Mako Mining Corp Common Stock
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for MAKO
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for MAKO
Mako Mining Corp Common Stock (MAKO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MAKO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAKO | $6.91 | +0.88% | 601.2M | 16.85 | $0.41 | N/A |
| BVN | $37.77 | -1.72% | 9.6B | 11.44 | $3.30 | +1.15% |
| AUGO | $101.97 | +3.27% | 8.5B | -100.96 | -$1.01 | +1.84% |
| TFPM | $35.63 | +0.65% | 7.4B | 30.18 | $1.18 | +0.64% |
| ALM | $17.88 | +1.42% | 5B | -31.93 | -$0.56 | N/A |
| ELVR | $62.41 | -0.57% | 4.7B | -3.76 | -$16.60 | N/A |
| ARIS | $20.74 | +1.42% | 4.3B | 50.49 | $0.41 | +1.36% |
| PPTA | $29.94 | -0.63% | 3.7B | -27.72 | -$1.08 | N/A |
| FRGOX | $44.88 | +1.72% | 3.6B | 17.83 | $2.49 | N/A |
| FSM | $10.48 | +0.38% | 3.2B | 12.31 | $0.85 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MAKO vs BVN Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while BVN trades at $37.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check BVN's competition here
MAKO vs AUGO Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, AUGO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while AUGO trades at $101.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas AUGO's P/E ratio is -100.96. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AUGO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to AUGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AUGO's competition here
MAKO vs TFPM Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while TFPM trades at $35.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 30.18. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check TFPM's competition here
MAKO vs ALM Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, ALM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while ALM trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas ALM's P/E ratio is -31.93. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ALM's competition here
MAKO vs ELVR Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, ELVR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while ELVR trades at $62.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas ELVR's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ELVR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to ELVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ELVR's competition here
MAKO vs ARIS Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, ARIS has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while ARIS trades at $20.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas ARIS's P/E ratio is 50.49. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ARIS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to ARIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ARIS's competition here
MAKO vs PPTA Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while PPTA trades at $29.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -27.72. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check PPTA's competition here
MAKO vs FRGOX Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, FRGOX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while FRGOX trades at $44.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas FRGOX's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FRGOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to FRGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check FRGOX's competition here
MAKO vs FSM Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, FSM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while FSM trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas FSM's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to FSM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to FSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check FSM's competition here
MAKO vs GMTL Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, GMTL has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while GMTL trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas GMTL's P/E ratio is -91.82. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GMTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GMTL's competition here
MAKO vs EXK Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, EXK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while EXK trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas EXK's P/E ratio is -22.45. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EXK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to EXK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check EXK's competition here
MAKO vs CNL Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while CNL trades at $18.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -32.47. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CNL's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check CNL's competition here
MAKO vs SILV Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while SILV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SILV's competition here
MAKO vs SLSR Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while SLSR trades at $9.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -36.33. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SLSR's competition here
MAKO vs MUX Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, MUX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while MUX trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas MUX's P/E ratio is 39.05. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MUX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to MUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check MUX's competition here
MAKO vs ELE Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, ELE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while ELE trades at $20.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas ELE's P/E ratio is 335.17. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ELE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ELE's competition here
MAKO vs ASM Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while ASM trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 41.56. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ASM's competition here
MAKO vs GATO Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GATO's competition here
MAKO vs NEWP Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 873.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while NEWP trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -237.25. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NEWP's competition here
MAKO vs MMX Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check MMX's competition here
MAKO vs SCZM Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, SCZM has a market cap of 735.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while SCZM trades at $7.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas SCZM's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SCZM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to SCZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SCZM's competition here
MAKO vs MTA Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 645.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while MTA trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -230.33. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check MTA's competition here
MAKO vs GROY Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 639.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while GROY trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -182.25. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GROY's competition here
MAKO vs ITRG Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 507.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while ITRG trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is -300.00. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ITRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ITRG's competition here
MAKO vs NSR Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NSR's competition here
MAKO vs VOXR Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 312.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while VOXR trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is 56.40. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VOXR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check VOXR's competition here
MAKO vs GROY-WT Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 289.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while GROY-WT trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GROY-WT's competition here
MAKO vs PLG Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 223.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while PLG trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -45.25. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check PLG's competition here
MAKO vs NVA Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, NVA has a market cap of 104.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while NVA trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas NVA's P/E ratio is -20.27. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NVA's competition here
MAKO vs ATLX Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 80.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while ATLX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ATLX's competition here
MAKO vs NEXM Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, NEXM has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while NEXM trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas NEXM's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NEXM's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to NEXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check NEXM's competition here
MAKO vs ALOY Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, ALOY has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while ALOY trades at $11.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas ALOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ALOY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to ALOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ALOY's competition here
MAKO vs GRML Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, GRML has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while GRML trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas GRML's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GRML's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GRML's competition here
MAKO vs GRMLW Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, GRMLW has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while GRMLW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas GRMLW's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GRMLW's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to GRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check GRMLW's competition here
MAKO vs AUMN Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, AUMN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while AUMN trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas AUMN's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AUMN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to AUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check AUMN's competition here
MAKO vs HDLS Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, HDLS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while HDLS trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas HDLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HDLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to HDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check HDLS's competition here
MAKO vs ATL Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, ATL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while ATL trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas ATL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MAKO has daily volatility of 3.33 and ATL has daily volatility of N/A.Check ATL's competition here
MAKO vs SWC Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, SWC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while SWC trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas SWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SWC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is less volatile compared to SWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check SWC's competition here
MAKO vs ERS Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, ERS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while ERS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas ERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ERS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to ERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check ERS's competition here
MAKO vs TRQ Comparison April 2026
MAKO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MAKO stands at 601.2M. In comparison, TRQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAKO is priced at $6.91, while TRQ trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MAKO currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, MAKO's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MAKO is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAKO.Check TRQ's competition here