Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.
Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. (MBII) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MBII) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBII | $0.80 | -20.19% | 0 | -6.82 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| CTA-PB | $71.91 | +0.39% | 62.4B | N/A | N/A | +6.26% |
| CTVA | $73.60 | +0.31% | 50B | 33.91 | $2.17 | +0.92% |
| NTR | $58.27 | +0.64% | 28.4B | 20.96 | $2.78 | +3.72% |
| CF | $86.17 | -0.39% | 14B | 11.29 | $7.63 | +2.32% |
| MOS | $33.13 | +1.78% | 10.5B | 11.23 | $2.95 | +2.59% |
| ICL | $6.39 | +1.43% | 8.3B | 22.09 | $0.29 | +2.86% |
| FMC | $40.14 | -1.35% | 5B | 38.58 | $1.04 | +5.76% |
| SMG | $62.07 | -2.13% | 3.6B | 75.66 | $0.82 | +4.26% |
| UAN | $90.31 | +0.29% | 954.7M | 10.86 | $8.32 | +10.03% |
Stock Comparison
MBII vs CTA-PB Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 62.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while CTA-PB trades at $71.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check CTA-PB's competition here
MBII vs CTVA Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while CTVA trades at $73.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check CTVA's competition here
MBII vs NTR Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while NTR trades at $58.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check NTR's competition here
MBII vs CF Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while CF trades at $86.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check CF's competition here
MBII vs MOS Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while MOS trades at $33.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check MOS's competition here
MBII vs ICL Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while ICL trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check ICL's competition here
MBII vs FMC Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while FMC trades at $40.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 38.58. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to FMC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check FMC's competition here
MBII vs SMG Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while SMG trades at $62.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 75.66. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check SMG's competition here
MBII vs UAN Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 954.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while UAN trades at $90.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check UAN's competition here
MBII vs IPI Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 391.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while IPI trades at $29.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check IPI's competition here
MBII vs LVRO Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 202.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while LVRO trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check LVRO's competition here
MBII vs BIOX Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 175M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while BIOX trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -19.93. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check BIOX's competition here
MBII vs AVD Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while AVD trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check AVD's competition here
MBII vs MULG Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check MULG's competition here
MBII vs BHIL-WT Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check BHIL-WT's competition here
MBII vs CGA Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CGA's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check CGA's competition here
MBII vs ENFY Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, ENFY has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while ENFY trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas ENFY's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ENFY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to ENFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check ENFY's competition here
MBII vs SEED Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while SEED trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -13.62. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SEED's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check SEED's competition here
MBII vs NITO Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while NITO trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check NITO's competition here
MBII vs RKDA Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while RKDA trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check RKDA's competition here
MBII vs SVFD Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -3.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check SVFD's competition here
MBII vs FMTO Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while FMTO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -10.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check FMTO's competition here
MBII vs BHIL Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is less volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check BHIL's competition here
MBII vs YTEN Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to YTEN's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check YTEN's competition here
MBII vs CTA-PA Comparison August 2025
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at 0. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while CTA-PA trades at $55.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.Check CTA-PA's competition here