McEwen Mining Inc.
McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MUX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Other Precious Metals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUX | $21.70 | -9.05% | 1.3B | 36.78 | $0.59 | N/A |
| BVN | $31.10 | -4.43% | 7.9B | 9.41 | $3.30 | +3.37% |
| ELVR | $94.83 | +7.71% | 7.1B | -5.71 | -$16.60 | N/A |
| AUGO | $83.61 | -4.93% | 7B | -82.78 | -$1.01 | +2.13% |
| TFPM | $32.25 | -4.02% | 6.7B | 27.31 | $1.18 | +0.68% |
| ALM | $20.77 | -3.35% | 5.8B | -36.44 | -$0.57 | N/A |
| ARIS | $17.91 | -4.53% | 3.7B | 43.63 | $0.41 | +1.49% |
| PPTA | $27.49 | -3.44% | 3.4B | -25.45 | -$1.08 | N/A |
| FRGOX | $43.82 | -0.54% | 3.4B | 16.90 | $2.59 | N/A |
| GMTL | $18.96 | -7.92% | 3.2B | -94.52 | -$0.20 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MUX vs BVN Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, BVN has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while BVN trades at $31.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas BVN's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BVN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to BVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check BVN's competition here
MUX vs ELVR Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ELVR has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while ELVR trades at $94.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ELVR's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELVR's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to ELVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check ELVR's competition here
MUX vs AUGO Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AUGO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while AUGO trades at $83.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas AUGO's P/E ratio is -82.78. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUGO's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to AUGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check AUGO's competition here
MUX vs TFPM Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TFPM has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while TFPM trades at $32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas TFPM's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFPM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to TFPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check TFPM's competition here
MUX vs ALM Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while ALM trades at $20.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ALM's P/E ratio is -36.44. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to ALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check ALM's competition here
MUX vs ARIS Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ARIS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while ARIS trades at $17.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ARIS's P/E ratio is 43.63. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARIS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to ARIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check ARIS's competition here
MUX vs PPTA Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PPTA has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while PPTA trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas PPTA's P/E ratio is -25.45. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPTA's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to PPTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check PPTA's competition here
MUX vs FRGOX Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FRGOX has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while FRGOX trades at $43.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas FRGOX's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRGOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to FRGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check FRGOX's competition here
MUX vs GMTL Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GMTL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while GMTL trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas GMTL's P/E ratio is -94.52. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GMTL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to GMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check GMTL's competition here
MUX vs FSM Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, FSM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while FSM trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas FSM's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FSM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to FSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check FSM's competition here
MUX vs EXK Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, EXK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while EXK trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas EXK's P/E ratio is -21.94. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EXK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to EXK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check EXK's competition here
MUX vs CNL Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while CNL trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -32.79. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNL's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check CNL's competition here
MUX vs SILV Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SILV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while SILV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas SILV's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SILV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to SILV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check SILV's competition here
MUX vs SLSR Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SLSR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while SLSR trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas SLSR's P/E ratio is -38.88. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SLSR's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to SLSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check SLSR's competition here
MUX vs ELE Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ELE has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while ELE trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ELE's P/E ratio is 283.83. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ELE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to ELE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check ELE's competition here
MUX vs ASM Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ASM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while ASM trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ASM's P/E ratio is 37.68. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to ASM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check ASM's competition here
MUX vs GATO Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GATO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while GATO trades at $14.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas GATO's P/E ratio is 30.64. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GATO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to GATO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check GATO's competition here
MUX vs NEWP Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NEWP has a market cap of 960.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while NEWP trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas NEWP's P/E ratio is -261.00. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEWP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to NEWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check NEWP's competition here
MUX vs MMX Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MMX has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while MMX trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas MMX's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to MMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check MMX's competition here
MUX vs SCZM Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SCZM has a market cap of 725.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while SCZM trades at $7.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas SCZM's P/E ratio is 17.13. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCZM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to SCZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check SCZM's competition here
MUX vs MAKO Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MAKO has a market cap of 660.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while MAKO trades at $7.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas MAKO's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAKO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to MAKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check MAKO's competition here
MUX vs MTA Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, MTA has a market cap of 619.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while MTA trades at $6.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas MTA's P/E ratio is -221.00. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to MTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check MTA's competition here
MUX vs GROY Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GROY has a market cap of 605.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while GROY trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas GROY's P/E ratio is -172.50. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GROY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to GROY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check GROY's competition here
MUX vs NSR Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NSR has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while NSR trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas NSR's P/E ratio is 776.00. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NSR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to NSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check NSR's competition here
MUX vs ITRG Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ITRG has a market cap of 461.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while ITRG trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ITRG's P/E ratio is -272.50. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITRG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to ITRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check ITRG's competition here
MUX vs VOXR Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, VOXR has a market cap of 295.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while VOXR trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas VOXR's P/E ratio is 53.40. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VOXR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to VOXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check VOXR's competition here
MUX vs GROY-WT Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GROY-WT has a market cap of 263.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while GROY-WT trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas GROY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GROY-WT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to GROY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check GROY-WT's competition here
MUX vs PLG Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, PLG has a market cap of 217.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while PLG trades at $1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas PLG's P/E ratio is -34.30. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PLG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to PLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check PLG's competition here
MUX vs NVA Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NVA has a market cap of 98.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while NVA trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas NVA's P/E ratio is -19.23. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to NVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check NVA's competition here
MUX vs ATLX Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 85.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while ATLX trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check ATLX's competition here
MUX vs NEXM Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, NEXM has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while NEXM trades at $2.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas NEXM's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NEXM's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to NEXM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check NEXM's competition here
MUX vs ALOY Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ALOY has a market cap of 40.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while ALOY trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ALOY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALOY's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to ALOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check ALOY's competition here
MUX vs GRML Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GRML has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while GRML trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas GRML's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRML's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to GRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check GRML's competition here
MUX vs GRMLW Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, GRMLW has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while GRMLW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas GRMLW's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRMLW's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is less volatile compared to GRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check GRMLW's competition here
MUX vs AUMN Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, AUMN has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while AUMN trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas AUMN's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUMN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to AUMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check AUMN's competition here
MUX vs SWC Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, SWC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while SWC trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas SWC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to SWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check SWC's competition here
MUX vs TRQ Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, TRQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while TRQ trades at $31.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas TRQ's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRQ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to TRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check TRQ's competition here
MUX vs HDLS Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, HDLS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while HDLS trades at $25.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas HDLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HDLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to HDLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check HDLS's competition here
MUX vs ATL Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ATL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while ATL trades at N/A.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ATL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MUX has daily volatility of 7.07 and ATL has daily volatility of N/A.Check ATL's competition here
MUX vs ERS Comparison April 2026
MUX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MUX stands at 1.3B. In comparison, ERS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MUX is priced at $21.70, while ERS trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MUX currently has a P/E ratio of 36.78, whereas ERS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MUX's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ERS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MUX is more volatile compared to ERS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MUX.Check ERS's competition here