BPMP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while BPMP trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas BPMP's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BPMP's ROE of +1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to BPMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs HMLP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, HMLP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while HMLP trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas HMLP's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to HMLP's ROE of -2.65%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to HMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs SHLX Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, SHLX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while SHLX trades at $15.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas SHLX's P/E ratio is 13.07. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to SHLX's ROE of -56.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is more volatile compared to SHLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs BKEP Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, BKEP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while BKEP trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas BKEP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to BKEP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to BKEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.
NSS vs ENBL Comparison
NSS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSS stands at 2B. In comparison, ENBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSS is priced at $25.44, while ENBL trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSS currently has a P/E ratio of -508.80, whereas ENBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSS's ROE is +0.28%, compared to ENBL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NSS is less volatile compared to ENBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSS.