Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.
Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. MBII Peers
See (MBII) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBII | $0.80 | -20.19% | N/A | -6.82 | -$0.12 | N/A |
| CTA-PB | $69.60 | +0.74% | 60.39B | N/A | N/A | +6.42% |
| CTVA | $67.56 | -0.50% | 46.09B | 40.70 | $1.66 | +0.99% |
| NTR | $56.99 | -1.84% | 27.84B | 53.76 | $1.06 | +3.79% |
| CF | $85.97 | -2.01% | 13.93B | 11.37 | $7.56 | +1.76% |
| MOS | $33.68 | -1.61% | 10.68B | 29.03 | $1.16 | +2.53% |
| ICL | $6.81 | -0.34% | 8.78B | 21.27 | $0.32 | +2.75% |
| FMC | $37.19 | -2.41% | 4.65B | 12.11 | $3.07 | +6.24% |
| SMG | $58.93 | -0.12% | 3.40B | 101.60 | $0.58 | +4.48% |
| UAN | $80.90 | -1.44% | 855.08M | 11.35 | $7.13 | +8.78% |
Stock Comparison
MBII vs CTA-PB Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 60.39B. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while CTA-PB trades at $69.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs CTVA Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 46.09B. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while CTVA trades at $67.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 40.70. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs NTR Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 27.84B. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while NTR trades at $56.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 53.76. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs CF Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 13.93B. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while CF trades at $85.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs MOS Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 10.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while MOS trades at $33.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 29.03. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs ICL Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 8.78B. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while ICL trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs FMC Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 4.65B. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while FMC trades at $37.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to FMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs SMG Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.40B. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while SMG trades at $58.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 101.60. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs UAN Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 855.08M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while UAN trades at $80.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs IPI Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 489.26M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while IPI trades at $36.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to IPI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs BIOX Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 283.45M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while BIOX trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is 226.00. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BIOX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs LVRO Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 281.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while LVRO trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to LVRO's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs AVD Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 120.33M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while AVD trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -4.02. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs MULG Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs BHIL-WT Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49.03M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs CGA Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.29M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CGA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs ENFY Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, ENFY has a market cap of 17.56M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while ENFY trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas ENFY's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to ENFY's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to ENFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs SEED Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 8.75M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while SEED trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is 2.76. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SEED's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs NITO Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, NITO has a market cap of 6.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while NITO trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas NITO's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to NITO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to NITO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs RKDA Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 5.69M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while RKDA trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs SVFD Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.17M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs FMTO Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 2.72M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while FMTO trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to FMTO's ROE of -9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs BHIL Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.52M. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is less volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs YTEN Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345460.00. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to YTEN's ROE of +4.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.
MBII vs CTA-PA Comparison
MBII plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MBII stands at N/A. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 11000.00. Regarding current trading prices, MBII is priced at $0.80, while CTA-PA trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MBII currently has a P/E ratio of -6.82, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MBII's ROE is -0.54%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MBII is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MBII.