Nomad Royalty Company Ltd. (NSR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NSR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSR | $7.76 | +6.61% | 477M | 776.00 | $0.01 | +2.58% |
| BVN | $30.99 | +2.51% | 7.9B | 7.52 | $4.12 | +3.69% |
| TFPM | $27.84 | -2.21% | 5.8B | 18.45 | $1.51 | +0.83% |
| ELVR | $73.63 | -1.47% | 5.5B | -4.44 | -$16.60 | N/A |
| AUGO | $57.05 | -2.78% | 4.8B | 50.94 | $1.12 | +3.96% |
| ALM | $15.97 | -2.92% | 4.5B | -33.27 | -$0.48 | N/A |
| FRGOX | $35.99 | -2.52% | 3.5B | 14.23 | $2.60 | N/A |
| ARIS | $15.08 | -2.71% | 3.1B | 17.33 | $0.87 | +1.89% |
| PPTA | $22.66 | -1.09% | 2.8B | -16.54 | -$1.37 | N/A |
| AYA | $16.68 | -4.74% | 2.4B | 27.80 | $0.60 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NSR vs BVN Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while BVN trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check BVN's competition here
NSR vs TFPM Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while TFPM trades at $27.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is more volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check TFPM's competition here
NSR vs ELVR Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, ELVR has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while ELVR trades at $73.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas ELVR's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ELVR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is more volatile compared to ELVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check ELVR's competition here
NSR vs AUGO Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, AUGO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while AUGO trades at $57.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas AUGO's P/E ratio is 50.94. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AUGO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to AUGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check AUGO's competition here
NSR vs ALM Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, ALM has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while ALM trades at $15.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas ALM's P/E ratio is -33.27. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ALM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to ALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check ALM's competition here
NSR vs FRGOX Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, FRGOX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while FRGOX trades at $35.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas FRGOX's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FRGOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is more volatile compared to FRGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check FRGOX's competition here
NSR vs ARIS Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, ARIS has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while ARIS trades at $15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas ARIS's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ARIS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to ARIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check ARIS's competition here
NSR vs PPTA Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while PPTA trades at $22.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -16.54. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check PPTA's competition here
NSR vs AYA Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, AYA has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while AYA trades at $16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas AYA's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AYA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to AYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check AYA's competition here
NSR vs GMTL Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, GMTL has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while GMTL trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas GMTL's P/E ratio is -68.00. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GMTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to GMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check GMTL's competition here
NSR vs SSMR Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, SSMR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while SSMR trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas SSMR's P/E ratio is -58.45. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SSMR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to SSMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check SSMR's competition here
NSR vs SILV Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while SILV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is more volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check SILV's competition here
NSR vs SLSR Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while SLSR trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -44.16. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check SLSR's competition here
NSR vs MUX Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, MUX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while MUX trades at $17.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas MUX's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MUX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to MUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check MUX's competition here
NSR vs GATO Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check GATO's competition here
NSR vs ASM Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 973M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while ASM trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 26.32. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check ASM's competition here
NSR vs ELE Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, ELE has a market cap of 954.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while ELE trades at $14.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas ELE's P/E ratio is 247.00. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ELE's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to ELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check ELE's competition here
NSR vs ALOY Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, ALOY has a market cap of 767M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while ALOY trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas ALOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ALOY's ROE of -3.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to ALOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check ALOY's competition here
NSR vs NEWP Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 760.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while NEWP trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -206.75. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check NEWP's competition here
NSR vs MMX Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is more volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check MMX's competition here
NSR vs MAKO Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, MAKO has a market cap of 631.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while MAKO trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas MAKO's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MAKO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to MAKO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check MAKO's competition here
NSR vs MTA Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 629.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while MTA trades at $6.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -168.37. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check MTA's competition here
NSR vs SCZM Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, SCZM has a market cap of 565.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while SCZM trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas SCZM's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SCZM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to SCZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check SCZM's competition here
NSR vs GROY Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 537.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while GROY trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -142.25. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check GROY's competition here
NSR vs GROY-WT Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 510.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while GROY-WT trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check GROY-WT's competition here
NSR vs ITRG Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 395.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while ITRG trades at $2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is 58.38. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ITRG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check ITRG's competition here
NSR vs REA Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, REA has a market cap of 370.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while REA trades at $18.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas REA's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to REA's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to REA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check REA's competition here
NSR vs VOXR Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 268.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while VOXR trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VOXR's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check VOXR's competition here
NSR vs SBMT Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, SBMT has a market cap of 224.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while SBMT trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas SBMT's P/E ratio is -10.15. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SBMT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to SBMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check SBMT's competition here
NSR vs PLG Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 173.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while PLG trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -27.30. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check PLG's competition here
NSR vs ATLX Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 72.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while ATLX trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check ATLX's competition here
NSR vs NEXM Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, NEXM has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while NEXM trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas NEXM's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NEXM's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to NEXM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check NEXM's competition here
NSR vs LITM Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, LITM has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while LITM trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas LITM's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LITM's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to LITM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check LITM's competition here
NSR vs FNUC Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, FNUC has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while FNUC trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas FNUC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FNUC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to FNUC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check FNUC's competition here
NSR vs GRML Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, GRML has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while GRML trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas GRML's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GRML's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to GRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check GRML's competition here
NSR vs GRMLW Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, GRMLW has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while GRMLW trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas GRMLW's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GRMLW's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is less volatile compared to GRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check GRMLW's competition here
NSR vs ERS Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, ERS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while ERS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas ERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ERS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is more volatile compared to ERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check ERS's competition here
NSR vs TRQ Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, TRQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while TRQ trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check TRQ's competition here
NSR vs SWC Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, SWC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while SWC trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas SWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SWC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is more volatile compared to SWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check SWC's competition here
NSR vs ATL Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, ATL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while ATL trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas ATL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ATL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NSR has daily volatility of 6.24 and ATL has daily volatility of N/A.Check ATL's competition here
NSR vs HDLS Comparison June 2026
NSR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NSR stands at 477M. In comparison, HDLS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NSR is priced at $7.76, while HDLS trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NSR currently has a P/E ratio of 776.00, whereas HDLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NSR's ROE is -0.01%, compared to HDLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NSR is more volatile compared to HDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NSR.Check HDLS's competition here