Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. NAK Peers
See (NAK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAK | $2.18 | +4.31% | 1.2B | -21.75 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| RIO | $60.10 | +2.37% | 97.7B | 8.50 | $7.07 | +6.67% |
| BHP | $51.51 | +3.83% | 65.3B | 11.49 | $4.48 | +4.78% |
| VALE | $9.96 | +1.01% | 42.5B | 7.21 | $1.38 | +8.30% |
| TECK | $38.81 | +0.96% | 19B | 776.20 | $0.05 | +2.10% |
| MP | $45.23 | +50.62% | 7.4B | -71.86 | -$0.63 | N/A |
| TMC | $6.85 | +9.25% | 2.5B | -29.83 | -$0.23 | N/A |
| MTRN | $87.00 | +2.62% | 1.8B | 181.31 | $0.48 | +0.63% |
| SKE | $15.76 | +1.94% | 1.8B | -13.59 | -$1.16 | N/A |
| STR | $17.88 | -0.22% | 1.4B | 34.41 | $0.52 | +9.77% |
Stock Comparison
NAK vs RIO Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 97.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while RIO trades at $60.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs BHP Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while BHP trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs VALE Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while VALE trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs TECK Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while TECK trades at $38.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 776.20. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs MP Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while MP trades at $45.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -71.86. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs TMC Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while TMC trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -29.83. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TMC's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs MTRN Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while MTRN trades at $87.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 181.31. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs SKE Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while SKE trades at $15.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -13.59. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs STR Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while STR trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 34.41. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs USAR Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while USAR trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is 14.45. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to USAR's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs IPX Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 975M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while IPX trades at $30.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -16.08. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs CMP Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 933.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while CMP trades at $22.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is -6.30. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CMP's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs VZLA Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 864M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while VZLA trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -148.97. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs GSM Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 840.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while GSM trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -19.59. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs NEXA Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 656.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while NEXA trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NEXA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs USAS Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 648.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while USAS trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -7.65. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to USAS's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs TMCWW Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 644.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while TMCWW trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs SGML Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 626M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while SGML trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -17.05. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs LAC Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 622.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while LAC trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -12.93. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs SLI Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 538.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while SLI trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SLI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs LAAC Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs PLM Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs GRFX Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs LAR Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 393.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while LAR trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -34.71. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs LZM Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 348.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while LZM trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs UAMY Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 317.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while UAMY trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -266.50. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs CRML Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 300.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while CRML trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CRML's ROE of -5.88%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs EMX Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 296.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while EMX trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is -91.50. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs NMG Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 280.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while NMG trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs CRMLW Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 273.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while CRMLW trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs TMQ Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 271.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while TMQ trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -33.10. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs WRN Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 265M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while WRN trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -66.25. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs USARW Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 257.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while USARW trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to USARW's ROE of -12.42%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs IONR Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 171.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while IONR trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -16.17. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs NB Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 170.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while NB trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -16.13. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to NB's ROE of -1.95%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs ABAT Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 164.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while ABAT trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs PLL Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 159.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while PLL trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs USGO Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 99.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while USGO trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs LGO Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 86.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while LGO trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs AMLI Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMLI has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while AMLI trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas AMLI's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to AMLI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to AMLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs FURY Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 83M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while FURY trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to FURY's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs GRO Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 59M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while GRO trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs XPL Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while XPL trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs WWR Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while WWR trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs LITM Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while LITM trades at $4.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs ELBM Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 20.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while ELBM trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs GTI Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while GTI trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -8.71. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GTI's ROE of +7.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs BYU Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BYU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs STR-WT Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 239.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs GLG Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs KMCM Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAK has daily volatility of 12.42 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.
NAK vs SMTS Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs EXN Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs IFFT Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to IFFT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs VEDL Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.
NAK vs BBL Comparison
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $2.18, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -21.75, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.32%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.