Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See MDGS's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Devices Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for MDGS and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDGS | $2.36 | +10.28% | 178.9M | -0.27 | -$8.70 | N/A |
| ABT | $111.27 | +0.32% | 192.6B | 21.36 | $5.21 | +2.23% |
| BSX-PA | $122.18 | +2.37% | 175.4B | 230.53 | $0.53 | N/A |
| SYK | $341.09 | -1.76% | 130.8B | 25.47 | $13.39 | +1.02% |
| MDT | $90.58 | -0.20% | 116B | 16.38 | $5.53 | +3.14% |
| BSX | $51.69 | +0.53% | 76.9B | 16.68 | $3.10 | N/A |
| EW | $92.56 | -0.53% | 53.3B | 34.29 | $2.70 | N/A |
| DXCM | $91.48 | +0.75% | 34.5B | 39.26 | $2.33 | N/A |
| RMD | $226.74 | +0.33% | 32.9B | 21.06 | $10.77 | +1.05% |
| PHG | $27.38 | +2.16% | 26.8B | 15.64 | $1.75 | +3.62% |
Stock Comparison
Abbott Laboratories (NYSE: ABT)
MDGS vs ABT Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, ABT has a market cap of 192.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ABT trades at $111.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas ABT's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to ABT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to ABT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check ABT's competition here
Boston Scientific Corporation (NYSE: BSX-PA)
MDGS vs BSX-PA Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, BSX-PA has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while BSX-PA trades at $122.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas BSX-PA's P/E ratio is 230.53. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to BSX-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to BSX-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check BSX-PA's competition here
Stryker Corporation (NYSE: SYK)
MDGS vs SYK Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, SYK has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SYK trades at $341.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas SYK's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to SYK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to SYK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check SYK's competition here
Medtronic plc (NYSE: MDT)
MDGS vs MDT Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, MDT has a market cap of 116B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while MDT trades at $90.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas MDT's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to MDT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to MDT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check MDT's competition here
Boston Scientific Corporation (NYSE: BSX)
MDGS vs BSX Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, BSX has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while BSX trades at $51.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas BSX's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to BSX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to BSX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check BSX's competition here
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (NYSE: EW)
MDGS vs EW Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, EW has a market cap of 53.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while EW trades at $92.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas EW's P/E ratio is 34.29. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to EW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to EW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check EW's competition here
DexCom, Inc. (NASDAQ: DXCM)
MDGS vs DXCM Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, DXCM has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while DXCM trades at $91.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas DXCM's P/E ratio is 39.26. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to DXCM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to DXCM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check DXCM's competition here
ResMed Inc. (NYSE: RMD)
MDGS vs RMD Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, RMD has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while RMD trades at $226.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas RMD's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to RMD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to RMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check RMD's competition here
Koninklijke Philips N.V. (NYSE: PHG)
MDGS vs PHG Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, PHG has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while PHG trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas PHG's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to PHG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to PHG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check PHG's competition here
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: ZBH)
MDGS vs ZBH Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, ZBH has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ZBH trades at $99.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas ZBH's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to ZBH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to ZBH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check ZBH's competition here
Abiomed, Inc. (NASDAQ: ABMD)
MDGS vs ABMD Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, ABMD has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ABMD trades at $381.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas ABMD's P/E ratio is 65.36. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to ABMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to ABMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check ABMD's competition here
Penumbra, Inc. (NYSE: PEN)
MDGS vs PEN Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, PEN has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while PEN trades at $326.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas PEN's P/E ratio is 85.36. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to PEN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to PEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check PEN's competition here
Smith & Nephew plc (NYSE: SNN)
MDGS vs SNN Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, SNN has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SNN trades at $30.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas SNN's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to SNN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to SNN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check SNN's competition here
Align Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: ALGN)
MDGS vs ALGN Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, ALGN has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ALGN trades at $176.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas ALGN's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to ALGN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to ALGN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check ALGN's competition here
ShockWave Medical, Inc. (NASDAQ: SWAV)
MDGS vs SWAV Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, SWAV has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SWAV trades at $334.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas SWAV's P/E ratio is 78.76. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to SWAV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to SWAV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check SWAV's competition here
Globus Medical, Inc. (NYSE: GMED)
MDGS vs GMED Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, GMED has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while GMED trades at $85.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas GMED's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to GMED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to GMED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check GMED's competition here
Glaukos Corporation (NYSE: GKOS)
MDGS vs GKOS Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, GKOS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while GKOS trades at $189.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas GKOS's P/E ratio is -220.30. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to GKOS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to GKOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check GKOS's competition here
Insulet Corp. (NASDAQ: PODD)
MDGS vs PODD Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, PODD has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while PODD trades at $146.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas PODD's P/E ratio is 24.95. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to PODD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to PODD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check PODD's competition here
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (NYSE: BIO)
MDGS vs BIO Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, BIO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while BIO trades at $361.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas BIO's P/E ratio is 38.93. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to BIO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to BIO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check BIO's competition here
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (NYSE: BIO-B)
MDGS vs BIO-B Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, BIO-B has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while BIO-B trades at $348.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas BIO-B's P/E ratio is 103.33. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to BIO-B's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to BIO-B. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check BIO-B's competition here
Masimo Corporation (NASDAQ: MASI)
MDGS vs MASI Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, MASI has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while MASI trades at $179.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas MASI's P/E ratio is 44.43. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to MASI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to MASI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check MASI's competition here
Bruker Corporation (NASDAQ: BRKR)
MDGS vs BRKR Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, BRKR has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while BRKR trades at $57.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas BRKR's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to BRKR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to BRKR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check BRKR's competition here
Inari Medical, Inc. (NASDAQ: NARI)
MDGS vs NARI Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, NARI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while NARI trades at $79.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas NARI's P/E ratio is -59.24. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to NARI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to NARI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check NARI's competition here
LivaNova PLC (NASDAQ: LIVN)
MDGS vs LIVN Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, LIVN has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while LIVN trades at $82.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas LIVN's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to LIVN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to LIVN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check LIVN's competition here
Integer Holdings Corporation (NYSE: ITGR)
MDGS vs ITGR Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, ITGR has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ITGR trades at $125.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas ITGR's P/E ratio is 19.69. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to ITGR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to ITGR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check ITGR's competition here
Haemonetics Corporation (NYSE: HAE)
MDGS vs HAE Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, HAE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while HAE trades at $90.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas HAE's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to HAE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to HAE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check HAE's competition here
iRhythm Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: IRTC)
MDGS vs IRTC Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, IRTC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while IRTC trades at $123.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas IRTC's P/E ratio is -192.44. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to IRTC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to IRTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check IRTC's competition here
Axonics, Inc. (NASDAQ: AXNX)
MDGS vs AXNX Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, AXNX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while AXNX trades at $70.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas AXNX's P/E ratio is -709.80. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to AXNX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to AXNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check AXNX's competition here
TransMedics Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMDX)
MDGS vs TMDX Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, TMDX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while TMDX trades at $89.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas TMDX's P/E ratio is 45.50. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to TMDX's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to TMDX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check TMDX's competition here
AxoGen, Inc. (NASDAQ: AXGN)
MDGS vs AXGN Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, AXGN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while AXGN trades at $48.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas AXGN's P/E ratio is 126.45. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to AXGN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to AXGN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check AXGN's competition here
UFP Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: UFPT)
MDGS vs UFPT Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, UFPT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while UFPT trades at $319.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas UFPT's P/E ratio is 32.67. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to UFPT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to UFPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check UFPT's competition here
Butterfly Network, Inc. (NYSE: BFLY)
MDGS vs BFLY Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, BFLY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while BFLY trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas BFLY's P/E ratio is -36.79. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to BFLY's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to BFLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check BFLY's competition here
Establishment Labs Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ESTA)
MDGS vs ESTA Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, ESTA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ESTA trades at $75.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas ESTA's P/E ratio is -59.99. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to ESTA's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to ESTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check ESTA's competition here
NuVasive, Inc. (NASDAQ: NUVA)
MDGS vs NUVA Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, NUVA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while NUVA trades at $39.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas NUVA's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to NUVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to NUVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check NUVA's competition here
Novocure Ltd (NASDAQ: NVCR)
MDGS vs NVCR Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, NVCR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while NVCR trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas NVCR's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to NVCR's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to NVCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check NVCR's competition here
Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. (NYSE: INSP)
MDGS vs INSP Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, INSP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while INSP trades at $58.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas INSP's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to INSP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to INSP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check INSP's competition here
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. (NASDAQ: TNDM)
MDGS vs TNDM Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, TNDM has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while TNDM trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas TNDM's P/E ratio is -21.03. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to TNDM's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to TNDM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check TNDM's competition here
Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: ATEC)
MDGS vs ATEC Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, ATEC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ATEC trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas ATEC's P/E ratio is -162.50. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to ATEC's ROE of -8.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to ATEC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check ATEC's competition here
CONMED Corporation (NYSE: CNMD)
MDGS vs CNMD Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, CNMD has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CNMD trades at $49.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas CNMD's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to CNMD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to CNMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check CNMD's competition here
Enovis Corporation (NYSE: ENOV)
MDGS vs ENOV Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ENOV trades at $25.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is 7.36. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check ENOV's competition here
Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (NASDAQ: IART)
MDGS vs IART Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, IART has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while IART trades at $18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas IART's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to IART's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to IART. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check IART's competition here
Artivion, Inc. (NYSE: AORT)
MDGS vs AORT Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, AORT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while AORT trades at $28.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas AORT's P/E ratio is 47.38. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to AORT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to AORT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check AORT's competition here
Heska Corporation (NASDAQ: HSKA)
MDGS vs HSKA Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, HSKA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while HSKA trades at $119.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas HSKA's P/E ratio is -62.49. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to HSKA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to HSKA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check HSKA's competition here
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (NASDAQ: PRCT)
MDGS vs PRCT Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, PRCT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while PRCT trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas PRCT's P/E ratio is -11.31. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to PRCT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to PRCT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check PRCT's competition here
Avanos Medical, Inc. (NYSE: AVNS)
MDGS vs AVNS Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, AVNS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while AVNS trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas AVNS's P/E ratio is 27.77. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to AVNS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to AVNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check AVNS's competition here
Lumexa Imaging Holdings, Inc. Common Stock (NASDAQ: LMRI)
MDGS vs LMRI Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, LMRI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while LMRI trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas LMRI's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to LMRI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to LMRI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check LMRI's competition here
Silk Road Medical, Inc (NASDAQ: SILK)
MDGS vs SILK Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, SILK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SILK trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas SILK's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to SILK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to SILK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check SILK's competition here
IRadimed Corporation (NASDAQ: IRMD)
MDGS vs IRMD Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, IRMD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while IRMD trades at $87.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas IRMD's P/E ratio is 43.80. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to IRMD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to IRMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check IRMD's competition here
Paragon 28, Inc. (NYSE: FNA)
MDGS vs FNA Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, FNA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while FNA trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas FNA's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to FNA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to FNA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check FNA's competition here
Bioventus Inc. (NASDAQ: BVS)
MDGS vs BVS Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, BVS has a market cap of 941M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while BVS trades at $13.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas BVS's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to BVS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to BVS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check BVS's competition here
CeriBell, Inc. (NASDAQ: CBLL)
MDGS vs CBLL Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, CBLL has a market cap of 882.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CBLL trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas CBLL's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to CBLL's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to CBLL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check CBLL's competition here
InMode Ltd. (NASDAQ: INMD)
MDGS vs INMD Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, INMD has a market cap of 873.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while INMD trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas INMD's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to INMD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to INMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check INMD's competition here
Anteris Technologies Global Corp. (NASDAQ: AVR)
MDGS vs AVR Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, AVR has a market cap of 868.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while AVR trades at $8.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas AVR's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to AVR's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to AVR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check AVR's competition here
Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CSII)
MDGS vs CSII Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, CSII has a market cap of 844M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CSII trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas CSII's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to CSII's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to CSII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check CSII's competition here
SI-BONE, Inc. (NASDAQ: SIBN)
MDGS vs SIBN Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, SIBN has a market cap of 840.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SIBN trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas SIBN's P/E ratio is -55.74. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to SIBN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to SIBN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check SIBN's competition here
Beta Bionics, Inc. (NASDAQ: BBNX)
MDGS vs BBNX Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, BBNX has a market cap of 813.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while BBNX trades at $18.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas BBNX's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to BBNX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to BBNX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check BBNX's competition here
Varex Imaging Corporation (NASDAQ: VREX)
MDGS vs VREX Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, VREX has a market cap of 778.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while VREX trades at $18.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas VREX's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to VREX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to VREX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check VREX's competition here
AdaptHealth Corp. (NASDAQ: AHCO)
MDGS vs AHCO Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, AHCO has a market cap of 775.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while AHCO trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas AHCO's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to AHCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to AHCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check AHCO's competition here
SS Innovations International, Inc. (NASDAQ: SSII)
MDGS vs SSII Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, SSII has a market cap of 766.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SSII trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas SSII's P/E ratio is -74.70. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to SSII's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to SSII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check SSII's competition here
BrainsWay Ltd. (NASDAQ: BWAY)
MDGS vs BWAY Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, BWAY has a market cap of 646M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while BWAY trades at $16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas BWAY's P/E ratio is 41.84. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to BWAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to BWAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check BWAY's competition here
OrthoPediatrics Corp. (NASDAQ: KIDS)
MDGS vs KIDS Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, KIDS has a market cap of 642.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while KIDS trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas KIDS's P/E ratio is -21.19. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to KIDS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to KIDS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check KIDS's competition here
Cytek Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ: CTKB)
MDGS vs CTKB Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, CTKB has a market cap of 631.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CTKB trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas CTKB's P/E ratio is -25.91. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to CTKB's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to CTKB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check CTKB's competition here
Surmodics, Inc. (NASDAQ: SRDX)
MDGS vs SRDX Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, SRDX has a market cap of 614.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SRDX trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas SRDX's P/E ratio is -34.66. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to SRDX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to SRDX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check SRDX's competition here
Delcath Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: DCTH)
MDGS vs DCTH Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, DCTH has a market cap of 599.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while DCTH trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas DCTH's P/E ratio is 1736.00. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to DCTH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to DCTH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check DCTH's competition here
Apollo Endosurgery, Inc. (NASDAQ: APEN)
MDGS vs APEN Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, APEN has a market cap of 579.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while APEN trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas APEN's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to APEN's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to APEN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check APEN's competition here
Cerus Corporation (NASDAQ: CERS)
MDGS vs CERS Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, CERS has a market cap of 572.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CERS trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas CERS's P/E ratio is -56.69. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to CERS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to CERS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check CERS's competition here
ZimVie Inc. (NASDAQ: ZIMV)
MDGS vs ZIMV Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, ZIMV has a market cap of 535.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ZIMV trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas ZIMV's P/E ratio is -27.52. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to ZIMV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to ZIMV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check ZIMV's competition here
Tactile Systems Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: TCMD)
MDGS vs TCMD Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, TCMD has a market cap of 534.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while TCMD trades at $23.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas TCMD's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to TCMD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to TCMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check TCMD's competition here
NeuroPace, Inc. (NASDAQ: NPCE)
MDGS vs NPCE Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, NPCE has a market cap of 494.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while NPCE trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas NPCE's P/E ratio is -22.32. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to NPCE's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to NPCE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check NPCE's competition here
ClearPoint Neuro, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLPT)
MDGS vs CLPT Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, CLPT has a market cap of 462.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CLPT trades at $15.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas CLPT's P/E ratio is -13.07. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to CLPT's ROE of -1.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to CLPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check CLPT's competition here
Sight Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ: SGHT)
MDGS vs SGHT Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, SGHT has a market cap of 452.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SGHT trades at $8.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas SGHT's P/E ratio is -14.86. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to SGHT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to SGHT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check SGHT's competition here
Orthofix Medical Inc. (NASDAQ: OFIX)
MDGS vs OFIX Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, OFIX has a market cap of 411.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while OFIX trades at $10.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas OFIX's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to OFIX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to OFIX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check OFIX's competition here
Carlsmed, Inc. (NASDAQ: CARL)
MDGS vs CARL Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, CARL has a market cap of 380.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CARL trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas CARL's P/E ratio is -9.78. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to CARL's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to CARL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check CARL's competition here
Pacific Biosciences of California, Inc. (NASDAQ: PACB)
MDGS vs PACB Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, PACB has a market cap of 357.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while PACB trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas PACB's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to PACB's ROE of -49.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to PACB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check PACB's competition here
Picard Medical, Inc. (AMEX: PMI)
MDGS vs PMI Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, PMI has a market cap of 354.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while PMI trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas PMI's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to PMI's ROE of +4.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to PMI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check PMI's competition here
Perspective Therapeutics, Inc. (AMEX: CATX)
MDGS vs CATX Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, CATX has a market cap of 352.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CATX trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas CATX's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to CATX's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to CATX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check CATX's competition here
Electromed, Inc. (AMEX: ELMD)
MDGS vs ELMD Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, ELMD has a market cap of 351.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ELMD trades at $42.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas ELMD's P/E ratio is 36.24. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to ELMD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to ELMD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check ELMD's competition here
TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ: TLSI)
MDGS vs TLSI Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, TLSI has a market cap of 346.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while TLSI trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas TLSI's P/E ratio is -3.35. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to TLSI's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to TLSI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check TLSI's competition here
CapsoVision, Inc. (NASDAQ: CV)
MDGS vs CV Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, CV has a market cap of 339.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while CV trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas CV's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to CV's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to CV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check CV's competition here
Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SENS)
MDGS vs SENS Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, SENS has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SENS trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas SENS's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to SENS's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to SENS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check SENS's competition here
Semler Scientific, Inc. (NASDAQ: SMLR)
MDGS vs SMLR Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, SMLR has a market cap of 310.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while SMLR trades at $20.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas SMLR's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to SMLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to SMLR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check SMLR's competition here
Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMCI)
MDGS vs TMCI Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, TMCI has a market cap of 292.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while TMCI trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas TMCI's P/E ratio is -4.80. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to TMCI's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to TMCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check TMCI's competition here
RxSight, Inc. (NASDAQ: RXST)
MDGS vs RXST Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, RXST has a market cap of 290.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while RXST trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas RXST's P/E ratio is -7.54. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to RXST's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to RXST. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check RXST's competition here
Anika Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: ANIK)
MDGS vs ANIK Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, ANIK has a market cap of 283.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ANIK trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas ANIK's P/E ratio is 43.20. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to ANIK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to ANIK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check ANIK's competition here
Monogram Orthopaedics, Inc. (NASDAQ: MGRM)
MDGS vs MGRM Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, MGRM has a market cap of 243.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while MGRM trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas MGRM's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to MGRM's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to MGRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check MGRM's competition here
Profound Medical Corp. (NASDAQ: PROF)
MDGS vs PROF Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, PROF has a market cap of 242.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while PROF trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas PROF's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to PROF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to PROF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check PROF's competition here
Nevro Corp. (NYSE: NVRO)
MDGS vs NVRO Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, NVRO has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while NVRO trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas NVRO's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to NVRO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to NVRO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check NVRO's competition here
Neuronetics, Inc. (NASDAQ: STIM)
MDGS vs STIM Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, STIM has a market cap of 210.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while STIM trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas STIM's P/E ratio is -5.61. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to STIM's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to STIM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check STIM's competition here
Avita Medical Inc. (NASDAQ: RCEL)
MDGS vs RCEL Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, RCEL has a market cap of 199M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while RCEL trades at $8.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas RCEL's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to RCEL's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to RCEL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check RCEL's competition here
BioSig Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: BSGM)
MDGS vs BSGM Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, BSGM has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while BSGM trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas BSGM's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to BSGM's ROE of +15.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is less volatile compared to BSGM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check BSGM's competition here
Lucid Diagnostics Inc. (NASDAQ: LUCD)
MDGS vs LUCD Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, LUCD has a market cap of 184.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while LUCD trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas LUCD's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to LUCD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to LUCD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check LUCD's competition here
EDAP TMS S.A. American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: FOCL)
MDGS vs FOCL Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, FOCL has a market cap of 178M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while FOCL trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas FOCL's P/E ratio is -5.80. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to FOCL's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to FOCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check FOCL's competition here
Quipt Home Medical Corp. (NASDAQ: QIPT)
MDGS vs QIPT Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, QIPT has a market cap of 162.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while QIPT trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas QIPT's P/E ratio is -15.87. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to QIPT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to QIPT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check QIPT's competition here
Inogen, Inc. (NASDAQ: INGN)
MDGS vs INGN Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, INGN has a market cap of 157.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while INGN trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas INGN's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to INGN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to INGN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check INGN's competition here
Quanterix Corporation (NASDAQ: QTRX)
MDGS vs QTRX Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, QTRX has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while QTRX trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas QTRX's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to QTRX's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to QTRX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check QTRX's competition here
Owlet, Inc. (NYSE: OWLT)
MDGS vs OWLT Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, OWLT has a market cap of 114.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while OWLT trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas OWLT's P/E ratio is -45.21. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to OWLT's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to OWLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check OWLT's competition here
iCAD, Inc. (NASDAQ: ICAD)
MDGS vs ICAD Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, ICAD has a market cap of 106.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while ICAD trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas ICAD's P/E ratio is -20.37. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to ICAD's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to ICAD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check ICAD's competition here
Solana Company (NASDAQ: HSDT)
MDGS vs HSDT Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, HSDT has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while HSDT trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas HSDT's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to HSDT's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to HSDT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check HSDT's competition here
Hancock Jaffe Laboratories (NASDAQ: HJLI)
MDGS vs HJLI Comparison August 2026
Xylo Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: MDGS) plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDGS stands at 178.9M. In comparison, HJLI has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDGS is priced at $2.36 on the NASDAQ, while HJLI trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDGS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.27, whereas HJLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDGS's ROE is -0.51%, compared to HJLI's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MDGS is more volatile compared to HJLI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDGS.Check HJLI's competition here