Mazda Limited (MAZDA.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MAZDA.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAZDA.BO | ₹276.85 | +19.85% | 4.6B | 2.98 | ₹77.71 | +1.57% |
| CUMMINSIND.BO | ₹5,578.80 | +0.01% | 1.5T | 63.00 | ₹86.84 | +0.98% |
| ABB.BO | ₹7,070.10 | +3.05% | 1.5T | 92.09 | ₹75.47 | +0.57% |
| BHEL.BO | ₹387.45 | -3.64% | 1.3T | 78.40 | ₹4.89 | +0.13% |
| BHEL.NS | ₹387.50 | -3.59% | 1.3T | 77.81 | ₹4.93 | +0.13% |
| SIEMENS.NS | ₹3,571.60 | -0.25% | 1.3T | 73.63 | ₹48.03 | N/A |
| SIEMENS.BO | ₹3,570.50 | -0.26% | 1.3T | 61.70 | ₹57.35 | N/A |
| THERMAX.BO | ₹4,733.85 | -3.61% | 521.3B | 78.26 | ₹58.94 | +0.43% |
| THERMAX.NS | ₹4,736.50 | -3.67% | 519B | 78.17 | ₹58.94 | +0.43% |
| AIAENG.NS | ₹4,813.00 | +0.27% | 443.7B | 34.86 | ₹136.38 | +0.34% |
Stock Comparison
MAZDA.BO vs CUMMINSIND.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while CUMMINSIND.BO trades at ₹5,578.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas CUMMINSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 63.00. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CUMMINSIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check CUMMINSIND.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs ABB.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ABB.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while ABB.BO trades at ₹7,070.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas ABB.BO's P/E ratio is 92.09. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABB.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to ABB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check ABB.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs BHEL.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BHEL.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while BHEL.BO trades at ₹387.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas BHEL.BO's P/E ratio is 78.40. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHEL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to BHEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check BHEL.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs BHEL.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BHEL.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while BHEL.NS trades at ₹387.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas BHEL.NS's P/E ratio is 77.81. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BHEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to BHEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check BHEL.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs SIEMENS.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SIEMENS.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while SIEMENS.NS trades at ₹3,571.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas SIEMENS.NS's P/E ratio is 73.63. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIEMENS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check SIEMENS.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs SIEMENS.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SIEMENS.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while SIEMENS.BO trades at ₹3,570.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas SIEMENS.BO's P/E ratio is 61.70. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIEMENS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check SIEMENS.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs THERMAX.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, THERMAX.BO has a market cap of 521.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while THERMAX.BO trades at ₹4,733.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas THERMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 78.26. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THERMAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to THERMAX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check THERMAX.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs THERMAX.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, THERMAX.NS has a market cap of 519B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while THERMAX.NS trades at ₹4,736.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas THERMAX.NS's P/E ratio is 78.17. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THERMAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to THERMAX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check THERMAX.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs AIAENG.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AIAENG.NS has a market cap of 443.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while AIAENG.NS trades at ₹4,813.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas AIAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIAENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to AIAENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check AIAENG.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs AIAENG.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AIAENG.BO has a market cap of 443.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while AIAENG.BO trades at ₹4,811.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas AIAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 34.83. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIAENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to AIAENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check AIAENG.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs VOLTAS.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VOLTAS.NS has a market cap of 423.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while VOLTAS.NS trades at ₹1,284.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas VOLTAS.NS's P/E ratio is 112.69. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VOLTAS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check VOLTAS.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs VOLTAS.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VOLTAS.BO has a market cap of 423.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while VOLTAS.BO trades at ₹1,284.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas VOLTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 112.86. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VOLTAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check VOLTAS.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs GET&D.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GET&D.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while GET&D.NS trades at ₹1,552.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas GET&D.NS's P/E ratio is 100.73. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GET&D.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to GET&D.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check GET&D.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs BLUESTARCO.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.NS has a market cap of 325.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while BLUESTARCO.NS trades at ₹1,597.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas BLUESTARCO.NS's P/E ratio is 51.29. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLUESTARCO.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check BLUESTARCO.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs BLUESTARCO.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.BO has a market cap of 325.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while BLUESTARCO.BO trades at ₹1,598.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas BLUESTARCO.BO's P/E ratio is 60.33. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLUESTARCO.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check BLUESTARCO.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs KIRLOSENG.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.NS has a market cap of 324.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while KIRLOSENG.NS trades at ₹2,265.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas KIRLOSENG.NS's P/E ratio is 67.70. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIRLOSENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check KIRLOSENG.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs KIRLOSENG.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.BO has a market cap of 323.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while KIRLOSENG.BO trades at ₹2,266.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas KIRLOSENG.BO's P/E ratio is 66.50. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check KIRLOSENG.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs CRAFTSMAN.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.NS has a market cap of 238.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while CRAFTSMAN.NS trades at ₹9,097.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas CRAFTSMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 54.54. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check CRAFTSMAN.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs KAYNES.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KAYNES.BO has a market cap of 223.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while KAYNES.BO trades at ₹3,358.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas KAYNES.BO's P/E ratio is 60.61. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAYNES.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to KAYNES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check KAYNES.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs KAYNES.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KAYNES.NS has a market cap of 223.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while KAYNES.NS trades at ₹3,359.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas KAYNES.NS's P/E ratio is 60.58. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KAYNES.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to KAYNES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check KAYNES.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs MTARTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MTARTECH.BO has a market cap of 216.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while MTARTECH.BO trades at ₹7,044.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas MTARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 230.17. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to MTARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check MTARTECH.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs MTARTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, MTARTECH.NS has a market cap of 216.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while MTARTECH.NS trades at ₹7,047.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas MTARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 229.85. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to MTARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check MTARTECH.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs TRITURBINE.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.BO has a market cap of 209.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while TRITURBINE.BO trades at ₹649.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas TRITURBINE.BO's P/E ratio is 57.78. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRITURBINE.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check TRITURBINE.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs TRITURBINE.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.NS has a market cap of 209.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while TRITURBINE.NS trades at ₹649.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas TRITURBINE.NS's P/E ratio is 57.66. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRITURBINE.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check TRITURBINE.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs LAXMIMACH.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while LAXMIMACH.BO trades at ₹17,338.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas LAXMIMACH.BO's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAXMIMACH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check LAXMIMACH.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs LAXMIMACH.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while LAXMIMACH.NS trades at ₹17,324.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas LAXMIMACH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LAXMIMACH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check LAXMIMACH.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs ELGIEQUIP.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.NS has a market cap of 182.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while ELGIEQUIP.NS trades at ₹591.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas ELGIEQUIP.NS's P/E ratio is 45.56. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check ELGIEQUIP.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs ELGIEQUIP.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.BO has a market cap of 182B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while ELGIEQUIP.BO trades at ₹592.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas ELGIEQUIP.BO's P/E ratio is 41.22. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check ELGIEQUIP.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs JYOTICNC.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, JYOTICNC.NS has a market cap of 175.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while JYOTICNC.NS trades at ₹770.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas JYOTICNC.NS's P/E ratio is 52.05. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JYOTICNC.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to JYOTICNC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check JYOTICNC.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs TDPOWERSYS.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.NS has a market cap of 170.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while TDPOWERSYS.NS trades at ₹1,174.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas TDPOWERSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 71.31. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check TDPOWERSYS.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs TDPOWERSYS.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.BO has a market cap of 169.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while TDPOWERSYS.BO trades at ₹1,175.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas TDPOWERSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 71.28. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check TDPOWERSYS.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs INOXINDIA.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, INOXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 169.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while INOXINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,872.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas INOXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 65.19. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INOXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to INOXINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check INOXINDIA.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs LMW.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LMW.NS has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while LMW.NS trades at ₹15,778.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas LMW.NS's P/E ratio is 177.18. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMW.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to LMW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check LMW.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs LMW.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LMW.BO has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while LMW.BO trades at ₹15,766.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas LMW.BO's P/E ratio is 184.85. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMW.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to LMW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check LMW.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs KSB.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KSB.BO has a market cap of 163B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while KSB.BO trades at ₹934.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas KSB.BO's P/E ratio is 32.70. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSB.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to KSB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check KSB.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs KSB.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KSB.NS has a market cap of 162.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while KSB.NS trades at ₹934.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas KSB.NS's P/E ratio is 32.73. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KSB.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to KSB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check KSB.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs KIRLOSBROS.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.NS has a market cap of 147.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while KIRLOSBROS.NS trades at ₹1,875.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas KIRLOSBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 39.39. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check KIRLOSBROS.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs KIRLOSBROS.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.BO has a market cap of 147.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while KIRLOSBROS.BO trades at ₹1,874.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas KIRLOSBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 39.38. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check KIRLOSBROS.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs AZAD.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, AZAD.NS has a market cap of 138.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while AZAD.NS trades at ₹2,246.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas AZAD.NS's P/E ratio is 109.59. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AZAD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to AZAD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check AZAD.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs INGERRAND.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, INGERRAND.BO has a market cap of 137.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while INGERRAND.BO trades at ₹4,451.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas INGERRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 50.45. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INGERRAND.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check INGERRAND.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs INGERRAND.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, INGERRAND.NS has a market cap of 137.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while INGERRAND.NS trades at ₹4,453.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas INGERRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 50.44. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INGERRAND.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check INGERRAND.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs TEGA.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TEGA.NS has a market cap of 123.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while TEGA.NS trades at ₹1,665.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas TEGA.NS's P/E ratio is 60.75. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEGA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to TEGA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check TEGA.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs TEGA.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TEGA.BO has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while TEGA.BO trades at ₹1,663.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas TEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 60.79. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEGA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to TEGA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check TEGA.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs KIRLPNU.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.NS has a market cap of 118.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while KIRLPNU.NS trades at ₹1,848.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas KIRLPNU.NS's P/E ratio is 44.94. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIRLPNU.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check KIRLPNU.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs KIRLPNU.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.BO has a market cap of 118.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while KIRLPNU.BO trades at ₹1,848.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas KIRLPNU.BO's P/E ratio is 45.43. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KIRLPNU.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check KIRLPNU.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs ELECON.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ELECON.NS has a market cap of 118.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while ELECON.NS trades at ₹531.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas ELECON.NS's P/E ratio is 32.75. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELECON.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to ELECON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check ELECON.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs ELECON.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ELECON.BO has a market cap of 118B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while ELECON.BO trades at ₹531.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas ELECON.BO's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELECON.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to ELECON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check ELECON.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs ACE.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ACE.BO has a market cap of 117.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while ACE.BO trades at ₹1,006.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas ACE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.26. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to ACE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check ACE.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs LLOYDSENGG.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.BO has a market cap of 112.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while LLOYDSENGG.BO trades at ₹90.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas LLOYDSENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 69.99. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check LLOYDSENGG.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs LLOYDSENGG.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.NS has a market cap of 112.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while LLOYDSENGG.NS trades at ₹90.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas LLOYDSENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 68.24. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check LLOYDSENGG.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs BANCOINDIA.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 98.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while BANCOINDIA.BO trades at ₹676.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas BANCOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BANCOINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check BANCOINDIA.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs VESUVIUS.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.NS has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while VESUVIUS.NS trades at ₹471.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas VESUVIUS.NS's P/E ratio is 36.14. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VESUVIUS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to VESUVIUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check VESUVIUS.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs VESUVIUS.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.BO has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while VESUVIUS.BO trades at ₹471.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas VESUVIUS.BO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VESUVIUS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to VESUVIUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check VESUVIUS.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs KRN.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KRN.NS has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while KRN.NS trades at ₹1,230.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas KRN.NS's P/E ratio is 111.96. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KRN.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to KRN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check KRN.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs BEML.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BEML.NS has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while BEML.NS trades at ₹1,855.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas BEML.NS's P/E ratio is 42.94. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BEML.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to BEML.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check BEML.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs BEML.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, BEML.BO has a market cap of 77.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while BEML.BO trades at ₹1,855.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas BEML.BO's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BEML.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to BEML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check BEML.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs SHAKTIPUMP.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.NS has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while SHAKTIPUMP.NS trades at ₹599.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.NS's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check SHAKTIPUMP.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs SHAKTIPUMP.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.BO has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while SHAKTIPUMP.BO trades at ₹599.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.BO's P/E ratio is 27.24. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check SHAKTIPUMP.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs DYNAMATECH.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.NS has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while DYNAMATECH.NS trades at ₹10,793.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas DYNAMATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 215.55. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DYNAMATECH.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check DYNAMATECH.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs DYNAMATECH.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.BO has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while DYNAMATECH.BO trades at ₹10,765.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas DYNAMATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 215.44. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DYNAMATECH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check DYNAMATECH.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs ISGEC.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ISGEC.BO has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while ISGEC.BO trades at ₹924.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas ISGEC.BO's P/E ratio is 36.52. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ISGEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to ISGEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check ISGEC.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs SETL.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SETL.NS has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while SETL.NS trades at ₹267.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas SETL.NS's P/E ratio is 70.44. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SETL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to SETL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check SETL.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs GREAVESCOT.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.NS has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while GREAVESCOT.NS trades at ₹224.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas GREAVESCOT.NS's P/E ratio is 51.61. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GREAVESCOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check GREAVESCOT.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs GREAVESCOT.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.BO has a market cap of 52.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while GREAVESCOT.BO trades at ₹224.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas GREAVESCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 49.18. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GREAVESCOT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check GREAVESCOT.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs DIAPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, DIAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while DIAPOWER.NS trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas DIAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DIAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is less volatile compared to DIAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check DIAPOWER.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs LSIL.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, LSIL.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while LSIL.NS trades at ₹48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas LSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 130.41. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LSIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to LSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check LSIL.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs WPIL.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WPIL.BO has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while WPIL.BO trades at ₹487.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas WPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WPIL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to WPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check WPIL.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs ANUP.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ANUP.BO has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while ANUP.BO trades at ₹2,306.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas ANUP.BO's P/E ratio is 42.12. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANUP.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to ANUP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check ANUP.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs ANUP.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ANUP.NS has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while ANUP.NS trades at ₹2,308.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas ANUP.NS's P/E ratio is 42.28. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANUP.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to ANUP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check ANUP.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs TEXRAIL.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.NS has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while TEXRAIL.NS trades at ₹121.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas TEXRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEXRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to TEXRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check TEXRAIL.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs TEXRAIL.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.BO has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while TEXRAIL.BO trades at ₹121.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas TEXRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TEXRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to TEXRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check TEXRAIL.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs PITTIENG.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PITTIENG.BO has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while PITTIENG.BO trades at ₹953.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas PITTIENG.BO's P/E ratio is 30.90. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PITTIENG.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check PITTIENG.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs PITTIENG.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PITTIENG.NS has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while PITTIENG.NS trades at ₹952.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas PITTIENG.NS's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PITTIENG.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check PITTIENG.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs GMMPFAUDLR.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.BO has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while GMMPFAUDLR.BO trades at ₹770.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.BO's P/E ratio is 36.77. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check GMMPFAUDLR.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs GMMPFAUDLR.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.NS has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while GMMPFAUDLR.NS trades at ₹769.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.NS's P/E ratio is 148.80. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check GMMPFAUDLR.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs SHANTIGEAR.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.BO has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while SHANTIGEAR.BO trades at ₹447.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas SHANTIGEAR.BO's P/E ratio is 41.16. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check SHANTIGEAR.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs SHANTIGEAR.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.NS has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while SHANTIGEAR.NS trades at ₹447.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas SHANTIGEAR.NS's P/E ratio is 44.64. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check SHANTIGEAR.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs JASH.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, JASH.NS has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while JASH.NS trades at ₹500.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas JASH.NS's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JASH.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to JASH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check JASH.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs WINDMACHIN.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.BO has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while WINDMACHIN.BO trades at ₹320.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas WINDMACHIN.BO's P/E ratio is -684.44. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WINDMACHIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check WINDMACHIN.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs WINDMACHIN.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.NS has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while WINDMACHIN.NS trades at ₹320.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas WINDMACHIN.NS's P/E ratio is -684.44. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WINDMACHIN.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check WINDMACHIN.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs KMEW.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KMEW.BO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while KMEW.BO trades at ₹2,260.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas KMEW.BO's P/E ratio is 97.91. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KMEW.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to KMEW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check KMEW.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs SGLTL.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, SGLTL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while SGLTL.NS trades at ₹137.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas SGLTL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGLTL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to SGLTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check SGLTL.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs JNKINDIA.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, JNKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while JNKINDIA.NS trades at ₹511.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas JNKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 52.87. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JNKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to JNKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check JNKINDIA.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs HLEGLAS.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.BO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while HLEGLAS.BO trades at ₹387.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas HLEGLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 33.00. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLEGLAS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to HLEGLAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check HLEGLAS.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs HLEGLAS.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.NS has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while HLEGLAS.NS trades at ₹387.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas HLEGLAS.NS's P/E ratio is 34.10. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HLEGLAS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to HLEGLAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check HLEGLAS.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs KLBRENG-B.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KLBRENG-B.BO has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while KLBRENG-B.BO trades at ₹484.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas KLBRENG-B.BO's P/E ratio is 43.27. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KLBRENG-B.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to KLBRENG-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check KLBRENG-B.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs PIXTRANS.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.BO has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while PIXTRANS.BO trades at ₹1,786.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas PIXTRANS.BO's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PIXTRANS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to PIXTRANS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check PIXTRANS.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs PIXTRANS.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.NS has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while PIXTRANS.NS trades at ₹1,788.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas PIXTRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.26. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PIXTRANS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to PIXTRANS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check PIXTRANS.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs NIBE.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, NIBE.NS has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while NIBE.NS trades at ₹1,609.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas NIBE.NS's P/E ratio is 477.68. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIBE.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to NIBE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check NIBE.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs ADVAIT.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ADVAIT.BO has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while ADVAIT.BO trades at ₹2,182.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas ADVAIT.BO's P/E ratio is 44.96. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADVAIT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to ADVAIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check ADVAIT.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs PENIND.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PENIND.BO has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while PENIND.BO trades at ₹172.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas PENIND.BO's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PENIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to PENIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check PENIND.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs PENIND.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, PENIND.NS has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while PENIND.NS trades at ₹171.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas PENIND.NS's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PENIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to PENIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check PENIND.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs ADOR.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ADOR.NS has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while ADOR.NS trades at ₹1,320.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas ADOR.NS's P/E ratio is 36.20. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADOR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to ADOR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check ADOR.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs ADOR.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, ADOR.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while ADOR.BO trades at ₹1,322.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas ADOR.BO's P/E ratio is 33.45. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADOR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to ADOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check ADOR.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs GMM.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, GMM.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while GMM.BO trades at ₹1,563.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas GMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to GMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check GMM.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs HONDAPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while HONDAPOWER.NS trades at ₹2,176.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas HONDAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HONDAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check HONDAPOWER.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs HONDAPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while HONDAPOWER.BO trades at ₹2,178.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas HONDAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HONDAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check HONDAPOWER.BO's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs THEJO.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, THEJO.NS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while THEJO.NS trades at ₹1,862.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas THEJO.NS's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THEJO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to THEJO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check THEJO.NS's competition here
MAZDA.BO vs KRISHNADEF.NS Comparison July 2026
MAZDA.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAZDA.BO stands at 4.6B. In comparison, KRISHNADEF.NS has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAZDA.BO is priced at ₹276.85, while KRISHNADEF.NS trades at ₹1,321.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAZDA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.98, whereas KRISHNADEF.NS's P/E ratio is 60.94. In terms of profitability, MAZDA.BO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KRISHNADEF.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAZDA.BO is more volatile compared to KRISHNADEF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAZDA.BO.Check KRISHNADEF.NS's competition here