Molekule Group, Inc.
Molekule Group, Inc. (MKUL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MKUL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKUL | $0.05 | -39.89% | 1.9M | -0.08 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| VLTO | $103.28 | +0.01% | 25.6B | 29.54 | $3.50 | +0.41% |
| FSS | $108.78 | +1.21% | 6.6B | 31.90 | $3.41 | +0.48% |
| ZWS | $38.47 | +1.69% | 6.5B | 40.09 | $0.96 | +0.92% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $38.55 | +1.34% | 3.2B | 17.37 | $2.22 | +0.52% |
| PCTTU | $22.85 | +4.01% | 2.9B | -36.68 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| PCT | $15.40 | -1.16% | 2.8B | -13.05 | -$1.18 | N/A |
| CECO | $34.63 | +2.21% | 1.2B | 26.63 | $1.30 | N/A |
| PCTTW | $5.35 | -2.73% | 954.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MKUL vs VLTO Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while VLTO trades at $103.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 29.54. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check VLTO's competition here
MKUL vs FSS Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while FSS trades at $108.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 31.90. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check FSS's competition here
MKUL vs ZWS Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ZWS trades at $38.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 40.09. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check ZWS's competition here
MKUL vs AQUA Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check AQUA's competition here
MKUL vs ATMU Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ATMU trades at $38.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check ATMU's competition here
MKUL vs PCTTU Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while PCTTU trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -36.68. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check PCTTU's competition here
MKUL vs PCT Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while PCT trades at $15.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -13.05. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PCT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check PCT's competition here
MKUL vs CECO Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while CECO trades at $34.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 26.63. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check CECO's competition here
MKUL vs PCTTW Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 954.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while PCTTW trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check PCTTW's competition here
MKUL vs ERII Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 756.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ERII trades at $13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 38.54. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check ERII's competition here
MKUL vs CECE Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check CECE's competition here
MKUL vs ARQ Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 244.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ARQ trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -116.00. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check ARQ's competition here
MKUL vs ADES Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ADES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check ADES's competition here
MKUL vs FTEK Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 87.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while FTEK trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -31.56. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check FTEK's competition here
MKUL vs SCWO Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 37.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while SCWO trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check SCWO's competition here
MKUL vs CLIR Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 31M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while CLIR trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -4.93. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check CLIR's competition here
MKUL vs BHTG Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check BHTG's competition here
MKUL vs ZONE Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 29.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ZONE trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -15.91. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check ZONE's competition here
MKUL vs LIQT Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while LIQT trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check LIQT's competition here
MKUL vs TOMZ Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while TOMZ trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -6.12. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check TOMZ's competition here
MKUL vs DEVS Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while DEVS trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check DEVS's competition here
MKUL vs CLWT Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while CLWT trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check CLWT's competition here
MKUL vs RAINW Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 986.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while RAINW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to RAINW's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check RAINW's competition here
MKUL vs SPECW Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check SPECW's competition here
MKUL vs SPEC Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check SPEC's competition here
MKUL vs NEWA Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check NEWA's competition here
MKUL vs AERC Comparison July 2025
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.Check AERC's competition here