Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc.
Muliang Viagoo Technology, Inc. MULG Peers
See (MULG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MULG | $7.00 | +174.51% | 134.8M | 50.00 | $0.14 | N/A |
| CTA-PB | $67.97 | -0.67% | 59B | N/A | N/A | +6.48% |
| CTVA | $74.19 | +2.43% | 50.6B | 44.69 | $1.66 | +0.92% |
| NTR | $62.84 | -0.08% | 30.6B | 59.28 | $1.06 | +3.46% |
| CF | $100.76 | +0.83% | 16.3B | 13.33 | $7.56 | +1.99% |
| MOS | $36.01 | +0.70% | 11.4B | 31.04 | $1.16 | +2.40% |
| ICL | $6.66 | +2.94% | 8.6B | 21.48 | $0.31 | +2.78% |
| FMC | $42.74 | +2.78% | 5.3B | 13.92 | $3.07 | +5.45% |
| SMG | $62.27 | +1.82% | 3.6B | 107.35 | $0.58 | +4.24% |
| UAN | $87.20 | +3.97% | 921.7M | 12.23 | $7.13 | +8.20% |
Stock Comparison
MULG vs CTA-PB Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while CTA-PB trades at $67.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs CTVA Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while CTVA trades at $74.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 44.69. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs NTR Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while NTR trades at $62.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 59.28. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs CF Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while CF trades at $100.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs MOS Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while MOS trades at $36.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs ICL Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while ICL trades at $6.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs FMC Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while FMC trades at $42.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs SMG Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while SMG trades at $62.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 107.35. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs UAN Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 921.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while UAN trades at $87.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs IPI Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 492.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while IPI trades at $36.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs BIOX Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 301M. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while BIOX trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is 240.00. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BIOX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs LVRO Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 298.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while LVRO trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -1.70. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs AVD Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 138.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while AVD trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs BHIL-WT Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs CGA Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGA's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs ENFY Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, ENFY has a market cap of 17.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while ENFY trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas ENFY's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENFY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to ENFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs SEED Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while SEED trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is 2.48. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEED's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs RKDA Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while RKDA trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs NITO Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while NITO trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs SVFD Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs FMTO Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while FMTO trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs BHIL Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs YTEN Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YTEN's ROE of +2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs CTA-PA Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 10.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while CTA-PA trades at $54.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.
MULG vs MBII Comparison
MULG plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MULG stands at 134.8M. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MULG is priced at $7.00, while MBII trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MULG currently has a P/E ratio of 50.00, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, MULG's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MULG is more volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MULG.