Molekule Group, Inc.
Molekule Group, Inc. MKUL Peers
See (MKUL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKUL | $0.05 | -39.89% | 1.9M | -0.08 | -$0.68 | N/A |
| VLTO | $103.75 | +0.89% | 25.7B | 29.64 | $3.50 | +0.40% |
| FSS | $110.79 | +1.33% | 6.8B | 32.49 | $3.41 | +0.47% |
| ZWS | $37.56 | +0.05% | 6.3B | 39.13 | $0.96 | +0.93% |
| AQUA | $49.88 | +0.95% | 6.1B | 77.94 | $0.64 | N/A |
| ATMU | $37.78 | +1.18% | 3.1B | 17.02 | $2.22 | +0.40% |
| PCT | $13.76 | -0.36% | 2.5B | -11.66 | -$1.18 | N/A |
| PCTTU | $16.00 | +2.24% | 2.2B | -25.68 | -$0.62 | N/A |
| CECO | $30.00 | +3.06% | 1.1B | 23.08 | $1.30 | N/A |
| PCTTW | $4.32 | +8.00% | 775.7M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MKUL vs VLTO Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, VLTO has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while VLTO trades at $103.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas VLTO's P/E ratio is 29.64. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to VLTO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to VLTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs FSS Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FSS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while FSS trades at $110.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FSS's P/E ratio is 32.49. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FSS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to FSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs ZWS Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ZWS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ZWS trades at $37.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ZWS's P/E ratio is 39.13. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ZWS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ZWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs AQUA Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AQUA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while AQUA trades at $49.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AQUA's P/E ratio is 77.94. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AQUA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to AQUA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs ATMU Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ATMU has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ATMU trades at $37.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ATMU's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ATMU's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ATMU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs PCT Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PCT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while PCT trades at $13.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PCT's P/E ratio is -11.66. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PCT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to PCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs PCTTU Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PCTTU has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while PCTTU trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PCTTU's P/E ratio is -25.68. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PCTTU's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to PCTTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs CECO Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CECO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while CECO trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CECO's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CECO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to CECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs PCTTW Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, PCTTW has a market cap of 775.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while PCTTW trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas PCTTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to PCTTW's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to PCTTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs ERII Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ERII has a market cap of 719.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ERII trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ERII's P/E ratio is 36.67. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ERII's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ERII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs CECE Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CECE has a market cap of 401M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while CECE trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CECE's P/E ratio is 58.25. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CECE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to CECE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs ARQ Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ARQ has a market cap of 247.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ARQ trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ARQ's P/E ratio is -117.20. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ARQ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ARQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs ADES Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ADES has a market cap of 111.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ADES trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ADES's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ADES's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ADES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs FTEK Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, FTEK has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while FTEK trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas FTEK's P/E ratio is -31.11. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to FTEK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to FTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs SCWO Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SCWO has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while SCWO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SCWO's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SCWO's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to SCWO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs BHTG Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, BHTG has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while BHTG trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas BHTG's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to BHTG's ROE of -7.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to BHTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs CLIR Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CLIR has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while CLIR trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CLIR's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CLIR's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to CLIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs TOMZ Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, TOMZ has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while TOMZ trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas TOMZ's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to TOMZ's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to TOMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs LIQT Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, LIQT has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while LIQT trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas LIQT's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to LIQT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to LIQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs DEVS Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, DEVS has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while DEVS trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas DEVS's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to DEVS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to DEVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs CLWT Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, CLWT has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while CLWT trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas CLWT's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to CLWT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to CLWT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs ZONE Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, ZONE has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while ZONE trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas ZONE's P/E ratio is -15.69. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to ZONE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to ZONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs RAINW Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, RAINW has a market cap of 794.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while RAINW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas RAINW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to RAINW's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to RAINW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs SPECW Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SPECW has a market cap of 71.6K. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while SPECW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SPECW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SPECW's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to SPECW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs SPEC Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, SPEC has a market cap of 20.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while SPEC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas SPEC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to SPEC's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is less volatile compared to SPEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs AERC Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, AERC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while AERC trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas AERC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to AERC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to AERC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.
MKUL vs NEWA Comparison
MKUL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MKUL stands at 1.9M. In comparison, NEWA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MKUL is priced at $0.05, while NEWA trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MKUL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.08, whereas NEWA's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, MKUL's ROE is +0.56%, compared to NEWA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MKUL is more volatile compared to NEWA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MKUL.